No Filter: Cultural and Socioeconomic Diversityin Contrastive Vision-Language Models
2405.13777
0
0
📉
Abstract
We study cultural and socioeconomic diversity in contrastive vision-language models (VLMs). Using a broad range of benchmark datasets and evaluation metrics, we bring to attention several important findings. First, the common filtering of training data to English image-text pairs disadvantages communities of lower socioeconomic status and negatively impacts cultural understanding. Notably, this performance gap is not captured by - and even at odds with - the currently popular evaluation metrics derived from the Western-centric ImageNet and COCO datasets. Second, pretraining with global, unfiltered data before fine-tuning on English content can improve cultural understanding without sacrificing performance on said popular benchmarks. Third, we introduce the task of geo-localization as a novel evaluation metric to assess cultural diversity in VLMs. Our work underscores the value of using diverse data to create more inclusive multimodal systems and lays the groundwork for developing VLMs that better represent global perspectives.
Create account to get full access
Overview
- Examines cultural and socioeconomic diversity in vision-language models (VLMs)
- Finds that filtering training data to English image-text pairs disadvantages lower socioeconomic communities and negatively impacts cultural understanding
- Suggests pretraining with global, unfiltered data before fine-tuning on English content can improve cultural understanding without sacrificing performance on popular benchmarks
- Introduces geo-localization as a novel evaluation metric to assess cultural diversity in VLMs
Plain English Explanation
The researchers looked at how well vision-language models (VLMs) handle diversity in culture and socioeconomic status. They used a variety of benchmark datasets and evaluation methods to make some important discoveries.
First, they found that when the training data for these models is filtered to only include English image-text pairs, it ends up hurting the performance of the models for communities with lower socioeconomic status. This also negatively impacts the models' overall understanding of different cultures. Surprisingly, this performance gap is not captured by the popular evaluation metrics based on the Western-centric ImageNet and COCO datasets.
The researchers then show that pretraining the models on a more diverse, global dataset before fine-tuning on English content can actually improve the models' cultural understanding without sacrificing their performance on those popular benchmarks.
Finally, the researchers introduce a new evaluation task called geo-localization as a way to specifically assess how well these VLMs capture cultural diversity.
Overall, this work highlights the importance of using diverse data to create more inclusive multimodal AI systems that better represent global perspectives. It lays the groundwork for developing VLMs that are more representative of the world's cultures.
Technical Explanation
The researchers conducted a comprehensive study on the impact of cultural and socioeconomic diversity on the performance of contrastive vision-language models (VLMs). They used a broad range of benchmark datasets and evaluation metrics to surface several key findings.
First, the researchers found that the common practice of filtering the training data to only include English image-text pairs disadvantages communities of lower socioeconomic status and negatively impacts cultural understanding. Notably, this performance gap is not captured by - and even at odds with - the currently popular evaluation metrics derived from the Western-centric ImageNet and COCO datasets.
To address this, the researchers show that pretraining with global, unfiltered data before fine-tuning on English content can improve cultural understanding without sacrificing performance on the aforementioned popular benchmarks.
Furthermore, the researchers introduce the task of geo-localization as a novel evaluation metric to specifically assess cultural diversity in VLMs.
Critical Analysis
The researchers acknowledge several caveats and limitations in their work. They note that their findings are based on a limited set of benchmark datasets and may not generalize to all VLM architectures and applications.
Additionally, the researchers highlight the need for more diverse and representative evaluation datasets to accurately capture cultural understanding and socioeconomic biases.
One could also argue that the proposed geo-localization task may have limitations in fully capturing the multifaceted nature of cultural diversity. Further research is needed to develop more comprehensive evaluation frameworks.
Conclusion
This study brings important linguistic diversity and cultural inclusivity considerations to the forefront of vision-language modeling research. The researchers' key findings underscore the value of using diverse data to create more representative and equitable multimodal AI systems.
This work lays the groundwork for developing VLMs that better reflect global perspectives and can serve a wider range of communities. By addressing these critical issues, the field can move towards building more inclusive and impactful vision-language technologies.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
📊
Multilingual Diversity Improves Vision-Language Representations
Thao Nguyen, Matthew Wallingford, Sebastin Santy, Wei-Chiu Ma, Sewoong Oh, Ludwig Schmidt, Pang Wei Koh, Ranjay Krishna
0
0
Massive web-crawled image-text datasets lay the foundation for recent progress in multimodal learning. These datasets are designed with the goal of training a model to do well on standard computer vision benchmarks, many of which, however, have been shown to be English-centric (e.g., ImageNet). Consequently, existing data curation techniques gravitate towards using predominantly English image-text pairs and discard many potentially useful non-English samples. Our work questions this practice. Multilingual data is inherently enriching not only because it provides a gateway to learn about culturally salient concepts, but also because it depicts common concepts differently from monolingual data. We thus conduct a systematic study to explore the performance benefits of using more samples of non-English origins with respect to English vision tasks. By translating all multilingual image-text pairs from a raw web crawl to English and re-filtering them, we increase the prevalence of (translated) multilingual data in the resulting training set. Pre-training on this dataset outperforms using English-only or English-dominated datasets on ImageNet, ImageNet distribution shifts, image-English-text retrieval and on average across 38 tasks from the DataComp benchmark. On a geographically diverse task like GeoDE, we also observe improvements across all regions, with the biggest gain coming from Africa. In addition, we quantitatively show that English and non-English data are significantly different in both image and (translated) text space. We hope that our findings motivate future work to be more intentional about including multicultural and multilingual data, not just when non-English or geographically diverse tasks are involved, but to enhance model capabilities at large.
5/28/2024
See It from My Perspective: Diagnosing the Western Cultural Bias of Large Vision-Language Models in Image Understanding
Amith Ananthram, Elias Stengel-Eskin, Carl Vondrick, Mohit Bansal, Kathleen McKeown
0
0
Vision-language models (VLMs) can respond to queries about images in many languages. However, beyond language, culture affects how we see things. For example, individuals from Western cultures focus more on the central figure in an image while individuals from Eastern cultures attend more to scene context. In this work, we present a novel investigation that demonstrates and localizes VLMs' Western bias in image understanding. We evaluate large VLMs across subjective and objective visual tasks with culturally diverse images and annotations. We find that VLMs perform better on the Western subset than the Eastern subset of each task. Controlled experimentation tracing the source of this bias highlights the importance of a diverse language mix in text-only pre-training for building equitable VLMs, even when inference is performed in English. Moreover, while prompting in the language of a target culture can lead to reductions in bias, it is not a substitute for building AI more representative of the world's languages.
6/18/2024
A Unified Framework and Dataset for Assessing Societal Bias in Vision-Language Models
Ashutosh Sathe, Prachi Jain, Sunayana Sitaram
0
0
Vision-language models (VLMs) have gained widespread adoption in both industry and academia. In this study, we propose a unified framework for systematically evaluating gender, race, and age biases in VLMs with respect to professions. Our evaluation encompasses all supported inference modes of the recent VLMs, including image-to-text, text-to-text, text-to-image, and image-to-image. Additionally, we propose an automated pipeline to generate high-quality synthetic datasets that intentionally conceal gender, race, and age information across different professional domains, both in generated text and images. The dataset includes action-based descriptions of each profession and serves as a benchmark for evaluating societal biases in vision-language models (VLMs). In our comparative analysis of widely used VLMs, we have identified that varying input-output modalities lead to discernible differences in bias magnitudes and directions. Additionally, we find that VLM models exhibit distinct biases across different bias attributes we investigated. We hope our work will help guide future progress in improving VLMs to learn socially unbiased representations. We will release our data and code.
6/18/2024
How Culturally Aware are Vision-Language Models?
Olena Burda-Lassen, Aman Chadha, Shashank Goswami, Vinija Jain
0
0
An image is often said to be worth a thousand words, and certain images can tell rich and insightful stories. Can these stories be told via image captioning? Images from folklore genres, such as mythology, folk dance, cultural signs, and symbols, are vital to every culture. Our research compares the performance of four popular vision-language models (GPT-4V, Gemini Pro Vision, LLaVA, and OpenFlamingo) in identifying culturally specific information in such images and creating accurate and culturally sensitive image captions. We also propose a new evaluation metric, Cultural Awareness Score (CAS), dedicated to measuring the degree of cultural awareness in image captions. We provide a dataset MOSAIC-1.5k, labeled with ground truth for images containing cultural background and context, as well as a labeled dataset with assigned Cultural Awareness Scores that can be used with unseen data. Creating culturally appropriate image captions is valuable for scientific research and can be beneficial for many practical applications. We envision that our work will promote a deeper integration of cultural sensitivity in AI applications worldwide. By making the dataset and Cultural Awareness Score available to the public, we aim to facilitate further research in this area, encouraging the development of more culturally aware AI systems that respect and celebrate global diversity.
5/29/2024