Analyzing constrained LLM through PDFA-learning
0
🏅
Sign in to get full access
Overview
- Presents an algorithm called "Omit-Zero" to learn (indist)-minimal PDFA based on theoretical results
- Develops an efficient learning algorithm for probabilistic deterministic finite automata (PDFA) with minimal parameters
- Aims to learn PDFA models that are as simple as possible while still accurately capturing the underlying distribution
Plain English Explanation
The paper introduces an algorithm called "Omit-Zero" that can learn a special type of probabilistic model called a (indist)-minimal PDFA. These models are designed to be as simple as possible while still accurately representing the underlying data distribution.
The key idea is to develop an efficient learning procedure that can identify the simplest PDFA model that still fits the data well. This is important because simpler models are often more interpretable and easier to work with, while still capturing the essential patterns in the data.
The algorithm builds on theoretical results about PDFA models presented earlier in the paper. By leveraging these insights, the Omit-Zero algorithm is able to efficiently search for the optimal PDFA model that meets the desired complexity and accuracy criteria.
Technical Explanation
The paper builds on previous work on probabilistic deterministic finite automata (PDFA) and verbalized probabilistic graphical modeling to develop an algorithm for learning (indist)-minimal PDFA models.
The key idea is to find the simplest PDFA model that can still accurately capture the underlying data distribution, as measured by the indistinguishability metric. This metric quantifies how different two probability distributions are, with the goal of learning models that are as indistinguishable as possible from the true distribution.
The Omit-Zero algorithm works by iteratively merging states in the PDFA model, removing parameters that do not significantly impact the model's ability to fit the data. This allows it to find the optimal trade-off between model complexity and accuracy.
The authors prove theoretical guarantees about the algorithm's ability to recover the (indist)-minimal PDFA, providing a strong theoretical foundation for the approach.
Critical Analysis
The paper presents a well-designed algorithm with solid theoretical backing. The Omit-Zero approach seems promising for learning compact, interpretable PDFA models in an efficient manner.
However, the authors acknowledge that the algorithm may struggle in high-dimensional or noisy settings, where the optimal model complexity is less clear. There is also the potential for the algorithm to get stuck in local optima, missing the global (indist)-minimal PDFA.
Additionally, the paper does not provide extensive empirical evaluations, so it is difficult to assess the algorithm's practical performance on real-world datasets. Further research and experimentation would be needed to better understand the algorithm's strengths, weaknesses, and potential applications.
Conclusion
This paper presents a novel algorithm, Omit-Zero, for learning (indist)-minimal PDFA models. The key contribution is the development of an efficient learning procedure that can identify the simplest PDFA model that still accurately represents the underlying data distribution.
The strong theoretical foundations and promising algorithmic approach make this work an interesting contribution to the field of probabilistic modeling. While more empirical validation is needed, the Omit-Zero algorithm represents a step forward in the pursuit of compact, interpretable models that can capture complex data patterns.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
🏅
0
Analyzing constrained LLM through PDFA-learning
Mat'ias Carrasco, Franz Mayr, Sergio Yovine, Johny Kidd, Mart'in Iturbide, Juan Pedro da Silva, Alejo Garat
We define a congruence that copes with null next-symbol probabilities that arise when the output of a language model is constrained by some means during text generation. We develop an algorithm for efficiently learning the quotient with respect to this congruence and evaluate it on case studies for analyzing statistical properties of LLM.
Read more6/18/2024
0
Large language model validity via enhanced conformal prediction methods
John J. Cherian, Isaac Gibbs, Emmanuel J. Cand`es
We develop new conformal inference methods for obtaining validity guarantees on the output of large language models (LLMs). Prior work in conformal language modeling identifies a subset of the text that satisfies a high-probability guarantee of correctness. These methods work by filtering claims from the LLM's original response if a scoring function evaluated on the claim fails to exceed a threshold calibrated via split conformal prediction. Existing methods in this area suffer from two deficiencies. First, the guarantee stated is not conditionally valid. The trustworthiness of the filtering step may vary based on the topic of the response. Second, because the scoring function is imperfect, the filtering step can remove many valuable and accurate claims. We address both of these challenges via two new conformal methods. First, we generalize the conditional conformal procedure of Gibbs et al. (2023) in order to adaptively issue weaker guarantees when they are required to preserve the utility of the output. Second, we show how to systematically improve the quality of the scoring function via a novel algorithm for differentiating through the conditional conformal procedure. We demonstrate the efficacy of our approach on both synthetic and real-world datasets.
Read more6/17/2024
0
Conformal Language Modeling
Victor Quach, Adam Fisch, Tal Schuster, Adam Yala, Jae Ho Sohn, Tommi S. Jaakkola, Regina Barzilay
We propose a novel approach to conformal prediction for generative language models (LMs). Standard conformal prediction produces prediction sets -- in place of single predictions -- that have rigorous, statistical performance guarantees. LM responses are typically sampled from the model's predicted distribution over the large, combinatorial output space of natural language. Translating this process to conformal prediction, we calibrate a stopping rule for sampling different outputs from the LM that get added to a growing set of candidates until we are confident that the output set is sufficient. Since some samples may be low-quality, we also simultaneously calibrate and apply a rejection rule for removing candidates from the output set to reduce noise. Similar to conformal prediction, we prove that the sampled set returned by our procedure contains at least one acceptable answer with high probability, while still being empirically precise (i.e., small) on average. Furthermore, within this set of candidate responses, we show that we can also accurately identify subsets of individual components -- such as phrases or sentences -- that are each independently correct (e.g., that are not hallucinations), again with statistical guarantees. We demonstrate the promise of our approach on multiple tasks in open-domain question answering, text summarization, and radiology report generation using different LM variants.
Read more6/4/2024
0
ConU: Conformal Uncertainty in Large Language Models with Correctness Coverage Guarantees
Zhiyuan Wang, Jinhao Duan, Lu Cheng, Yue Zhang, Qingni Wang, Hengtao Shen, Xiaofeng Zhu, Xiaoshuang Shi, Kaidi Xu
Uncertainty quantification (UQ) in natural language generation (NLG) tasks remains an open challenge, exacerbated by the intricate nature of the recent large language models (LLMs). This study investigates adapting conformal prediction (CP), which can convert any heuristic measure of uncertainty into rigorous theoretical guarantees by constructing prediction sets, for black-box LLMs in open-ended NLG tasks. We propose a sampling-based uncertainty measure leveraging self-consistency and develop a conformal uncertainty criterion by integrating the uncertainty condition aligned with correctness into the design of the CP algorithm. Experimental results indicate that our uncertainty measure generally surpasses prior state-of-the-art methods. Furthermore, we calibrate the prediction sets within the model's unfixed answer distribution and achieve strict control over the correctness coverage rate across 6 LLMs on 4 free-form NLG datasets, spanning general-purpose and medical domains, while the small average set size further highlights the efficiency of our method in providing trustworthy guarantees for practical open-ended NLG applications.
Read more7/2/2024