LLM Processes: Numerical Predictive Distributions Conditioned on Natural Language

2405.12856

YC

0

Reddit

0

Published 5/28/2024 by James Requeima, John Bronskill, Dami Choi, Richard E. Turner, David Duvenaud

🌿

Abstract

Machine learning practitioners often face significant challenges in formally integrating their prior knowledge and beliefs into predictive models, limiting the potential for nuanced and context-aware analyses. Moreover, the expertise needed to integrate this prior knowledge into probabilistic modeling typically limits the application of these models to specialists. Our goal is to build a regression model that can process numerical data and make probabilistic predictions at arbitrary locations, guided by natural language text which describes a user's prior knowledge. Large Language Models (LLMs) provide a useful starting point for designing such a tool since they 1) provide an interface where users can incorporate expert insights in natural language and 2) provide an opportunity for leveraging latent problem-relevant knowledge encoded in LLMs that users may not have themselves. We start by exploring strategies for eliciting explicit, coherent numerical predictive distributions from LLMs. We examine these joint predictive distributions, which we call LLM Processes, over arbitrarily-many quantities in settings such as forecasting, multi-dimensional regression, black-box optimization, and image modeling. We investigate the practical details of prompting to elicit coherent predictive distributions, and demonstrate their effectiveness at regression. Finally, we demonstrate the ability to usefully incorporate text into numerical predictions, improving predictive performance and giving quantitative structure that reflects qualitative descriptions. This lets us begin to explore the rich, grounded hypothesis space that LLMs implicitly encode.

Create account to get full access

or

If you already have an account, we'll log you in

Overview

  • Researchers explore strategies for integrating user's prior knowledge and beliefs into predictive models using large language models (LLMs)
  • LLMs can provide an interface for users to incorporate expert insights in natural language and leverage their latent problem-relevant knowledge
  • The paper examines how to elicit explicit, coherent numerical predictive distributions from LLMs, called "LLM Processes", and demonstrates their effectiveness for regression tasks
  • It also shows how text can be incorporated into numerical predictions to improve performance and provide quantitative structure reflecting qualitative descriptions

Plain English Explanation

Machine learning models often struggle to incorporate the prior knowledge and beliefs of domain experts into their predictions. This can limit the nuance and context-awareness of the models. Large language models (LLMs) provide a potential solution by allowing users to easily input their expert insights in natural language form. LLMs also have rich, latent knowledge that users may not have themselves, which could be leveraged to enhance the predictions.

The researchers in this paper set out to create regression models that can process numerical data and make probabilistic predictions, while allowing users to guide the model with their prior knowledge expressed in text. They call these "LLM Processes" - the coherent numerical predictive distributions that can be elicited from LLMs.

By demonstrating the effectiveness of LLM Processes for regression tasks and the ability to incorporate text into numerical predictions, the researchers show how LLMs can be used to create more nuanced and context-aware predictive models that reflect the real-world knowledge of domain experts.

Technical Explanation

The paper begins by exploring strategies for eliciting explicit, coherent numerical predictive distributions from LLMs. These joint predictive distributions, called "LLM Processes", can be used to make probabilistic predictions over arbitrarily many quantities in settings such as forecasting, multi-dimensional regression, black-box optimization, and image modeling.

The researchers investigate the practical details of prompting to elicit these coherent predictive distributions from LLMs. They demonstrate the effectiveness of LLM Processes at regression tasks, showing how they can outperform traditional regression techniques.

Finally, the paper explores the ability to incorporate text-based prior knowledge into the numerical predictions made by LLM Processes. This allows the models to improve their predictive performance and generate quantitative outputs that reflect the qualitative descriptions provided by users. This begins to unlock the rich, grounded hypothesis space that is implicitly encoded within LLMs.

Critical Analysis

The paper presents a promising approach for integrating user knowledge into predictive models using LLMs. However, the researchers acknowledge that further work is needed to fully understand the capabilities and limitations of LLM Processes.

For example, the paper does not address the potential biases or inconsistencies that may arise when eliciting predictive distributions from LLMs, which could impact the reliability of the models. Additionally, the researchers note that the practical details of prompting LLMs to obtain coherent probability distributions require careful attention and further investigation.

Another area for further research is the extent to which LLM Processes can truly capture and reflect the nuanced, context-aware knowledge of domain experts. While the paper demonstrates improvements in predictive performance, more work may be needed to fully harness the rich, grounded hypothesis space of LLMs in service of real-world decision-making.

Conclusion

This paper presents a novel approach for integrating user knowledge into predictive models using large language models (LLMs). By eliciting coherent numerical predictive distributions from LLMs, called "LLM Processes", and incorporating text-based prior knowledge, the researchers demonstrate how LLMs can be leveraged to create more nuanced and context-aware predictive models.

This work has the potential to significantly enhance the capabilities of machine learning systems in a wide range of domains, from forecasting to optimization, by bridging the gap between human expertise and statistical modeling. As the applications of LLMs continue to evolve, this research paves the way for more powerful and versatile machine learning tools that can better reflect the complexity of the real world.



This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!

Related Papers

🤿

Bayesian Statistical Modeling with Predictors from LLMs

Michael Franke, Polina Tsvilodub, Fausto Carcassi

YC

0

Reddit

0

State of the art large language models (LLMs) have shown impressive performance on a variety of benchmark tasks and are increasingly used as components in larger applications, where LLM-based predictions serve as proxies for human judgements or decision. This raises questions about the human-likeness of LLM-derived information, alignment with human intuition, and whether LLMs could possibly be considered (parts of) explanatory models of (aspects of) human cognition or language use. To shed more light on these issues, we here investigate the human-likeness of LLMs' predictions for multiple-choice decision tasks from the perspective of Bayesian statistical modeling. Using human data from a forced-choice experiment on pragmatic language use, we find that LLMs do not capture the variance in the human data at the item-level. We suggest different ways of deriving full distributional predictions from LLMs for aggregate, condition-level data, and find that some, but not all ways of obtaining condition-level predictions yield adequate fits to human data. These results suggests that assessment of LLM performance depends strongly on seemingly subtle choices in methodology, and that LLMs are at best predictors of human behavior at the aggregate, condition-level, for which they are, however, not designed to, or usually used to, make predictions in the first place.

Read more

6/14/2024

LLMs learn governing principles of dynamical systems, revealing an in-context neural scaling law

LLMs learn governing principles of dynamical systems, revealing an in-context neural scaling law

Toni J. B. Liu, Nicolas Boull'e, Raphael Sarfati, Christopher J. Earls

YC

0

Reddit

0

Pretrained large language models (LLMs) are surprisingly effective at performing zero-shot tasks, including time-series forecasting. However, understanding the mechanisms behind such capabilities remains highly challenging due to the complexity of the models. We study LLMs' ability to extrapolate the behavior of dynamical systems whose evolution is governed by principles of physical interest. Our results show that LLaMA 2, a language model trained primarily on texts, achieves accurate predictions of dynamical system time series without fine-tuning or prompt engineering. Moreover, the accuracy of the learned physical rules increases with the length of the input context window, revealing an in-context version of neural scaling law. Along the way, we present a flexible and efficient algorithm for extracting probability density functions of multi-digit numbers directly from LLMs.

Read more

6/24/2024

💬

What Are the Odds? Language Models Are Capable of Probabilistic Reasoning

Akshay Paruchuri, Jake Garrison, Shun Liao, John Hernandez, Jacob Sunshine, Tim Althoff, Xin Liu, Daniel McDuff

YC

0

Reddit

0

Language models (LM) are capable of remarkably complex linguistic tasks; however, numerical reasoning is an area in which they frequently struggle. An important but rarely evaluated form of reasoning is understanding probability distributions. In this paper, we focus on evaluating the probabilistic reasoning capabilities of LMs using idealized and real-world statistical distributions. We perform a systematic evaluation of state-of-the-art LMs on three tasks: estimating percentiles, drawing samples, and calculating probabilities. We evaluate three ways to provide context to LMs 1) anchoring examples from within a distribution or family of distributions, 2) real-world context, 3) summary statistics on which to base a Normal approximation. Models can make inferences about distributions, and can be further aided by the incorporation of real-world context, example shots and simplified assumptions, even if these assumptions are incorrect or misspecified. To conduct this work, we developed a comprehensive benchmark distribution dataset with associated question-answer pairs that we will release publicly.

Read more

6/19/2024

👁️

Through the Thicket: A Study of Number-Oriented LLMs derived from Random Forest Models

Micha{l} Romaszewski, Przemys{l}aw Seku{l}a, Przemys{l}aw G{l}omb, Micha{l} Cholewa, Katarzyna Ko{l}odziej

YC

0

Reddit

0

Large Language Models (LLMs) have shown exceptional performance in text processing. Notably, LLMs can synthesize information from large datasets and explain their decisions similarly to human reasoning through a chain of thought (CoT). An emerging application of LLMs is the handling and interpreting of numerical data, where fine-tuning enhances their performance over basic inference methods. This paper proposes a novel approach to training LLMs using knowledge transfer from a random forest (RF) ensemble, leveraging its efficiency and accuracy. By converting RF decision paths into natural language statements, we generate outputs for LLM fine-tuning, enhancing the model's ability to classify and explain its decisions. Our method includes verifying these rules through established classification metrics, ensuring their correctness. We also examine the impact of preprocessing techniques on the representation of numerical data and their influence on classification accuracy and rule correctness

Read more

6/10/2024