Axioms for AI Alignment from Human Feedback

Overview

• This paper explores the problem of learning a reward function in reinforcement learning from human feedback (RLHF).
• The authors argue that this problem can be viewed through the lens of social choice theory, which provides a framework for evaluating different reward aggregation methods.
• The paper demonstrates that commonly used models, such as the Bradley-Terry-Luce Model, fail to meet basic axioms in social choice theory.
• In response, the authors develop novel rules for learning reward functions with strong axiomatic guarantees, introducing a new paradigm called linear social choice.

Plain English Explanation

When training AI systems using reinforcement learning from human feedback (RLHF), the reward function is typically derived from analyzing the preferences expressed by humans through pairwise comparisons. This is essentially a problem of preference aggregation, similar to how a group of people might try to come to a collective decision.

The authors of this paper suggest that we can evaluate different reward aggregation methods through the lens of social choice theory, which studies how to combine individual preferences into a collective decision. By applying the principles and axioms from social choice theory, the authors show that common models used in RLHF, such as the Bradley-Terry-Luce Model, fail to meet basic standards.

To address this issue, the authors develop new rules for learning reward functions that have strong guarantees based on social choice theory. The key innovation is that their approach has a linear structure, which greatly restricts the space of possible rules and leads to a new paradigm they call linear social choice.

Technical Explanation

The paper frames the problem of learning a reward function in RLHF as one of preference aggregation, which the authors argue largely falls within the scope of social choice theory. From this perspective, the authors evaluate different aggregation methods using established axioms, examining whether these methods meet or fail well-known standards.

The authors demonstrate that both the Bradley-Terry-Luce Model and its broad generalizations fail to meet basic axioms in social choice theory. In response, they develop novel rules for learning reward functions with strong axiomatic guarantees.

A key innovation from the standpoint of social choice is that the problem has a linear structure, which greatly restricts the space of feasible rules and leads to a new paradigm that the authors call linear social choice. This linear structure allows the authors to derive new reward learning algorithms with strong theoretical properties.

Critical Analysis

The paper presents a thoughtful and rigorous analysis of the reward learning problem in RLHF, drawing important connections to the field of social choice theory. By applying well-established axioms from this domain, the authors effectively highlight limitations in commonly used models, such as the Bradley-Terry-Luce Model.

One potential limitation of the research is that it primarily focuses on the theoretical properties of reward learning methods, without extensive empirical evaluation. While the authors demonstrate the axiomatic guarantees of their proposed rules, it would be valuable to see how these methods perform in practice compared to existing approaches.

Additionally, the authors acknowledge that their linear social choice framework may be limited in its ability to capture more complex human preferences. Further research may be needed to develop reward learning methods that can handle a wider range of preference structures while maintaining strong theoretical properties.

Overall, this paper makes a compelling case for the importance of grounding reward learning in the principles of social choice theory, and its insights could have significant implications for the design of RLHF systems and the broader field of AI alignment.

Conclusion

This paper presents a novel perspective on the problem of learning reward functions in reinforcement learning from human feedback (RLHF). By framing the task as one of preference aggregation, the authors leverage the principles of social choice theory to evaluate and develop new reward learning methods.

The key contribution of the paper is the introduction of a linear social choice framework, which provides a structured approach to designing reward learning algorithms with strong axiomatic guarantees. This work advances our understanding of the theoretical underpinnings of RLHF and could have significant implications for the development of AI systems that are better aligned with human values.