Bagging Provides Assumption-free Stability
0
🎲
Sign in to get full access
Overview
- This paper provides a finite-sample guarantee on the stability of the bagging technique for machine learning models.
- The results make no assumptions about the data distribution, the properties of the base algorithm, or the dimensionality of the input features.
- The stability guarantee applies to many variants of bagging and is optimal up to a constant.
- Empirical results show that bagging can successfully stabilize highly unstable base algorithms.
Plain English Explanation
Bagging is a powerful technique used to stabilize machine learning models. This paper offers a mathematical guarantee that bagging will provide stable results, even when working with highly unpredictable base models.
Unlike many theoretical analyses, this guarantee does not depend on any specific assumptions about the data, the model, or the number of input features. It applies broadly to many different types of bagging methods.
The authors show that their stability guarantee is as strong as possible, differing from the optimal result by only a constant factor. They also provide experimental evidence demonstrating that bagging can indeed tame the instability of volatile base models.
Technical Explanation
This paper derives a finite-sample guarantee on the stability of bagging for any machine learning model. The result makes no assumptions about the distribution of the data, the properties of the base algorithm, or the dimensionality of the input features.
The stability guarantee applies to many variants of bagging, including subagging and other related techniques. The authors show that their bound is optimal up to a constant factor.
The empirical results validate the theoretical findings, demonstrating that bagging can successfully stabilize even highly unstable base models. This aligns with other research on stabilizing estimates of Shapley values using control variates.
Critical Analysis
The paper provides a robust theoretical analysis of bagging that makes minimal assumptions. This is a strength of the work, as it shows the broad applicability of the stability guarantee.
However, the analysis is purely theoretical and does not consider practical implementation details or the computational costs of bagging. There may be cases where the stability benefits of bagging are outweighed by the increased training time or resource requirements.
Additionally, the paper does not explore the potential for model retraining to improve stability or other techniques that could be used in conjunction with bagging.
Overall, this is a valuable contribution to the understanding of bagging, but further research may be needed to fully assess its real-world performance and implications.
Conclusion
This paper presents a powerful theoretical result, proving that bagging can provide stable machine learning models without relying on restrictive assumptions. The findings are validated by empirical evidence, demonstrating the practical utility of bagging for improving the reliability of unpredictable base models.
The broad applicability of the stability guarantee makes this work an important reference for researchers and practitioners working on robust and trustworthy machine learning systems.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
🎲
0
Bagging Provides Assumption-free Stability
Jake A. Soloff, Rina Foygel Barber, Rebecca Willett
Bagging is an important technique for stabilizing machine learning models. In this paper, we derive a finite-sample guarantee on the stability of bagging for any model. Our result places no assumptions on the distribution of the data, on the properties of the base algorithm, or on the dimensionality of the covariates. Our guarantee applies to many variants of bagging and is optimal up to a constant. Empirical results validate our findings, showing that bagging successfully stabilizes even highly unstable base algorithms.
Read more4/26/2024
🎲
0
Bagging Improves Generalization Exponentially
Huajie Qian, Donghao Ying, Henry Lam, Wotao Yin
Bagging is a popular ensemble technique to improve the accuracy of machine learning models. It hinges on the well-established rationale that, by repeatedly retraining on resampled data, the aggregated model exhibits lower variance and hence higher stability, especially for discontinuous base learners. In this paper, we provide a new perspective on bagging: By suitably aggregating the base learners at the parametrization instead of the output level, bagging improves generalization performances exponentially, a strength that is significantly more powerful than variance reduction. More precisely, we show that for general stochastic optimization problems that suffer from slowly (i.e., polynomially) decaying generalization errors, bagging can effectively reduce these errors to an exponential decay. Moreover, this power of bagging is agnostic to the solution schemes, including common empirical risk minimization, distributionally robust optimization, and various regularizations. We demonstrate how bagging can substantially improve generalization performances in a range of examples involving heavy-tailed data that suffer from intrinsically slow rates.
Read more5/30/2024
❗
0
Building a stable classifier with the inflated argmax
Jake A. Soloff, Rina Foygel Barber, Rebecca Willett
We propose a new framework for algorithmic stability in the context of multiclass classification. In practice, classification algorithms often operate by first assigning a continuous score (for instance, an estimated probability) to each possible label, then taking the maximizer -- i.e., selecting the class that has the highest score. A drawback of this type of approach is that it is inherently unstable, meaning that it is very sensitive to slight perturbations of the training data, since taking the maximizer is discontinuous. Motivated by this challenge, we propose a pipeline for constructing stable classifiers from data, using bagging (i.e., resampling and averaging) to produce stable continuous scores, and then using a stable relaxation of argmax, which we call the inflated argmax, to convert these scores to a set of candidate labels. The resulting stability guarantee places no distributional assumptions on the data, does not depend on the number of classes or dimensionality of the covariates, and holds for any base classifier. Using a common benchmark data set, we demonstrate that the inflated argmax provides necessary protection against unstable classifiers, without loss of accuracy.
Read more5/24/2024
🔮
0
Prediction Instability in Machine Learning Ensembles
Jeremy Kedziora
In machine learning ensembles predictions from multiple models are aggregated. Despite widespread use and strong performance of ensembles in applied problems little is known about the mathematical properties of aggregating models and associated consequences for safe, explainable use of such models. In this paper we prove a theorem that shows that any ensemble will exhibit at least one of the following forms of prediction instability. It will either ignore agreement among all underlying models, change its mind when none of the underlying models have done so, or be manipulable through inclusion or exclusion of options it would never actually predict. As a consequence, ensemble aggregation procedures will always need to balance the benefits of information use against the risk of these prediction instabilities. This analysis also sheds light on what specific forms of prediction instability to expect from particular ensemble algorithms; for example popular tree ensembles like random forest, or xgboost will violate basic, intuitive fairness properties. Finally, we show that this can be ameliorated by using consistent models in asymptotic conditions.
Read more8/27/2024