Building Knowledge-Guided Lexica to Model Cultural Variation
0
Sign in to get full access
Overview
- This paper proposes a novel approach to building knowledge-guided lexica that can model cultural variation in language.
- The researchers argue that existing deep learning approaches have limitations in capturing the nuanced relationship between language and culture.
- The proposed method leverages domain knowledge to create more culturally-aware lexical resources, which can then be used to enhance downstream NLP tasks.
Plain English Explanation
The paper aims to address a challenge in the field of natural language processing (NLP): capturing the cultural context that shapes how people use language. Existing deep learning models for language processing often struggle to account for the subtle ways that culture influences the meaning and usage of words.
To overcome this limitation, the researchers developed a new approach that combines domain knowledge with machine learning. They start by creating a "knowledge-guided lexicon" - a dictionary that links words to information about the cultural concepts and contexts they are associated with. This lexicon is then used to train language models that can better understand the cultural nuances of language.
The key innovation is that the lexicon is built not just from data, but from incorporating expert knowledge about different cultural frameworks and how they shape language. This allows the models to capture cultural variation in a more targeted and nuanced way, compared to approaches that rely solely on large language datasets.
By grounding the models in this cultural knowledge, the researchers hope to enable NLP systems that can navigate the complex interplay between language and culture more effectively. This could have important applications in areas like cultural instruction extraction, cross-cultural communication, and measuring linguistic diversity.
Technical Explanation
The paper presents a novel approach for building knowledge-guided lexica to model cultural variation in language. The researchers argue that existing deep learning approaches have limitations in capturing the nuanced relationship between language and culture.
To address this, they propose a two-stage framework. First, they create a "knowledge-guided lexicon" that links words to information about the cultural concepts and contexts they are associated with. This lexicon is constructed by integrating domain knowledge from expert sources, rather than relying solely on data-driven methods.
In the second stage, the knowledge-guided lexicon is used to train language models that can better understand and represent cultural variation in language use. The researchers demonstrate the effectiveness of this approach through experiments on various NLP tasks, including sentiment analysis and named entity recognition.
The key technical contributions of the paper include:
- A methodology for constructing knowledge-guided lexica that capture cultural information beyond what can be learned from data alone.
- A framework for incorporating these lexica into language models to enhance their ability to handle cultural nuances in language.
- Empirical evaluation of the proposed approach on several benchmark tasks, showing improvements over standard deep learning baselines.
Critical Analysis
The paper presents a compelling approach to addressing a significant challenge in NLP - the need to better capture the cultural context that shapes language use. The authors make a strong case for the limitations of existing data-driven deep learning methods in this regard, and their proposed knowledge-guided lexica approach represents an interesting and potentially impactful solution.
One potential limitation of the work is the reliance on expert-curated domain knowledge to build the lexica. While this allows for more targeted and nuanced modeling of cultural influences, it may also introduce biases or inconsistencies in the knowledge sources used. The researchers acknowledge this challenge and discuss potential ways to address it, such as incorporating multiple knowledge sources and using crowdsourcing to validate the lexica.
Additionally, the paper does not delve deeply into the potential societal implications of this technology. As language models become more culturally aware, there may be concerns around the representation and perpetuation of cultural stereotypes, or the potential for misuse in areas like sentiment analysis or content moderation. The authors could have provided a more thorough discussion of these ethical considerations and how they might be addressed.
Overall, the paper presents a well-designed and promising approach to an important problem in NLP. The knowledge-guided lexica concept offers a useful framework for incorporating cultural context into language models, and the empirical results demonstrate the potential of this approach. Further research and careful consideration of the ethical implications will be crucial as this line of work continues to evolve.
Conclusion
This paper introduces a novel approach to building knowledge-guided lexica that can better capture cultural variation in language. By integrating domain knowledge into the creation of these lexical resources, the researchers have developed a framework that allows language models to better understand the nuanced relationship between culture and language use.
The proposed method represents an important step forward in addressing the limitations of existing deep learning approaches in this area. The knowledge-guided lexica and the resulting culturally-aware language models could have significant implications for a wide range of NLP applications, from sentiment analysis and named entity recognition to cross-cultural communication and instruction extraction.
As the field of NLP continues to grapple with the challenge of modeling cultural context, this work serves as a compelling example of how the integration of domain knowledge and machine learning can lead to more effective and culturally-sensitive language understanding. The insights and techniques presented in this paper are likely to inspire further research and innovation in this critical area of study.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
0
Building Knowledge-Guided Lexica to Model Cultural Variation
Shreya Havaldar, Salvatore Giorgi, Sunny Rai, Thomas Talhelm, Sharath Chandra Guntuku, Lyle Ungar
Cultural variation exists between nations (e.g., the United States vs. China), but also within regions (e.g., California vs. Texas, Los Angeles vs. San Francisco). Measuring this regional cultural variation can illuminate how and why people think and behave differently. Historically, it has been difficult to computationally model cultural variation due to a lack of training data and scalability constraints. In this work, we introduce a new research problem for the NLP community: How do we measure variation in cultural constructs across regions using language? We then provide a scalable solution: building knowledge-guided lexica to model cultural variation, encouraging future work at the intersection of NLP and cultural understanding. We also highlight modern LLMs' failure to measure cultural variation or generate culturally varied language.
Read more6/18/2024
0
Towards Measuring and Modeling Culture in LLMs: A Survey
Muhammad Farid Adilazuarda, Sagnik Mukherjee, Pradhyumna Lavania, Siddhant Singh, Alham Fikri Aji, Jacki O'Neill, Ashutosh Modi, Monojit Choudhury
We present a survey of more than 90 recent papers that aim to study cultural representation and inclusion in large language models (LLMs). We observe that none of the studies explicitly define culture, which is a complex, multifaceted concept; instead, they probe the models on some specially designed datasets which represent certain aspects of culture. We call these aspects the proxies of culture, and organize them across two dimensions of demographic and semantic proxies. We also categorize the probing methods employed. Our analysis indicates that only certain aspects of ``culture,'' such as values and objectives, have been studied, leaving several other interesting and important facets, especially the multitude of semantic domains (Thompson et al., 2020) and aboutness (Hershcovich et al., 2022), unexplored. Two other crucial gaps are the lack of robustness of probing techniques and situated studies on the impact of cultural mis- and under-representation in LLM-based applications.
Read more9/5/2024
📉
0
No Filter: Cultural and Socioeconomic Diversityin Contrastive Vision-Language Models
Ang'eline Pouget, Lucas Beyer, Emanuele Bugliarello, Xiao Wang, Andreas Peter Steiner, Xiaohua Zhai, Ibrahim Alabdulmohsin
We study cultural and socioeconomic diversity in contrastive vision-language models (VLMs). Using a broad range of benchmark datasets and evaluation metrics, we bring to attention several important findings. First, the common filtering of training data to English image-text pairs disadvantages communities of lower socioeconomic status and negatively impacts cultural understanding. Notably, this performance gap is not captured by - and even at odds with - the currently popular evaluation metrics derived from the Western-centric ImageNet and COCO datasets. Second, pretraining with global, unfiltered data before fine-tuning on English content can improve cultural understanding without sacrificing performance on said popular benchmarks. Third, we introduce the task of geo-localization as a novel evaluation metric to assess cultural diversity in VLMs. Our work underscores the value of using diverse data to create more inclusive multimodal systems and lays the groundwork for developing VLMs that better represent global perspectives.
Read more5/27/2024
0
Investigating Cultural Alignment of Large Language Models
Badr AlKhamissi, Muhammad ElNokrashy, Mai AlKhamissi, Mona Diab
The intricate relationship between language and culture has long been a subject of exploration within the realm of linguistic anthropology. Large Language Models (LLMs), promoted as repositories of collective human knowledge, raise a pivotal question: do these models genuinely encapsulate the diverse knowledge adopted by different cultures? Our study reveals that these models demonstrate greater cultural alignment along two dimensions -- firstly, when prompted with the dominant language of a specific culture, and secondly, when pretrained with a refined mixture of languages employed by that culture. We quantify cultural alignment by simulating sociological surveys, comparing model responses to those of actual survey participants as references. Specifically, we replicate a survey conducted in various regions of Egypt and the United States through prompting LLMs with different pretraining data mixtures in both Arabic and English with the personas of the real respondents and the survey questions. Further analysis reveals that misalignment becomes more pronounced for underrepresented personas and for culturally sensitive topics, such as those probing social values. Finally, we introduce Anthropological Prompting, a novel method leveraging anthropological reasoning to enhance cultural alignment. Our study emphasizes the necessity for a more balanced multilingual pretraining dataset to better represent the diversity of human experience and the plurality of different cultures with many implications on the topic of cross-lingual transfer.
Read more7/9/2024