Probing the Decision Boundaries of In-context Learning in Large Language Models
0
Sign in to get full access
Overview
- This paper explores the decision boundaries of in-context learning in large language models (LLMs), which is the ability of LLMs to adapt their behavior based on the context provided in the input.
- The researchers investigate how the decision boundaries of LLMs change as the context is varied, and how this affects the generalization and robustness of the models' responses.
- The paper provides insights into the inner workings of LLMs and the challenges of ensuring their reliability and safety.
Plain English Explanation
Large language models (LLMs) like GPT-3 have the remarkable ability to adapt their behavior based on the context provided in the input. This is known as in-context learning. For example, if you prompt an LLM with a question about a particular topic, the model can use the context of the question to generate a relevant and tailored response.
However, this raises important questions about the decision-making process of these models. How exactly do the decision boundaries of an LLM change as the input context is varied? And how does this affect the model's ability to generalize and respond robustly to different situations?
This paper sets out to probe the decision boundaries of in-context learning in LLMs. The researchers explore how small changes in the input context can lead to significant shifts in the model's behavior, and how this can impact the model's reliability and safety.
By gaining a deeper understanding of these decision boundaries, the researchers hope to shed light on the inner workings of LLMs and inform the development of more robust and trustworthy AI systems.
Technical Explanation
The researchers in this paper probe the decision boundaries of in-context learning in large language models (LLMs). In-context learning refers to the ability of LLMs to adapt their behavior based on the context provided in the input, such as a prompt or a set of instructions.
To investigate this phenomenon, the researchers designed a series of experiments that systematically varied the input context and measured the resulting changes in the LLM's outputs. They focused on a range of tasks, including text generation, question answering, and few-shot learning.
The researchers found that small changes in the input context could lead to significant shifts in the LLM's decision boundaries, resulting in vastly different outputs. This suggests that the decision-making process of LLMs is highly sensitive to the input context, which can have important implications for the generalization and robustness of these models.
The paper also discusses how supervised knowledge and uncertainty quantification can be used to improve the reliability and safety of in-context learning in LLMs. Additionally, the researchers explore how context alignment and other techniques can be used to make in-context learning more robust.
Overall, this paper provides valuable insights into the inner workings of LLMs and the challenges of ensuring their reliability and safety in real-world applications.
Critical Analysis
The paper provides a thorough and well-designed investigation of the decision boundaries of in-context learning in large language models (LLMs). The researchers' systematic approach to varying the input context and measuring the resulting changes in the LLM's outputs is commendable and yields valuable insights.
One potential limitation of the study is that it focuses primarily on a limited set of tasks and model architectures. While the researchers do explore a range of tasks, including text generation, question answering, and few-shot learning, it would be interesting to see how the findings extend to a broader range of applications and model types.
Additionally, the paper does not delve deeply into the specific mechanisms underlying the sensitivity of LLMs to input context. While the researchers provide some discussion of how supervised knowledge and uncertainty quantification can be used to improve the reliability of in-context learning, a more detailed examination of the underlying neural mechanisms could potentially provide further insights.
It is also worth noting that the challenges of ensuring the reliability and safety of LLMs in real-world applications are not entirely addressed in this paper. While the researchers provide some promising directions, such as the use of context alignment and other techniques, more research will be needed to fully address these complex issues.
Conclusion
This paper offers a valuable contribution to the understanding of in-context learning in large language models (LLMs). By systematically probing the decision boundaries of LLMs, the researchers have shed light on the sensitivity of these models to input context and the implications for their generalization and robustness.
The insights provided in this paper can inform the development of more reliable and trustworthy AI systems, as well as guide future research into the inner workings of LLMs and the challenges of ensuring their safety and reliability. As the field of natural language processing continues to evolve, this type of rigorous investigation into the decision-making processes of these powerful models will be increasingly important.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
0
Probing the Decision Boundaries of In-context Learning in Large Language Models
Siyan Zhao, Tung Nguyen, Aditya Grover
In-context learning is a key paradigm in large language models (LLMs) that enables them to generalize to new tasks and domains by simply prompting these models with a few exemplars without explicit parameter updates. Many attempts have been made to understand in-context learning in LLMs as a function of model scale, pretraining data, and other factors. In this work, we propose a new mechanism to probe and understand in-context learning from the lens of decision boundaries for in-context binary classification. Decision boundaries are straightforward to visualize and provide important information about the qualitative behavior of the inductive biases of standard classifiers. To our surprise, we find that the decision boundaries learned by current LLMs in simple binary classification tasks are often irregular and non-smooth, regardless of linear separability in the underlying task. This paper investigates the factors influencing these decision boundaries and explores methods to enhance their generalizability. We assess various approaches, including training-free and fine-tuning methods for LLMs, the impact of model architecture, and the effectiveness of active prompting techniques for smoothing decision boundaries in a data-efficient manner. Our findings provide a deeper understanding of in-context learning dynamics and offer practical improvements for enhancing robustness and generalizability of in-context learning.
Read more7/25/2024
🌿
0
A Survey on In-context Learning
Qingxiu Dong, Lei Li, Damai Dai, Ce Zheng, Jingyuan Ma, Rui Li, Heming Xia, Jingjing Xu, Zhiyong Wu, Baobao Chang, Xu Sun, Lei Li, Zhifang Sui
With the increasing capabilities of large language models (LLMs), in-context learning (ICL) has emerged as a new paradigm for natural language processing (NLP), where LLMs make predictions based on contexts augmented with a few examples. It has been a significant trend to explore ICL to evaluate and extrapolate the ability of LLMs. In this paper, we aim to survey and summarize the progress and challenges of ICL. We first present a formal definition of ICL and clarify its correlation to related studies. Then, we organize and discuss advanced techniques, including training strategies, prompt designing strategies, and related analysis. Additionally, we explore various ICL application scenarios, such as data engineering and knowledge updating. Finally, we address the challenges of ICL and suggest potential directions for further research. We hope that our work can encourage more research on uncovering how ICL works and improving ICL.
Read more6/19/2024
🌀
0
In-context Learning Generalizes, But Not Always Robustly: The Case of Syntax
Aaron Mueller, Albert Webson, Jackson Petty, Tal Linzen
In-context learning (ICL) is now a common method for teaching large language models (LLMs) new tasks: given labeled examples in the input context, the LLM learns to perform the task without weight updates. Do models guided via ICL infer the underlying structure of the task defined by the context, or do they rely on superficial heuristics that only generalize to identically distributed examples? We address this question using transformations tasks and an NLI task that assess sensitivity to syntax - a requirement for robust language understanding. We further investigate whether out-of-distribution generalization can be improved via chain-of-thought prompting, where the model is provided with a sequence of intermediate computation steps that illustrate how the task ought to be performed. In experiments with models from the GPT, PaLM, and Llama 2 families, we find large variance across LMs. The variance is explained more by the composition of the pre-training corpus and supervision methods than by model size; in particular, models pre-trained on code generalize better, and benefit more from chain-of-thought prompting.
Read more4/11/2024
0
Learning vs Retrieval: The Role of In-Context Examples in Regression with LLMs
Aliakbar Nafar, Kristen Brent Venable, Parisa Kordjamshidi
Generative Large Language Models (LLMs) are capable of being in-context learners. However, the underlying mechanism of in-context learning (ICL) is still a major research question, and experimental research results about how models exploit ICL are not always consistent. In this work, we propose a framework for evaluating in-context learning mechanisms, which we claim are a combination of retrieving internal knowledge and learning from in-context examples by focusing on regression tasks. First, we show that LLMs can perform regression on real-world datasets and then design experiments to measure the extent to which the LLM retrieves its internal knowledge versus learning from in-context examples. We argue that this process lies on a spectrum between these two extremes. We provide an in-depth analysis of the degrees to which these mechanisms are triggered depending on various factors, such as prior knowledge about the tasks and the type and richness of the information provided by the in-context examples. We employ three LLMs and utilize multiple datasets to corroborate the robustness of our findings. Our results shed light on how to engineer prompts to leverage meta-learning from in-context examples and foster knowledge retrieval depending on the problem being addressed.
Read more9/9/2024