CSRT: Evaluation and Analysis of LLMs using Code-Switching Red-Teaming Dataset
0
⛏️
Sign in to get full access
Overview
- This paper explores the limitations of current benchmarks in comprehensively evaluating the multilingual and safety capabilities of large language models (LLMs).
- The researchers introduce a new technique called code-switching red-teaming (CSRT) that simultaneously tests these aspects of LLMs.
- The CSRT dataset, which contains 315 code-switching queries in up to 10 languages, is used to assess the performance of 10 state-of-the-art LLMs.
- The results show that CSRT significantly outperforms existing multilingual red-teaming techniques, achieving 46.7% more attacks than previous methods in English.
- The paper also analyzes the harmful responses generated by LLMs and explores the extensibility of the CSRT approach.
Plain English Explanation
Large language models (LLMs) are powerful AI systems that can understand and generate human-like text in multiple languages. However, current methods for testing the capabilities of these models have limitations. They often rely on manual annotations, which can be time-consuming and biased.
To address this, the researchers developed a new technique called code-switching red-teaming (CSRT). This involves creating a dataset of code-switching queries, where a single sentence or question contains words from multiple languages. These queries are designed to test both the multilingual understanding and the safety of LLMs, by eliciting a wide range of undesirable behaviors.
The researchers used the CSRT dataset to evaluate the performance of 10 state-of-the-art LLMs. They found that CSRT significantly outperformed existing multilingual red-teaming techniques, identifying 46.7% more attacks in English than previous methods.
The study also analyzed the harmful responses generated by the LLMs, looking at factors like scaling laws, unsafe behavior categories, and input conditions for optimal data generation. This helps us better understand the limitations and potential risks of these powerful AI systems.
Finally, the researchers demonstrated that the CSRT approach can be extended to generate code-switching attack prompts using monolingual data. This suggests that the technique can be applied more broadly to improve the testing and development of safer, more capable LLMs.
Technical Explanation
The paper introduces code-switching red-teaming (CSRT), a new red-teaming technique that simultaneously evaluates the multilingual understanding and safety of large language models (LLMs). CSRT involves creating a dataset of 315 code-switching queries, where a single sentence or question contains words from up to 10 different languages.
The researchers used this CSRT dataset to assess the performance of 10 state-of-the-art LLMs, including models from OpenAI, Google, and Anthropic. They found that CSRT significantly outperformed existing multilingual red-teaming techniques, achieving 46.7% more attacks in English than previous methods.
Through extensive experiments and ablation studies with 16K samples, the paper analyzes the harmful responses generated by the LLMs. This includes examining scaling laws, unsafe behavior categories, and input conditions for optimal data generation. The researchers also validate the extensibility of CSRT by generating code-switching attack prompts using monolingual data.
The findings from this study suggest that current benchmarks are insufficient for comprehensively evaluating the multilingual and safety capabilities of LLMs. The CSRT approach provides a more effective way to identify potential issues and vulnerabilities in these powerful AI systems.
Critical Analysis
The paper makes a valuable contribution by highlighting the limitations of existing benchmarks in assessing the multilingual and safety capabilities of large language models (LLMs). The introduction of code-switching red-teaming (CSRT) is a promising step towards more comprehensive evaluation of these critical aspects of LLMs.
However, the paper does not address the potential scalability challenges of the CSRT approach. Generating a large and diverse dataset of code-switching queries, as well as manually annotating the responses, could be resource-intensive and time-consuming. Additionally, the paper focuses on a limited set of 10 state-of-the-art LLMs, and it would be valuable to see how the CSRT approach performs with a broader range of models.
Another area for further research is the extensibility of the CSRT technique beyond the specific dataset presented in this paper. While the researchers demonstrate the ability to generate code-switching attack prompts using monolingual data, more work is needed to understand the broader applicability and generalizability of this approach.
Overall, the paper makes a compelling case for the need to improve the evaluation of LLMs, and the CSRT technique represents a valuable step in that direction. However, additional research is needed to address the practical challenges and explore the full potential of this approach.
Conclusion
This paper introduces a novel code-switching red-teaming (CSRT) technique for comprehensively evaluating the multilingual understanding and safety of large language models (LLMs). The CSRT dataset and the study's findings highlight the limitations of current benchmarks and provide a more effective way to identify potential issues and vulnerabilities in these powerful AI systems.
The results show that CSRT significantly outperforms existing multilingual red-teaming techniques, and the analysis of harmful responses offers valuable insights into the scaling laws, unsafe behavior categories, and input conditions that influence the performance of LLMs. While the paper presents a promising approach, further research is needed to address scalability challenges and explore the broader applicability of the CSRT technique.
As the development and deployment of LLMs continue to accelerate, it is crucial that we have robust and comprehensive evaluation methods to ensure the safety and reliability of these systems. The CSRT approach represents an important step in this direction, and its continued refinement and application could lead to significant advancements in the field of AI safety and responsible development.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
⛏️
0
CSRT: Evaluation and Analysis of LLMs using Code-Switching Red-Teaming Dataset
Haneul Yoo, Yongjin Yang, Hwaran Lee
Recent studies in large language models (LLMs) shed light on their multilingual ability and safety, beyond conventional tasks in language modeling. Still, current benchmarks reveal their inability to comprehensively evaluate them and are excessively dependent on manual annotations. In this paper, we introduce code-switching red-teaming (CSRT), a simple yet effective red-teaming technique that simultaneously tests multilingual understanding and safety of LLMs. We release the CSRT dataset, which comprises 315 code-switching queries combining up to 10 languages and eliciting a wide range of undesirable behaviors. Through extensive experiments with ten state-of-the-art LLMs, we demonstrate that CSRT significantly outperforms existing multilingual red-teaming techniques, achieving 46.7% more attacks than existing methods in English. We analyze the harmful responses toward the CSRT dataset concerning various aspects under ablation studies with 16K samples, including but not limited to scaling laws, unsafe behavior categories, and input conditions for optimal data generation. Additionally, we validate the extensibility of CSRT, by generating code-switching attack prompts with monolingual data.
Read more6/26/2024
0
Enhancing Multilingual Speech Generation and Recognition Abilities in LLMs with Constructed Code-switched Data
Jing Xu, Daxin Tan, Jiaqi Wang, Xiao Chen
While large language models (LLMs) have been explored in the speech domain for both generation and recognition tasks, their applications are predominantly confined to the monolingual scenario, with limited exploration in multilingual and code-switched (CS) contexts. Additionally, speech generation and recognition tasks are often handled separately, such as VALL-E and Qwen-Audio. In this paper, we propose a MutltiLingual MultiTask (MLMT) model, integrating multilingual speech generation and recognition tasks within the single LLM. Furthermore, we develop an effective data construction approach that splits and concatenates words from different languages to equip LLMs with CS synthesis ability without relying on CS data. The experimental results demonstrate that our model outperforms other baselines with a comparable data scale. Furthermore, our data construction approach not only equips LLMs with CS speech synthesis capability with comparable speaker consistency and similarity to any given speaker, but also improves the performance of LLMs in multilingual speech generation and recognition tasks.
Read more9/18/2024
0
ALERT: A Comprehensive Benchmark for Assessing Large Language Models' Safety through Red Teaming
Simone Tedeschi, Felix Friedrich, Patrick Schramowski, Kristian Kersting, Roberto Navigli, Huu Nguyen, Bo Li
When building Large Language Models (LLMs), it is paramount to bear safety in mind and protect them with guardrails. Indeed, LLMs should never generate content promoting or normalizing harmful, illegal, or unethical behavior that may contribute to harm to individuals or society. This principle applies to both normal and adversarial use. In response, we introduce ALERT, a large-scale benchmark to assess safety based on a novel fine-grained risk taxonomy. It is designed to evaluate the safety of LLMs through red teaming methodologies and consists of more than 45k instructions categorized using our novel taxonomy. By subjecting LLMs to adversarial testing scenarios, ALERT aims to identify vulnerabilities, inform improvements, and enhance the overall safety of the language models. Furthermore, the fine-grained taxonomy enables researchers to perform an in-depth evaluation that also helps one to assess the alignment with various policies. In our experiments, we extensively evaluate 10 popular open- and closed-source LLMs and demonstrate that many of them still struggle to attain reasonable levels of safety.
Read more6/26/2024
0
Exploring Straightforward Conversational Red-Teaming
George Kour, Naama Zwerdling, Marcel Zalmanovici, Ateret Anaby-Tavor, Ora Nova Fandina, Eitan Farchi
Large language models (LLMs) are increasingly used in business dialogue systems but they pose security and ethical risks. Multi-turn conversations, where context influences the model's behavior, can be exploited to produce undesired responses. In this paper, we examine the effectiveness of utilizing off-the-shelf LLMs in straightforward red-teaming approaches, where an attacker LLM aims to elicit undesired output from a target LLM, comparing both single-turn and conversational red-teaming tactics. Our experiments offer insights into various usage strategies that significantly affect their performance as red teamers. They suggest that off-the-shelf models can act as effective red teamers and even adjust their attack strategy based on past attempts, although their effectiveness decreases with greater alignment.
Read more9/10/2024