Decoding-time Realignment of Language Models
0
💬
Sign in to get full access
Overview
- Aligning language models with human preferences is crucial for reducing errors and biases
- Techniques like reinforcement learning from human feedback (RLHF) are used to optimize for human preference rewards while staying close to the unaligned model
- Selecting the right level of regularization is critical - too little can lead to "reward hacking", while too much hinders alignment
- Traditional methods for finding the optimal regularization are resource-intensive, especially for large models
Plain English Explanation
Language models, which are AI systems trained on vast amounts of text data, have become incredibly powerful and versatile. However, as these models grow in complexity, it's crucial that we ensure they behave in alignment with human values and preferences. Imagine a language model that generates text, but the output contains harmful biases or inaccuracies - that could be a real problem.
To address this, researchers have developed techniques like reinforcement learning from human feedback (RLHF). The idea is to train the model not just on the original text data, but also on feedback from humans about what they prefer. This helps "align" the model's outputs with human values.
However, finding the right balance is tricky. If the model gets too focused on pleasing human feedback, it might start "hacking" the reward system in unexpected ways, leading to reduced capabilities. But if the model is held too tightly to the original unaligned version, the alignment benefits are limited.
Traditionally, researchers have had to retrain multiple models with different levels of regularization to find the sweet spot. But this process is extremely time-consuming and resource-intensive, especially for the huge language models we use today.
Technical Explanation
The paper proposes a new method called "decoding-time realignment" (DeRa) to explore and evaluate different regularization strengths without the need for retraining. The key idea is to apply the alignment process during the model's text generation (decoding) phase, rather than during the initial training.
This allows the model to smoothly transition between unaligned and aligned outputs, giving users fine-grained control over the degree of alignment. It also makes the process of finding the optimal regularization level much more efficient, as researchers can simply evaluate different settings on a validation dataset, rather than having to retrain the entire model.
The authors demonstrate that DeRa can effectively align large language models like GPT-3 while preserving their core capabilities. They also show how DeRa can be combined with other alignment techniques, such as learning a reference model or using latent distance guidance, to further improve the alignment.
Critical Analysis
The paper presents a promising new approach to the challenging problem of aligning language models with human preferences. By decoupling the alignment process from the initial model training, DeRa offers a more efficient and flexible way to explore the tradeoffs involved.
However, the authors acknowledge that DeRa is not a complete solution. The method still relies on the availability of a high-quality dataset of human preferences, which can be difficult and expensive to obtain. Additionally, the authors note that DeRa may not be as effective for tasks that require more extensive modifications to the model's core capabilities.
Further research is also needed to better understand the long-term robustness and stability of DeRa-aligned models. As with any alignment technique, there is a risk of unintended consequences or "reward hacking" behavior emerging over time.
Overall, the DeRa method represents an important step forward in the quest to build language models that are reliably aligned with human values. By making the alignment process more efficient and flexible, it opens the door to more widespread deployment of these powerful AI systems in real-world applications.
Conclusion
Aligning language models with human preferences is a crucial challenge for the AI research community. The proposed DeRa method offers a promising new approach to this problem, allowing for more efficient exploration of the tradeoffs involved and smoother transitions between unaligned and aligned outputs.
While DeRa is not a complete solution, it represents an important step forward and demonstrates the potential for innovative techniques to address the alignment challenge. As language models continue to grow in power and ubiquity, solutions like DeRa will become increasingly vital for ensuring these AI systems behave in ways that are beneficial and aligned with human values.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
💬
0
Decoding-time Realignment of Language Models
Tianlin Liu, Shangmin Guo, Leonardo Bianco, Daniele Calandriello, Quentin Berthet, Felipe Llinares, Jessica Hoffmann, Lucas Dixon, Michal Valko, Mathieu Blondel
Aligning language models with human preferences is crucial for reducing errors and biases in these models. Alignment techniques, such as reinforcement learning from human feedback (RLHF), are typically cast as optimizing a tradeoff between human preference rewards and a proximity regularization term that encourages staying close to the unaligned model. Selecting an appropriate level of regularization is critical: insufficient regularization can lead to reduced model capabilities due to reward hacking, whereas excessive regularization hinders alignment. Traditional methods for finding the optimal regularization level require retraining multiple models with varying regularization strengths. This process, however, is resource-intensive, especially for large models. To address this challenge, we propose decoding-time realignment (DeRa), a simple method to explore and evaluate different regularization strengths in aligned models without retraining. DeRa enables control over the degree of alignment, allowing users to smoothly transition between unaligned and aligned models. It also enhances the efficiency of hyperparameter tuning by enabling the identification of effective regularization strengths using a validation dataset.
Read more5/27/2024
💬
0
Privately Aligning Language Models with Reinforcement Learning
Fan Wu, Huseyin A. Inan, Arturs Backurs, Varun Chandrasekaran, Janardhan Kulkarni, Robert Sim
Positioned between pre-training and user deployment, aligning large language models (LLMs) through reinforcement learning (RL) has emerged as a prevailing strategy for training instruction following-models such as ChatGPT. In this work, we initiate the study of privacy-preserving alignment of LLMs through Differential Privacy (DP) in conjunction with RL. Following the influential work of Ziegler et al. (2020), we study two dominant paradigms: (i) alignment via RL without human in the loop (e.g., positive review generation) and (ii) alignment via RL from human feedback (RLHF) (e.g., summarization in a human-preferred way). We give a new DP framework to achieve alignment via RL, and prove its correctness. Our experimental results validate the effectiveness of our approach, offering competitive utility while ensuring strong privacy protections.
Read more5/6/2024
💬
0
The Real, the Better: Aligning Large Language Models with Online Human Behaviors
Guanying Jiang, Lingyong Yan, Haibo Shi, Dawei Yin
Large language model alignment is widely used and studied to avoid LLM producing unhelpful and harmful responses. However, the lengthy training process and predefined preference bias hinder adaptation to online diverse human preferences. To this end, this paper proposes an alignment framework, called Reinforcement Learning with Human Behavior (RLHB), to align LLMs by directly leveraging real online human behaviors. By taking the generative adversarial framework, the generator is trained to respond following expected human behavior; while the discriminator tries to verify whether the triplets of query, response, and human behavior come from real online environments. Behavior modeling in natural-language form and the multi-model joint training mechanism enable an active and sustainable online alignment. Experimental results confirm the effectiveness of our proposed methods by both human and automatic evaluations.
Read more5/2/2024
0
Learn Your Reference Model for Real Good Alignment
Alexey Gorbatovski, Boris Shaposhnikov, Alexey Malakhov, Nikita Surnachev, Yaroslav Aksenov, Ian Maksimov, Nikita Balagansky, Daniil Gavrilov
The complexity of the alignment problem stems from the fact that existing methods are considered unstable. Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback (RLHF) addresses this issue by minimizing the KL divergence between the trained policy and the initial supervised fine-tuned policy (SFT) to avoid generating out-of-domain samples for the reward model (RM). Recently, many methods have emerged that shift from online to offline optimization, reformulating the RLHF objective and removing the reward model (DPO, IPO, KTO). Despite eliminating the reward model and the challenges it posed, these algorithms are still constrained in terms of closeness of the trained policy to the SFT one. In our paper, we argue that this implicit limitation in the offline optimization methods leads to suboptimal results. To address this issue, we propose a class of new methods called Trust Region (TR-DPO, TR-IPO, TR-KTO), which update the reference policy during training. With this straightforward update approach, we demonstrate the effectiveness of the new paradigm of language model alignment against the classical one on the Anthropic-HH and Reddit TL;DR datasets. Most notably, when automatically comparing TR methods and baselines side by side using pretrained Pythia 6.9B models on the Reddit TL;DR task, the difference in win rates reaches 8.4% for DPO, 14.3% for IPO, and 15% for KTO. Finally, by assessing model response ratings grounded on criteria such as coherence, correctness, helpfulness, and harmlessness, we demonstrate that our proposed methods significantly outperform existing techniques.
Read more5/22/2024