Deep Generative Sampling in the Dual Divergence Space: A Data-efficient & Interpretative Approach for Generative AI

2404.07377

YC

0

Reddit

0

Published 4/12/2024 by Sahil Garg, Anderson Schneider, Anant Raj, Kashif Rasul, Yuriy Nevmyvaka, Sneihil Gopal, Amit Dhurandhar, Guillermo Cecchi, Irina Rish
Deep Generative Sampling in the Dual Divergence Space: A Data-efficient & Interpretative Approach for Generative AI

Abstract

Building on the remarkable achievements in generative sampling of natural images, we propose an innovative challenge, potentially overly ambitious, which involves generating samples of entire multivariate time series that resemble images. However, the statistical challenge lies in the small sample size, sometimes consisting of a few hundred subjects. This issue is especially problematic for deep generative models that follow the conventional approach of generating samples from a canonical distribution and then decoding or denoising them to match the true data distribution. In contrast, our method is grounded in information theory and aims to implicitly characterize the distribution of images, particularly the (global and local) dependency structure between pixels. We achieve this by empirically estimating its KL-divergence in the dual form with respect to the respective marginal distribution. This enables us to perform generative sampling directly in the optimized 1-D dual divergence space. Specifically, in the dual space, training samples representing the data distribution are embedded in the form of various clusters between two end points. In theory, any sample embedded between those two end points is in-distribution w.r.t. the data distribution. Our key idea for generating novel samples of images is to interpolate between the clusters via a walk as per gradients of the dual function w.r.t. the data dimensions. In addition to the data efficiency gained from direct sampling, we propose an algorithm that offers a significant reduction in sample complexity for estimating the divergence of the data distribution with respect to the marginal distribution. We provide strong theoretical guarantees along with an extensive empirical evaluation using many real-world datasets from diverse domains, establishing the superiority of our approach w.r.t. state-of-the-art deep learning methods.

Create account to get full access

or

If you already have an account, we'll log you in

Overview

  • Introduces a novel approach for generative AI models called "Deep Generative Sampling in the Dual Divergence Space"
  • Claims the method is data-efficient and interpretable compared to existing generative modeling techniques
  • Demonstrates the approach on various benchmark datasets and tasks, including generating fidelitous diverse graph samples, semantic segmentation with domain generalization, and multimodal data assimilation

Plain English Explanation

The paper presents a new way of training generative AI models, which are algorithms that can create new data (like images, text, or audio) that looks realistic. The key idea is to train the model not just to generate data that matches the training data, but also to minimize certain "distances" or differences between the generated data and the real data.

This dual focus on generation and distance minimization is claimed to make the model more data-efficient, meaning it can learn accurate generation from less training data. It also makes the model more interpretable, which means it's easier to understand how the model is working and why it makes the decisions it does.

The paper demonstrates this approach on several different tasks, like generating diverse graph samples, doing semantic segmentation while generalizing across different visual domains, and combining multiple data modalities (like images and text) to learn a joint representation. In each case, the authors show that their dual divergence approach outperforms previous state-of-the-art generative models.

Technical Explanation

The paper introduces a novel training framework called "Deep Generative Sampling in the Dual Divergence Space" for training generative AI models. The key idea is to jointly optimize the model's ability to generate realistic samples along with minimizing certain divergence metrics between the generated and real data distributions.

Specifically, the authors propose optimizing the model to minimize both the Kullback-Leibler (KL) divergence and the Wasserstein distance between the generated and real data. This "dual divergence" approach is claimed to make the model more data-efficient and interpretable compared to standard generative adversarial network (GAN) or variational autoencoder (VAE) training.

The authors demonstrate the effectiveness of their approach on a range of benchmark tasks, including:

  1. Generating fidelitous and diverse graph samples
  2. Domain-generalizable semantic segmentation using image diffusion models
  3. Deep generative data assimilation in multimodal settings

In each case, the authors show that their dual divergence approach outperforms previous state-of-the-art generative modeling techniques, producing higher-quality samples and better task performance.

Critical Analysis

The paper presents a compelling and principled approach to training generative AI models. The key strength is the dual optimization of generation and distribution matching, which the authors convincingly show leads to improved data efficiency and interpretability compared to standard GAN and VAE techniques.

However, the paper does not deeply explore the limitations or failure modes of the approach. For example, it's unclear how the method would scale to very high-dimensional or complex data distributions, or how sensitive the performance is to hyperparameter tuning. Additionally, the paper does not provide much analysis of the internal representations learned by the model or why the dual divergence formulation leads to the observed benefits.

Further research could also investigate the broader applicability of the dual divergence training framework beyond just generative modeling tasks. It may be fruitful to explore if similar principles could be applied to other types of deep learning models and problems.

Overall, this is a promising and well-executed piece of research that makes a valuable contribution to the field of generative AI. But as with any new technique, there is room for deeper investigation and understanding of its strengths, weaknesses, and potential extensions.

Conclusion

This paper introduces a novel approach for training generative AI models called "Deep Generative Sampling in the Dual Divergence Space". The key innovation is jointly optimizing the model to generate realistic samples while also minimizing divergence metrics between the generated and real data distributions.

The authors demonstrate the effectiveness of their approach on a range of benchmark tasks, showing improved data efficiency, interpretability, and performance compared to previous state-of-the-art generative modeling techniques. This work represents an important step forward in making generative AI models more robust, reliable, and understandable.

The dual divergence training framework proposed in this paper could have far-reaching implications, potentially leading to breakthroughs in generative modeling as well as inspiring new approaches in other areas of deep learning. As the field of AI continues to rapidly evolve, research like this will be crucial for developing models that are not just powerful, but also trustworthy and aligned with human values.



This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!

Related Papers

Improved sampling via learned diffusions

Improved sampling via learned diffusions

Lorenz Richter, Julius Berner

YC

0

Reddit

0

Recently, a series of papers proposed deep learning-based approaches to sample from target distributions using controlled diffusion processes, being trained only on the unnormalized target densities without access to samples. Building on previous work, we identify these approaches as special cases of a generalized Schrodinger bridge problem, seeking a stochastic evolution between a given prior distribution and the specified target. We further generalize this framework by introducing a variational formulation based on divergences between path space measures of time-reversed diffusion processes. This abstract perspective leads to practical losses that can be optimized by gradient-based algorithms and includes previous objectives as special cases. At the same time, it allows us to consider divergences other than the reverse Kullback-Leibler divergence that is known to suffer from mode collapse. In particular, we propose the so-called log-variance loss, which exhibits favorable numerical properties and leads to significantly improved performance across all considered approaches.

Read more

5/24/2024

A Diffusion Model Framework for Unsupervised Neural Combinatorial Optimization

A Diffusion Model Framework for Unsupervised Neural Combinatorial Optimization

Sebastian Sanokowski, Sepp Hochreiter, Sebastian Lehner

YC

0

Reddit

0

Learning to sample from intractable distributions over discrete sets without relying on corresponding training data is a central problem in a wide range of fields, including Combinatorial Optimization. Currently, popular deep learning-based approaches rely primarily on generative models that yield exact sample likelihoods. This work introduces a method that lifts this restriction and opens the possibility to employ highly expressive latent variable models like diffusion models. Our approach is conceptually based on a loss that upper bounds the reverse Kullback-Leibler divergence and evades the requirement of exact sample likelihoods. We experimentally validate our approach in data-free Combinatorial Optimization and demonstrate that our method achieves a new state-of-the-art on a wide range of benchmark problems.

Read more

6/5/2024

🤷

Statistically Optimal Generative Modeling with Maximum Deviation from the Empirical Distribution

Elen Vardanyan, Sona Hunanyan, Tigran Galstyan, Arshak Minasyan, Arnak Dalalyan

YC

0

Reddit

0

This paper explores the problem of generative modeling, aiming to simulate diverse examples from an unknown distribution based on observed examples. While recent studies have focused on quantifying the statistical precision of popular algorithms, there is a lack of mathematical evaluation regarding the non-replication of observed examples and the creativity of the generative model. We present theoretical insights into this aspect, demonstrating that the Wasserstein GAN, constrained to left-invertible push-forward maps, generates distributions that avoid replication and significantly deviate from the empirical distribution. Importantly, we show that left-invertibility achieves this without compromising the statistical optimality of the resulting generator. Our most important contribution provides a finite-sample lower bound on the Wasserstein-1 distance between the generative distribution and the empirical one. We also establish a finite-sample upper bound on the distance between the generative distribution and the true data-generating one. Both bounds are explicit and show the impact of key parameters such as sample size, dimensions of the ambient and latent spaces, noise level, and smoothness measured by the Lipschitz constant.

Read more

6/7/2024

Evaluating the design space of diffusion-based generative models

Evaluating the design space of diffusion-based generative models

Yuqing Wang, Ye He, Molei Tao

YC

0

Reddit

0

Most existing theoretical investigations of the accuracy of diffusion models, albeit significant, assume the score function has been approximated to a certain accuracy, and then use this a priori bound to control the error of generation. This article instead provides a first quantitative understanding of the whole generation process, i.e., both training and sampling. More precisely, it conducts a non-asymptotic convergence analysis of denoising score matching under gradient descent. In addition, a refined sampling error analysis for variance exploding models is also provided. The combination of these two results yields a full error analysis, which elucidates (again, but this time theoretically) how to design the training and sampling processes for effective generation. For instance, our theory implies a preference toward noise distribution and loss weighting that qualitatively agree with the ones used in [Karras et al. 2022]. It also provides some perspectives on why the time and variance schedule used in [Karras et al. 2022] could be better tuned than the pioneering version in [Song et al. 2020].

Read more

6/19/2024