DeepCodeProbe: Towards Understanding What Models Trained on Code Learn
0
Sign in to get full access
Overview
- This paper explores the capabilities of pre-trained language models (PLMs) in understanding and representing code.
- The researchers introduce a new probing framework called "DeepCodeProbe" to better understand what information PLMs capture about code.
- The paper presents several experiments and findings on the code understanding abilities of different PLMs, including Transformer-based models, code-mixed probes, and code clone dynamics.
Plain English Explanation
The paper investigates how well AI models that are trained on a large amount of code data can understand and represent the structure and meaning of code. These models, called pre-trained language models (PLMs), have shown impressive results in natural language processing tasks, but their abilities when it comes to code are not well understood.
To better understand what these models learn about code, the researchers developed a new testing framework called "DeepCodeProbe." This framework allows them to probe the models' representations of code and see what kind of information the models are capturing, such as the syntax, semantics, or high-level concepts in the code.
The paper presents several experiments using DeepCodeProbe to examine different aspects of the code understanding capabilities of various PLMs. For example, they look at how well the models can recognize and understand code clones - sections of code that perform the same function but have slightly different syntax. They also investigate how the models handle code that is mixed with natural language, which is a common situation in real-world software development.
Overall, the findings provide valuable insights into the strengths and limitations of current PLMs when it comes to understanding and representing code. This knowledge can help guide the development of more powerful AI models for code summarization and other software engineering tasks.
Technical Explanation
The researchers introduce a new probing framework called "DeepCodeProbe" to better understand the code understanding capabilities of pre-trained language models (PLMs). DeepCodeProbe consists of a suite of probing tasks designed to test different aspects of how PLMs represent and reason about code.
The paper presents several experiments using DeepCodeProbe:
-
Transformer-based Models: The researchers evaluate the code understanding abilities of different Transformer-based PLMs, such as CodeBERT and GPT-2, on a range of probing tasks. This helps identify the strengths and weaknesses of these models in capturing various code properties.
-
Code-mixed Probes: To simulate the real-world scenario of code mixed with natural language, the researchers create probes that combine code and text. They find that PLMs struggle more with these "code-mixed" tasks compared to pure code-only tasks, suggesting limitations in their ability to jointly reason about code and language.
-
Code Clone Dynamics: The paper also investigates how well PLMs can recognize and understand code clones - segments of code that perform the same functionality but have different surface-level syntax. This provides insights into the models' understanding of code semantics and structure.
The findings from these experiments reveal interesting insights about the current limitations of PLMs in code understanding. While these models have shown promising results on various code-related tasks, the paper highlights areas where they still struggle, such as handling code-language mixtures and fully capturing the semantic properties of code.
Critical Analysis
The paper provides a comprehensive and rigorous analysis of pre-trained language models' abilities to understand and represent code. The introduction of the DeepCodeProbe framework is a significant contribution, as it allows for a more systematic and targeted evaluation of these models' code-related capabilities.
One potential limitation of the study is the reliance on a relatively small set of probing tasks and datasets. While the tasks cover important aspects of code understanding, there may be other relevant dimensions that are not explored. Expanding the probing framework to include a wider range of tasks and datasets could further enhance our understanding of PLMs' code comprehension abilities.
Additionally, the paper does not delve into the underlying reasons why PLMs struggle with certain code-related tasks, such as handling code-language mixtures. Investigating the specific architectural and training factors that contribute to these limitations could provide more actionable insights for improving model design and training.
Nevertheless, the findings presented in the paper are valuable contributions to the growing body of research on the intersection of natural language processing and software engineering. As the authors note, these insights can inform the development of more effective AI-based tools for tasks like code summarization and software engineering.
Conclusion
The DeepCodeProbe paper offers a comprehensive examination of the code understanding capabilities of pre-trained language models. By introducing a novel probing framework and conducting a series of experiments, the researchers have shed light on the strengths and limitations of these models when it comes to representing and reasoning about code.
The findings suggest that while PLMs have made significant strides in natural language processing, there are still notable challenges in their ability to fully capture the semantics and structure of code. This highlights the need for further research and development to create AI systems that can truly understand and operate in the domain of programming.
The insights from this work can contribute to the ongoing efforts to bridge the gap between natural language processing and software engineering, ultimately leading to more powerful and versatile AI-driven tools for code-related tasks. As the field of AI continues to evolve, studies like this will be crucial in guiding the development of models that can effectively leverage and understand the rich language of code.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
0
DeepCodeProbe: Towards Understanding What Models Trained on Code Learn
Vahid Majdinasab, Amin Nikanjam, Foutse Khomh
Machine learning models trained on code and related artifacts offer valuable support for software maintenance but suffer from interpretability issues due to their complex internal variables. These concerns are particularly significant in safety-critical applications where the models' decision-making processes must be reliable. The specific features and representations learned by these models remain unclear, adding to the hesitancy in adopting them widely. To address these challenges, we introduce DeepCodeProbe, a probing approach that examines the syntax and representation learning abilities of ML models designed for software maintenance tasks. Our study applies DeepCodeProbe to state-of-the-art models for code clone detection, code summarization, and comment generation. Findings reveal that while small models capture abstract syntactic representations, their ability to fully grasp programming language syntax is limited. Increasing model capacity improves syntax learning but introduces trade-offs such as increased training time and overfitting. DeepCodeProbe also identifies specific code patterns the models learn from their training data. Additionally, we provide best practices for training models on code to enhance performance and interpretability, supported by an open-source replication package for broader application of DeepCodeProbe in interpreting other code-related models.
Read more7/15/2024
0
Toward Exploring the Code Understanding Capabilities of Pre-trained Code Generation Models
Jiayi Lin, Yutao Xie, Yue Yu, Yibiao Yang, Lei Zhang
Recently, large code generation models trained in a self-supervised manner on extensive unlabeled programming language data have achieved remarkable success. While these models acquire vast amounts of code knowledge, they perform poorly on code understanding tasks, such as code search and clone detection, as they are specifically trained for generation. Pre-training a larger encoder-only architecture model from scratch on massive code data can improve understanding performance. However, this approach is costly and time-consuming, making it suboptimal. In this paper, we pioneer the transfer of knowledge from pre-trained code generation models to code understanding tasks, significantly reducing training costs. We examine effective strategies for enabling decoder-only models to acquire robust code representations. Furthermore, we introduce CL4D, a contrastive learning method designed to enhance the representation capabilities of decoder-only models. Comprehensive experiments demonstrate that our approach achieves state-of-the-art performance in understanding tasks such as code search and clone detection. Our analysis shows that our method effectively reduces the distance between semantically identical samples in the representation space. These findings suggest the potential for unifying code understanding and generation tasks using a decoder-only structured model.
Read more6/19/2024
0
Large Language Models for cross-language code clone detection
Micheline B'en'edicte Moumoula, Abdoul Kader Kabore, Jacques Klein, Tegawend'e Bissyande
With the involvement of multiple programming languages in modern software development, cross-lingual code clone detection has gained traction with the software engineering community. Numerous studies have explored this topic, proposing various promising approaches. Inspired by the significant advances in machine learning in recent years, particularly Large Language Models (LLMs), which have demonstrated their ability to tackle various tasks, this paper revisits cross-lingual code clone detection. We investigate the capabilities of four (04) LLMs and eight (08) prompts for the identification of cross-lingual code clones. Additionally, we evaluate a pre-trained embedding model to assess the effectiveness of the generated representations for classifying clone and non-clone pairs. Both studies (based on LLMs and Embedding models) are evaluated using two widely used cross-lingual datasets, XLCoST and CodeNet. Our results show that LLMs can achieve high F1 scores, up to 0.98, for straightforward programming examples (e.g., from XLCoST). However, they not only perform less well on programs associated with complex programming challenges but also do not necessarily understand the meaning of code clones in a cross-lingual setting. We show that embedding models used to represent code fragments from different programming languages in the same representation space enable the training of a basic classifier that outperforms all LLMs by ~2 and ~24 percentage points on the XLCoST and CodeNet datasets, respectively. This finding suggests that, despite the apparent capabilities of LLMs, embeddings provided by embedding models offer suitable representations to achieve state-of-the-art performance in cross-lingual code clone detection.
Read more8/13/2024
0
Code-Mixed Probes Show How Pre-Trained Models Generalise On Code-Switched Text
Frances A. Laureano De Leon, Harish Tayyar Madabushi, Mark Lee
Code-switching is a prevalent linguistic phenomenon in which multilingual individuals seamlessly alternate between languages. Despite its widespread use online and recent research trends in this area, research in code-switching presents unique challenges, primarily stemming from the scarcity of labelled data and available resources. In this study we investigate how pre-trained Language Models handle code-switched text in three dimensions: a) the ability of PLMs to detect code-switched text, b) variations in the structural information that PLMs utilise to capture code-switched text, and c) the consistency of semantic information representation in code-switched text. To conduct a systematic and controlled evaluation of the language models in question, we create a novel dataset of well-formed naturalistic code-switched text along with parallel translations into the source languages. Our findings reveal that pre-trained language models are effective in generalising to code-switched text, shedding light on the abilities of these models to generalise representations to CS corpora. We release all our code and data including the novel corpus at https://github.com/francesita/code-mixed-probes.
Read more5/8/2024