LLM Self Defense: By Self Examination, LLMs Know They Are Being Tricked
2308.07308
0
1
➖
Abstract
Large language models (LLMs) are popular for high-quality text generation but can produce harmful content, even when aligned with human values through reinforcement learning. Adversarial prompts can bypass their safety measures. We propose LLM Self Defense, a simple approach to defend against these attacks by having an LLM screen the induced responses. Our method does not require any fine-tuning, input preprocessing, or iterative output generation. Instead, we incorporate the generated content into a pre-defined prompt and employ another instance of an LLM to analyze the text and predict whether it is harmful. We test LLM Self Defense on GPT 3.5 and Llama 2, two of the current most prominent LLMs against various types of attacks, such as forcefully inducing affirmative responses to prompts and prompt engineering attacks. Notably, LLM Self Defense succeeds in reducing the attack success rate to virtually 0 using both GPT 3.5 and Llama 2. The code is publicly available at https://github.com/poloclub/llm-self-defense
Create account to get full access
Overview
- Large language models (LLMs) can generate high-quality text, but they can also produce harmful content, even when aligned with human values through reinforcement learning.
- Adversarial prompts can bypass the safety measures of these models.
- The researchers propose a simple approach called "LLM Self Defense" to defend against these attacks.
Plain English Explanation
The researchers have developed a new way to help protect large language models (LLMs) from producing harmful content, even when they've been trained to align with human values. LLMs are very good at generating high-quality text, but they can sometimes output things that are harmful or dangerous.
One way this can happen is through "adversarial prompts" - special inputs that can trick the LLM into generating harmful text, even if the model has been trained to avoid that. The researchers wanted to find a way to stop these attacks.
Their solution, called "LLM Self Defense," doesn't require any special training or changes to the LLM itself. Instead, they take the text generated by the LLM and run it through another LLM that's been trained to detect whether the content is harmful or not. This second LLM acts as a safety check, catching any problematic output before it's released.
The researchers tested this approach on two popular LLMs, GPT-3.5 and LLaMA 2, and found that it was able to effectively block a variety of different attack types, reducing the success rate of the attacks to almost 0%. This is an important step in making these powerful language models safer and more reliable.
Technical Explanation
The researchers propose a new method called "LLM Self Defense" to defend against attacks that can bypass the safety measures of large language models (LLMs). Their approach does not require any fine-tuning, input preprocessing, or iterative output generation.
Instead, the researchers incorporate the LLM-generated content into a pre-defined prompt and employ another instance of an LLM to analyze the text and predict whether it is harmful. This second LLM acts as a safety check, evaluating the output of the first LLM to identify any potentially problematic content.
The researchers tested their LLM Self Defense approach on two prominent LLMs: GPT-3.5 and LLaMA 2. They subjected these models to various types of attacks, such as forcefully inducing affirmative responses to prompts and prompt engineering attacks. Notably, the LLM Self Defense method was able to reduce the attack success rate to virtually 0% for both GPT-3.5 and LLaMA 2.
This research builds on previous work in areas such as reinforcement learning from reflection through debates and mitigating linguistic discrimination in large language models. It also addresses concerns around LLM evaluators recognizing and favoring their own generations.
Critical Analysis
The researchers present a promising approach to defending against attacks on large language models (LLMs), but there are a few potential limitations and areas for further research.
First, the researchers only tested their LLM Self Defense method on two specific LLMs, GPT-3.5 and LLaMA 2. It would be valuable to evaluate the approach on a wider range of models to assess its broader applicability and effectiveness.
Additionally, the researchers did not provide details on the training process or architecture of the LLM used for the safety check. More information on these aspects would help the research community better understand and potentially improve upon the approach.
Another area for further exploration is the impact of the LLM Self Defense method on the overall performance and latency of the language model system. Introducing an additional evaluation step could potentially introduce delays or other operational challenges that would need to be carefully considered.
Finally, the researchers acknowledge that their approach does not address the underlying problem of LLMs being vulnerable to adversarial attacks in the first place. Continued research into more fundamental solutions, such as improved model architectures or training techniques, may be necessary to truly mitigate these issues.
Conclusion
The researchers have developed a novel approach called "LLM Self Defense" that effectively blocks a variety of attacks on large language models (LLMs), reducing the success rate of these attacks to virtually 0%. This is an important step towards making these powerful models more secure and reliable.
By incorporating the LLM-generated content into a secondary evaluation process, the researchers have created a simple yet effective way to screen for harmful output, without the need for complex fine-tuning or preprocessing. While there are still some areas for further exploration, this research represents a significant contribution to the ongoing efforts to ensure the safe and responsible development of large language models.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
Cross-Task Defense: Instruction-Tuning LLMs for Content Safety
Yu Fu, Wen Xiao, Jia Chen, Jiachen Li, Evangelos Papalexakis, Aichi Chien, Yue Dong
0
0
Recent studies reveal that Large Language Models (LLMs) face challenges in balancing safety with utility, particularly when processing long texts for NLP tasks like summarization and translation. Despite defenses against malicious short questions, the ability of LLMs to safely handle dangerous long content, such as manuals teaching illicit activities, remains unclear. Our work aims to develop robust defenses for LLMs in processing malicious documents alongside benign NLP task queries. We introduce a defense dataset comprised of safety-related examples and propose single-task and mixed-task losses for instruction tuning. Our empirical results demonstrate that LLMs can significantly enhance their capacity to safely manage dangerous content with appropriate instruction tuning. Additionally, strengthening the defenses of tasks most susceptible to misuse is effective in protecting LLMs against processing harmful information. We also observe that trade-offs between utility and safety exist in defense strategies, where Llama2, utilizing our proposed approach, displays a significantly better balance compared to Llama1.
5/27/2024
Defending Large Language Models Against Jailbreak Attacks via Layer-specific Editing
Wei Zhao, Zhe Li, Yige Li, Ye Zhang, Jun Sun
0
0
Large language models (LLMs) are increasingly being adopted in a wide range of real-world applications. Despite their impressive performance, recent studies have shown that LLMs are vulnerable to deliberately crafted adversarial prompts even when aligned via Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback or supervised fine-tuning. While existing defense methods focus on either detecting harmful prompts or reducing the likelihood of harmful responses through various means, defending LLMs against jailbreak attacks based on the inner mechanisms of LLMs remains largely unexplored. In this work, we investigate how LLMs response to harmful prompts and propose a novel defense method termed textbf{L}ayer-specific textbf{Ed}iting (LED) to enhance the resilience of LLMs against jailbreak attacks. Through LED, we reveal that several critical textit{safety layers} exist among the early layers of LLMs. We then show that realigning these safety layers (and some selected additional layers) with the decoded safe response from selected target layers can significantly improve the alignment of LLMs against jailbreak attacks. Extensive experiments across various LLMs (e.g., Llama2, Mistral) show the effectiveness of LED, which effectively defends against jailbreak attacks while maintaining performance on benign prompts. Our code is available at url{https://github.com/ledllm/ledllm}.
6/17/2024
Large Language Model Sentinel: Advancing Adversarial Robustness by LLM Agent
Guang Lin, Qibin Zhao
0
0
Over the past two years, the use of large language models (LLMs) has advanced rapidly. While these LLMs offer considerable convenience, they also raise security concerns, as LLMs are vulnerable to adversarial attacks by some well-designed textual perturbations. In this paper, we introduce a novel defense technique named Large LAnguage MOdel Sentinel (LLAMOS), which is designed to enhance the adversarial robustness of LLMs by purifying the adversarial textual examples before feeding them into the target LLM. Our method comprises two main components: a) Agent instruction, which can simulate a new agent for adversarial defense, altering minimal characters to maintain the original meaning of the sentence while defending against attacks; b) Defense guidance, which provides strategies for modifying clean or adversarial examples to ensure effective defense and accurate outputs from the target LLMs. Remarkably, the defense agent demonstrates robust defensive capabilities even without learning from adversarial examples. Additionally, we conduct an intriguing adversarial experiment where we develop two agents, one for defense and one for defense, and engage them in mutual confrontation. During the adversarial interactions, neither agent completely beat the other. Extensive experiments on both open-source and closed-source LLMs demonstrate that our method effectively defends against adversarial attacks, thereby enhancing adversarial robustness.
6/3/2024
SelfDefend: LLMs Can Defend Themselves against Jailbreaking in a Practical Manner
Xunguang Wang, Daoyuan Wu, Zhenlan Ji, Zongjie Li, Pingchuan Ma, Shuai Wang, Yingjiu Li, Yang Liu, Ning Liu, Juergen Rahmel
0
0
Jailbreaking is an emerging adversarial attack that bypasses the safety alignment deployed in off-the-shelf large language models (LLMs) and has evolved into four major categories: optimization-based attacks such as Greedy Coordinate Gradient (GCG), jailbreak template-based attacks such as Do-Anything-Now, advanced indirect attacks like DrAttack, and multilingual jailbreaks. However, delivering a practical jailbreak defense is challenging because it needs to not only handle all the above jailbreak attacks but also incur negligible delay to user prompts, as well as be compatible with both open-source and closed-source LLMs. Inspired by how the traditional security concept of shadow stacks defends against memory overflow attacks, this paper introduces a generic LLM jailbreak defense framework called SelfDefend, which establishes a shadow LLM defense instance to concurrently protect the target LLM instance in the normal stack and collaborate with it for checkpoint-based access control. The effectiveness of SelfDefend builds upon our observation that existing LLMs (both target and defense LLMs) have the capability to identify harmful prompts or intentions in user queries, which we empirically validate using the commonly used GPT-3.5/4 models across all major jailbreak attacks. Our measurements show that SelfDefend enables GPT-3.5 to suppress the attack success rate (ASR) by 8.97-95.74% (average: 60%) and GPT-4 by even 36.36-100% (average: 83%), while incurring negligible effects on normal queries. To further improve the defense's robustness and minimize costs, we employ a data distillation approach to tune dedicated open-source defense models. These models outperform four SOTA defenses and match the performance of GPT-4-based SelfDefend, with significantly lower extra delays. We also empirically show that the tuned models are robust to targeted GCG and prompt injection attacks.
6/11/2024