Demystifying Why Local Aggregation Helps: Convergence Analysis of Hierarchical SGD

Overview

• The paper introduces a new distributed Stochastic Gradient Descent (SGD) algorithm called Hierarchical SGD (H-SGD) for multi-level communication networks.
• In H-SGD, workers send their updated local models to local servers for aggregation before each global aggregation.
• The paper analyzes the effect of local aggregation on the global convergence of H-SGD.

Plain English Explanation

Distributed machine learning is a way to train models using multiple computers working together. In this approach, data is split across different workers, and they each update a local model. These local models are then combined to create a single global model.

The paper introduces a new distributed SGD algorithm called H-SGD that adds an extra step to this process. Before the global aggregation, the local models are first aggregated at the local server level. The researchers then analyze how this additional local aggregation step affects the overall convergence of the global model.

To do this, the paper introduces a new way of looking at the "divergence" - or difference - between the local and global models. It uses this concept of upward and downward divergence to derive a theoretical bound on the convergence of H-SGD.

The key insight is that the convergence of H-SGD is "sandwiched" between the convergence of two simpler settings: one where there is only local aggregation, and one where there is only global aggregation. This suggests that the local aggregation step in H-SGD can actually help improve the overall convergence of the global model.

Technical Explanation

The paper first introduces the H-SGD algorithm, which performs local aggregation at intermediate servers before the final global aggregation. To analyze its convergence, the authors define new notions of "upward" and "downward" divergences to capture the difference between local and global models.

Using these divergence measures, the paper provides a worst-case convergence upper bound for two-level H-SGD, considering non-IID data, non-convex objectives, and stochastic gradients. This bound is shown to be "sandwiched" between the upper bounds of two single-level SGD settings - one with only local updates, and one with only global updates.

The authors then extend this analysis to the general case of H-SGD with more than two levels, and again observe the same sandwich behavior in the convergence upper bounds. This suggests that the local aggregation step in H-SGD can actually help improve the overall convergence compared to a purely global aggregation approach.

The theoretical analysis provides insights into why local aggregation can be beneficial for the convergence of H-SGD, which the authors argue is an important step towards a better understanding of this new distributed optimization algorithm.

Critical Analysis

The paper provides a rigorous theoretical analysis of the convergence properties of H-SGD, which is a novel contribution to the field of distributed machine learning. The authors' introduction of upward and downward divergence measures is a clever way to capture the interplay between local and global model updates.

However, the analysis is limited to a worst-case convergence upper bound, and does not provide guarantees on the actual convergence rate or the tightness of the bound. Additionally, the theoretical results assume certain conditions, such as bounded gradients and Lipschitz-continuous objective functions, which may not always hold in practice.

Furthermore, the paper does not explore the practical performance of H-SGD compared to other distributed SGD algorithms, such as Decentralized SGD or AdaGossip. Empirical evaluations on real-world datasets and applications would help validate the theoretical insights and demonstrate the potential benefits of H-SGD in realistic settings.

Future research could also investigate the impact of different local aggregation strategies, the effect of network topology, and the potential connections to other hierarchical optimization techniques, such as multi-level graph subspace contrastive learning or iterative local graph generation. Such extensions could further strengthen the understanding and applicability of H-SGD.

Conclusion

The paper introduces a new distributed SGD algorithm called Hierarchical SGD (H-SGD) and provides a novel theoretical analysis of its convergence properties. The key insight is that the local aggregation step in H-SGD can actually help improve the overall convergence of the global model, as evidenced by the "sandwich" behavior observed in the convergence upper bounds.

These theoretical results offer important insights into the role of local aggregation in distributed optimization and could inform the design of more effective distributed learning algorithms. While the analysis has certain limitations, the paper represents a valuable contribution to the understanding of hierarchical communication structures in the context of large-scale machine learning.