CLUE: A Clinical Language Understanding Evaluation for LLMs
0
Sign in to get full access
Overview
- This paper introduces CLUE, a comprehensive clinical language understanding evaluation for large language models (LLMs).
- CLUE aims to assess the performance of LLMs on various clinical tasks, including medical question answering, clinical inference, and medical entity recognition.
- The evaluation is designed to provide a standardized benchmark for comparing the capabilities of different LLMs in the clinical domain.
Plain English Explanation
CLUE is a new way to test how well large language models (LLMs) can understand and work with clinical, or medical, information. LLMs are AI systems that can process and generate human-like text. The researchers created CLUE to see how good these LLMs are at tasks like answering medical questions, drawing conclusions from clinical data, and identifying important medical terms and concepts.
The goal of CLUE is to provide a standard way to compare the performance of different LLMs when it comes to understanding and working with clinical information. This is important because LLMs are starting to be used in healthcare and medical settings, and it's crucial to know how well they can handle the specialized language and knowledge required in those domains.
Technical Explanation
The CLUE evaluation consists of several tasks designed to test different aspects of clinical language understanding. These include:
- Medical question answering: LLMs are asked to answer questions based on provided medical information.
- Clinical inference: LLMs must draw conclusions and make inferences from clinical data and notes.
- Medical entity recognition: LLMs are tasked with identifying important medical terms and concepts within text.
The researchers compiled a diverse dataset of clinical text and information to use in the CLUE evaluation. This includes medical notes, research papers, and other clinical documents.
By testing LLMs on this comprehensive set of clinical language understanding tasks, the CLUE benchmark aims to provide a more thorough and standardized way to assess the capabilities of these models in the medical domain. This can help researchers and developers better understand the strengths and limitations of LLMs for clinical applications.
Critical Analysis
The CLUE evaluation represents an important step towards more rigorous and reliable assessment of LLMs in the clinical domain. By focusing on specific, clinically-relevant tasks, the benchmark can provide more meaningful insights than generic language understanding tests.
However, the paper also acknowledges some potential limitations of CLUE. For example, the dataset, while diverse, may not fully capture the breadth of clinical language and knowledge required in real-world healthcare settings. Additionally, the evaluation does not address issues like model biases or the ability to handle sensitive patient information, which are crucial considerations for clinical applications of LLMs.
Further research and development of CLUE, as well as other clinical language understanding benchmarks (Dialogbench), (CMB), (METAL), and (Developing Healthcare Language Model Embedding Spaces), will be important to ensure these evaluations fully capture the capabilities and limitations of LLMs for clinical use cases.
Conclusion
The CLUE benchmark represents a significant advancement in the evaluation of LLMs for clinical language understanding. By providing a standardized set of clinically-relevant tasks, CLUE can help researchers and developers better understand the strengths and limitations of these models when it comes to processing and working with medical information.
As LLMs continue to be explored for healthcare applications, tools like CLUE will be crucial for ensuring these models can reliably and safely handle the specialized language and knowledge required in clinical settings. The insights gained from CLUE can inform the development of more robust and clinically-capable LLMs to support improved patient care and outcomes.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
0
CLUE: A Clinical Language Understanding Evaluation for LLMs
Amin Dada, Marie Bauer, Amanda Butler Contreras, Osman Alperen Korac{s}, Constantin Marc Seibold, Kaleb E Smith, Jens Kleesiek
Large Language Models (LLMs) are expected to significantly contribute to patient care, diagnostics, and administrative processes. Emerging biomedical LLMs aim to address healthcare-specific challenges, including privacy demands and computational constraints. Assessing the models' suitability for this sensitive application area is of the utmost importance. However, biomedical training has not been systematically evaluated on medical tasks. This study investigates the effect of biomedical training in the context of six practical medical tasks evaluating $25$ models. In contrast to previous evaluations, our results reveal a performance decline in nine out of twelve biomedical models after fine-tuning, particularly on tasks involving hallucinations, ICD10 coding, and instruction adherence. General-domain models like Meta-Llama-3.1-70B-Instruct outperformed their biomedical counterparts, indicating a trade-off between domain-specific fine-tuning and general medical task performance. We open-source all evaluation scripts and datasets at https://github.com/TIO-IKIM/CLUE to support further research in this critical area.
Read more9/18/2024
0
CliBench: Multifaceted Evaluation of Large Language Models in Clinical Decisions on Diagnoses, Procedures, Lab Tests Orders and Prescriptions
Mingyu Derek Ma, Chenchen Ye, Yu Yan, Xiaoxuan Wang, Peipei Ping, Timothy S Chang, Wei Wang
The integration of Artificial Intelligence (AI), especially Large Language Models (LLMs), into the clinical diagnosis process offers significant potential to improve the efficiency and accessibility of medical care. While LLMs have shown some promise in the medical domain, their application in clinical diagnosis remains underexplored, especially in real-world clinical practice, where highly sophisticated, patient-specific decisions need to be made. Current evaluations of LLMs in this field are often narrow in scope, focusing on specific diseases or specialties and employing simplified diagnostic tasks. To bridge this gap, we introduce CliBench, a novel benchmark developed from the MIMIC IV dataset, offering a comprehensive and realistic assessment of LLMs' capabilities in clinical diagnosis. This benchmark not only covers diagnoses from a diverse range of medical cases across various specialties but also incorporates tasks of clinical significance: treatment procedure identification, lab test ordering and medication prescriptions. Supported by structured output ontologies, CliBench enables a precise and multi-granular evaluation, offering an in-depth understanding of LLM's capability on diverse clinical tasks of desired granularity. We conduct a zero-shot evaluation of leading LLMs to assess their proficiency in clinical decision-making. Our preliminary results shed light on the potential and limitations of current LLMs in clinical settings, providing valuable insights for future advancements in LLM-powered healthcare.
Read more6/17/2024
💬
0
Evaluating large language models in medical applications: a survey
Xiaolan Chen, Jiayang Xiang, Shanfu Lu, Yexin Liu, Mingguang He, Danli Shi
Large language models (LLMs) have emerged as powerful tools with transformative potential across numerous domains, including healthcare and medicine. In the medical domain, LLMs hold promise for tasks ranging from clinical decision support to patient education. However, evaluating the performance of LLMs in medical contexts presents unique challenges due to the complex and critical nature of medical information. This paper provides a comprehensive overview of the landscape of medical LLM evaluation, synthesizing insights from existing studies and highlighting evaluation data sources, task scenarios, and evaluation methods. Additionally, it identifies key challenges and opportunities in medical LLM evaluation, emphasizing the need for continued research and innovation to ensure the responsible integration of LLMs into clinical practice.
Read more5/14/2024
0
Large Language Models in Healthcare: A Comprehensive Benchmark
Andrew Liu, Hongjian Zhou, Yining Hua, Omid Rohanian, Anshul Thakur, Lei Clifton, David A. Clifton
The adoption of large language models (LLMs) to assist clinicians has attracted remarkable attention. Existing works mainly adopt the close-ended question-answering (QA) task with answer options for evaluation. However, many clinical decisions involve answering open-ended questions without pre-set options. To better understand LLMs in the clinic, we construct a benchmark ClinicBench. We first collect eleven existing datasets covering diverse clinical language generation, understanding, and reasoning tasks. Furthermore, we construct six novel datasets and complex clinical tasks that are close to real-world practice, i.e., referral QA, treatment recommendation, hospitalization (long document) summarization, patient education, pharmacology QA and drug interaction for emerging drugs. We conduct an extensive evaluation of twenty-two LLMs under both zero-shot and few-shot settings. Finally, we invite medical experts to evaluate the clinical usefulness of LLMs.
Read more6/27/2024