Does Object Grounding Really Reduce Hallucination of Large Vision-Language Models?
0
Sign in to get full access
Overview
- This paper examines whether object grounding, the process of connecting language to visual representations, can reduce hallucination in large vision-language models (LVLMs).
- Hallucination refers to the tendency of LVLMs to generate nonsensical or factually incorrect outputs, especially when presented with open-ended prompts.
- The researchers investigate different grounding objectives and their impact on model hallucination, providing insights into how to mitigate this issue.
Plain English Explanation
Large vision-language models (LVLMs) are powerful AI systems that can understand and generate text based on visual information. However, these models can sometimes produce outputs that are completely made up or incorrect, a phenomenon known as hallucination.
The paper explores whether a technique called object grounding can help reduce hallucination in LVLMs. Object grounding is the process of connecting language to specific visual representations, like identifying objects in an image. The researchers test different ways of incorporating object grounding into the training of LVLMs to see if this can make the models less prone to hallucination.
By investigating various grounding objectives, the researchers aim to provide insights into how to design LVLMs that are more reliable and trustworthy, generating outputs that are closer to reality. This is an important step in making these powerful AI systems more useful and safe for real-world applications.
Technical Explanation
The paper explores the use of object grounding as a way to mitigate hallucination in LVLMs. The researchers experiment with different grounding objectives, which are the specific ways that the model is trained to connect language to visual representations.
One approach is visual detection grounding, where the model is trained to identify objects in images and then use that information to inform its language generation. Another is visual-linguistic grounding, which focuses on learning the relationships between visual and linguistic elements.
The paper presents experiments comparing the performance of LVLMs trained with different grounding objectives, evaluating their ability to generate accurate and coherent outputs across a range of tasks. The findings offer insights into how the choice of grounding objective can impact the model's propensity for hallucination.
Critical Analysis
The paper provides a comprehensive examination of the relationship between object grounding and hallucination in LVLMs. However, it's important to note that the research is limited to specific model architectures and datasets, and the findings may not generalize to all LVLM systems.
Additionally, the paper acknowledges that while object grounding can help reduce hallucination, it may also introduce other challenges, such as increased complexity and potential trade-offs in model performance. Further research is needed to fully understand the broader implications and find optimal strategies for mitigating hallucination in LVLMs.
Conclusion
This paper contributes to the growing body of research on detecting and mitigating hallucination in large vision-language models. By investigating different object grounding objectives, the researchers provide valuable insights into how to design more reliable and trustworthy LVLM systems. As these models continue to advance, addressing issues like hallucination will be crucial for their safe and effective deployment in real-world applications.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
0
Does Object Grounding Really Reduce Hallucination of Large Vision-Language Models?
Gregor Geigle, Radu Timofte, Goran Glavav{s}
Large vision-language models (LVLMs) have recently dramatically pushed the state of the art in image captioning and many image understanding tasks (e.g., visual question answering). LVLMs, however, often textit{hallucinate} and produce captions that mention concepts that cannot be found in the image. These hallucinations erode the trustworthiness of LVLMs and are arguably among the main obstacles to their ubiquitous adoption. Recent work suggests that addition of grounding objectives -- those that explicitly align image regions or objects to text spans -- reduces the amount of LVLM hallucination. Although intuitive, this claim is not empirically justified as the reduction effects have been established, we argue, with flawed evaluation protocols that (i) rely on data (i.e., MSCOCO) that has been extensively used in LVLM training and (ii) measure hallucination via question answering rather than open-ended caption generation. In this work, in contrast, we offer the first systematic analysis of the effect of fine-grained object grounding on LVLM hallucination under an evaluation protocol that more realistically captures LVLM hallucination in open generation. Our extensive experiments over three backbone LLMs reveal that grounding objectives have little to no effect on object hallucination in open caption generation.
Read more6/21/2024
🐍
0
Logical Closed Loop: Uncovering Object Hallucinations in Large Vision-Language Models
Junfei Wu, Qiang Liu, Ding Wang, Jinghao Zhang, Shu Wu, Liang Wang, Tieniu Tan
Object hallucination has been an Achilles' heel which hinders the broader applications of large vision-language models (LVLMs). Object hallucination refers to the phenomenon that the LVLMs claim non-existent objects in the image. To mitigate the object hallucinations, instruction tuning and external model-based detection methods have been proposed, which either require large-scare computational resources or depend on the detection result of external models. However, there remains an under-explored field to utilize the LVLM itself to alleviate object hallucinations. In this work, we adopt the intuition that the LVLM tends to respond logically consistently for existent objects but inconsistently for hallucinated objects. Therefore, we propose a Logical Closed Loop-based framework for Object Hallucination Detection and Mitigation, namely LogicCheckGPT. In specific, we devise logical consistency probing to raise questions with logical correlations, inquiring about attributes from objects and vice versa. Whether their responses can form a logical closed loop serves as an indicator of object hallucination. As a plug-and-play method, it can be seamlessly applied to all existing LVLMs. Comprehensive experiments conducted on three benchmarks across four LVLMs have demonstrated significant improvements brought by our method, indicating its effectiveness and generality.
Read more7/1/2024
0
Learning Visual Grounding from Generative Vision and Language Model
Shijie Wang, Dahun Kim, Ali Taalimi, Chen Sun, Weicheng Kuo
Visual grounding tasks aim to localize image regions based on natural language references. In this work, we explore whether generative VLMs predominantly trained on image-text data could be leveraged to scale up the text annotation of visual grounding data. We find that grounding knowledge already exists in generative VLM and can be elicited by proper prompting. We thus prompt a VLM to generate object-level descriptions by feeding it object regions from existing object detection datasets. We further propose attribute modeling to explicitly capture the important object attributes, and spatial relation modeling to capture inter-object relationship, both of which are common linguistic pattern in referring expression. Our constructed dataset (500K images, 1M objects, 16M referring expressions) is one of the largest grounding datasets to date, and the first grounding dataset with purely model-generated queries and human-annotated objects. To verify the quality of this data, we conduct zero-shot transfer experiments to the popular RefCOCO benchmarks for both referring expression comprehension (REC) and segmentation (RES) tasks. On both tasks, our model significantly outperform the state-of-the-art approaches without using human annotated visual grounding data. Our results demonstrate the promise of generative VLM to scale up visual grounding in the real world. Code and models will be released.
Read more7/23/2024
0
A Survey on Hallucination in Large Vision-Language Models
Hanchao Liu, Wenyuan Xue, Yifei Chen, Dapeng Chen, Xiutian Zhao, Ke Wang, Liping Hou, Rongjun Li, Wei Peng
Recent development of Large Vision-Language Models (LVLMs) has attracted growing attention within the AI landscape for its practical implementation potential. However, ``hallucination'', or more specifically, the misalignment between factual visual content and corresponding textual generation, poses a significant challenge of utilizing LVLMs. In this comprehensive survey, we dissect LVLM-related hallucinations in an attempt to establish an overview and facilitate future mitigation. Our scrutiny starts with a clarification of the concept of hallucinations in LVLMs, presenting a variety of hallucination symptoms and highlighting the unique challenges inherent in LVLM hallucinations. Subsequently, we outline the benchmarks and methodologies tailored specifically for evaluating hallucinations unique to LVLMs. Additionally, we delve into an investigation of the root causes of these hallucinations, encompassing insights from the training data and model components. We also critically review existing methods for mitigating hallucinations. The open questions and future directions pertaining to hallucinations within LVLMs are discussed to conclude this survey.
Read more5/7/2024