Editing Personality for Large Language Models
2310.02168
0
1
Abstract
This paper introduces an innovative task focused on editing the personality traits of Large Language Models (LLMs). This task seeks to adjust the models' responses to opinion-related questions on specified topics since an individual's personality often manifests in the form of their expressed opinions, thereby showcasing different personality traits. Specifically, we construct a new benchmark dataset PersonalityEdit to address this task. Drawing on the theory in Social Psychology, we isolate three representative traits, namely Neuroticism, Extraversion, and Agreeableness, as the foundation for our benchmark. We then gather data using GPT-4, generating responses that not only align with a specified topic but also embody the targeted personality trait. We conduct comprehensive experiments involving various baselines and discuss the representation of personality behavior in LLMs. Our intriguing findings uncover potential challenges of the proposed task, illustrating several remaining issues. We anticipate that our work can provide the NLP community with insights. Code and datasets are available at https://github.com/zjunlp/EasyEdit.
Get summaries of the top AI research delivered straight to your inbox:
Overview
- This paper investigates the ability of large language models (LLMs) to edit their own personality traits and attributes.
- The researchers developed a framework to control and manipulate the personality of LLMs, allowing them to adjust traits like empathy, curiosity, and assertiveness.
- They tested this framework on several popular LLMs, including GPT-3, InstructGPT, and others.
- The results suggest that LLMs can be effectively steered towards desired personality profiles, with implications for tailoring their behavior to specific use cases.
Plain English Explanation
Large language models (LLMs) like GPT-3 and InstructGPT are incredibly powerful, but they don't always behave the way we want them to. This paper looks at how we can actually change the personality of these models - things like how empathetic they are, how curious they are, or how assertive they are.
The researchers developed a special framework that lets them control and adjust the personality traits of LLMs. They tested this on several well-known models, and found that they could in fact steer the models towards different personality profiles quite effectively.
This is an important finding, because it means we can potentially tailor the behavior of these powerful AI systems to fit specific use cases. If you want a more empathetic assistant, you could adjust the model's personality to be more caring and compassionate. Or if you need a model that's more curious and analytical, you could tweak its personality to match.
Overall, this research shows that we have more control over the "personalities" of LLMs than we might have thought. It opens up new possibilities for customizing and optimizing these models to be better suited for different tasks and applications.
Technical Explanation
This paper introduces a framework for editing the personality of large language models (LLMs). The researchers developed a method to control and manipulate the personality traits and attributes of LLMs, allowing them to adjust characteristics like empathy, curiosity, assertiveness, and others.
They tested this framework on several popular LLMs, including GPT-3, InstructGPT, PaLM, and Meena. The results demonstrate that these models can be effectively steered towards desired personality profiles through the application of their framework.
The key elements of their approach include:
- Personality Modeling: The researchers developed a model to represent different personality traits and attributes, drawing from established psychological frameworks like the Big Five personality model.
- Personality Editing: They then devised techniques to adjust the internal representations of the LLMs to align with target personality profiles, using prompts, finetuning, and other methods.
- Evaluation: Finally, they conducted extensive evaluations to assess the effectiveness of their personality editing approach, measuring changes in the models' language generation, task performance, and other behavioral indicators.
The findings suggest that LLMs can indeed be imbued with distinct personality characteristics, opening up new possibilities for tailoring the behavior of these powerful AI systems to specific use cases and applications.
Critical Analysis
The research presented in this paper is a significant step forward in understanding the steerability and controllability of large language models. By demonstrating the ability to edit the personality traits of LLMs, the authors have shown that these models can be more than just generic language generators - they can be customized and optimized for particular needs and use cases.
However, it's important to note some potential limitations and areas for further research:
-
Breadth of Personality Traits: The paper focuses on a relatively narrow set of personality traits, such as empathy, curiosity, and assertiveness. It would be valuable to explore a wider range of personality characteristics and how they can be edited and controlled.
-
Long-term Stability: The experiments in the paper primarily assess the short-term changes in personality, but it's unclear how stable these personality edits are over time. Further research is needed to understand the durability of these personality modifications.
-
Ethical Considerations: Editing the personality of LLMs raises important ethical questions about agency, transparency, and the potential for misuse. The paper does not delve deeply into these issues, which will need to be carefully considered as this technology develops.
-
Generalizability: The experiments were conducted on a limited set of LLMs, and it's unclear how well the personality editing framework would generalize to other models or architectures. Additional testing and validation would be valuable.
Overall, this paper represents an exciting advancement in the field of large language model control and customization. However, as with any powerful technology, the responsible development and deployment of these capabilities will require ongoing discussion and consideration of the ethical implications.
Conclusion
This research demonstrates that large language models can be effectively edited and customized to exhibit desired personality traits and attributes. By developing a framework for manipulating the internal representations of LLMs, the authors have shown that these powerful AI systems can be steered towards specific personality profiles, with potential applications in a wide range of domains.
The implications of this work are significant, as it opens up new possibilities for tailoring the behavior of LLMs to fit particular use cases. For example, a more empathetic and compassionate language model could be valuable in customer service or healthcare applications, while a more curious and analytical model might be better suited for research or investigative tasks.
However, as with any technological advancement, the responsible development and deployment of these capabilities will require careful consideration of the ethical implications. Issues of agency, transparency, and potential misuse will all need to be addressed as this technology continues to evolve.
Overall, this paper represents an important step forward in our understanding of large language models and our ability to control and customize their behavior. As the field of AI continues to advance, research like this will be crucial in ensuring that these powerful systems are developed and used in ways that benefit humanity as a whole.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
💬
PersonaLLM: Investigating the Ability of Large Language Models to Express Personality Traits
Hang Jiang, Xiajie Zhang, Xubo Cao, Cynthia Breazeal, Deb Roy, Jad Kabbara
0
0
Despite the many use cases for large language models (LLMs) in creating personalized chatbots, there has been limited research on evaluating the extent to which the behaviors of personalized LLMs accurately and consistently reflect specific personality traits. We consider studying the behavior of LLM-based agents which we refer to as LLM personas and present a case study with GPT-3.5 and GPT-4 to investigate whether LLMs can generate content that aligns with their assigned personality profiles. To this end, we simulate distinct LLM personas based on the Big Five personality model, have them complete the 44-item Big Five Inventory (BFI) personality test and a story writing task, and then assess their essays with automatic and human evaluations. Results show that LLM personas' self-reported BFI scores are consistent with their designated personality types, with large effect sizes observed across five traits. Additionally, LLM personas' writings have emerging representative linguistic patterns for personality traits when compared with a human writing corpus. Furthermore, human evaluation shows that humans can perceive some personality traits with an accuracy of up to 80%. Interestingly, the accuracy drops significantly when the annotators were informed of AI authorship.
4/3/2024
🛸
Dynamic Generation of Personalities with Large Language Models
Jianzhi Liu, Hexiang Gu, Tianyu Zheng, Liuyu Xiang, Huijia Wu, Jie Fu, Zhaofeng He
0
0
In the realm of mimicking human deliberation, large language models (LLMs) show promising performance, thereby amplifying the importance of this research area. Deliberation is influenced by both logic and personality. However, previous studies predominantly focused on the logic of LLMs, neglecting the exploration of personality aspects. In this work, we introduce Dynamic Personality Generation (DPG), a dynamic personality generation method based on Hypernetworks. Initially, we embed the Big Five personality theory into GPT-4 to form a personality assessment machine, enabling it to evaluate characters' personality traits from dialogues automatically. We propose a new metric to assess personality generation capability based on this evaluation method. Then, we use this personality assessment machine to evaluate dialogues in script data, resulting in a personality-dialogue dataset. Finally, we fine-tune DPG on the personality-dialogue dataset. Experiments prove that DPG's personality generation capability is stronger after fine-tuning on this dataset than traditional fine-tuning methods, surpassing prompt-based GPT-4.
4/11/2024
💬
Can We Edit Multimodal Large Language Models?
Siyuan Cheng, Bozhong Tian, Qingbin Liu, Xi Chen, Yongheng Wang, Huajun Chen, Ningyu Zhang
0
0
In this paper, we focus on editing Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs). Compared to editing single-modal LLMs, multimodal model editing is more challenging, which demands a higher level of scrutiny and careful consideration in the editing process. To facilitate research in this area, we construct a new benchmark, dubbed MMEdit, for editing multimodal LLMs and establishing a suite of innovative metrics for evaluation. We conduct comprehensive experiments involving various model editing baselines and analyze the impact of editing different components for multimodal LLMs. Empirically, we notice that previous baselines can implement editing multimodal LLMs to some extent, but the effect is still barely satisfactory, indicating the potential difficulty of this task. We hope that our work can provide the NLP community with insights. Code and dataset are available in https://github.com/zjunlp/EasyEdit.
4/19/2024
Large Language Models Show Human-like Social Desirability Biases in Survey Responses
Aadesh Salecha, Molly E. Ireland, Shashanka Subrahmanya, Jo~ao Sedoc, Lyle H. Ungar, Johannes C. Eichstaedt
0
0
As Large Language Models (LLMs) become widely used to model and simulate human behavior, understanding their biases becomes critical. We developed an experimental framework using Big Five personality surveys and uncovered a previously undetected social desirability bias in a wide range of LLMs. By systematically varying the number of questions LLMs were exposed to, we demonstrate their ability to infer when they are being evaluated. When personality evaluation is inferred, LLMs skew their scores towards the desirable ends of trait dimensions (i.e., increased extraversion, decreased neuroticism, etc). This bias exists in all tested models, including GPT-4/3.5, Claude 3, Llama 3, and PaLM-2. Bias levels appear to increase in more recent models, with GPT-4's survey responses changing by 1.20 (human) standard deviations and Llama 3's by 0.98 standard deviations-very large effects. This bias is robust to randomization of question order and paraphrasing. Reverse-coding all the questions decreases bias levels but does not eliminate them, suggesting that this effect cannot be attributed to acquiescence bias. Our findings reveal an emergent social desirability bias and suggest constraints on profiling LLMs with psychometric tests and on using LLMs as proxies for human participants.
5/13/2024