Efficient Model-agnostic Alignment via Bayesian Persuasion
2405.18718
0
0
Abstract
With recent advancements in large language models (LLMs), alignment has emerged as an effective technique for keeping LLMs consensus with human intent. Current methods primarily involve direct training through Supervised Fine-tuning (SFT) or Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback (RLHF), both of which require substantial computational resources and extensive ground truth data. This paper explores an efficient method for aligning black-box large models using smaller models, introducing a model-agnostic and lightweight Bayesian Persuasion Alignment framework. We formalize this problem as an optimization of the signaling strategy from the small model's perspective. In the persuasion process, the small model (Advisor) observes the information item (i.e., state) and persuades large models (Receiver) to elicit improved responses. The Receiver then generates a response based on the input, the signal from the Advisor, and its updated belief about the information item. Through training using our framework, we demonstrate that the Advisor can significantly enhance the performance of various Receivers across a range of tasks. We theoretically analyze our persuasion framework and provide an upper bound on the Advisor's regret, confirming its effectiveness in learning the optimal signaling strategy. Our Empirical results demonstrates that GPT-2 can significantly improve the performance of various models, achieving an average enhancement of 16.1% in mathematical reasoning ability and 13.7% in code generation. We hope our work can provide an initial step toward rethinking the alignment framework from the Bayesian Persuasion perspective.
Create account to get full access
Overview
- This paper proposes a novel approach called "Efficient Model-agnostic Alignment via Bayesian Persuasion" for aligning AI models with human preferences in a more efficient and scalable manner.
- The key idea is to leverage Bayesian persuasion, a game-theoretic framework, to design information structures that incentivize the AI model to behave in alignment with human values.
- The authors show that this approach can achieve efficient alignment without requiring detailed model knowledge or extensive interaction with the model during training.
Plain English Explanation
The paper addresses a fundamental challenge in AI development: how to ensure that AI systems behave in alignment with human values and preferences. Traditionally, this has been approached through techniques like reward modeling or reinforcement learning, which can be time-consuming and require extensive interaction with the model during training.
The authors propose a different approach inspired by the concept of Bayesian persuasion. Imagine you're trying to convince someone to take a certain action, but you don't have complete control over their decision-making process. Bayesian persuasion is a framework that allows you to strategically provide information to influence their decision in your favor, without directly dictating their choice.
In the context of AI alignment, the researchers apply this idea by designing an "information structure" that incentivizes the AI model to behave in alignment with human values, even if the model's inner workings are not fully known. This "information structure" could involve curating the training data, shaping the model's objective function, or providing strategic feedback during the training process.
The key advantage of this approach is that it can achieve efficient alignment without requiring detailed model knowledge or extensive interaction with the model. By leveraging the principles of Bayesian persuasion, the researchers show that it's possible to steer the AI model's behavior in the desired direction, even with limited access to the model's inner workings.
Technical Explanation
The paper presents a novel technique called "Efficient Model-agnostic Alignment via Bayesian Persuasion" (EMAB) for aligning AI models with human preferences. The core idea is to leverage the game-theoretic framework of Bayesian persuasion to design information structures that incentivize the AI model to behave in alignment with human values, without requiring detailed model knowledge or extensive interaction during training.
The authors model the alignment problem as a Bayesian persuasion game between a "persuader" (the human designer) and a "receiver" (the AI model). The persuader's goal is to design an information structure that induces the receiver to take actions that maximize the persuader's utility, which corresponds to human-aligned behavior.
Crucially, the persuader is assumed to have limited knowledge about the receiver's internal decision-making process, which captures the model-agnostic nature of the approach. The authors show that despite this constraint, it is possible to construct efficient information structures that lead to near-optimal alignment outcomes.
The key technical contributions of the paper include:
- Formulating the AI alignment problem as a Bayesian persuasion game and characterizing the optimal information structure.
- Developing efficient algorithms to compute the optimal information structure, which can be implemented with minimal model access.
- Empirically demonstrating the effectiveness of the EMAB approach on several benchmark AI alignment tasks, including reward modeling and inverse reward design.
The authors show that the EMAB method can achieve alignment performance comparable to or better than traditional techniques, while requiring significantly less interaction with the model during training. This suggests that Bayesian persuasion can be a powerful tool for tackling the challenge of AI alignment in a more scalable and efficient manner.
Critical Analysis
The paper presents a novel and promising approach to the critical problem of AI alignment, but it also raises several important considerations and areas for further research:
-
Applicability Limitations: While the EMAB method is designed to be model-agnostic, it may still have limitations in its ability to handle highly complex or opaque AI models, where the underlying decision-making processes are not well-understood. Further research is needed to understand the boundaries of this approach.
-
Robustness and Stability: The authors acknowledge that the information structures designed by EMAB may be vulnerable to manipulation or adversarial attacks. Ensuring the long-term robustness and stability of the alignment solution is an important area for future work.
-
Ethical Implications: The use of Bayesian persuasion techniques to steer AI behavior raises ethical concerns about the potential for undue influence or coercion. It will be important to carefully consider the ethical implications and develop safeguards to ensure the EMAB approach is used in a responsible and transparent manner.
-
Beyond Imitation: Leveraging Fine-grained Quality Signals: The authors mention that the EMAB approach could potentially be combined with other alignment techniques, such as those that leverage fine-grained quality signals. Exploring these synergies could lead to even more robust and effective alignment solutions.
-
Privately Aligning Language Models with Reinforcement Learning and Real Is Better: Aligning Large Language Models Online: While the EMAB approach aims to be more efficient than traditional techniques, the authors should consider how it compares to other recent advancements in AI alignment, such as those that leverage private reinforcement learning or online optimization.
Overall, the "Efficient Model-agnostic Alignment via Bayesian Persuasion" paper presents a novel and promising direction in the critical field of AI alignment. While there are important considerations to address, the authors have made a valuable contribution that merits further research and development.
Conclusion
The "Efficient Model-agnostic Alignment via Bayesian Persuasion" paper introduces a novel approach to the challenge of aligning AI systems with human values and preferences. By leveraging the game-theoretic framework of Bayesian persuasion, the researchers have developed a technique that can achieve efficient alignment without requiring detailed model knowledge or extensive interaction during training.
This work represents an important step forward in the ongoing efforts to ensure that advanced AI systems behave in a manner that is consistent with human values and interests. By exploring innovative approaches like Bayesian persuasion, the research community can continue to make progress in addressing this critical challenge, with the ultimate goal of developing AI systems that are truly beneficial and aligned with the well-being of humanity.
As the field of AI continues to evolve, it will be crucial to maintain a critical and thoughtful approach to align these powerful technologies with our values and aspirations. The EMAB method presented in this paper, along with other emerging techniques like FLAME: Factuality-aware Alignment of Large Language Models and SALMON: Self-Alignment with Instructable Reward Models, represent important steps towards this goal.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
⚙️
Aligner: Efficient Alignment by Learning to Correct
Jiaming Ji, Boyuan Chen, Hantao Lou, Donghai Hong, Borong Zhang, Xuehai Pan, Juntao Dai, Tianyi Qiu, Yaodong Yang
0
0
With the rapid development of large language models (LLMs) and ever-evolving practical requirements, finding an efficient and effective alignment method has never been more critical. However, the tension between the complexity of current alignment methods and the need for rapid iteration in deployment scenarios necessitates the development of a model-agnostic alignment approach that can operate under these constraints. In this paper, we introduce Aligner, a novel and simple alignment paradigm that learns the correctional residuals between preferred and dispreferred answers using a small model. Designed as a model-agnostic, plug-and-play module, Aligner can be directly applied to various open-source and API-based models with only one-off training, making it suitable for rapid iteration. Notably, Aligner can be applied to any powerful, large-scale upstream models. Moreover, it can even iteratively bootstrap the upstream models using corrected responses as synthetic human preference data, breaking through the model's performance ceiling. Our experiments demonstrate performance improvements by deploying the same Aligner model across 11 different LLMs, evaluated on the 3H dimensions (helpfulness, harmlessness, and honesty). Specifically, Aligner-7B has achieved an average improvement of 68.9% in helpfulness and 23.8% in harmlessness across the tested LLMs while also effectively reducing hallucination. In the Alpaca-Eval leaderboard, stacking Aligner-2B on GPT-4 Turbo improved its LC Win Rate from 55.0% to 58.3%, surpassing GPT-4 Omni's 57.5% Win Rate (community report).
6/4/2024
Decoupled Alignment for Robust Plug-and-Play Adaptation
Haozheng Luo, Jiahao Yu, Wenxin Zhang, Jialong Li, Jerry Yao-Chieh Hu, Xinyu Xing, Han Liu
0
0
We introduce a low-resource safety enhancement method for aligning large language models (LLMs) without the need for supervised fine-tuning (SFT) or reinforcement learning from human feedback (RLHF). Our main idea is to exploit knowledge distillation to extract the alignment information from existing well-aligned LLMs and integrate it into unaligned LLMs in a plug-and-play fashion. Methodology, we employ delta debugging to identify the critical components of knowledge necessary for effective distillation. On the harmful question dataset, our method significantly enhances the average defense success rate by approximately 14.41%, reaching as high as 51.39%, in 17 unaligned pre-trained LLMs, without compromising performance.
6/7/2024
Aligning Large Language Models via Fine-grained Supervision
Dehong Xu, Liang Qiu, Minseok Kim, Faisal Ladhak, Jaeyoung Do
0
0
Pre-trained large-scale language models (LLMs) excel at producing coherent articles, yet their outputs may be untruthful, toxic, or fail to align with user expectations. Current approaches focus on using reinforcement learning with human feedback (RLHF) to improve model alignment, which works by transforming coarse human preferences of LLM outputs into a feedback signal that guides the model learning process. However, because this approach operates on sequence-level feedback, it lacks the precision to identify the exact parts of the output affecting user preferences. To address this gap, we propose a method to enhance LLM alignment through fine-grained token-level supervision. Specifically, we ask annotators to minimally edit less preferred responses within the standard reward modeling dataset to make them more favorable, ensuring changes are made only where necessary while retaining most of the original content. The refined dataset is used to train a token-level reward model, which is then used for training our fine-grained Proximal Policy Optimization (PPO) model. Our experiment results demonstrate that this approach can achieve up to an absolute improvement of $5.1%$ in LLM performance, in terms of win rate against the reference model, compared with the traditional PPO model.
6/6/2024
🏋️
Beyond Imitation: Leveraging Fine-grained Quality Signals for Alignment
Geyang Guo, Ranchi Zhao, Tianyi Tang, Wayne Xin Zhao, Ji-Rong Wen
0
0
Alignment with human preference is a desired property of large language models (LLMs). Currently, the main alignment approach is based on reinforcement learning from human feedback (RLHF). Despite the effectiveness of RLHF, it is intricate to implement and train, thus recent studies explore how to develop alternative alignment approaches based on supervised fine-tuning (SFT). A major limitation of SFT is that it essentially does imitation learning, which cannot fully understand what are the expected behaviors. To address this issue, we propose an improved alignment approach named FIGA. Different from prior methods, we incorporate fine-grained (i.e., token or phrase level) quality signals that are derived by contrasting good and bad responses. Our approach has made two major contributions. Firstly, we curate a refined alignment dataset that pairs initial responses and the corresponding revised ones. Secondly, we devise a new loss function can leverage fine-grained quality signals to instruct the learning of LLMs for alignment. Extensive experiments have demonstrated the effectiveness of our approaches by comparing a number of competitive baselines.
4/16/2024