Riemann-Lebesgue Forest for Regression
0
↗️
Sign in to get full access
Overview
- Proposes a new ensemble method called Riemann-Lebesgue Forest (RLF) for regression tasks
- RLF is designed to mimic how a measurable function can be approximated by partitioning its range into intervals
- Introduces a new tree learner called Riemann-Lebesgue Tree (RLT) that can perform Lebesgue-type cutting to split nodes based on the response variable
- Shows that Lebesgue-type cutting can lead to larger variance reduction in the response variable compared to standard CART cutting
- Provides theoretical analysis on the asymptotic normality of RLF under different parameter settings
- Demonstrates the flexibility and competitive performance of RLF through simulations and real-world datasets
Plain English Explanation
The researchers propose a new machine learning method called Riemann-Lebesgue Forest (RLF) for solving regression problems. The core idea behind RLF is to mimic how a measurable function can be approximated by splitting its range into a few intervals.
To achieve this, the researchers developed a new type of decision tree learner called Riemann-Lebesgue Tree (RLT). RLT has the ability to perform a special type of splitting called "Lebesgue-type cutting," where it can split nodes based on the response variable (the value you're trying to predict) rather than just the input features.
The researchers show that this Lebesgue-type cutting can lead to larger reductions in the variance of the response variable, compared to the standard CART splitting used in random forests. This property is beneficial for the ensemble part of RLF, as it can potentially improve the overall predictive performance.
The researchers also provide a theoretical analysis of the asymptotic (long-term) behavior of RLF under different parameter settings. They demonstrate the flexibility and effectiveness of RLF through experiments on simulated data and real-world datasets, showing that it can outperform the original random forest algorithm.
Technical Explanation
The core idea behind the Riemann-Lebesgue Forest (RLF) method is to mimic how a measurable function can be approximated by partitioning its range into a few intervals. To achieve this, the researchers developed a new tree learner called the Riemann-Lebesgue Tree (RLT).
RLT has the capability to perform a special type of splitting called "Lebesgue-type cutting," where it can split nodes based on the response variable (the value you're trying to predict) rather than just the input features. The researchers show that this Lebesgue-type cutting can lead to larger variance reduction in the response variable, compared to the standard CART splitting used in random forests.
The researchers also provide a theoretical analysis of the asymptotic normality of RLF under different parameter settings. They demonstrate the flexibility and competitive performance of RLF through experiments on simulated data and real-world datasets, showing that it can outperform the original random forest algorithm.
Critical Analysis
The paper presents a novel and interesting approach to ensemble learning for regression tasks. The researchers have provided a solid theoretical foundation for the Riemann-Lebesgue Forest (RLF) method, including the analysis of the asymptotic behavior of the algorithm.
One potential limitation of the research is the lack of a more extensive comparison to other state-of-the-art ensemble methods for regression, such as joint optimization of piecewise linear ensembles or decentralized online regularized learning. While the authors demonstrate the competitive performance of RLF, a more comprehensive benchmark against a broader set of algorithms would help strengthen the claims about the method's superiority.
Additionally, the paper does not provide much insight into the practical implementation details or the computational complexity of the RLF algorithm. This information would be valuable for practitioners considering the adoption of the method in real-world applications.
Overall, the Riemann-Lebesgue Forest is a promising new approach to ensemble learning, and the paper provides a solid foundation for future research in this direction. Researchers and practitioners should carefully consider the tradeoffs and limitations of the method when evaluating its suitability for their specific use cases.
Conclusion
The Riemann-Lebesgue Forest (RLF) is a novel ensemble method proposed for regression tasks. The key innovation is the introduction of a new tree learner, the Riemann-Lebesgue Tree (RLT), which can perform a specialized type of splitting called Lebesgue-type cutting. This cutting mechanism can lead to larger variance reduction in the response variable, resulting in improved predictive performance for the overall ensemble.
The researchers have provided a strong theoretical foundation for RLF, including an analysis of its asymptotic behavior. The experiments demonstrate the flexibility and competitive performance of RLF compared to the original random forest algorithm. While the method shows promise, further research is needed to better understand its practical implementation details and to benchmark it against a wider range of state-of-the-art ensemble techniques for regression.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
↗️
0
Riemann-Lebesgue Forest for Regression
Tian Qin, Wei-Min Huang
We propose a novel ensemble method called Riemann-Lebesgue Forest (RLF) for regression. The core idea in RLF is to mimic the way how a measurable function can be approximated by partitioning its range into a few intervals. With this idea in mind, we develop a new tree learner named Riemann-Lebesgue Tree (RLT) which has a chance to perform Lebesgue type cutting,i.e splitting the node from response $Y$ at certain non-terminal nodes. We show that the optimal Lebesgue type cutting results in larger variance reduction in response $Y$ than ordinary CART cite{Breiman1984ClassificationAR} cutting (an analogue of Riemann partition). Such property is beneficial to the ensemble part of RLF. We also generalize the asymptotic normality of RLF under different parameter settings. Two one-dimensional examples are provided to illustrate the flexibility of RLF. The competitive performance of RLF against original random forest cite{Breiman2001RandomF} is demonstrated by experiments in simulation data and real world datasets.
Read more5/13/2024
↗️
0
Ensembles of Probabilistic Regression Trees
Alexandre Seiller (APTIKAL), 'Eric Gaussier (APTIKAL), Emilie Devijver (APTIKAL), Marianne Clausel (IECL), Sami Alkhoury
Tree-based ensemble methods such as random forests, gradient-boosted trees, and Bayesianadditive regression trees have been successfully used for regression problems in many applicationsand research studies. In this paper, we study ensemble versions of probabilisticregression trees that provide smooth approximations of the objective function by assigningeach observation to each region with respect to a probability distribution. We prove thatthe ensemble versions of probabilistic regression trees considered are consistent, and experimentallystudy their bias-variance trade-off and compare them with the state-of-the-art interms of performance prediction.
Read more6/21/2024
0
Theoretical and Empirical Advances in Forest Pruning
Albert Dorador
Decades after their inception, regression forests continue to provide state-of-the-art accuracy, outperforming in this respect alternative machine learning models such as regression trees or even neural networks. However, being an ensemble method, the one aspect where regression forests tend to severely underperform regression trees is interpretability. In the present work, we revisit forest pruning, an approach that aims to have the best of both worlds: the accuracy of regression forests and the interpretability of regression trees. This pursuit, whose foundation lies at the core of random forest theory, has seen vast success in empirical studies. In this paper, we contribute theoretical results that support and qualify those empirical findings; namely, we prove the asymptotic advantage of a Lasso-pruned forest over its unpruned counterpart under extremely weak assumptions, as well as high-probability finite-sample generalization bounds for regression forests pruned according to the main methods, which we then validate by way of simulation. Then, we test the accuracy of pruned regression forests against their unpruned counterparts on 19 different datasets (16 synthetic, 3 real). We find that in the vast majority of scenarios tested, there is at least one forest-pruning method that yields equal or better accuracy than the original full forest (in expectation), while just using a small fraction of the trees. We show that, in some cases, the reduction in the size of the forest is so dramatic that the resulting sub-forest can be meaningfully merged into a single tree, obtaining a level of interpretability that is qualitatively superior to that of the original regression forest, which remains a black box.
Read more9/24/2024
🗣️
0
Adaptive Split Balancing for Optimal Random Forest
Yuqian Zhang, Weijie Ji, Jelena Bradic
In this paper, we propose a new random forest algorithm that constructs the trees using a novel adaptive split-balancing method. Rather than relying on the widely-used random feature selection, we propose a permutation-based balanced splitting criterion. The adaptive split balancing forest (ASBF), achieves minimax optimality under the Lipschitz class. Its localized version, which fits local regressions at the leaf level, attains the minimax rate under the broad Holder class $mathcal{H}^{q,beta}$ of problems for any $qinmathbb{N}$ and $betain(0,1]$. We identify that over-reliance on auxiliary randomness in tree construction may compromise the approximation power of trees, leading to suboptimal results. Conversely, the proposed less random, permutation-based approach demonstrates optimality over a wide range of models. Although random forests are known to perform well empirically, their theoretical convergence rates are slow. Simplified versions that construct trees without data dependence offer faster rates but lack adaptability during tree growth. Our proposed method achieves optimality in simple, smooth scenarios while adaptively learning the tree structure from the data. Additionally, we establish uniform upper bounds and demonstrate that ASBF improves dimensionality dependence in average treatment effect estimation problems. Simulation studies and real-world applications demonstrate our methods' superior performance over existing random forests.
Read more9/4/2024