Evaluating In-Context Learning of Libraries for Code Generation

2311.09635

YC

0

Reddit

0

Published 4/8/2024 by Arkil Patel, Siva Reddy, Dzmitry Bahdanau, Pradeep Dasigi

🛸

Abstract

Contemporary Large Language Models (LLMs) exhibit a high degree of code generation and comprehension capability. A particularly promising area is their ability to interpret code modules from unfamiliar libraries for solving user-instructed tasks. Recent work has shown that large proprietary LLMs can learn novel library usage in-context from demonstrations. These results raise several open questions: whether demonstrations of library usage is required, whether smaller (and more open) models also possess such capabilities, etc. In this work, we take a broader approach by systematically evaluating a diverse array of LLMs across three scenarios reflecting varying levels of domain specialization to understand their abilities and limitations in generating code based on libraries defined in-context. Our results show that even smaller open-source LLMs like Llama-2 and StarCoder demonstrate an adept understanding of novel code libraries based on specification presented in-context. Our findings further reveal that LLMs exhibit a surprisingly high proficiency in learning novel library modules even when provided with just natural language descriptions or raw code implementations of the functions, which are often cheaper to obtain than demonstrations. Overall, our results pave the way for harnessing LLMs in more adaptable and dynamic coding environments.

Get summaries of the top AI research delivered straight to your inbox:

Overview

  • Contemporary large language models (LLMs) exhibit strong code generation and comprehension capabilities.
  • A promising area is their ability to interpret code modules from unfamiliar libraries to solve user-instructed tasks.
  • Recent studies have shown that large proprietary LLMs can learn novel library usage from in-context demonstrations.
  • This raises questions about whether demonstrations are required, and if smaller, more open models possess similar capabilities.

Plain English Explanation

Modern, large language models (LLMs) have become highly skilled at generating and understanding code. One particularly interesting ability is their capacity to interpret code from libraries they haven't seen before, and use that code to complete tasks that users instruct them to do. Recent research has demonstrated that large, private LLMs can learn how to use new libraries just by being shown examples of how to use them.

This raises some interesting questions. Is seeing demonstrations of library usage really necessary for LLMs to learn how to use new libraries? And can smaller, more open-source language models also pick up on how to use unfamiliar libraries in this way? To answer these questions, the researchers in this paper took a broad look at the capabilities of a variety of different LLMs, testing how well they could understand and use new libraries based on different types of information provided to them.

Technical Explanation

The researchers systematically evaluated a diverse set of LLMs, including smaller open-source models like LLaMA-2 and StarCoder, across three scenarios with varying levels of domain specialization. This was done to understand the LLMs' abilities and limitations in generating code based on libraries defined in-context.

The results showed that even these smaller, open-source LLMs demonstrated a strong understanding of novel code libraries, based solely on the specification presented to them. Importantly, the LLMs were often able to learn how to use new libraries just from natural language descriptions or raw code implementations of the library functions, without needing to see full demonstrations.

These findings suggest that LLMs can be quite adaptable and capable of learning new coding capabilities on the fly, even without extensive training on specific library usage. This points to the potential for LLMs to be leveraged in more dynamic and flexible coding environments, where users can easily introduce new functionality as needed.

Critical Analysis

The paper provides valuable insights into the remarkable abilities of LLMs to learn and apply novel coding concepts from limited information. However, the research also raises some important caveats and areas for further study.

For example, the paper does not deeply explore the limitations of LLMs in handling long-context information, which could impact their ability to fully comprehend complex library specifications. Additionally, the reliability and consistency of LLM code generation requires further investigation, especially for mission-critical applications.

It would also be valuable to better understand the uncertainty quantification of these LLM capabilities, to ensure users can properly assess the trustworthiness of the generated code.

Overall, this research is an important step in unlocking the potential of LLMs as adaptable coding assistants. However, continued scrutiny and refinement will be necessary to fully harness these powerful models in real-world, human-facing coding environments.

Conclusion

This paper demonstrates the remarkable ability of even smaller, open-source language models to understand and apply novel code libraries based on limited information. The findings suggest that LLMs can be highly adaptable coding tools, capable of quickly learning new functionality without extensive training.

While this research is promising, it also highlights the need for further investigation into the limitations and reliability of these LLM capabilities. Continued work in areas like long-context understanding, uncertainty quantification, and human-facing code generation will be crucial to realizing the full potential of LLMs as versatile coding assistants.



This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!

Related Papers

Supervised Knowledge Makes Large Language Models Better In-context Learners

Supervised Knowledge Makes Large Language Models Better In-context Learners

Linyi Yang, Shuibai Zhang, Zhuohao Yu, Guangsheng Bao, Yidong Wang, Jindong Wang, Ruochen Xu, Wei Ye, Xing Xie, Weizhu Chen, Yue Zhang

YC

0

Reddit

0

Large Language Models (LLMs) exhibit emerging in-context learning abilities through prompt engineering. The recent progress in large-scale generative models has further expanded their use in real-world language applications. However, the critical challenge of improving the generalizability and factuality of LLMs in natural language understanding and question answering remains under-explored. While previous in-context learning research has focused on enhancing models to adhere to users' specific instructions and quality expectations, and to avoid undesired outputs, little to no work has explored the use of task-Specific fine-tuned Language Models (SLMs) to improve LLMs' in-context learning during the inference stage. Our primary contribution is the establishment of a simple yet effective framework that enhances the reliability of LLMs as it: 1) generalizes out-of-distribution data, 2) elucidates how LLMs benefit from discriminative models, and 3) minimizes hallucinations in generative tasks. Using our proposed plug-in method, enhanced versions of Llama 2 and ChatGPT surpass their original versions regarding generalizability and factuality. We offer a comprehensive suite of resources, including 16 curated datasets, prompts, model checkpoints, and LLM outputs across 9 distinct tasks. The code and data are released at: https://github.com/YangLinyi/Supervised-Knowledge-Makes-Large-Language-Models-Better-In-context-Learners. Our empirical analysis sheds light on the advantages of incorporating discriminative models into LLMs and highlights the potential of our methodology in fostering more reliable LLMs.

Read more

4/12/2024

🛸

Analyzing LLM Usage in an Advanced Computing Class in India

Chaitanya Arora, Utkarsh Venaik, Pavit Singh, Sahil Goyal, Jatin Tyagi, Shyama Goel, Ujjwal Singhal, Dhruv Kumar

YC

0

Reddit

0

This paper investigates the usage patterns of undergraduate and graduate students when engaging with large language models (LLMs) to tackle programming assignments in the context of advanced computing courses. Existing work predominantly focuses on the influence of LLMs in introductory programming contexts. Additionally, there is a scarcity of studies analyzing actual conversations between students and LLMs. Our study provides a comprehensive quantitative and qualitative analysis of raw interactions between students and LLMs within an advanced computing course (Distributed Systems) at an Indian University. We further complement this by conducting student interviews to gain deeper insights into their usage patterns. Our study shows that students make use of large language models (LLMs) in various ways: generating code or debugging code by identifying and fixing errors. They also copy and paste assignment descriptions into LLM interfaces for specific solutions, ask conceptual questions about complex programming ideas or theoretical concepts, and generate test cases to check code functionality and robustness. Our analysis includes over 4,000 prompts from 411 students and conducting interviews with 10 students. Our analysis shows that LLMs excel at generating boilerplate code and assisting in debugging, while students handle the integration of components and system troubleshooting. This aligns with the learning objectives of advanced computing courses, which are oriented towards teaching students how to build systems and troubleshoot, with less emphasis on generating code from scratch. Therefore, LLM tools can be leveraged to increase student productivity, as shown by the data we collected. This study contributes to the ongoing discussion on LLM use in education, advocating for their usefulness in advanced computing courses to complement higher-level learning and productivity.

Read more

4/9/2024

🛸

LLMs for Science: Usage for Code Generation and Data Analysis

Mohamed Nejjar, Luca Zacharias, Fabian Stiehle, Ingo Weber

YC

0

Reddit

0

Large language models (LLMs) have been touted to enable increased productivity in many areas of today's work life. Scientific research as an area of work is no exception: the potential of LLM-based tools to assist in the daily work of scientists has become a highly discussed topic across disciplines. However, we are only at the very onset of this subject of study. It is still unclear how the potential of LLMs will materialise in research practice. With this study, we give first empirical evidence on the use of LLMs in the research process. We have investigated a set of use cases for LLM-based tools in scientific research, and conducted a first study to assess to which degree current tools are helpful. In this paper we report specifically on use cases related to software engineering, such as generating application code and developing scripts for data analytics. While we studied seemingly simple use cases, results across tools differ significantly. Our results highlight the promise of LLM-based tools in general, yet we also observe various issues, particularly regarding the integrity of the output these tools provide.

Read more

4/24/2024

🌀

In-context Learning Generalizes, But Not Always Robustly: The Case of Syntax

Aaron Mueller, Albert Webson, Jackson Petty, Tal Linzen

YC

0

Reddit

0

In-context learning (ICL) is now a common method for teaching large language models (LLMs) new tasks: given labeled examples in the input context, the LLM learns to perform the task without weight updates. Do models guided via ICL infer the underlying structure of the task defined by the context, or do they rely on superficial heuristics that only generalize to identically distributed examples? We address this question using transformations tasks and an NLI task that assess sensitivity to syntax - a requirement for robust language understanding. We further investigate whether out-of-distribution generalization can be improved via chain-of-thought prompting, where the model is provided with a sequence of intermediate computation steps that illustrate how the task ought to be performed. In experiments with models from the GPT, PaLM, and Llama 2 families, we find large variance across LMs. The variance is explained more by the composition of the pre-training corpus and supervision methods than by model size; in particular, models pre-trained on code generalize better, and benefit more from chain-of-thought prompting.

Read more

4/11/2024