Evaluating Gender Bias of Pre-trained Language Models in Natural Language Inference by Considering All Labels

Overview

• Researchers investigated gender biases in pre-trained language models (PLMs) across multiple languages
• They proposed a new bias evaluation method called NLI-CoAL that considers all three labels in natural language inference (NLI) tasks
• The method creates evaluation datasets in English, Japanese, and Chinese to measure biases in PLMs across languages

Plain English Explanation

Language models, which are AI systems trained on large amounts of text data, can sometimes develop biases - for example, associating certain occupations more strongly with one gender over another. This can lead to problems when these models are used in real-world applications.

In this research, the team focused on evaluating gender biases in language models across different languages - English, Japanese, and Chinese. Rather than just looking at whether a model makes the "right" or "wrong" prediction, they created a more nuanced evaluation method called NLI-CoAL.

NLI is a task where the model has to determine whether a given statement (the "premise") can be inferred from another statement (the "hypothesis"). NLI-CoAL looks at all three possible outcomes - entailment, neutral, and contradiction - to get a better sense of how the model is reasoning and where biases might be creeping in.

The researchers built datasets in each language that capture different types of gender biases, then used NLI-CoAL to measure how the language models performed. This allowed them to identify biases that might have been missed by simpler evaluation methods.

Importantly, they found gender biases not only in English language models, but also in Japanese and Chinese models. This suggests that these issues are widespread and that we need to be vigilant about measuring and addressing them as these technologies are developed and deployed around the world.

Technical Explanation

The researchers first created three groups of evaluation data for the NLI task, each representing a different type of gender bias:

1. Stereotypical gender biases: Premises and hypotheses that reinforce common gender stereotypes.
2. Occupational gender biases: Premises and hypotheses related to gender and occupation.
3. Relational gender biases: Premises and hypotheses involving familial or romantic relationships.

They then defined a bias measure based on the model's output probabilities for the three NLI labels (entailment, neutral, contradiction) across these data groups. This "NLI-CoAL" (Comprehensive Bias Alignment) metric aims to better capture biased inferences that may be associated with specific labels, rather than just looking at overall accuracy.

The researchers conducted experiments to validate their NLI-CoAL metric, showing that it can distinguish biased, incorrect inferences from non-biased incorrect inferences better than a baseline approach. They created NLI datasets in English, Japanese, and Chinese, and used their metric to analyze gender biases in language models across these languages.

The results revealed gender biases in language models for all three languages, confirming that these issues are not limited to English-language models. The researchers were the first to construct such evaluation datasets and measure biases in Japanese and Chinese language models.

Critical Analysis

The researchers acknowledge several limitations in their work. First, the evaluation datasets they created, while comprehensive, may not capture the full range of gender biases present in language models. There may be other types of biases that are not represented.

Additionally, the NLI-CoAL metric, while an improvement over previous approaches, still relies on human judgments to categorize biases into the three data groups. There is inherent subjectivity in this process that could affect the results.

The researchers also note that their analysis focuses on gender biases, but language models may exhibit biases along other demographic dimensions as well, such as race, age, or socioeconomic status. Further research would be needed to understand the intersectional nature of these biases.

Overall, this work represents an important step forward in measuring and understanding gender biases in language models across multiple languages. However, continued effort will be needed to develop more robust and comprehensive bias evaluation techniques, as well as to identify effective strategies for mitigating these biases in the development of language AI systems.

Conclusion

This research paper proposes a new method, NLI-CoAL, for comprehensively evaluating gender biases in pre-trained language models across multiple languages. By considering all three labels in natural language inference tasks, the authors were able to uncover biased inferences that might have been missed by simpler evaluation approaches.

The findings confirm that gender biases are prevalent not only in English language models, but also in Japanese and Chinese models. This underscores the importance of addressing these issues as language AI systems are developed and deployed globally.

While the NLI-CoAL method represents an important advance, the researchers acknowledge limitations and suggest areas for further work, such as exploring biases along other demographic dimensions. Continued research and vigilance will be necessary to ensure language technologies are equitable and avoid perpetuating harmful stereotypes.