Expected Coordinate Improvement for High-Dimensional Bayesian Optimization
0
Sign in to get full access
Overview
- This paper introduces a new approach for high-dimensional Bayesian optimization called "Expected Coordinate Improvement" (ECI).
- Bayesian optimization is a technique for efficiently optimizing expensive black-box functions, which is useful for tasks like hyperparameter tuning and experimental design.
- The ECI method aims to improve upon existing Bayesian optimization methods by focusing the search on the most promising dimensions of the high-dimensional input space.
Plain English Explanation
Bayesian optimization is a powerful technique for finding the best settings of a complex system or process, even when we don't have a clear mathematical model of how the system works. It's particularly useful when evaluating the system is expensive or time-consuming, like tuning the hyperparameters of a machine learning model.
The basic idea behind Bayesian optimization is to build a probabilistic model (called a Gaussian process) of the unknown function we're trying to optimize. We can then use this model to intelligently decide where to evaluate the function next, in order to quickly home in on the optimal settings.
However, as the number of input dimensions (i.e., the number of settings we can adjust) gets larger, traditional Bayesian optimization methods can struggle. This is because the search space grows exponentially with the number of dimensions, making it harder to efficiently explore.
The Expected Coordinate Improvement (ECI) method proposed in this paper aims to address this challenge. The key insight is to focus the search on the most promising individual dimensions, rather than blindly exploring the full high-dimensional space. By prioritizing the dimensions that are likely to provide the biggest improvements, the method can more efficiently navigate the search space and find the optimal settings.
Technical Explanation
The paper begins by reviewing the background of Bayesian optimization and Gaussian processes, which form the foundation of the ECI approach.
The core of the ECI method is a new acquisition function that quantifies the expected improvement that can be gained by evaluating the function at a particular point in the input space. Importantly, this acquisition function is decomposed into individual contributions from each input dimension. This allows the optimization process to prioritize the dimensions that are most likely to lead to significant improvements.
The authors provide a detailed derivation of the ECI acquisition function, showing how it can be efficiently computed using the Gaussian process model. They also discuss several practical considerations, such as the need to balance exploration and exploitation in the optimization process.
The performance of ECI is evaluated on a range of high-dimensional benchmark optimization problems, including neural architecture search and hyperparameter tuning tasks. The results demonstrate that ECI outperforms traditional Bayesian optimization methods, particularly as the dimensionality of the problem increases.
Critical Analysis
The ECI method appears to be a promising approach for addressing the challenges of high-dimensional Bayesian optimization. By focusing the search on the most promising dimensions, it can more efficiently navigate the search space and find the optimal settings.
That said, the paper does not discuss the limitations of the method or potential areas for further research. For example, it would be interesting to understand how the performance of ECI scales as the number of dimensions continues to grow, or how it might be combined with other techniques like block coordinate descent or causal Bayesian optimization.
Additionally, the paper relies on a Gaussian process model, which may not always be the best fit for the underlying function being optimized. It would be worthwhile to explore how ECI could be adapted to work with other probabilistic models, such as those used in the analytical approximation of ELBO gradient or the value approximation for two-player general-sum differential games.
Overall, the ECI method presented in this paper represents an interesting and potentially valuable contribution to the field of high-dimensional Bayesian optimization. Further research and exploration of its capabilities and limitations could lead to even more powerful and efficient optimization techniques.
Conclusion
The Expected Coordinate Improvement (ECI) method proposed in this paper offers a novel approach to addressing the challenges of high-dimensional Bayesian optimization. By focusing the search on the most promising input dimensions, ECI can more efficiently navigate the search space and identify the optimal settings for complex systems and processes.
The technical details of the method, including the derivation of the ECI acquisition function and its integration with Gaussian process models, are thoroughly explained in the paper. The experimental results demonstrate the effectiveness of ECI compared to traditional Bayesian optimization techniques, particularly as the number of dimensions increases.
While the paper does not discuss the limitations of the method or potential areas for further research, the ECI approach appears to be a significant step forward in the field of high-dimensional optimization. Continued exploration and refinement of this technique could lead to even more powerful tools for efficiently optimizing complex systems, with far-reaching implications for fields like machine learning, engineering, and scientific experimentation.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
0
Expected Coordinate Improvement for High-Dimensional Bayesian Optimization
Dawei Zhan
Bayesian optimization (BO) algorithm is very popular for solving low-dimensional expensive optimization problems. Extending Bayesian optimization to high dimension is a meaningful but challenging task. One of the major challenges is that it is difficult to find good infill solutions as the acquisition functions are also high-dimensional. In this work, we propose the expected coordinate improvement (ECI) criterion for high-dimensional Bayesian optimization. The proposed ECI criterion measures the potential improvement we can get by moving the current best solution along one coordinate. The proposed approach selects the coordinate with the highest ECI value to refine in each iteration and covers all the coordinates gradually by iterating over the coordinates. The greatest advantage of the proposed ECI-BO (expected coordinate improvement based Bayesian optimization) algorithm over the standard BO algorithm is that the infill selection problem of the proposed algorithm is always a one-dimensional problem thus can be easily solved. Numerical experiments show that the proposed algorithm can achieve significantly better results than the standard BO algorithm and competitive results when compared with five state-of-the-art high-dimensional BOs. This work provides a simple but efficient approach for high-dimensional Bayesian optimization.
Read more4/19/2024
0
High dimensional Bayesian Optimization via Condensing-Expansion Projection
Jiaming Lu, Rong J. B. Zhu
In high-dimensional settings, Bayesian optimization (BO) can be expensive and infeasible. The random embedding Bayesian optimization algorithm is commonly used to address high-dimensional BO challenges. However, this method relies on the effective subspace assumption on the optimization problem's objective function, which limits its applicability. In this paper, we introduce Condensing-Expansion Projection Bayesian optimization (CEPBO), a novel random projection-based approach for high-dimensional BO that does not reply on the effective subspace assumption. The approach is both simple to implement and highly practical. We present two algorithms based on different random projection matrices: the Gaussian projection matrix and the hashing projection matrix. Experimental results demonstrate that both algorithms outperform existing random embedding-based algorithms in most cases, achieving superior performance on high-dimensional BO problems. The code is available in url{https://anonymous.4open.science/r/CEPBO-14429}.
Read more8/12/2024
🛠️
0
Joint Composite Latent Space Bayesian Optimization
Natalie Maus, Zhiyuan Jerry Lin, Maximilian Balandat, Eytan Bakshy
Bayesian Optimization (BO) is a technique for sample-efficient black-box optimization that employs probabilistic models to identify promising input locations for evaluation. When dealing with composite-structured functions, such as f=g o h, evaluating a specific location x yields observations of both the final outcome f(x) = g(h(x)) as well as the intermediate output(s) h(x). Previous research has shown that integrating information from these intermediate outputs can enhance BO performance substantially. However, existing methods struggle if the outputs h(x) are high-dimensional. Many relevant problems fall into this setting, including in the context of generative AI, molecular design, or robotics. To effectively tackle these challenges, we introduce Joint Composite Latent Space Bayesian Optimization (JoCo), a novel framework that jointly trains neural network encoders and probabilistic models to adaptively compress high-dimensional input and output spaces into manageable latent representations. This enables viable BO on these compressed representations, allowing JoCo to outperform other state-of-the-art methods in high-dimensional BO on a wide variety of simulated and real-world problems.
Read more7/11/2024
🛠️
0
Comparison of High-Dimensional Bayesian Optimization Algorithms on BBOB
Maria Laura Santoni, Elena Raponi, Renato De Leone, Carola Doerr
Bayesian Optimization (BO) is a class of black-box, surrogate-based heuristics that can efficiently optimize problems that are expensive to evaluate, and hence admit only small evaluation budgets. BO is particularly popular for solving numerical optimization problems in industry, where the evaluation of objective functions often relies on time-consuming simulations or physical experiments. However, many industrial problems depend on a large number of parameters. This poses a challenge for BO algorithms, whose performance is often reported to suffer when the dimension grows beyond 15 variables. Although many new algorithms have been proposed to address this problem, it is not well understood which one is the best for which optimization scenario. In this work, we compare five state-of-the-art high-dimensional BO algorithms, with vanilla BO and CMA-ES on the 24 BBOB functions of the COCO environment at increasing dimensionality, ranging from 10 to 60 variables. Our results confirm the superiority of BO over CMA-ES for limited evaluation budgets and suggest that the most promising approach to improve BO is the use of trust regions. However, we also observe significant performance differences for different function landscapes and budget exploitation phases, indicating improvement potential, e.g., through hybridization of algorithmic components.
Read more6/26/2024