Explaining Chest X-ray Pathology Models using Textual Concepts
0
Sign in to get full access
Overview
- This paper presents a novel approach to explaining the predictions of chest X-ray pathology models using textual concepts.
- The researchers developed a vision-language model that can associate visual features in chest X-rays with relevant textual descriptions, allowing for more interpretable model explanations.
- The model was evaluated on various publicly available chest X-ray datasets, demonstrating its ability to generate concept-based explanations that align with human understanding.
Plain English Explanation
The researchers in this paper have found a way to make AI models that analyze chest X-ray images more understandable. These AI models can detect things like diseases or abnormalities in the X-rays, but it's often hard to understand how they make their decisions.
To address this, the researchers developed a special kind of AI model that can connect the visual features it sees in the X-ray images to relevant textual descriptions. For example, if the model detects a certain pattern in the X-ray that indicates pneumonia, it can then provide an explanation using words that a human would understand, like "there is an area of increased opacity in the lower right lung field, consistent with pneumonia."
This allows the AI model to explain its reasoning in a way that aligns with how a human doctor would interpret the X-ray. The researchers tested this approach on several different chest X-ray datasets and found that it could generate explanations that matched what medical experts would say.
This is an important step towards making AI models in healthcare more transparent and trustworthy. By being able to understand how these models arrive at their conclusions, doctors and patients can have more confidence in relying on them to make important medical decisions.
Technical Explanation
The researchers developed a vision-language model that learns to associate visual features in chest X-rays with relevant textual descriptions. This model takes an input X-ray image and outputs a set of textual concepts that explain the visual characteristics observed.
To train this model, the researchers leveraged a large dataset of chest X-ray images paired with corresponding radiology reports. They used a joint chest X-ray diagnosis and clinical visual explanation architecture to learn the mapping between visual features and textual concepts.
The model was evaluated on several publicly available chest X-ray datasets, including ChestX-ray8, CheXpert, and MIMIC-CXR. The concept-based explanations generated by the model were found to align well with the reasoning of human radiologists, demonstrating its potential for improving the interpretability of chest X-ray pathology models.
Critical Analysis
The researchers acknowledge several limitations of their approach. First, the textual concepts generated by the model are limited to those present in the training data, which may not capture the full breadth of radiological terminology and descriptions. Additionally, the model's performance is dependent on the quality and completeness of the radiology reports used for training.
Another potential issue is that the concept-based explanations, while more interpretable, may not fully capture the complex reasoning that goes into a radiologist's diagnosis. There could be nuanced visual patterns or contextual factors that are not easily represented by individual textual concepts.
Further research is needed to explore ways of generating more comprehensive and customizable explanations, potentially by incorporating additional domain knowledge or allowing for more flexible language generation. Evaluating the model's usefulness in real-world clinical settings would also be an important next step.
Conclusion
This paper presents a promising approach for improving the interpretability of chest X-ray pathology models by leveraging a vision-language model to generate concept-based explanations. The researchers have demonstrated the model's ability to align its explanations with human radiological reasoning, which could enhance trust and adoption of these AI-powered diagnostic tools in healthcare.
As AI continues to play a greater role in medical imaging analysis, developing methods for transparent and explainable AI will be crucial. The work described in this paper represents an important step towards this goal, with the potential to improve clinical decision-making and patient outcomes.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
0
Explaining Chest X-ray Pathology Models using Textual Concepts
Vijay Sadashivaiah, Mannudeep K. Kalra, Pingkun Yan, James A. Hendler
Deep learning models have revolutionized medical imaging and diagnostics, yet their opaque nature poses challenges for clinical adoption and trust. Amongst approaches to improve model interpretability, concept-based explanations aim to provide concise and human understandable explanations of any arbitrary classifier. However, such methods usually require a large amount of manually collected data with concept annotation, which is often scarce in the medical domain. In this paper, we propose Conceptual Counterfactual Explanations for Chest X-ray (CoCoX) that leverage existing vision-language models (VLM) joint embedding space to explain black-box classifier outcomes without the need for annotated datasets. Specifically, we utilize textual concepts derived from chest radiography reports and a pre-trained chest radiography-based VLM to explain three common cardiothoracic pathologies. We demonstrate that the explanations generated by our method are semantically meaningful and faithful to underlying pathologies.
Read more7/2/2024
0
ChEX: Interactive Localization and Region Description in Chest X-rays
Philip Muller, Georgios Kaissis, Daniel Rueckert
Report generation models offer fine-grained textual interpretations of medical images like chest X-rays, yet they often lack interactivity (i.e. the ability to steer the generation process through user queries) and localized interpretability (i.e. visually grounding their predictions), which we deem essential for future adoption in clinical practice. While there have been efforts to tackle these issues, they are either limited in their interactivity by not supporting textual queries or fail to also offer localized interpretability. Therefore, we propose a novel multitask architecture and training paradigm integrating textual prompts and bounding boxes for diverse aspects like anatomical regions and pathologies. We call this approach the Chest X-Ray Explainer (ChEX). Evaluations across a heterogeneous set of 9 chest X-ray tasks, including localized image interpretation and report generation, showcase its competitiveness with SOTA models while additional analysis demonstrates ChEX's interactive capabilities. Code: https://github.com/philip-mueller/chex
Read more7/16/2024
0
Contrastive Learning with Counterfactual Explanations for Radiology Report Generation
Mingjie Li, Haokun Lin, Liang Qiu, Xiaodan Liang, Ling Chen, Abdulmotaleb Elsaddik, Xiaojun Chang
Due to the common content of anatomy, radiology images with their corresponding reports exhibit high similarity. Such inherent data bias can predispose automatic report generation models to learn entangled and spurious representations resulting in misdiagnostic reports. To tackle these, we propose a novel textbf{Co}untertextbf{F}actual textbf{E}xplanations-based framework (CoFE) for radiology report generation. Counterfactual explanations serve as a potent tool for understanding how decisions made by algorithms can be changed by asking ``what if'' scenarios. By leveraging this concept, CoFE can learn non-spurious visual representations by contrasting the representations between factual and counterfactual images. Specifically, we derive counterfactual images by swapping a patch between positive and negative samples until a predicted diagnosis shift occurs. Here, positive and negative samples are the most semantically similar but have different diagnosis labels. Additionally, CoFE employs a learnable prompt to efficiently fine-tune the pre-trained large language model, encapsulating both factual and counterfactual content to provide a more generalizable prompt representation. Extensive experiments on two benchmarks demonstrate that leveraging the counterfactual explanations enables CoFE to generate semantically coherent and factually complete reports and outperform in terms of language generation and clinical efficacy metrics.
Read more7/22/2024
0
TextCAVs: Debugging vision models using text
Angus Nicolson, Yarin Gal, J. Alison Noble
Concept-based interpretability methods are a popular form of explanation for deep learning models which provide explanations in the form of high-level human interpretable concepts. These methods typically find concept activation vectors (CAVs) using a probe dataset of concept examples. This requires labelled data for these concepts -- an expensive task in the medical domain. We introduce TextCAVs: a novel method which creates CAVs using vision-language models such as CLIP, allowing for explanations to be created solely using text descriptions of the concept, as opposed to image exemplars. This reduced cost in testing concepts allows for many concepts to be tested and for users to interact with the model, testing new ideas as they are thought of, rather than a delay caused by image collection and annotation. In early experimental results, we demonstrate that TextCAVs produces reasonable explanations for a chest x-ray dataset (MIMIC-CXR) and natural images (ImageNet), and that these explanations can be used to debug deep learning-based models.
Read more8/19/2024