Exploration is Harder than Prediction: Cryptographically Separating Reinforcement Learning from Supervised Learning
2404.03774
0
0
🏅
Abstract
Supervised learning is often computationally easy in practice. But to what extent does this mean that other modes of learning, such as reinforcement learning (RL), ought to be computationally easy by extension? In this work we show the first cryptographic separation between RL and supervised learning, by exhibiting a class of block MDPs and associated decoding functions where reward-free exploration is provably computationally harder than the associated regression problem. We also show that there is no computationally efficient algorithm for reward-directed RL in block MDPs, even when given access to an oracle for this regression problem. It is known that being able to perform regression in block MDPs is necessary for finding a good policy; our results suggest that it is not sufficient. Our separation lower bound uses a new robustness property of the Learning Parities with Noise (LPN) hardness assumption, which is crucial in handling the dependent nature of RL data. We argue that separations and oracle lower bounds, such as ours, are a more meaningful way to prove hardness of learning because the constructions better reflect the practical reality that supervised learning by itself is often not the computational bottleneck.
Create account to get full access
Overview
- This research paper explores the computational complexity of reinforcement learning (RL) compared to supervised learning.
- The authors show the first cryptographic separation between RL and supervised learning, demonstrating that reward-free exploration in certain types of Markov decision processes (MDPs) is computationally harder than the associated regression problem.
- They also show that there is no computationally efficient algorithm for reward-directed RL in these MDPs, even when given access to an oracle for the regression problem.
Plain English Explanation
The paper examines whether reinforcement learning is inherently more computationally difficult than supervised learning. Supervised learning, where an algorithm learns from labeled training data, is often relatively straightforward to implement in practice. The researchers wanted to understand whether this ease of use for supervised learning necessarily extends to other modes of machine learning, such as reinforcement learning.
In reinforcement learning, an agent learns by interacting with an environment and receiving rewards or penalties for its actions. The researchers demonstrate that for certain types of Markov decision processes (MDPs), the computational difficulty of exploring the environment to find good rewards is actually greater than the difficulty of the supervised learning problem associated with that MDP.
They also show that there is no efficient algorithm for learning a good policy in these MDPs, even if you have access to a tool that can solve the supervised learning problem. This suggests that the supervised learning aspect is not the main computational bottleneck in these reinforcement learning tasks.
The researchers use a new mathematical property related to the "Learning Parities with Noise" problem to prove these separation and hardness results. This property allows them to handle the interdependent nature of reinforcement learning data, which is a key challenge in this field.
Technical Explanation
The core technical contribution of this paper is the establishment of the first cryptographic separation between reinforcement learning and supervised learning. Specifically, the authors exhibit a class of block MDPs and associated decoding functions where reward-free exploration is provably computationally harder than the associated regression problem.
Furthermore, the authors show that there is no computationally efficient algorithm for reward-directed RL in these block MDPs, even when given access to an oracle for the regression problem. This suggests that the supervised learning aspect is not the main computational bottleneck in these RL tasks.
The key technical tool used to prove these separation and hardness results is a new robustness property of the Learning Parities with Noise (LPN) hardness assumption. This property is crucial in handling the dependent nature of RL data, which is a major challenge in this domain.
Critical Analysis
The research presented in this paper provides an interesting perspective on the relative computational complexity of reinforcement learning and supervised learning. By demonstrating cryptographic separations between the two learning paradigms, the authors challenge the common assumption that supervised learning is inherently easier than reinforcement learning.
However, it is important to note that the results are specific to the class of block MDPs and associated decoding functions considered in the paper. The authors acknowledge that their constructions may not reflect the practical reality of many real-world reinforcement learning problems, where supervised learning may still be the computational bottleneck.
Additionally, the reliance on the LPN hardness assumption, while a common tool in cryptography, introduces some uncertainty around the generalizability of the results. Further research may be needed to understand whether similar separations hold under alternative hardness assumptions or in different MDP settings.
Conclusion
This paper presents an important theoretical result in the field of machine learning, challenging the common assumption that reinforcement learning is inherently more computationally complex than supervised learning. By establishing cryptographic separations and hardness results for certain classes of MDPs, the authors demonstrate that the relative difficulty of these two learning paradigms is not as straightforward as it may seem.
While the results may not directly translate to all practical reinforcement learning problems, the paper highlights the need to carefully consider the computational complexity of different learning approaches, rather than relying on intuitive notions of difficulty. This work paves the way for a more nuanced understanding of the tradeoffs between reinforcement learning and supervised learning, which could have important implications for the design of efficient model-based reinforcement learning algorithms and the development of effective learning strategies in a variety of applications.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
🤿
Near-Optimal Learning and Planning in Separated Latent MDPs
Fan Chen, Constantinos Daskalakis, Noah Golowich, Alexander Rakhlin
0
0
We study computational and statistical aspects of learning Latent Markov Decision Processes (LMDPs). In this model, the learner interacts with an MDP drawn at the beginning of each epoch from an unknown mixture of MDPs. To sidestep known impossibility results, we consider several notions of separation of the constituent MDPs. The main thrust of this paper is in establishing a nearly-sharp *statistical threshold* for the horizon length necessary for efficient learning. On the computational side, we show that under a weaker assumption of separability under the optimal policy, there is a quasi-polynomial algorithm with time complexity scaling in terms of the statistical threshold. We further show a near-matching time complexity lower bound under the exponential time hypothesis.
6/13/2024
🏅
Distributionally Robust Reinforcement Learning with Interactive Data Collection: Fundamental Hardness and Near-Optimal Algorithm
Miao Lu, Han Zhong, Tong Zhang, Jose Blanchet
0
0
The sim-to-real gap, which represents the disparity between training and testing environments, poses a significant challenge in reinforcement learning (RL). A promising approach to addressing this challenge is distributionally robust RL, often framed as a robust Markov decision process (RMDP). In this framework, the objective is to find a robust policy that achieves good performance under the worst-case scenario among all environments within a pre-specified uncertainty set centered around the training environment. Unlike previous work, which relies on a generative model or a pre-collected offline dataset enjoying good coverage of the deployment environment, we tackle robust RL via interactive data collection, where the learner interacts with the training environment only and refines the policy through trial and error. In this robust RL paradigm, two main challenges emerge: managing distributional robustness while striking a balance between exploration and exploitation during data collection. Initially, we establish that sample-efficient learning without additional assumptions is unattainable owing to the curse of support shift; i.e., the potential disjointedness of the distributional supports between the training and testing environments. To circumvent such a hardness result, we introduce the vanishing minimal value assumption to RMDPs with a total-variation (TV) distance robust set, postulating that the minimal value of the optimal robust value function is zero. We prove that such an assumption effectively eliminates the support shift issue for RMDPs with a TV distance robust set, and present an algorithm with a provable sample complexity guarantee. Our work makes the initial step to uncovering the inherent difficulty of robust RL via interactive data collection and sufficient conditions for designing a sample-efficient algorithm accompanied by sharp sample complexity analysis.
4/5/2024
🤷
Light-weight probing of unsupervised representations for Reinforcement Learning
Wancong Zhang, Anthony GX-Chen, Vlad Sobal, Yann LeCun, Nicolas Carion
0
0
Unsupervised visual representation learning offers the opportunity to leverage large corpora of unlabeled trajectories to form useful visual representations, which can benefit the training of reinforcement learning (RL) algorithms. However, evaluating the fitness of such representations requires training RL algorithms which is computationally intensive and has high variance outcomes. Inspired by the vision community, we study whether linear probing can be a proxy evaluation task for the quality of unsupervised RL representation. Specifically, we probe for the observed reward in a given state and the action of an expert in a given state, both of which are generally applicable to many RL domains. Through rigorous experimentation, we show that the probing tasks are strongly rank correlated with the downstream RL performance on the Atari100k Benchmark, while having lower variance and up to 600x lower computational cost. This provides a more efficient method for exploring the space of pretraining algorithms and identifying promising pretraining recipes without the need to run RL evaluations for every setting. Leveraging this framework, we further improve existing self-supervised learning (SSL) recipes for RL, highlighting the importance of the forward model, the size of the visual backbone, and the precise formulation of the unsupervised objective.
6/4/2024
🤷
Unsupervised Representation Learning in Deep Reinforcement Learning: A Review
Nicol`o Botteghi, Mannes Poel, Christoph Brune
0
0
This review addresses the problem of learning abstract representations of the measurement data in the context of Deep Reinforcement Learning (DRL). While the data are often ambiguous, high-dimensional, and complex to interpret, many dynamical systems can be effectively described by a low-dimensional set of state variables. Discovering these state variables from the data is a crucial aspect for (i) improving the data efficiency, robustness, and generalization of DRL methods, (ii) tackling the curse of dimensionality, and (iii) bringing interpretability and insights into black-box DRL. This review provides a comprehensive and complete overview of unsupervised representation learning in DRL by describing the main Deep Learning tools used for learning representations of the world, providing a systematic view of the method and principles, summarizing applications, benchmarks and evaluation strategies, and discussing open challenges and future directions.
5/2/2024