Exploring Robustness in Doctor-Patient Conversation Summarization: An Analysis of Out-of-Domain SOAP Notes

Read original: arXiv:2406.02826 - Published 6/6/2024 by Yu-Wen Chen, Julia Hirschberg
Total Score

0

Exploring Robustness in Doctor-Patient Conversation Summarization: An Analysis of Out-of-Domain SOAP Notes

Sign in to get full access

or

If you already have an account, we'll log you in

Overview

  • This paper explores the robustness of doctor-patient conversation summarization models when applied to out-of-domain medical notes called "SOAP notes".
  • The researchers analyze the performance of existing summarization models on this new data, which has different formatting and content compared to the training data the models were originally developed on.
  • The goal is to understand the limitations of current models and identify areas for improvement to make them more generalizable across diverse medical documentation.

Plain English Explanation

Summarizing conversations between doctors and patients is an important task, as it helps capture the key points discussed during an appointment. Comparing Two Model Designs for Clinical Note Generation and Comparative Analysis of Open-Source Language Models for Summarizing Medical Notes have explored this topic previously.

However, most existing summarization models are trained on a specific type of medical record called "SOAP notes". SOAP stands for Subjective, Objective, Assessment, and Plan - the standard structure for documenting a patient visit. In this paper, the researchers look at how well these models perform when applied to a different type of medical note, called "out-of-domain SOAP notes".

Out-of-domain SOAP notes may have a different style, format, and content compared to the training data. The researchers want to see if the models can still accurately summarize these new types of notes, or if they struggle due to the shift in domain. Understanding the strengths and limitations of current models in this scenario can help guide future research to make them more robust and adaptable across diverse medical documentation.

Adapting Open-Source Large Language Models at a Lower Cost and Adapted Large Language Models Can Outperform Medical-Specific Models on Clinical Tasks have explored ways to make language models more generalizable, which could be applied to medical summarization as well.

Technical Explanation

The researchers evaluate several state-of-the-art summarization models, including BART, on their ability to summarize out-of-domain SOAP notes. They measure performance using standard metrics like ROUGE scores, which compare the model-generated summaries to human-written reference summaries.

The results show that the models struggle to maintain performance when applied to this new data, with significant drops in scores compared to in-domain evaluation. The researchers identify several key factors that contribute to this performance degradation, including differences in medical terminology, formatting, and the overall writing style between the training and test data.

The paper provides detailed analysis of these issues and discusses potential avenues for improving model robustness, such as using more diverse training data or incorporating domain-specific fine-tuning techniques. The insights from this study can inform the development of more generalizable medical summarization systems that can better handle the heterogeneity of real-world clinical documentation.

Critical Analysis

The paper provides a thoughtful analysis of an important practical challenge in deploying summarization models in real-world clinical settings. The researchers acknowledge the limitations of their study, such as the relatively small size of the out-of-domain SOAP note dataset, and call for further research to validate and extend their findings.

One potential area for improvement could be to explore the use of transfer learning techniques, where the models are first trained on a large, diverse corpus of medical text before being fine-tuned on the specific SOAP note data. This could help the models better capture the general linguistic patterns and domain knowledge needed to handle the variability in clinical documentation.

Additionally, the researchers could investigate the performance of ensemble approaches, where multiple summarization models are combined to leverage their complementary strengths and mitigate individual weaknesses. This type of approach has shown promise in other domains and could be a fruitful direction for improving robustness in medical summarization.

Overall, this paper provides valuable insights into an important challenge facing the deployment of language models in real-world healthcare applications. The findings highlight the need for continued research to develop more adaptable and generalizable summarization systems that can truly meet the needs of clinicians and patients.

Conclusion

This paper explores the robustness of doctor-patient conversation summarization models when applied to out-of-domain medical notes, known as SOAP notes. The researchers find that existing models struggle to maintain their performance when summarizing these new types of documents, which differ in format, style, and content from the training data.

The insights from this study can inform the development of more generalizable medical summarization systems that can better handle the heterogeneity of real-world clinical documentation. Potential avenues for improvement include leveraging transfer learning, ensemble approaches, and other techniques to make the models more adaptable across diverse medical data sources. Continued research in this area is essential for deploying effective language-based tools that can truly support clinicians and improve patient care.



This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!

Follow @aimodelsfyi on 𝕏 →

Related Papers

Exploring Robustness in Doctor-Patient Conversation Summarization: An Analysis of Out-of-Domain SOAP Notes
Total Score

0

Exploring Robustness in Doctor-Patient Conversation Summarization: An Analysis of Out-of-Domain SOAP Notes

Yu-Wen Chen, Julia Hirschberg

Summarizing medical conversations poses unique challenges due to the specialized domain and the difficulty of collecting in-domain training data. In this study, we investigate the performance of state-of-the-art doctor-patient conversation generative summarization models on the out-of-domain data. We divide the summarization model of doctor-patient conversation into two configurations: (1) a general model, without specifying subjective (S), objective (O), and assessment (A) and plan (P) notes; (2) a SOAP-oriented model that generates a summary with SOAP sections. We analyzed the limitations and strengths of the fine-tuning language model-based methods and GPTs on both configurations. We also conducted a Linguistic Inquiry and Word Count analysis to compare the SOAP notes from different datasets. The results exhibit a strong correlation for reference notes across different datasets, indicating that format mismatch (i.e., discrepancies in word distribution) is not the main cause of performance decline on out-of-domain data. Lastly, a detailed analysis of SOAP notes is included to provide insights into missing information and hallucinations introduced by the models.

Read more

6/6/2024

Improving Clinical Note Generation from Complex Doctor-Patient Conversation
Total Score

0

Improving Clinical Note Generation from Complex Doctor-Patient Conversation

Yizhan Li, Sifan Wu, Christopher Smith, Thomas Lo, Bang Liu

Writing clinical notes and documenting medical exams is a critical task for healthcare professionals, serving as a vital component of patient care documentation. However, manually writing these notes is time-consuming and can impact the amount of time clinicians can spend on direct patient interaction and other tasks. Consequently, the development of automated clinical note generation systems has emerged as a clinically meaningful area of research within AI for health. In this paper, we present three key contributions to the field of clinical note generation using large language models (LLMs). First, we introduce CliniKnote, a comprehensive dataset consisting of 1,200 complex doctor-patient conversations paired with their full clinical notes. This dataset, created and curated by medical experts with the help of modern neural networks, provides a valuable resource for training and evaluating models in clinical note generation tasks. Second, we propose the K-SOAP (Keyword, Subjective, Objective, Assessment, and Plan) note format, which enhances traditional SOAP~cite{podder2023soap} (Subjective, Objective, Assessment, and Plan) notes by adding a keyword section at the top, allowing for quick identification of essential information. Third, we develop an automatic pipeline to generate K-SOAP notes from doctor-patient conversations and benchmark various modern LLMs using various metrics. Our results demonstrate significant improvements in efficiency and performance compared to standard LLM finetuning methods.

Read more

8/28/2024

Personalized Clinical Note Generation from Doctor-Patient Conversations
Total Score

0

Personalized Clinical Note Generation from Doctor-Patient Conversations

Nathan Brake, Thomas Schaaf

In this work, we present a novel technique to improve the quality of draft clinical notes for physicians. This technique is concentrated on the ability to model implicit physician conversation styles and note preferences. We also introduce a novel technique for the enrollment of new physicians when a limited number of clinical notes paired with conversations are available for that physician, without the need to re-train a model to support them. We show that our technique outperforms the baseline model by improving the ROUGE-2 score of the History of Present Illness section by 13.8%, the Physical Examination section by 88.6%, and the Assessment & Plan section by 50.8%.

Read more

8/9/2024

Comparing Two Model Designs for Clinical Note Generation; Is an LLM a Useful Evaluator of Consistency?
Total Score

0

Comparing Two Model Designs for Clinical Note Generation; Is an LLM a Useful Evaluator of Consistency?

Nathan Brake, Thomas Schaaf

Following an interaction with a patient, physicians are responsible for the submission of clinical documentation, often organized as a SOAP note. A clinical note is not simply a summary of the conversation but requires the use of appropriate medical terminology. The relevant information can then be extracted and organized according to the structure of the SOAP note. In this paper we analyze two different approaches to generate the different sections of a SOAP note based on the audio recording of the conversation, and specifically examine them in terms of note consistency. The first approach generates the sections independently, while the second method generates them all together. In this work we make use of PEGASUS-X Transformer models and observe that both methods lead to similar ROUGE values (less than 1% difference) and have no difference in terms of the Factuality metric. We perform a human evaluation to measure aspects of consistency and demonstrate that LLMs like Llama2 can be used to perform the same tasks with roughly the same agreement as the human annotators. Between the Llama2 analysis and the human reviewers we observe a Cohen Kappa inter-rater reliability of 0.79, 1.00, and 0.32 for consistency of age, gender, and body part injury, respectively. With this we demonstrate the usefulness of leveraging an LLM to measure quality indicators that can be identified by humans but are not currently captured by automatic metrics. This allows scaling evaluation to larger data sets, and we find that clinical note consistency improves by generating each new section conditioned on the output of all previously generated sections.

Read more

4/10/2024