Extrinsic Evaluation of Cultural Competence in Large Language Models
0
Sign in to get full access
Overview
- This paper explores the cultural competence of large language models (LLMs) through extrinsic evaluation.
- The researchers designed tasks to assess LLMs' ability to understand and respond appropriately to cultural contexts, going beyond simply measuring factual knowledge.
- The evaluation covers a range of cultural domains, including social norms, interpersonal sensitivity, and cultural traditions.
Plain English Explanation
The paper looks at how well large language models, the powerful AI systems that can produce human-like text, understand and respond to different cultural contexts. Rather than just testing how much factual knowledge the models have, the researchers designed tasks to see if the models can correctly interpret social norms, show interpersonal sensitivity, and understand cultural traditions. This goes beyond just checking the models' general knowledge and looks at their ability to engage with the complexities of culture. The evaluation covers a wide range of cultural domains to get a comprehensive understanding of the models' cultural competence.
Technical Explanation
The researchers developed a suite of extrinsic evaluation tasks to assess the cultural competence of large language models (LLMs). These tasks go beyond simply measuring factual knowledge and instead focus on the models' ability to understand and respond appropriately to cultural contexts.
The evaluation covers several key cultural domains, including social norms, interpersonal sensitivity, and cultural traditions. For example, the researchers tested the models' ability to identify appropriate responses to social situations, recognize emotional cues, and demonstrate knowledge of cultural practices.
Critical Analysis
The paper makes a valuable contribution by going beyond typical evaluations of LLMs' factual knowledge and exploring their cultural competence. However, the researchers acknowledge several limitations in their approach. The tasks were primarily focused on Western cultural contexts, and the evaluation did not cover the full breadth of cultural diversity globally.
Additionally, the researchers note that the performance of LLMs on these tasks may be influenced by biases in the training data, which could lead to blind spots or inaccuracies in the models' understanding of certain cultural perspectives. Further research is needed to better understand the limitations and potential biases of LLMs when it comes to cultural awareness and sensitivity.
Conclusion
This paper represents an important step in measuring and modeling the cultural competence of large language models. By designing extrinsic evaluation tasks that go beyond factual knowledge, the researchers have highlighted the need for LLMs to develop a deeper understanding of cultural contexts in order to engage effectively with diverse audiences. The insights from this work can inform the development of more culturally aware and sensitive AI systems, which will be crucial as these technologies become increasingly integrated into our daily lives.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
0
Extrinsic Evaluation of Cultural Competence in Large Language Models
Shaily Bhatt, Fernando Diaz
Productive interactions between diverse users and language technologies require outputs from the latter to be culturally relevant and sensitive. Prior works have evaluated models' knowledge of cultural norms, values, and artifacts, without considering how this knowledge manifests in downstream applications. In this work, we focus on extrinsic evaluation of cultural competence in two text generation tasks, open-ended question answering and story generation. We quantitatively and qualitatively evaluate model outputs when an explicit cue of culture, specifically nationality, is perturbed in the prompts. Although we find that model outputs do vary when varying nationalities and feature culturally relevant words, we also find weak correlations between text similarity of outputs for different countries and the cultural values of these countries. Finally, we discuss important considerations in designing comprehensive evaluation of cultural competence in user-facing tasks.
Read more6/21/2024
⚙️
0
Navigating Cultural Chasms: Exploring and Unlocking the Cultural POV of Text-To-Image Models
Mor Ventura, Eyal Ben-David, Anna Korhonen, Roi Reichart
Text-To-Image (TTI) models, such as DALL-E and StableDiffusion, have demonstrated remarkable prompt-based image generation capabilities. Multilingual encoders may have a substantial impact on the cultural agency of these models, as language is a conduit of culture. In this study, we explore the cultural perception embedded in TTI models by characterizing culture across three hierarchical tiers: cultural dimensions, cultural domains, and cultural concepts. Based on this ontology, we derive prompt templates to unlock the cultural knowledge in TTI models, and propose a comprehensive suite of evaluation techniques, including intrinsic evaluations using the CLIP space, extrinsic evaluations with a Visual-Question-Answer (VQA) model and human assessments, to evaluate the cultural content of TTI-generated images. To bolster our research, we introduce the CulText2I dataset, derived from six diverse TTI models and spanning ten languages. Our experiments provide insights regarding Do, What, Which and How research questions about the nature of cultural encoding in TTI models, paving the way for cross-cultural applications of these models.
Read more8/14/2024
0
Beyond Aesthetics: Cultural Competence in Text-to-Image Models
Nithish Kannen, Arif Ahmad, Marco Andreetto, Vinodkumar Prabhakaran, Utsav Prabhu, Adji Bousso Dieng, Pushpak Bhattacharyya, Shachi Dave
Text-to-Image (T2I) models are being increasingly adopted in diverse global communities where they create visual representations of their unique cultures. Current T2I benchmarks primarily focus on faithfulness, aesthetics, and realism of generated images, overlooking the critical dimension of cultural competence. In this work, we introduce a framework to evaluate cultural competence of T2I models along two crucial dimensions: cultural awareness and cultural diversity, and present a scalable approach using a combination of structured knowledge bases and large language models to build a large dataset of cultural artifacts to enable this evaluation. In particular, we apply this approach to build CUBE (CUltural BEnchmark for Text-to-Image models), a first-of-its-kind benchmark to evaluate cultural competence of T2I models. CUBE covers cultural artifacts associated with 8 countries across different geo-cultural regions and along 3 concepts: cuisine, landmarks, and art. CUBE consists of 1) CUBE-1K, a set of high-quality prompts that enable the evaluation of cultural awareness, and 2) CUBE-CSpace, a larger dataset of cultural artifacts that serves as grounding to evaluate cultural diversity. We also introduce cultural diversity as a novel T2I evaluation component, leveraging quality-weighted Vendi score. Our evaluations reveal significant gaps in the cultural awareness of existing models across countries and provide valuable insights into the cultural diversity of T2I outputs for under-specified prompts. Our methodology is extendable to other cultural regions and concepts, and can facilitate the development of T2I models that better cater to the global population.
Read more7/26/2024
💬
0
Cultural Bias and Cultural Alignment of Large Language Models
Yan Tao, Olga Viberg, Ryan S. Baker, Rene F. Kizilcec
Culture fundamentally shapes people's reasoning, behavior, and communication. As people increasingly use generative artificial intelligence (AI) to expedite and automate personal and professional tasks, cultural values embedded in AI models may bias people's authentic expression and contribute to the dominance of certain cultures. We conduct a disaggregated evaluation of cultural bias for five widely used large language models (OpenAI's GPT-4o/4-turbo/4/3.5-turbo/3) by comparing the models' responses to nationally representative survey data. All models exhibit cultural values resembling English-speaking and Protestant European countries. We test cultural prompting as a control strategy to increase cultural alignment for each country/territory. For recent models (GPT-4, 4-turbo, 4o), this improves the cultural alignment of the models' output for 71-81% of countries and territories. We suggest using cultural prompting and ongoing evaluation to reduce cultural bias in the output of generative AI.
Read more6/27/2024