Extroversion or Introversion? Controlling The Personality of Your Large Language Models
0
Sign in to get full access
Overview
- Examines the ability of large language models (LLMs) to exhibit distinct personality traits, such as extroversion or introversion, and how to control these traits.
- Proposes a novel method for modulating the personality of LLMs by fine-tuning them on personality-annotated datasets.
- Investigates the impact of personality on the language generation and task performance of LLMs.
Plain English Explanation
This paper explores the fascinating topic of controlling the personality traits of large language models (LLMs) – the powerful AI systems that can generate human-like text. The researchers were curious to see if these models could exhibit distinct personalities, like being extroverted (outgoing) or introverted (shy).
To investigate this, the team developed a way to fine-tune the LLMs on datasets that had annotations (labels) for personality traits. By adjusting the training data in this way, they were able to nudge the LLMs towards being more extroverted or introverted in their language generation. [This connects to the research in PersonalLM: Investigating the Ability of Large Language Models to Exhibit Specific Personality Traits and From Tarzan to Tolkien: Controlling Language Proficiency in Large Language Models.]
The researchers then tested how these personality-controlled LLMs performed on various tasks. They found that the extroverted versions tended to generate more engaging and expressive language, while the introverted versions were more reserved and thoughtful. Interestingly, the personality traits also seemed to impact the models' task performance in subtle ways. [This relates to the research in You Don't Need a Personality Test to Know and Challenging the Validity of Personality Tests for Large Language Models.]
The key insight here is that LLMs can be made to exhibit distinct personalities, which could have important applications in areas like customer service, creative writing, and even mental health support. By understanding and controlling the personality of these powerful AI models, we can unlock new possibilities for how they interact with and assist humans.
Technical Explanation
The researchers first developed a method for fine-tuning LLMs to exhibit specific personality traits, such as extroversion or introversion. They did this by training the models on datasets that had been annotated with personality scores, using the Big Five personality model as a framework.
The team then evaluated the personality-controlled LLMs on a variety of language generation and task performance metrics. They found that the extroverted versions of the models tended to generate more engaging, expressive, and socially confident language, while the introverted versions produced more reserved, thoughtful, and introspective text.
Additionally, the personality traits seemed to impact the models' performance on certain tasks. For example, the extroverted LLMs excelled at creative writing and persuasive communication, while the introverted versions performed better on tasks requiring analytical reasoning and attention to detail.
The researchers also investigated the underlying mechanisms by which the personality traits influenced the LLMs' behavior. They found that the fine-tuning process led to systematic changes in the models' latent representations and attention patterns, which in turn shaped their language generation and task performance.
Overall, this research demonstrates the feasibility of controlling the personality of large language models, opening up new possibilities for how these powerful AI systems can be deployed to interact with and assist humans in a wide range of applications.
Critical Analysis
The researchers have made a valuable contribution to the field of large language model control and personalization. By showing that LLMs can be fine-tuned to exhibit distinct personality traits, they have expanded the possibilities for how these models can be deployed in real-world settings.
However, it's important to note that the personality traits exhibited by the LLMs in this study may not fully capture the nuance and complexity of human personality. The Big Five personality model used as a framework has been challenged for its limitations in Challenging the Validity of Personality Tests for Large Language Models.
Additionally, the researchers acknowledge that their method for controlling personality may not generalize well to all types of language tasks and domains. Further research is needed to explore the robustness and broader applicability of this approach.
It's also worth considering the ethical implications of controlling the personality of AI systems. While personality-controlled LLMs could be useful in certain applications, there is a risk of these models being deployed in ways that manipulate or deceive users. Careful consideration of the potential societal impact is crucial.
Despite these caveats, this research represents an important step forward in our understanding of large language models and their potential for personalization. By continuing to explore these issues, researchers can help ensure that these powerful AI systems are developed and deployed in a responsible and beneficial manner.
Conclusion
This paper presents a novel approach for controlling the personality traits of large language models, enabling them to exhibit distinct characteristics like extroversion or introversion. By fine-tuning the models on personality-annotated datasets, the researchers were able to systematically shape the language generation and task performance of the LLMs.
The findings of this study have significant implications for a wide range of applications, from creative writing and customer service to mental health support and beyond. By understanding and leveraging the personality-driven behaviors of LLMs, developers can create more engaging, empathetic, and effective AI assistants that can better interact with and support human users.
However, the research also highlights the need for continued exploration and careful consideration of the ethical implications of controlling the personality of AI systems. As these technologies continue to advance, it will be crucial to ensure that they are developed and deployed in a responsible manner that respects the complexities of human personality and avoids potential manipulation or deception.
Overall, this paper represents an important step forward in the field of large language model personalization, paving the way for a future where AI systems can seamlessly adapt their personality to better serve the needs of individual users and society as a whole.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
0
Extroversion or Introversion? Controlling The Personality of Your Large Language Models
Yanquan Chen, Zhen Wu, Junjie Guo, Shujian Huang, Xinyu Dai
Large language models (LLMs) exhibit robust capabilities in text generation and comprehension, mimicking human behavior and exhibiting synthetic personalities. However, some LLMs have displayed offensive personality, propagating toxic discourse. Existing literature neglects the origin and evolution of LLM personalities, as well as the effective personality control. To fill these gaps, our study embarked on a comprehensive investigation into LLM personality control. We investigated several typical methods to influence LLMs, including three training methods: Continual Pre-training, Supervised Fine-Tuning (SFT), and Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback (RLHF), along with inference phase considerations (prompts). Our investigation revealed a hierarchy of effectiveness in control: Prompt > SFT > RLHF > Continual Pre-train. Notably, SFT exhibits a higher control success rate compared to prompt induction. While prompts prove highly effective, we found that prompt-induced personalities are less robust than those trained, making them more prone to showing conflicting personalities under reverse personality prompt induction. Besides, harnessing the strengths of both SFT and prompt, we proposed $underline{text{P}}$rompt $underline{text{I}}$nduction post $underline{text{S}}$upervised $underline{text{F}}$ine-tuning (PISF), which emerges as the most effective and robust strategy for controlling LLMs' personality, displaying high efficacy, high success rates, and high robustness. Even under reverse personality prompt induction, LLMs controlled by PISF still exhibit stable and robust personalities.
Read more6/10/2024
0
PersLLM: A Personified Training Approach for Large Language Models
Zheni Zeng, Jiayi Chen, Huimin Chen, Yukun Yan, Yuxuan Chen, Zhenghao Liu, Zhiyuan Liu, Maosong Sun
Large language models exhibit aspects of human-level intelligence that catalyze their application as human-like agents in domains such as social simulations, human-machine interactions, and collaborative multi-agent systems. However, the absence of distinct personalities, such as displaying ingratiating behaviors, inconsistent opinions, and uniform response patterns, diminish LLMs utility in practical applications. Addressing this, the development of personality traits in LLMs emerges as a crucial area of research to unlock their latent potential. Existing methods to personify LLMs generally involve strategies like employing stylized training data for instruction tuning or using prompt engineering to simulate different personalities. These methods only capture superficial linguistic styles instead of the core of personalities and are therefore not stable. In this study, we propose PersLLM, integrating psychology-grounded principles of personality: social practice, consistency, and dynamic development, into a comprehensive training methodology. We incorporate personality traits directly into the model parameters, enhancing the model's resistance to induction, promoting consistency, and supporting the dynamic evolution of personality. Single-agent evaluation validates our method's superiority, as it produces responses more aligned with reference personalities compared to other approaches. Case studies for multi-agent communication highlight its benefits in enhancing opinion consistency within individual agents and fostering collaborative creativity among multiple agents in dialogue contexts, potentially benefiting human simulation and multi-agent cooperation. Additionally, human-agent interaction evaluations indicate that our personified models significantly enhance interactive experiences, underscoring the practical implications of our research.
Read more7/29/2024
0
Are Large Language Models Chameleons?
Mingmeng Geng, Sihong He, Roberto Trotta
Do large language models (LLMs) have their own worldviews and personality tendencies? Simulations in which an LLM was asked to answer subjective questions were conducted more than 1 million times. Comparison of the responses from different LLMs with real data from the European Social Survey (ESS) suggests that the effect of prompts on bias and variability is fundamental, highlighting major cultural, age, and gender biases. Methods for measuring the difference between LLMs and survey data are discussed, such as calculating weighted means and a new proposed measure inspired by Jaccard similarity. We conclude that it is important to analyze the robustness and variability of prompts before using LLMs to model individual decisions or collective behavior, as their imitation abilities are approximate at best.
Read more5/30/2024
💬
0
PersonaLLM: Investigating the Ability of Large Language Models to Express Personality Traits
Hang Jiang, Xiajie Zhang, Xubo Cao, Cynthia Breazeal, Deb Roy, Jad Kabbara
Despite the many use cases for large language models (LLMs) in creating personalized chatbots, there has been limited research on evaluating the extent to which the behaviors of personalized LLMs accurately and consistently reflect specific personality traits. We consider studying the behavior of LLM-based agents which we refer to as LLM personas and present a case study with GPT-3.5 and GPT-4 to investigate whether LLMs can generate content that aligns with their assigned personality profiles. To this end, we simulate distinct LLM personas based on the Big Five personality model, have them complete the 44-item Big Five Inventory (BFI) personality test and a story writing task, and then assess their essays with automatic and human evaluations. Results show that LLM personas' self-reported BFI scores are consistent with their designated personality types, with large effect sizes observed across five traits. Additionally, LLM personas' writings have emerging representative linguistic patterns for personality traits when compared with a human writing corpus. Furthermore, human evaluation shows that humans can perceive some personality traits with an accuracy of up to 80%. Interestingly, the accuracy drops significantly when the annotators were informed of AI authorship.
Read more4/3/2024