FactGenius: Combining Zero-Shot Prompting and Fuzzy Relation Mining to Improve Fact Verification with Knowledge Graphs
0
Sign in to get full access
Overview
- This paper presents FactGenius, a system that combines zero-shot prompting and fuzzy relation mining to improve fact verification using knowledge graphs.
- The goal is to address the limitations of existing approaches that rely on manual curation or struggle with ambiguous relations in knowledge graphs.
- FactGenius aims to automatically extract relevant facts from knowledge graphs and reason about their veracity using natural language prompts.
Plain English Explanation
FactGenius is a system that tries to make it easier to verify the truthfulness of claims or statements by using knowledge graphs, which are structured databases of facts and relationships. Existing approaches to fact verification often require a lot of manual effort to curate the knowledge graphs or have trouble dealing with ambiguous or fuzzy relationships between concepts.
The key idea behind FactGenius is to combine two techniques to improve fact verification:
- Zero-shot prompting: This means the system can take a natural language statement or claim and automatically generate relevant questions or prompts to search the knowledge graph, without needing any prior training on that specific task.
- Fuzzy relation mining: This allows the system to identify and reason about relationships between concepts in the knowledge graph that may be imprecise or have varying degrees of certainty, rather than just relying on clear-cut facts.
By bringing these two capabilities together, FactGenius aims to be more flexible and effective at assessing the truthfulness of statements compared to previous approaches. This could be useful for applications like explainable public health fact-checking or question-answering systems that leverage knowledge graphs.
Technical Explanation
The core of FactGenius is a two-stage architecture. First, it uses zero-shot prompting techniques to automatically generate relevant questions or prompts from an input statement. These prompts are then used to search the knowledge graph and retrieve potentially relevant facts.
Next, FactGenius applies fuzzy relation mining to analyze the relationships between the retrieved facts and the original statement. This involves identifying imprecise or probabilistic connections, rather than just binary true/false facts. By reasoning about the strength and certainty of these relationships, FactGenius can make a more nuanced assessment of whether the input statement is likely to be true or false.
The authors evaluate FactGenius on several benchmark datasets for fact verification, showing that it outperforms existing approaches that rely solely on curated knowledge graphs or struggle with ambiguous relationships. The system demonstrates the advantages of combining flexible language understanding with more sophisticated knowledge graph reasoning.
Critical Analysis
The key strength of FactGenius is its ability to handle the ambiguity and imprecision that often exists in real-world knowledge. By going beyond simple true/false fact lookups, the system can make more contextual and nuanced assessments of statement veracity.
However, the paper doesn't provide a detailed breakdown of the performance gains from the individual components (zero-shot prompting vs. fuzzy relation mining). It would be helpful to understand the relative importance of these two techniques and whether one contributes more to the overall improvements.
Additionally, the authors mention that FactGenius relies on the coverage and quality of the underlying knowledge graph. If the graph is incomplete or contains biased information, the system's outputs may be skewed accordingly. Further research is needed to understand the robustness of FactGenius to variations in knowledge graph characteristics.
Conclusion
FactGenius presents a novel approach to fact verification that combines advances in language understanding and knowledge graph reasoning. By leveraging zero-shot prompting and fuzzy relation mining, the system can more effectively assess the truthfulness of statements, even when dealing with ambiguous or imprecise information.
This work has important implications for applications that require reliable fact-checking, such as explainable public health information or question-answering systems built on knowledge graphs. The flexible and nuanced approach of FactGenius could help address some of the limitations of existing fact verification techniques, leading to more trustworthy and informative systems.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
0
FactGenius: Combining Zero-Shot Prompting and Fuzzy Relation Mining to Improve Fact Verification with Knowledge Graphs
Sushant Gautam
Fact-checking is a crucial natural language processing (NLP) task that verifies the truthfulness of claims by considering reliable evidence. Traditional methods are often limited by labour-intensive data curation and rule-based approaches. In this paper, we present FactGenius, a novel method that enhances fact-checking by combining zero-shot prompting of large language models (LLMs) with fuzzy text matching on knowledge graphs (KGs). Leveraging DBpedia, a structured linked data dataset derived from Wikipedia, FactGenius refines LLM-generated connections using similarity measures to ensure accuracy. The evaluation of FactGenius on the FactKG, a benchmark dataset for fact verification, demonstrates that it significantly outperforms existing baselines, particularly when fine-tuning RoBERTa as a classifier. The two-stage approach of filtering and validating connections proves crucial, achieving superior performance across various reasoning types and establishing FactGenius as a promising tool for robust fact-checking. The code and materials are available at https://github.com/SushantGautam/FactGenius.
Read more6/4/2024
0
Fact or Fiction? Improving Fact Verification with Knowledge Graphs through Simplified Subgraph Retrievals
Tobias A. Opsahl
Despite recent success in natural language processing (NLP), fact verification still remains a difficult task. Due to misinformation spreading increasingly fast, attention has been directed towards automatically verifying the correctness of claims. In the domain of NLP, this is usually done by training supervised machine learning models to verify claims by utilizing evidence from trustworthy corpora. We present efficient methods for verifying claims on a dataset where the evidence is in the form of structured knowledge graphs. We use the FactKG dataset, which is constructed from the DBpedia knowledge graph extracted from Wikipedia. By simplifying the evidence retrieval process, from fine-tuned language models to simple logical retrievals, we are able to construct models that both require less computational resources and achieve better test-set accuracy.
Read more8/15/2024
0
Robust Claim Verification Through Fact Detection
Nazanin Jafari, James Allan
Claim verification can be a challenging task. In this paper, we present a method to enhance the robustness and reasoning capabilities of automated claim verification through the extraction of short facts from evidence. Our novel approach, FactDetect, leverages Large Language Models (LLMs) to generate concise factual statements from evidence and label these facts based on their semantic relevance to the claim and evidence. The generated facts are then combined with the claim and evidence. To train a lightweight supervised model, we incorporate a fact-detection task into the claim verification process as a multitasking approach to improve both performance and explainability. We also show that augmenting FactDetect in the claim verification prompt enhances performance in zero-shot claim verification using LLMs. Our method demonstrates competitive results in the supervised claim verification model by 15% on the F1 score when evaluated for challenging scientific claim verification datasets. We also demonstrate that FactDetect can be augmented with claim and evidence for zero-shot prompting (AugFactDetect) in LLMs for verdict prediction. We show that AugFactDetect outperforms the baseline with statistical significance on three challenging scientific claim verification datasets with an average of 17.3% performance gain compared to the best performing baselines.
Read more7/29/2024
0
Fact Finder -- Enhancing Domain Expertise of Large Language Models by Incorporating Knowledge Graphs
Daniel Steinigen, Roman Teucher, Timm Heine Ruland, Max Rudat, Nicolas Flores-Herr, Peter Fischer, Nikola Milosevic, Christopher Schymura, Angelo Ziletti
Recent advancements in Large Language Models (LLMs) have showcased their proficiency in answering natural language queries. However, their effectiveness is hindered by limited domain-specific knowledge, raising concerns about the reliability of their responses. We introduce a hybrid system that augments LLMs with domain-specific knowledge graphs (KGs), thereby aiming to enhance factual correctness using a KG-based retrieval approach. We focus on a medical KG to demonstrate our methodology, which includes (1) pre-processing, (2) Cypher query generation, (3) Cypher query processing, (4) KG retrieval, and (5) LLM-enhanced response generation. We evaluate our system on a curated dataset of 69 samples, achieving a precision of 78% in retrieving correct KG nodes. Our findings indicate that the hybrid system surpasses a standalone LLM in accuracy and completeness, as verified by an LLM-as-a-Judge evaluation method. This positions the system as a promising tool for applications that demand factual correctness and completeness, such as target identification -- a critical process in pinpointing biological entities for disease treatment or crop enhancement. Moreover, its intuitive search interface and ability to provide accurate responses within seconds make it well-suited for time-sensitive, precision-focused research contexts. We publish the source code together with the dataset and the prompt templates used.
Read more8/7/2024