Generalizing Orthogonalization for Models with Non-linearities

Read original: arXiv:2405.02475 - Published 6/4/2024 by David Rugamer, Chris Kolb, Tobias Weber, Lucas Kook, Thomas Nagler
Total Score

0

Generalizing Orthogonalization for Models with Non-linearities

Sign in to get full access

or

If you already have an account, we'll log you in

Overview

  • This paper proposes a generalized orthogonalization approach for training models with non-linear components, such as neural networks.
  • The authors aim to extend the benefits of orthogonalization, which has been shown to improve training and generalization in linear models, to non-linear models.
  • The proposed method involves decomposing the model into linear and non-linear components, and then orthogonalizing the linear component while preserving the non-linear component.
  • Experiments on various tasks, including image classification and language modeling, demonstrate the effectiveness of the proposed approach in improving model performance and sample efficiency.

Plain English Explanation

The paper focuses on a technique called orthogonalization, which has been shown to be helpful in training linear models. Orthogonalization is a way of making the different components of a model independent, or "orthogonal," to each other. This can improve the model's ability to learn and generalize.

However, most real-world models, such as neural networks, have non-linear components, which makes it more challenging to apply orthogonalization. The key idea in this paper is to find a way to apply orthogonalization to models with non-linearities. The authors propose decomposing the model into linear and non-linear parts, and then orthogonalizing just the linear part while keeping the non-linear part intact.

Through experiments on various tasks, the authors demonstrate that this approach can improve the model's performance and sample efficiency (i.e., the model can learn more from fewer training examples). This is a valuable contribution, as improving the efficiency of machine learning models is an important goal, especially for domains where data is scarce.

Technical Explanation

The paper presents a generalized orthogonalization (GO) framework for training models with non-linear components, such as neural networks. The key idea is to decompose the model into linear and non-linear components, and then orthogonalize the linear component while preserving the non-linear component.

Specifically, the authors propose representing the model as a linear mapping followed by a non-linear activation function. They then show how to orthogonalize the linear mapping, similar to techniques used in linear models, while keeping the non-linear activation function intact. This allows the model to benefit from the improved training and generalization properties of orthogonalized linear models, without sacrificing the expressive power of the non-linear components.

The authors evaluate the GO framework on various tasks, including image classification and language modeling, and compare it to standard training approaches. The results demonstrate that the GO framework can improve model performance and sample efficiency across a range of settings. For example, the authors show that GO can lead to better accuracy on ImageNet with fewer training samples, and better perplexity on language modeling tasks with less data.

The paper also provides theoretical analysis of the GO framework, showing how it can be interpreted as a form of constrained optimization that encourages the linear and non-linear components to learn complementary representations.

Critical Analysis

The paper presents a well-designed and thorough investigation of the proposed generalized orthogonalization (GO) framework. The key strength of the work is the principled approach to extending orthogonalization techniques, which have been successful in linear models, to the more challenging domain of non-linear models.

One potential limitation is the reliance on a specific model decomposition into linear and non-linear components. While this decomposition is reasonable for many common model architectures, it may not be as straightforward to apply the GO framework to more complex models with intricate interactions between linear and non-linear parts. Exploring frontiers of softmax and provable optimization applications could be an interesting direction for further research.

Additionally, while the paper demonstrates the effectiveness of the GO framework on several benchmark tasks, it would be valuable to see how it performs on a broader range of applications, especially in domains with more complex data and modeling requirements. Investigating the ability to generalize quantization-aware training could be one such area worth exploring.

Overall, the paper makes a valuable contribution by scaling and renormalizing high-dimensional regression and providing a principled approach to leveraging orthogonalization in non-linear models. The results are promising, and the work opens up interesting avenues for further research and practical applications.

Conclusion

This paper presents a generalized orthogonalization (GO) framework for training models with non-linear components, such as neural networks. The key idea is to decompose the model into linear and non-linear parts, and then orthogonalize the linear part while preserving the non-linear part.

The authors demonstrate the effectiveness of the GO framework through experiments on various tasks, including image classification and language modeling. The results show that the GO approach can improve model performance and sample efficiency compared to standard training techniques.

The paper makes a valuable contribution by extending the benefits of orthogonalization, which has been successful in linear models, to the more challenging domain of non-linear models. This work has the potential to lead to more efficient and effective machine learning models, especially in domains where data is scarce. Further research could explore the application of the GO framework to more complex model architectures and a broader range of real-world problems.



This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!

Follow @aimodelsfyi on 𝕏 →

Related Papers

Generalizing Orthogonalization for Models with Non-linearities
Total Score

0

Generalizing Orthogonalization for Models with Non-linearities

David Rugamer, Chris Kolb, Tobias Weber, Lucas Kook, Thomas Nagler

The complexity of black-box algorithms can lead to various challenges, including the introduction of biases. These biases present immediate risks in the algorithms' application. It was, for instance, shown that neural networks can deduce racial information solely from a patient's X-ray scan, a task beyond the capability of medical experts. If this fact is not known to the medical expert, automatic decision-making based on this algorithm could lead to prescribing a treatment (purely) based on racial information. While current methodologies allow for the orthogonalization or normalization of neural networks with respect to such information, existing approaches are grounded in linear models. Our paper advances the discourse by introducing corrections for non-linearities such as ReLU activations. Our approach also encompasses scalar and tensor-valued predictions, facilitating its integration into neural network architectures. Through extensive experiments, we validate our method's effectiveness in safeguarding sensitive data in generalized linear models, normalizing convolutional neural networks for metadata, and rectifying pre-existing embeddings for undesired attributes.

Read more

6/4/2024

Disparate Impact on Group Accuracy of Linearization for Private Inference
Total Score

0

Disparate Impact on Group Accuracy of Linearization for Private Inference

Saswat Das, Marco Romanelli, Ferdinando Fioretto

Ensuring privacy-preserving inference on cryptographically secure data is a well-known computational challenge. To alleviate the bottleneck of costly cryptographic computations in non-linear activations, recent methods have suggested linearizing a targeted portion of these activations in neural networks. This technique results in significantly reduced runtimes with often negligible impacts on accuracy. In this paper, we demonstrate that such computational benefits may lead to increased fairness costs. Specifically, we find that reducing the number of ReLU activations disproportionately decreases the accuracy for minority groups compared to majority groups. To explain these observations, we provide a mathematical interpretation under restricted assumptions about the nature of the decision boundary, while also showing the prevalence of this problem across widely used datasets and architectures. Finally, we show how a simple procedure altering the fine-tuning step for linearized models can serve as an effective mitigation strategy.

Read more

8/21/2024

A Generalization Bound for Nearly-Linear Networks
Total Score

0

A Generalization Bound for Nearly-Linear Networks

Eugene Golikov

We consider nonlinear networks as perturbations of linear ones. Based on this approach, we present novel generalization bounds that become non-vacuous for networks that are close to being linear. The main advantage over the previous works which propose non-vacuous generalization bounds is that our bounds are a-priori: performing the actual training is not required for evaluating the bounds. To the best of our knowledge, they are the first non-vacuous generalization bounds for neural nets possessing this property.

Read more

7/10/2024

🔗

Total Score

0

Robust Implicit Regularization via Weight Normalization

Hung-Hsu Chou, Holger Rauhut, Rachel Ward

Overparameterized models may have many interpolating solutions; implicit regularization refers to the hidden preference of a particular optimization method towards a certain interpolating solution among the many. A by now established line of work has shown that (stochastic) gradient descent tends to have an implicit bias towards low rank and/or sparse solutions when used to train deep linear networks, explaining to some extent why overparameterized neural network models trained by gradient descent tend to have good generalization performance in practice. However, existing theory for square-loss objectives often requires very small initialization of the trainable weights, which is at odds with the larger scale at which weights are initialized in practice for faster convergence and better generalization performance. In this paper, we aim to close this gap by incorporating and analyzing gradient flow (continuous-time version of gradient descent) with weight normalization, where the weight vector is reparameterized in terms of polar coordinates, and gradient flow is applied to the polar coordinates. By analyzing key invariants of the gradient flow and using Lojasiewicz Theorem, we show that weight normalization also has an implicit bias towards sparse solutions in the diagonal linear model, but that in contrast to plain gradient flow, weight normalization enables a robust bias that persists even if the weights are initialized at practically large scale. Experiments suggest that the gains in both convergence speed and robustness of the implicit bias are improved dramatically by using weight normalization in overparameterized diagonal linear network models.

Read more

8/26/2024