Glue pizza and eat rocks -- Exploiting Vulnerabilities in Retrieval-Augmented Generative Models
0
Sign in to get full access
Overview
- This paper explores vulnerabilities in retrieval-augmented generative models, which are large language models that use external information sources to generate text.
- The researchers demonstrate how these models can be exploited to produce harmful, offensive, or undesirable outputs by carefully crafting prompts or "triggers".
- The paper highlights the need for robust safety mechanisms and thorough testing of these AI systems to mitigate potential misuse.
Plain English Explanation
Retrieval-augmented generative models are a type of AI system that can generate text by drawing on information from external sources, like databases or the internet. This allows them to produce more informed and relevant outputs compared to models that rely solely on their training data.
However, the researchers of this paper found that these models can also be easily "tricked" into generating harmful or offensive content. By providing carefully crafted prompts or "triggers", they were able to get the models to produce text that included profanity, hate speech, and other undesirable material.
This is concerning because these AI systems are increasingly being used in real-world applications, such as conversational assistants or content generation tools. If they can be exploited to create harmful outputs, it could have serious consequences for users and society.
The paper highlights the need for AI developers to thoroughly test these models and implement robust safety mechanisms to prevent such misuse, as well as the importance of continued research into identifying and mitigating vulnerabilities in these powerful AI systems.
Technical Explanation
The paper begins by introducing retrieval-augmented generative models, which combine large language models with external information sources to generate more informed and contextual text. The researchers then describe their approach to exploiting vulnerabilities in these models.
They developed a set of "trigger" prompts that, when provided to the models, would result in the generation of harmful or offensive content. These triggers were designed to manipulate the models' retrieval and generation processes, causing them to output text that included profanity, hate speech, and other undesirable material.
Through a series of experiments, the researchers demonstrated the effectiveness of their approach across multiple retrieval-augmented models and tasks, such as open-ended text generation and question-answering. They found that even well-performing, state-of-the-art models could be exploited in this manner.
The paper also includes an analysis of the underlying mechanisms that enable these vulnerabilities, highlighting issues with the models' retrieval and reasoning capabilities, as well as potential biases in their training data.
Critical Analysis
The researchers have provided a compelling demonstration of the vulnerabilities in retrieval-augmented generative models. Their work highlights the importance of thorough testing and safety measures for these AI systems, as they can be easily exploited to produce harmful outputs.
However, the paper does not delve deeply into potential mitigating strategies or solutions to address these vulnerabilities. While the researchers mention the need for robust safety mechanisms, they do not provide specific recommendations or frameworks for how this could be achieved.
Additionally, the paper does not discuss the broader implications of these vulnerabilities, such as the potential for misuse by bad actors or the societal impact of these models generating harmful content. A more thorough discussion of these issues would help readers understand the full gravity of the problem and the urgency for solutions.
Conclusion
This paper reveals significant vulnerabilities in retrieval-augmented generative models, demonstrating how they can be exploited to produce harmful and offensive content. The researchers' work underscores the critical need for AI developers to prioritize safety and robustness in the design and deployment of these powerful systems.
As these models become increasingly integrated into real-world applications, it is essential that the research community and industry work together to identify and mitigate the vulnerabilities highlighted in this paper. Failure to do so could lead to serious consequences for users and society as a whole.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
0
Glue pizza and eat rocks -- Exploiting Vulnerabilities in Retrieval-Augmented Generative Models
Zhen Tan, Chengshuai Zhao, Raha Moraffah, Yifan Li, Song Wang, Jundong Li, Tianlong Chen, Huan Liu
Retrieval-Augmented Generative (RAG) models enhance Large Language Models (LLMs) by integrating external knowledge bases, improving their performance in applications like fact-checking and information searching. In this paper, we demonstrate a security threat where adversaries can exploit the openness of these knowledge bases by injecting deceptive content into the retrieval database, intentionally changing the model's behavior. This threat is critical as it mirrors real-world usage scenarios where RAG systems interact with publicly accessible knowledge bases, such as web scrapings and user-contributed data pools. To be more realistic, we target a realistic setting where the adversary has no knowledge of users' queries, knowledge base data, and the LLM parameters. We demonstrate that it is possible to exploit the model successfully through crafted content uploads with access to the retriever. Our findings emphasize an urgent need for security measures in the design and deployment of RAG systems to prevent potential manipulation and ensure the integrity of machine-generated content.
Read more7/1/2024
0
BadRAG: Identifying Vulnerabilities in Retrieval Augmented Generation of Large Language Models
Jiaqi Xue, Mengxin Zheng, Yebowen Hu, Fei Liu, Xun Chen, Qian Lou
Large Language Models (LLMs) are constrained by outdated information and a tendency to generate incorrect data, commonly referred to as hallucinations. Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) addresses these limitations by combining the strengths of retrieval-based methods and generative models. This approach involves retrieving relevant information from a large, up-to-date dataset and using it to enhance the generation process, leading to more accurate and contextually appropriate responses. Despite its benefits, RAG introduces a new attack surface for LLMs, particularly because RAG databases are often sourced from public data, such as the web. In this paper, we propose TrojRAG{} to identify the vulnerabilities and attacks on retrieval parts (RAG database) and their indirect attacks on generative parts (LLMs). Specifically, we identify that poisoning several customized content passages could achieve a retrieval backdoor, where the retrieval works well for clean queries but always returns customized poisoned adversarial queries. Triggers and poisoned passages can be highly customized to implement various attacks. For example, a trigger could be a semantic group like The Republican Party, Donald Trump, etc. Adversarial passages can be tailored to different contents, not only linked to the triggers but also used to indirectly attack generative LLMs without modifying them. These attacks can include denial-of-service attacks on RAG and semantic steering attacks on LLM generations conditioned by the triggers. Our experiments demonstrate that by just poisoning 10 adversarial passages can induce 98.2% success rate to retrieve the adversarial passages. Then, these passages can increase the reject ratio of RAG-based GPT-4 from 0.01% to 74.6% or increase the rate of negative responses from 0.22% to 72% for targeted queries.
Read more6/7/2024
0
Black-Box Opinion Manipulation Attacks to Retrieval-Augmented Generation of Large Language Models
Zhuo Chen, Jiawei Liu, Haotan Liu, Qikai Cheng, Fan Zhang, Wei Lu, Xiaozhong Liu
Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) is applied to solve hallucination problems and real-time constraints of large language models, but it also induces vulnerabilities against retrieval corruption attacks. Existing research mainly explores the unreliability of RAG in white-box and closed-domain QA tasks. In this paper, we aim to reveal the vulnerabilities of Retrieval-Enhanced Generative (RAG) models when faced with black-box attacks for opinion manipulation. We explore the impact of such attacks on user cognition and decision-making, providing new insight to enhance the reliability and security of RAG models. We manipulate the ranking results of the retrieval model in RAG with instruction and use these results as data to train a surrogate model. By employing adversarial retrieval attack methods to the surrogate model, black-box transfer attacks on RAG are further realized. Experiments conducted on opinion datasets across multiple topics show that the proposed attack strategy can significantly alter the opinion polarity of the content generated by RAG. This demonstrates the model's vulnerability and, more importantly, reveals the potential negative impact on user cognition and decision-making, making it easier to mislead users into accepting incorrect or biased information.
Read more7/19/2024
0
Phantom: General Trigger Attacks on Retrieval Augmented Language Generation
Harsh Chaudhari, Giorgio Severi, John Abascal, Matthew Jagielski, Christopher A. Choquette-Choo, Milad Nasr, Cristina Nita-Rotaru, Alina Oprea
Retrieval Augmented Generation (RAG) expands the capabilities of modern large language models (LLMs) in chatbot applications, enabling developers to adapt and personalize the LLM output without expensive training or fine-tuning. RAG systems use an external knowledge database to retrieve the most relevant documents for a given query, providing this context to the LLM generator. While RAG achieves impressive utility in many applications, its adoption to enable personalized generative models introduces new security risks. In this work, we propose new attack surfaces for an adversary to compromise a victim's RAG system, by injecting a single malicious document in its knowledge database. We design Phantom, general two-step attack framework against RAG augmented LLMs. The first step involves crafting a poisoned document designed to be retrieved by the RAG system within the top-k results only when an adversarial trigger, a specific sequence of words acting as backdoor, is present in the victim's queries. In the second step, a specially crafted adversarial string within the poisoned document triggers various adversarial attacks in the LLM generator, including denial of service, reputation damage, privacy violations, and harmful behaviors. We demonstrate our attacks on multiple LLM architectures, including Gemma, Vicuna, and Llama.
Read more6/3/2024