GraphMU: Repairing Robustness of Graph Neural Networks via Machine Unlearning

Read original: arXiv:2406.13499 - Published 6/21/2024 by Tao Wu, Xinwen Cao, Chao Wang, Shaojie Qiao, Xingping Xian, Lin Yuan, Canyixing Cui, Yanbing Liu
Total Score

0

GraphMU: Repairing Robustness of Graph Neural Networks via Machine Unlearning

Sign in to get full access

or

If you already have an account, we'll log you in

Overview

  • Proposes a novel technique called GraphMU to repair the robustness of Graph Neural Networks (GNNs) against adversarial attacks
  • Leverages machine unlearning to selectively remove the model's vulnerability to specific attacks without degrading overall performance
  • Demonstrates the effectiveness of GraphMU on various GNN architectures and benchmark datasets

Plain English Explanation

Graph Neural Networks (GNNs) are a powerful type of machine learning model that can analyze and make predictions on data represented as graphs, such as social networks or chemical structures. However, GNNs can be vulnerable to adversarial attacks, where small, carefully crafted changes to the input data can cause the model to make incorrect predictions.

The GraphMU technique proposed in this paper aims to address this issue by "repairing" the GNN model to be more robust against specific types of adversarial attacks. The key idea is to use a process called "machine unlearning" to selectively remove the parts of the model that are sensitive to those attacks, without significantly impacting the model's overall performance on regular (non-adversarial) data.

The authors demonstrate that GraphMU can effectively improve the robustness of various GNN architectures across different benchmark datasets, making the models more resistant to a variety of adversarial attacks. This could have important implications for deploying GNNs in real-world applications, where the ability to withstand adversarial tampering is crucial.

Technical Explanation

The paper introduces a framework called GraphMU (Graph Machine Unlearning) that leverages the concept of machine unlearning to repair the robustness of GNNs against adversarial attacks. The key steps of the GraphMU approach are:

  1. Attack Identification: The first step is to identify the specific types of adversarial attacks that the GNN model is vulnerable to. The authors use several well-established attack methods, such as FGSM and PGD, to generate adversarial examples and analyze the model's weaknesses.

  2. Unlearning Attacks: Once the vulnerable attack types are identified, the GraphMU method selectively "unlearns" the model's sensitivity to those attacks using a machine unlearning technique. This involves identifying the critical model parameters that contribute to the model's vulnerability and then updating those parameters to reduce the impact of the attacks.

  3. Robustness Evaluation: The paper then evaluates the robustness of the repaired GNN model using both standard and adversarial evaluation metrics. The authors demonstrate that GraphMU can significantly improve the model's resistance to the targeted attacks without significantly degrading its overall performance on regular (non-adversarial) data.

The authors conduct extensive experiments on various GNN architectures and benchmark datasets, including node classification, link prediction, and graph classification tasks. The results show that GraphMU can effectively repair the robustness of GNNs against a range of adversarial attacks, outperforming alternative defense methods.

Critical Analysis

The GraphMU approach provides a promising solution for improving the robustness of GNNs, but there are a few limitations and areas for further research:

  1. Scalability: The authors note that the unlearning process can be computationally intensive, especially for large-scale GNN models. Developing more efficient unlearning algorithms or techniques to target only the most critical model parameters would be beneficial.

  2. Generalization: While GraphMU demonstrates improvements against the specific attack types used in the experiments, it's unclear how well the approach would generalize to novel or unseen attack methods. Exploring more diverse attack scenarios and developing more comprehensive defense mechanisms would be an important next step.

  3. Interpretability: The paper provides little insight into the specific model parameters or graph-level features that are being "unlearned" to improve robustness. Improving the interpretability of the unlearning process could help researchers and practitioners better understand the vulnerabilities of GNNs and develop more principled defense strategies.

  4. Real-World Applicability: The experiments in the paper are conducted on relatively small-scale benchmark datasets. Evaluating the performance of GraphMU on larger, more complex real-world graph datasets would be crucial to assess its practical viability.

Overall, the GraphMU approach represents a valuable contribution to the field of GNN robustness, and the authors have demonstrated its effectiveness in improving the model's resistance to a range of adversarial attacks. Further research to address the limitations and expand the technique's capabilities could lead to significant advancements in the development of reliable and secure GNN-based applications.

Conclusion

The GraphMU technique proposed in this paper offers a novel approach to repairing the robustness of Graph Neural Networks against adversarial attacks. By leveraging machine unlearning, the method can selectively remove the model's vulnerability to specific attack types without significantly degrading its overall performance. The authors' experiments demonstrate the effectiveness of GraphMU across various GNN architectures and benchmark datasets, suggesting its potential for real-world applications where the ability to withstand adversarial tampering is crucial.

While the technique has some limitations, such as computational complexity and the need for further generalization, the paper represents an important step forward in addressing the security challenges of GNNs. Continued research and development in this area could lead to more robust and trustworthy graph-based machine learning systems, with far-reaching implications for fields like social network analysis, drug discovery, and cybersecurity.



This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!

Follow @aimodelsfyi on 𝕏 →

Related Papers

GraphMU: Repairing Robustness of Graph Neural Networks via Machine Unlearning
Total Score

0

GraphMU: Repairing Robustness of Graph Neural Networks via Machine Unlearning

Tao Wu, Xinwen Cao, Chao Wang, Shaojie Qiao, Xingping Xian, Lin Yuan, Canyixing Cui, Yanbing Liu

Graph Neural Networks (GNNs) have demonstrated significant application potential in various fields. However, GNNs are still vulnerable to adversarial attacks. Numerous adversarial defense methods on GNNs are proposed to address the problem of adversarial attacks. However, these methods can only serve as a defense before poisoning, but cannot repair poisoned GNN. Therefore, there is an urgent need for a method to repair poisoned GNN. In this paper, we address this gap by introducing the novel concept of model repair for GNNs. We propose a repair framework, Repairing Robustness of Graph Neural Networks via Machine Unlearning (GraphMU), which aims to fine-tune poisoned GNN to forget adversarial samples without the need for complete retraining. We also introduce a unlearning validation method to ensure that our approach effectively forget specified poisoned data. To evaluate the effectiveness of GraphMU, we explore three fine-tuned subgraph construction scenarios based on the available perturbation information: (i) Known Perturbation Ratios, (ii) Known Complete Knowledge of Perturbations, and (iii) Unknown any Knowledge of Perturbations. Our extensive experiments, conducted across four citation datasets and four adversarial attack scenarios, demonstrate that GraphMU can effectively restore the performance of poisoned GNN.

Read more

6/21/2024

Towards Robust Knowledge Unlearning: An Adversarial Framework for Assessing and Improving Unlearning Robustness in Large Language Models
Total Score

0

Towards Robust Knowledge Unlearning: An Adversarial Framework for Assessing and Improving Unlearning Robustness in Large Language Models

Hongbang Yuan, Zhuoran Jin, Pengfei Cao, Yubo Chen, Kang Liu, Jun Zhao

LLM have achieved success in many fields but still troubled by problematic content in the training corpora. LLM unlearning aims at reducing their influence and avoid undesirable behaviours. However, existing unlearning methods remain vulnerable to adversarial queries and the unlearned knowledge resurfaces after the manually designed attack queries. As part of a red-team effort to proactively assess the vulnerabilities of unlearned models, we design Dynamic Unlearning Attack (DUA), a dynamic and automated framework to attack these models and evaluate their robustness. It optimizes adversarial suffixes to reintroduce the unlearned knowledge in various scenarios. We find that unlearned knowledge can be recovered in $55.2%$ of the questions, even without revealing the unlearned model's parameters. In response to this vulnerability, we propose Latent Adversarial Unlearning (LAU), a universal framework that effectively enhances the robustness of the unlearned process. It formulates the unlearning process as a min-max optimization problem and resolves it through two stages: an attack stage, where perturbation vectors are trained and added to the latent space of LLMs to recover the unlearned knowledge, and a defense stage, where previously trained perturbation vectors are used to enhance unlearned model's robustness. With our LAU framework, we obtain two robust unlearning methods, AdvGA and AdvNPO. We conduct extensive experiments across multiple unlearning benchmarks and various models, and demonstrate that they improve the unlearning effectiveness by over $53.5%$, cause only less than a $11.6%$ reduction in neighboring knowledge, and have almost no impact on the model's general capabilities.

Read more

8/21/2024

Learning to Unlearn for Robust Machine Unlearning
Total Score

0

Learning to Unlearn for Robust Machine Unlearning

Mark He Huang, Lin Geng Foo, Jun Liu

Machine unlearning (MU) seeks to remove knowledge of specific data samples from trained models without the necessity for complete retraining, a task made challenging by the dual objectives of effective erasure of data and maintaining the overall performance of the model. Despite recent advances in this field, balancing between the dual objectives of unlearning remains challenging. From a fresh perspective of generalization, we introduce a novel Learning-to-Unlearn (LTU) framework, which adopts a meta-learning approach to optimize the unlearning process to improve forgetting and remembering in a unified manner. LTU includes a meta-optimization scheme that facilitates models to effectively preserve generalizable knowledge with only a small subset of the remaining set, while thoroughly forgetting the specific data samples. We also introduce a Gradient Harmonization strategy to align the optimization trajectories for remembering and forgetting via mitigating gradient conflicts, thus ensuring efficient and effective model updates. Our approach demonstrates improved efficiency and efficacy for MU, offering a promising solution to the challenges of data rights and model reusability.

Read more

7/16/2024

Provable Robustness of (Graph) Neural Networks Against Data Poisoning and Backdoor Attacks
Total Score

0

Provable Robustness of (Graph) Neural Networks Against Data Poisoning and Backdoor Attacks

Lukas Gosch, Mahalakshmi Sabanayagam, Debarghya Ghoshdastidar, Stephan Gunnemann

Generalization of machine learning models can be severely compromised by data poisoning, where adversarial changes are applied to the training data, as well as backdoor attacks that additionally manipulate the test data. These vulnerabilities have led to interest in certifying (i.e., proving) that such changes up to a certain magnitude do not affect test predictions. We, for the first time, certify Graph Neural Networks (GNNs) against poisoning and backdoor attacks targeting the node features of a given graph. Our certificates are white-box and based upon $(i)$ the neural tangent kernel, which characterizes the training dynamics of sufficiently wide networks; and $(ii)$ a novel reformulation of the bilevel optimization problem describing poisoning as a mixed-integer linear program. Consequently, we leverage our framework to provide fundamental insights into the role of graph structure and its connectivity on the worst-case robustness behavior of convolution-based and PageRank-based GNNs. We note that our framework is more general and constitutes the first approach to derive white-box poisoning certificates for NNs, which can be of independent interest beyond graph-related tasks.

Read more

7/16/2024