Grounding Language Plans in Demonstrations Through Counterfactual Perturbations
0
Sign in to get full access
Overview
- This paper introduces a method for grounding language plans in demonstrations through counterfactual perturbations.
- The key idea is to augment demonstration data with counterfactual perturbations, which can help a language model learn more robust and generalizable plans.
- The proposed approach is evaluated on language-guided robot manipulation tasks, showing improved performance compared to baselines.
Plain English Explanation
The paper Grounding Language Plans in Demonstrations Through Counterfactual Perturbations explores a way to help language models learn more versatile and adaptable plans from demonstration data.
The researchers recognized that language models can struggle to generalize beyond the specific examples they were trained on. To address this, they developed a technique to augment the demonstration data with "counterfactual" examples - variations on the original demonstrations that change certain aspects, like the object being manipulated or the environment.
By training the language model on this expanded dataset with counterfactual perturbations, the researchers found that the model was able to learn more robust and flexible language-guided plans for tasks like robot manipulation. The model could then apply these plans to new situations more effectively, rather than being limited to the exact demonstrations it was shown during training.
This work connects to other recent research on using large language models as generalizable policies and reasoning with language as a form of policy. By imbuing language models with more flexible and adaptable planning capabilities, this approach could enable them to follow high-level instructions and reason about tasks in increasingly powerful ways.
Technical Explanation
The key technical contribution of the paper Grounding Language Plans in Demonstrations Through Counterfactual Perturbations is the demonstration data augmentation technique using counterfactual perturbations.
Specifically, the researchers start with a dataset of language instructions paired with demonstrations of the corresponding actions. They then algorithmically generate counterfactual variations of these demonstrations by perturbing factors like the object being manipulated, the initial state of the environment, or the sequence of actions.
This expanded dataset, containing both the original demonstrations and the counterfactual variations, is used to train a language-conditioned policy model. The researchers hypothesized that exposure to these counterfactual examples would help the model learn more robust and generalizable language plans, rather than overfitting to the specific training demonstrations.
The policy model is evaluated on language-guided robot manipulation tasks, where it demonstrates improved performance compared to baselines that do not use counterfactual data augmentation. This suggests the proposed technique is effective at grounding language plans in more flexible, adaptable behaviors.
Critical Analysis
The paper makes a strong case for the benefits of counterfactual data augmentation in learning language-conditioned policies. However, a few potential limitations or areas for further research are worth considering:
-
The experiments focused on relatively simple robotic manipulation tasks. It would be valuable to see how well the approach scales to more complex, real-world tasks that require deeper language understanding and planning.
-
The paper does not provide a detailed analysis of which types of counterfactual perturbations are most effective. Further research into the relative importance of different perturbation strategies could help optimize the approach.
-
While the results demonstrate improved performance, there may still be significant gaps between the language-guided plans learned by the model and human-level planning and reasoning abilities. Continued progress in grounding language in flexible, generalizable behaviors remains an important challenge.
Overall, this paper presents a promising technique for enhancing the language understanding and planning capabilities of AI systems. By carefully augmenting demonstration data, the authors have shown how language models can be imbued with more robust and adaptable skills. Further research building on these ideas could lead to significant advancements in language-guided autonomy.
Conclusion
The paper "Grounding Language Plans in Demonstrations Through Counterfactual Perturbations" introduces an innovative approach to improving the language planning abilities of AI systems. By augmenting demonstration data with counterfactual variations, the researchers were able to train language models that learned more flexible, generalizable plans for robotic manipulation tasks.
This work connects to broader efforts to leverage large language models as versatile, embodied policies and to utilize language as a form of high-level reasoning and planning. As AI systems become increasingly adept at understanding and acting on language instructions, techniques like counterfactual data augmentation will likely play an important role in unlocking their full potential.
While the paper demonstrates promising results, there remain significant challenges in bridging the gap between language-guided AI and human-level planning and reasoning abilities. Continued research into policy improvement using language feedback and few-shot learning of language-conditioned behaviors will be crucial to advancing the state of the art in this rapidly evolving field.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
0
Grounding Language Plans in Demonstrations Through Counterfactual Perturbations
Yanwei Wang, Tsun-Hsuan Wang, Jiayuan Mao, Michael Hagenow, Julie Shah
Grounding the common-sense reasoning of Large Language Models (LLMs) in physical domains remains a pivotal yet unsolved problem for embodied AI. Whereas prior works have focused on leveraging LLMs directly for planning in symbolic spaces, this work uses LLMs to guide the search of task structures and constraints implicit in multi-step demonstrations. Specifically, we borrow from manipulation planning literature the concept of mode families, which group robot configurations by specific motion constraints, to serve as an abstraction layer between the high-level language representations of an LLM and the low-level physical trajectories of a robot. By replaying a few human demonstrations with synthetic perturbations, we generate coverage over the demonstrations' state space with additional successful executions as well as counterfactuals that fail the task. Our explanation-based learning framework trains an end-to-end differentiable neural network to predict successful trajectories from failures and as a by-product learns classifiers that ground low-level states and images in mode families without dense labeling. The learned grounding classifiers can further be used to translate language plans into reactive policies in the physical domain in an interpretable manner. We show our approach improves the interpretability and reactivity of imitation learning through 2D navigation and simulated and real robot manipulation tasks. Website: https://yanweiw.github.io/glide
Read more4/30/2024
0
Grounding Language Models in Autonomous Loco-manipulation Tasks
Jin Wang, Nikos Tsagarakis
Humanoid robots with behavioral autonomy have consistently been regarded as ideal collaborators in our daily lives and promising representations of embodied intelligence. Compared to fixed-based robotic arms, humanoid robots offer a larger operational space while significantly increasing the difficulty of control and planning. Despite the rapid progress towards general-purpose humanoid robots, most studies remain focused on locomotion ability with few investigations into whole-body coordination and tasks planning, thus limiting the potential to demonstrate long-horizon tasks involving both mobility and manipulation under open-ended verbal instructions. In this work, we propose a novel framework that learns, selects, and plans behaviors based on tasks in different scenarios. We combine reinforcement learning (RL) with whole-body optimization to generate robot motions and store them into a motion library. We further leverage the planning and reasoning features of the large language model (LLM), constructing a hierarchical task graph that comprises a series of motion primitives to bridge lower-level execution with higher-level planning. Experiments in simulation and real-world using the CENTAURO robot show that the language model based planner can efficiently adapt to new loco-manipulation tasks, demonstrating high autonomy from free-text commands in unstructured scenes.
Read more9/4/2024
0
Autonomous Behavior Planning For Humanoid Loco-manipulation Through Grounded Language Model
Jin Wang, Arturo Laurenzi, Nikos Tsagarakis
Enabling humanoid robots to perform autonomously loco-manipulation in unstructured environments is crucial and highly challenging for achieving embodied intelligence. This involves robots being able to plan their actions and behaviors in long-horizon tasks while using multi-modality to perceive deviations between task execution and high-level planning. Recently, large language models (LLMs) have demonstrated powerful planning and reasoning capabilities for comprehension and processing of semantic information through robot control tasks, as well as the usability of analytical judgment and decision-making for multi-modal inputs. To leverage the power of LLMs towards humanoid loco-manipulation, we propose a novel language-model based framework that enables robots to autonomously plan behaviors and low-level execution under given textual instructions, while observing and correcting failures that may occur during task execution. To systematically evaluate this framework in grounding LLMs, we created the robot 'action' and 'sensing' behavior library for task planning, and conducted mobile manipulation tasks and experiments in both simulated and real environments using the CENTAURO robot, and verified the effectiveness and application of this approach in robotic tasks with autonomous behavioral planning.
Read more8/16/2024
0
Open Grounded Planning: Challenges and Benchmark Construction
Shiguang Guo, Ziliang Deng, Hongyu Lin, Yaojie Lu, Xianpei Han, Le Sun
The emergence of large language models (LLMs) has increasingly drawn attention to the use of LLMs for human-like planning. Existing work on LLM-based planning either focuses on leveraging the inherent language generation capabilities of LLMs to produce free-style plans, or employs reinforcement learning approaches to learn decision-making for a limited set of actions within restricted environments. However, both approaches exhibit significant discrepancies from the open and executable requirements in real-world planning. In this paper, we propose a new planning task--open grounded planning. The primary objective of open grounded planning is to ask the model to generate an executable plan based on a variable action set, thereby ensuring the executability of the produced plan. To this end, we establishes a benchmark for open grounded planning spanning a wide range of domains. Then we test current state-of-the-art LLMs along with five planning approaches, revealing that existing LLMs and methods still struggle to address the challenges posed by grounded planning in open domains. The outcomes of this paper define and establish a foundational dataset for open grounded planning, and shed light on the potential challenges and future directions of LLM-based planning.
Read more6/6/2024