How Much are Large Language Models Contaminated? A Comprehensive Survey and the LLMSanitize Library
0
💬
Sign in to get full access
Overview
- This paper provides a comprehensive survey of data contamination in large language models (LLMs).
- It explores the extent of contamination, the types of contamination, and the consequences of using contaminated models.
- The paper also introduces the LLMSanitize library, a tool for detecting and mitigating data contamination in LLMs.
Plain English Explanation
Large language models (LLMs) like GPT-3 and BERT are powerful AI systems that can generate human-like text on a wide range of topics. However, these models are often trained on data from the internet, which can contain biases, inaccuracies, and even harmful content.
This paper examines the problem of "data contamination" - when an LLM is trained on data that contains errors, biases, or inappropriate content. The researchers conducted a comprehensive survey to understand the extent and types of data contamination in LLMs.
Their findings show that data contamination is a significant problem that can lead to LLMs producing inaccurate, biased, or even dangerous output. The paper categorizes different types of data contamination, such as factual errors, hate speech, and personal information.
To address this issue, the researchers developed the LLMSanitize library, a tool that can detect and mitigate data contamination in LLMs. This tool can help researchers and developers ensure that their language models are less contaminated and more reliable.
Technical Explanation
The paper begins by defining and categorizing the different types of data contamination that can occur in LLMs, such as factual errors, hate speech, and personal information. The researchers then conduct a comprehensive survey to understand the extent of data contamination in popular LLMs.
Their survey involves evaluating LLMs on a range of tasks designed to benchmark the level of data contamination. The results show that data contamination is a significant problem, with LLMs producing inaccurate, biased, or harmful outputs in many cases.
To address this issue, the researchers introduce the LLMSanitize library, a tool that can detect and mitigate data contamination in LLMs. The library uses various techniques, such as anomaly detection and content filtering, to identify and remove contaminated data from the model's training process.
Critical Analysis
The paper presents a thorough and well-designed study on the problem of data contamination in LLMs. The researchers have done an admirable job of defining and categorizing the different types of contamination, and their comprehensive survey provides valuable insights into the extent of the problem.
One potential limitation of the study is that it focuses primarily on English-language LLMs. While the researchers do mention that data contamination can cross language barriers, it would be interesting to see how their findings and the LLMSanitize library apply to LLMs in other languages.
Additionally, the paper does not delve deeply into the societal implications of data contamination in LLMs. While the researchers touch on privacy risks, the broader impact on vulnerable communities and the potential for harm could be further explored.
Conclusion
This paper provides a comprehensive and valuable analysis of the issue of data contamination in large language models. The researchers have developed a robust methodology for benchmarking and detecting contamination, and the LLMSanitize library offers a promising solution for mitigating these problems.
As LLMs become increasingly prevalent in a wide range of applications, addressing data contamination will be crucial for ensuring the reliability, safety, and ethical deployment of these powerful AI systems. This paper represents an important step forward in understanding and addressing this critical challenge.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
💬
0
How Much are Large Language Models Contaminated? A Comprehensive Survey and the LLMSanitize Library
Mathieu Ravaut, Bosheng Ding, Fangkai Jiao, Hailin Chen, Xingxuan Li, Ruochen Zhao, Chengwei Qin, Caiming Xiong, Shafiq Joty
With the rise of Large Language Models (LLMs) in recent years, abundant new opportunities are emerging, but also new challenges, among which contamination is quickly becoming critical. Business applications and fundraising in AI have reached a scale at which a few percentage points gained on popular question-answering benchmarks could translate into dozens of millions of dollars, placing high pressure on model integrity. At the same time, it is becoming harder and harder to keep track of the data that LLMs have seen; if not impossible with closed-source models like GPT-4 and Claude-3 not divulging any information on the training set. As a result, contamination becomes a major issue: LLMs' performance may not be reliable anymore, as the high performance may be at least partly due to their previous exposure to the data. This limitation jeopardizes the entire progress in the field of NLP, yet, there remains a lack of methods on how to efficiently detect contamination.In this paper, we survey all recent work on contamination detection with LLMs, and help the community track contamination levels of LLMs by releasing an open-source Python library named LLMSanitize implementing major contamination detection algorithms.
Read more8/22/2024
0
Data Contamination Can Cross Language Barriers
Feng Yao, Yufan Zhuang, Zihao Sun, Sunan Xu, Animesh Kumar, Jingbo Shang
The opacity in developing large language models (LLMs) is raising growing concerns about the potential contamination of public benchmarks in the pre-training data. Existing contamination detection methods are typically based on the text overlap between training and evaluation data, which can be too superficial to reflect deeper forms of contamination. In this paper, we first present a cross-lingual form of contamination that inflates LLMs' performance while evading current detection methods, deliberately injected by overfitting LLMs on the translated versions of benchmark test sets. Then, we propose generalization-based approaches to unmask such deeply concealed contamination. Specifically, we examine the LLM's performance change after modifying the original benchmark by replacing the false answer choices with correct ones from other questions. Contaminated models can hardly generalize to such easier situations, where the false choices can be emph{not even wrong}, as all choices are correct in their memorization. Experimental results demonstrate that cross-lingual contamination can easily fool existing detection methods, but not ours. In addition, we discuss the potential utilization of cross-lingual contamination in interpreting LLMs' working mechanisms and in post-training LLMs for enhanced multilingual capabilities. The code and dataset we use can be obtained from url{https://github.com/ShangDataLab/Deep-Contam}.
Read more6/21/2024
0
Assessing Contamination in Large Language Models: Introducing the LogProber method
Nicolas Yax, Pierre-Yves Oudeyer, Stefano Palminteri
In machine learning, contamination refers to situations where testing data leak into the training set. The issue is particularly relevant for the evaluation of the performance of Large Language Models (LLMs), which are generally trained on gargantuan, and generally opaque, corpora of text scraped from the world wide web. Developing tools to detect contamination is therefore crucial to be able to fairly and properly track the evolution of the performance of LLMs. Most recent works in the field are not tailored to quantify contamination on short sequences of text like we find in psychology questionnaires. In the present paper we introduce LogProber, a novel, efficient, algorithm that we show able to detect contamination using token probability in given sentences. In the second part we investigate the limitations of the method and discuss how different training methods can contaminate models without leaving traces in the token probabilities.
Read more8/27/2024
0
New!Towards Data Contamination Detection for Modern Large Language Models: Limitations, Inconsistencies, and Oracle Challenges
Vinay Samuel, Yue Zhou, Henry Peng Zou
As large language models achieve increasingly impressive results, questions arise about whether such performance is from generalizability or mere data memorization. Thus, numerous data contamination detection methods have been proposed. However, these approaches are often validated with traditional benchmarks and early-stage LLMs, leaving uncertainty about their effectiveness when evaluating state-of-the-art LLMs on the contamination of more challenging benchmarks. To address this gap and provide a dual investigation of SOTA LLM contamination status and detection method robustness, we evaluate five contamination detection approaches with four state-of-the-art LLMs across eight challenging datasets often used in modern LLM evaluation. Our analysis reveals that (1) Current methods have non-trivial limitations in their assumptions and practical applications; (2) Notable difficulties exist in detecting contamination introduced during instruction fine-tuning with answer augmentation; and (3) Limited consistencies between SOTA contamination detection techniques. These findings highlight the complexity of contamination detection in advanced LLMs and the urgent need for further research on robust and generalizable contamination evaluation. Our code is available at https://github.com/vsamuel2003/data-contamination.
Read more9/17/2024