A Taxonomy for Data Contamination in Large Language Models
0
📊
Sign in to get full access
Overview
- Large language models (LLMs) trained on extensive web data demonstrate impressive performance on various tasks.
- Concern over data contamination, where evaluation datasets are present in the pretraining corpus, leading to inflated model performance.
- Decontamination, the process of detecting and removing such data, is a potential solution, but contamination may come from altered versions of the test set, evading detection.
- The impact of different types of contamination on LLM performance is not fully understood.
Plain English Explanation
The researchers explore the issue of data contamination in large language models. These powerful AI systems are trained on vast amounts of online data, which allows them to perform well on a wide range of tasks. However, there is a concern that the data used to evaluate the models may have been included in the original training data, leading to an unfair advantage and inflating the models' apparent capabilities.
To address this, the researchers propose decontamination - the process of identifying and removing any overlapping data between the training and evaluation sets. But the problem is that the contamination may come from altered versions of the test data, making it difficult to detect during the decontamination process.
The researchers aim to better understand how different types of data contamination impact the performance of language models on tasks like summarization and question answering. By categorizing the various forms of contamination, they hope to identify the ones that pose the greatest risk to the reliability and trustworthiness of these model evaluations.
Technical Explanation
The researchers present a taxonomy that categorizes the different types of contamination that can occur during the pretraining of large language models. They analyze the impact of these various forms of contamination on the performance of models on two key NLP tasks: summarization and question answering.
The study explores how different types of contamination can influence task performance during evaluation, shedding light on the potential pitfalls of relying on contaminated data to assess the capabilities of these powerful models.
Critical Analysis
The researchers acknowledge the limitations of their study, noting that the impact of contamination may vary depending on the specific task and model architecture. They also suggest that further research is needed to develop more robust decontamination techniques that can reliably identify and remove all traces of contamination.
One potential concern not addressed in the paper is the possibility that the contamination may not be limited to the evaluation dataset, but could also be present in the training data itself. This could lead to models learning spurious correlations and biases, which could then manifest in their performance on a wide range of tasks.
Conclusion
This research highlights the critical importance of carefully evaluating the data used to train and assess large language models. By understanding the various forms of data contamination and their impact on model performance, the research community can work towards developing more reliable and trustworthy evaluation methods for these powerful AI systems.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
📊
0
A Taxonomy for Data Contamination in Large Language Models
Medha Palavalli, Amanda Bertsch, Matthew R. Gormley
Large language models pretrained on extensive web corpora demonstrate remarkable performance across a wide range of downstream tasks. However, a growing concern is data contamination, where evaluation datasets may be contained in the pretraining corpus, inflating model performance. Decontamination, the process of detecting and removing such data, is a potential solution; yet these contaminants may originate from altered versions of the test set, evading detection during decontamination. How different types of contamination impact the performance of language models on downstream tasks is not fully understood. We present a taxonomy that categorizes the various types of contamination encountered by LLMs during the pretraining phase and identify which types pose the highest risk. We analyze the impact of contamination on two key NLP tasks -- summarization and question answering -- revealing how different types of contamination influence task performance during evaluation.
Read more7/12/2024
0
Unveiling the Spectrum of Data Contamination in Language Models: A Survey from Detection to Remediation
Chunyuan Deng, Yilun Zhao, Yuzhao Heng, Yitong Li, Jiannan Cao, Xiangru Tang, Arman Cohan
Data contamination has garnered increased attention in the era of large language models (LLMs) due to the reliance on extensive internet-derived training corpora. The issue of training corpus overlap with evaluation benchmarks--referred to as contamination--has been the focus of significant recent research. This body of work aims to identify contamination, understand its impacts, and explore mitigation strategies from diverse perspectives. However, comprehensive studies that provide a clear pathway from foundational concepts to advanced insights are lacking in this nascent field. Therefore, we present a comprehensive survey in the field of data contamination, laying out the key issues, methodologies, and findings to date, and highlighting areas in need of further research and development. In particular, we begin by examining the effects of data contamination across various stages and forms. We then provide a detailed analysis of current contamination detection methods, categorizing them to highlight their focus, assumptions, strengths, and limitations. We also discuss mitigation strategies, offering a clear guide for future research. This survey serves as a succinct overview of the most recent advancements in data contamination research, providing a straightforward guide for the benefit of future research endeavors.
Read more6/24/2024
0
Data Contamination Can Cross Language Barriers
Feng Yao, Yufan Zhuang, Zihao Sun, Sunan Xu, Animesh Kumar, Jingbo Shang
The opacity in developing large language models (LLMs) is raising growing concerns about the potential contamination of public benchmarks in the pre-training data. Existing contamination detection methods are typically based on the text overlap between training and evaluation data, which can be too superficial to reflect deeper forms of contamination. In this paper, we first present a cross-lingual form of contamination that inflates LLMs' performance while evading current detection methods, deliberately injected by overfitting LLMs on the translated versions of benchmark test sets. Then, we propose generalization-based approaches to unmask such deeply concealed contamination. Specifically, we examine the LLM's performance change after modifying the original benchmark by replacing the false answer choices with correct ones from other questions. Contaminated models can hardly generalize to such easier situations, where the false choices can be emph{not even wrong}, as all choices are correct in their memorization. Experimental results demonstrate that cross-lingual contamination can easily fool existing detection methods, but not ours. In addition, we discuss the potential utilization of cross-lingual contamination in interpreting LLMs' working mechanisms and in post-training LLMs for enhanced multilingual capabilities. The code and dataset we use can be obtained from url{https://github.com/ShangDataLab/Deep-Contam}.
Read more6/21/2024
0
Assessing Contamination in Large Language Models: Introducing the LogProber method
Nicolas Yax, Pierre-Yves Oudeyer, Stefano Palminteri
In machine learning, contamination refers to situations where testing data leak into the training set. The issue is particularly relevant for the evaluation of the performance of Large Language Models (LLMs), which are generally trained on gargantuan, and generally opaque, corpora of text scraped from the world wide web. Developing tools to detect contamination is therefore crucial to be able to fairly and properly track the evolution of the performance of LLMs. Most recent works in the field are not tailored to quantify contamination on short sequences of text like we find in psychology questionnaires. In the present paper we introduce LogProber, a novel, efficient, algorithm that we show able to detect contamination using token probability in given sentences. In the second part we investigate the limitations of the method and discuss how different training methods can contaminate models without leaving traces in the token probabilities.
Read more8/27/2024