Inference of Utilities and Time Preference in Sequential Decision-Making

Read original: arXiv:2405.15975 - Published 6/5/2024 by Haoyang Cao, Zhengqi Wu, Renyuan Xu

🤯

Overview

Introduces a novel stochastic control framework to enhance automated investment managers (robo-advisors)
Aims to accurately infer clients' investment preferences from past activities
Leverages a continuous-time model with utility functions and time-varying discounting to capture individual risk tolerance, valuation of daily consumption, and life goals
Addresses time inconsistency issues and provides conditions for identifiability of client preferences
Proposes a learning algorithm based on maximum likelihood estimation and entropy regularization within a discrete-time Markov Decision Process framework

Plain English Explanation

This research paper presents a new approach to improve the capabilities of automated investment managers, or "robo-advisors." The key idea is to accurately infer each client's investment preferences by analyzing their past investment activities. The researchers use a continuous-time model that incorporates personalized utility functions and a time-varying discounting scheme. This allows the model to capture individual factors like risk tolerance, valuation of daily spending, and significant life goals.

To address the issue of time inconsistency that arises in such a setting, the researchers use state augmentation and establish the dynamic programming principle and verification theorem. They also provide conditions to ensure that the client's investment preferences can be accurately identified.

To complement the theoretical developments, the researchers propose a learning algorithm based on maximum likelihood estimation within a discrete-time Markov Decision Process framework, with the addition of entropy regularization. They prove that the log-likelihood function is locally concave, which facilitates the fast convergence of their algorithm.

The researchers demonstrate the practical effectiveness and efficiency of their framework through two numerical examples, including Merton's problem and an investment problem with unhedgeable risks.

The proposed framework not only advances financial technology by improving personalized investment advice but also has broader applications in other fields such as healthcare, economics, and artificial intelligence, where understanding individual preferences is crucial.

Technical Explanation

The researchers introduce a novel stochastic control framework to enhance the capabilities of automated investment managers, or robo-advisors. The key objective is to accurately infer clients' investment preferences from their past activities.

The researchers leverage a continuous-time model that incorporates utility functions and a generic discounting scheme with a time-varying rate. This framework is tailored to each client's risk tolerance, valuation of daily consumption, and significant life goals. To address the resulting time inconsistency issue, the researchers employ state augmentation and establish the dynamic programming principle and the verification theorem.

Additionally, the researchers provide sufficient conditions for the identifiability of client investment preferences. To complement their theoretical developments, they propose a learning algorithm based on maximum likelihood estimation within a discrete-time Markov Decision Process framework, augmented with entropy regularization. The researchers prove that the log-likelihood function is locally concave, enabling the fast convergence of their proposed algorithm.

The practical effectiveness and efficiency of the framework are demonstrated through two numerical examples, including Merton's problem and an investment problem with unhedgeable risks.

Critical Analysis

The researchers have addressed the important challenge of accurately inferring clients' investment preferences, which is crucial for providing personalized investment advice through robo-advisors. Their continuous-time model with time-varying discounting and utility functions provides a flexible framework to capture individual factors, such as risk tolerance and life goals.

However, the researchers do not discuss the potential limitations of their approach, such as the availability and quality of historical data needed for accurate preference inference, or the computational complexity of the proposed learning algorithm. Additionally, the paper does not provide a detailed analysis of the robustness of the framework to various market conditions or the potential impact of model misspecification.

While the researchers mention the broader applicability of their framework in other domains, such as healthcare and economics, they do not delve into the specific challenges and adaptations that may be required to apply their approach in these different contexts.

Overall, the research presents a promising framework for enhancing robo-advisor capabilities, but further investigation into the practical limitations and potential extensions of the approach would be valuable for researchers and practitioners in the field.

Conclusion

This research paper introduces a novel stochastic control framework to improve the capabilities of automated investment managers, or robo-advisors. The key innovation is the accurate inference of clients' investment preferences from their past activities, leveraging a continuous-time model with personalized utility functions and time-varying discounting.

The researchers address the issue of time inconsistency and provide conditions for the identifiability of client preferences. They also propose a learning algorithm based on maximum likelihood estimation and entropy regularization, which they demonstrate to be effective and efficient through numerical examples.

The proposed framework not only advances financial technology by enhancing personalized investment advice but also has broader applications in other domains, such as healthcare, economics, and artificial intelligence, where understanding individual preferences is crucial. The research highlights the potential for stochastic control techniques to drive personalization and improve decision-making in various real-world settings.

This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!

Follow @aimodelsfyi on 𝕏 →

Related Papers

🤯

Inference of Utilities and Time Preference in Sequential Decision-Making

Haoyang Cao, Zhengqi Wu, Renyuan Xu

This paper introduces a novel stochastic control framework to enhance the capabilities of automated investment managers, or robo-advisors, by accurately inferring clients' investment preferences from past activities. Our approach leverages a continuous-time model that incorporates utility functions and a generic discounting scheme of a time-varying rate, tailored to each client's risk tolerance, valuation of daily consumption, and significant life goals. We address the resulting time inconsistency issue through state augmentation and the establishment of the dynamic programming principle and the verification theorem. Additionally, we provide sufficient conditions for the identifiability of client investment preferences. To complement our theoretical developments, we propose a learning algorithm based on maximum likelihood estimation within a discrete-time Markov Decision Process framework, augmented with entropy regularization. We prove that the log-likelihood function is locally concave, facilitating the fast convergence of our proposed algorithm. Practical effectiveness and efficiency are showcased through two numerical examples, including Merton's problem and an investment problem with unhedgeable risks. Our proposed framework not only advances financial technology by improving personalized investment advice but also contributes broadly to other fields such as healthcare, economics, and artificial intelligence, where understanding individual preferences is crucial.

6/5/2024

An incremental preference elicitation-based approach to learning potentially non-monotonic preferences in multi-criteria sorting

Zhuolin Li, Zhen Zhang, Witold Pedrycz

This paper introduces a novel incremental preference elicitation-based approach to learning potentially non-monotonic preferences in multi-criteria sorting (MCS) problems, enabling decision makers to progressively provide assignment example preference information. Specifically, we first construct a max-margin optimization-based model to model potentially non-monotonic preferences and inconsistent assignment example preference information in each iteration of the incremental preference elicitation process. Using the optimal objective function value of the max-margin optimization-based model, we devise information amount measurement methods and question selection strategies to pinpoint the most informative alternative in each iteration within the framework of uncertainty sampling in active learning. Once the termination criterion is satisfied, the sorting result for non-reference alternatives can be determined through the use of two optimization models, i.e., the max-margin optimization-based model and the complexity controlling optimization model. Subsequently, two incremental preference elicitation-based algorithms are developed to learn potentially non-monotonic preferences, considering different termination criteria. Ultimately, we apply the proposed approach to a credit rating problem to elucidate the detailed implementation steps, and perform computational experiments on both artificial and real-world data sets to compare the proposed question selection strategies with several benchmark strategies.

9/5/2024

Maximizing utility in multi-agent environments by anticipating the behavior of other learners

Angelos Assos, Yuval Dagan, Constantinos Daskalakis

Learning algorithms are often used to make decisions in sequential decision-making environments. In multi-agent settings, the decisions of each agent can affect the utilities/losses of the other agents. Therefore, if an agent is good at anticipating the behavior of the other agents, in particular how they will make decisions in each round as a function of their experience that far, it could try to judiciously make its own decisions over the rounds of the interaction so as to influence the other agents to behave in a way that ultimately benefits its own utility. In this paper, we study repeated two-player games involving two types of agents: a learner, which employs an online learning algorithm to choose its strategy in each round; and an optimizer, which knows the learner's utility function and the learner's online learning algorithm. The optimizer wants to plan ahead to maximize its own utility, while taking into account the learner's behavior. We provide two results: a positive result for repeated zero-sum games and a negative result for repeated general-sum games. Our positive result is an algorithm for the optimizer, which exactly maximizes its utility against a learner that plays the Replicator Dynamics -- the continuous-time analogue of Multiplicative Weights Update (MWU). Additionally, we use this result to provide an algorithm for the optimizer against MWU, i.e.~for the discrete-time setting, which guarantees an average utility for the optimizer that is higher than the value of the one-shot game. Our negative result shows that, unless P=NP, there is no Fully Polynomial Time Approximation Scheme (FPTAS) for maximizing the utility of an optimizer against a learner that best-responds to the history in each round. Yet, this still leaves open the question of whether there exists a polynomial-time algorithm that optimizes the utility up to $o(T)$.

7/9/2024

Ensembling Portfolio Strategies for Long-Term Investments: A Distribution-Free Preference Framework for Decision-Making and Algorithms

Duy Khanh Lam

This paper investigates the problem of ensembling multiple strategies for sequential portfolios to outperform individual strategies in terms of long-term wealth. Due to the uncertainty of strategies' performances in the future market, which are often based on specific models and statistical assumptions, investors often mitigate risk and enhance robustness by combining multiple strategies, akin to common approaches in collective learning prediction. However, the absence of a distribution-free and consistent preference framework complicates decisions of combination due to the ambiguous objective. To address this gap, we introduce a novel framework for decision-making in combining strategies, irrespective of market conditions, by establishing the investor's preference between decisions and then forming a clear objective. Through this framework, we propose a combinatorial strategy construction, free from statistical assumptions, for any scale of component strategies, even infinite, such that it meets the determined criterion. Finally, we test the proposed strategy along with its accelerated variant and some other multi-strategies. The numerical experiments show results in favor of the proposed strategies, albeit with small tradeoffs in their Sharpe ratios, in which their cumulative wealths eventually exceed those of the best component strategies while the accelerated strategy significantly improves performance.

6/7/2024