Instance-Level Safety-Aware Fidelity of Synthetic Data and Its Calibration

2402.07031

YC

0

Reddit

0

Published 5/3/2024 by Chih-Hong Cheng, Paul Stockel, Xingyu Zhao
Instance-Level Safety-Aware Fidelity of Synthetic Data and Its Calibration

Abstract

Modeling and calibrating the fidelity of synthetic data is paramount in shaping the future of safe and reliable self-driving technology by offering a cost-effective and scalable alternative to real-world data collection. We focus on its role in safety-critical applications, introducing four types of instance-level fidelity that go beyond mere visual input characteristics. The aim is to ensure that applying testing on synthetic data can reveal real-world safety issues, and the absence of safety-critical issues when testing under synthetic data can provide a strong safety guarantee in real-world behavior. We suggest an optimization method to refine the synthetic data generator, reducing fidelity gaps identified by deep learning components. Experiments show this tuning enhances the correlation between safety-critical errors in synthetic and real data.

Create account to get full access

or

If you already have an account, we'll log you in

Overview

  • This paper proposes a framework for evaluating the instance-level fidelity of synthetic data, with a focus on safety-critical applications.
  • The authors introduce several facets of instance-level fidelity, including realism, diversity, and safety-awareness.
  • They present a calibration technique to optimize the fidelity of synthetic data while preserving safety properties.
  • The framework is demonstrated on synthetic driving data, showing its ability to generate high-fidelity samples that maintain safety-critical characteristics.

Plain English Explanation

The paper discusses a new way to evaluate the quality of synthetic data, which is data that is computer-generated rather than real-world data. The key focus is on synthetic data for safety-critical applications, like self-driving cars, where it's important that the synthetic data closely matches real-world data, especially when it comes to safety-related factors.

The researchers identify several important aspects of synthetic data quality, including how realistic the data looks, how diverse it is, and how well it captures safety-critical features. They then present a method to "calibrate" the synthetic data to optimize these different aspects of quality, while still preserving the safety-critical properties.

The researchers test their framework on synthetic driving data, showing that they can generate high-quality synthetic data that looks and behaves very similarly to real-world driving data, including maintaining the important safety characteristics. This is a significant advance, as it allows for the creation of large, diverse datasets of synthetic driving data that can be used to train and test self-driving car systems in a safe and controlled way.

Technical Explanation

The paper introduces a framework for evaluating the instance-level fidelity of synthetic data, with a focus on safety-critical applications. The authors identify three key facets of instance-level fidelity: realism, diversity, and safety-awareness.

Realism refers to how closely the synthetic data matches the statistical and distributional properties of real-world data. Diversity measures the coverage of the synthetic data, ensuring it captures the breadth of the real-world distribution. Safety-awareness evaluates whether the synthetic data preserves the safety-critical characteristics of the real-world data.

To optimize these facets of fidelity, the authors present a calibration technique that adjusts the synthetic data generation process. This involves defining safety constraints and using them to guide the synthesis of new samples. The calibration process aims to maximize the fidelity of the synthetic data while ensuring the safety properties are maintained.

The framework is demonstrated on a synthetic driving dataset, where the authors show that the calibrated synthetic data achieves high realism and diversity scores, while also preserving important safety-critical features like road curvature, speed, and collision avoidance. This allows for the generation of large, diverse datasets of synthetic driving data that can be used to train and test self-driving car systems in a safe and controlled manner.

Critical Analysis

The paper presents a comprehensive framework for evaluating the instance-level fidelity of synthetic data, with a focus on safety-critical applications. The authors' identification of the key facets of fidelity - realism, diversity, and safety-awareness - provides a useful structure for assessing the quality of synthetic data.

One potential limitation of the framework is the reliance on predefined safety constraints, which may not capture all the nuances of safety-critical behavior. There may be emergent safety properties that are difficult to encode explicitly. Additionally, the calibration process, while effective, may be computationally intensive, especially for large-scale datasets.

Further research could explore ways to incorporate more adaptive or data-driven approaches to safety-awareness, perhaps leveraging techniques from reinforcement learning or [anomaly detection]. This could help the framework better capture the complex safety characteristics of real-world data.

Additionally, the authors could consider extending the framework to other safety-critical domains beyond driving, such as medical imaging or industrial automation. Demonstrating the versatility of the approach would further strengthen its impact.

Conclusion

This paper presents a novel framework for evaluating the instance-level fidelity of synthetic data, with a focus on safety-critical applications. By identifying the key facets of fidelity and introducing a calibration technique to optimize them, the authors have developed a valuable tool for the creation of high-quality synthetic data.

The successful demonstration of the framework on synthetic driving data highlights its potential to enable the generation of large, diverse datasets that can be used to train and test self-driving car systems in a safe and controlled manner. As synthetic data continues to play an increasingly important role in the development of safety-critical AI systems, this work represents a significant contribution to the field.



This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!

Related Papers

📊

Auditing and Generating Synthetic Data with Controllable Trust Trade-offs

Brian Belgodere, Pierre Dognin, Adam Ivankay, Igor Melnyk, Youssef Mroueh, Aleksandra Mojsilovic, Jiri Navratil, Apoorva Nitsure, Inkit Padhi, Mattia Rigotti, Jerret Ross, Yair Schiff, Radhika Vedpathak, Richard A. Young

YC

0

Reddit

0

Real-world data often exhibits bias, imbalance, and privacy risks. Synthetic datasets have emerged to address these issues. This paradigm relies on generative AI models to generate unbiased, privacy-preserving data while maintaining fidelity to the original data. However, assessing the trustworthiness of synthetic datasets and models is a critical challenge. We introduce a holistic auditing framework that comprehensively evaluates synthetic datasets and AI models. It focuses on preventing bias and discrimination, ensures fidelity to the source data, assesses utility, robustness, and privacy preservation. We demonstrate the framework's effectiveness by auditing various generative models across diverse use cases like education, healthcare, banking, and human resources, spanning different data modalities such as tabular, time-series, vision, and natural language. This holistic assessment is essential for compliance with regulatory safeguards. We introduce a trustworthiness index to rank synthetic datasets based on their safeguards trade-offs. Furthermore, we present a trustworthiness-driven model selection and cross-validation process during training, exemplified with TrustFormers across various data types. This approach allows for controllable trustworthiness trade-offs in synthetic data creation. Our auditing framework fosters collaboration among stakeholders, including data scientists, governance experts, internal reviewers, external certifiers, and regulators. This transparent reporting should become a standard practice to prevent bias, discrimination, and privacy violations, ensuring compliance with policies and providing accountability, safety, and performance guarantees.

Read more

6/11/2024

Advancing Retail Data Science: Comprehensive Evaluation of Synthetic Data

Advancing Retail Data Science: Comprehensive Evaluation of Synthetic Data

Yu Xia, Chi-Hua Wang, Joshua Mabry, Guang Cheng

YC

0

Reddit

0

The evaluation of synthetic data generation is crucial, especially in the retail sector where data accuracy is paramount. This paper introduces a comprehensive framework for assessing synthetic retail data, focusing on fidelity, utility, and privacy. Our approach differentiates between continuous and discrete data attributes, providing precise evaluation criteria. Fidelity is measured through stability and generalizability. Stability ensures synthetic data accurately replicates known data distributions, while generalizability confirms its robustness in novel scenarios. Utility is demonstrated through the synthetic data's effectiveness in critical retail tasks such as demand forecasting and dynamic pricing, proving its value in predictive analytics and strategic planning. Privacy is safeguarded using Differential Privacy, ensuring synthetic data maintains a perfect balance between resembling training and holdout datasets without compromising security. Our findings validate that this framework provides reliable and scalable evaluation for synthetic retail data. It ensures high fidelity, utility, and privacy, making it an essential tool for advancing retail data science. This framework meets the evolving needs of the retail industry with precision and confidence, paving the way for future advancements in synthetic data methodologies.

Read more

6/21/2024

Best Practices and Lessons Learned on Synthetic Data for Language Models

Best Practices and Lessons Learned on Synthetic Data for Language Models

Ruibo Liu, Jerry Wei, Fangyu Liu, Chenglei Si, Yanzhe Zhang, Jinmeng Rao, Steven Zheng, Daiyi Peng, Diyi Yang, Denny Zhou, Andrew M. Dai

YC

0

Reddit

0

The success of AI models relies on the availability of large, diverse, and high-quality datasets, which can be challenging to obtain due to data scarcity, privacy concerns, and high costs. Synthetic data has emerged as a promising solution by generating artificial data that mimics real-world patterns. This paper provides an overview of synthetic data research, discussing its applications, challenges, and future directions. We present empirical evidence from prior art to demonstrate its effectiveness and highlight the importance of ensuring its factuality, fidelity, and unbiasedness. We emphasize the need for responsible use of synthetic data to build more powerful, inclusive, and trustworthy language models.

Read more

4/12/2024

🏅

Real Risks of Fake Data: Synthetic Data, Diversity-Washing and Consent Circumvention

Cedric Deslandes Whitney, Justin Norman

YC

0

Reddit

0

Machine learning systems require representations of the real world for training and testing - they require data, and lots of it. Collecting data at scale has logistical and ethical challenges, and synthetic data promises a solution to these challenges. Instead of needing to collect photos of real people's faces to train a facial recognition system, a model creator could create and use photo-realistic, synthetic faces. The comparative ease of generating this synthetic data rather than relying on collecting data has made it a common practice. We present two key risks of using synthetic data in model development. First, we detail the high risk of false confidence when using synthetic data to increase dataset diversity and representation. We base this in the examination of a real world use-case of synthetic data, where synthetic datasets were generated for an evaluation of facial recognition technology. Second, we examine how using synthetic data risks circumventing consent for data usage. We illustrate this by considering the importance of consent to the U.S. Federal Trade Commission's regulation of data collection and affected models. Finally, we discuss how these two risks exemplify how synthetic data complicates existing governance and ethical practice; by decoupling data from those it impacts, synthetic data is prone to consolidating power away those most impacted by algorithmically-mediated harm.

Read more

5/6/2024