Integrated Hardware Architecture and Device Placement Search
0
Sign in to get full access
Overview
- This paper presents an integrated approach to hardware architecture design and device placement optimization for deep learning workloads.
- It introduces a novel framework that jointly optimizes the hardware architecture and device placement to improve the overall performance and efficiency of deep learning models.
- The paper explores techniques for hardware-aware neural architecture search and device placement search, leveraging insights from both the hardware and software domains.
Plain English Explanation
The paper tackles the challenge of building efficient deep learning systems by taking an integrated approach to hardware design and software optimization. Traditionally, these two aspects have been addressed separately, but the researchers recognized that jointly optimizing them could lead to significant improvements.
The key idea is to combine the process of designing the hardware architecture with the task of deciding how to place the different components of a deep learning model onto that hardware. By considering both aspects together, the framework can make more informed decisions that lead to better overall performance and efficiency.
For example, the hardware design process might explore different configurations of processing units, memory, and communication channels, while the device placement search determines the optimal way to distribute the model's layers and operations across the available hardware resources. By iterating between these two processes, the system can converge on a highly optimized solution.
The paper demonstrates the effectiveness of this integrated approach through experiments on various deep learning workloads and hardware platforms. The results show that the proposed framework can outperform traditional methods that treat hardware and software optimization as separate concerns.
Technical Explanation
The researchers developed a framework that integrates hardware architecture design and device placement search. The hardware architecture design process explores different configurations of processing units, memory, and interconnects, while the device placement search determines the optimal way to distribute the deep learning model's layers and operations across the available hardware resources.
The framework leverages techniques from hardware-aware neural architecture search and device placement optimization to jointly optimize the hardware and software components. This includes using performance models to guide the search process and incorporating hardware-specific constraints and considerations into the optimization.
The researchers also developed a dataflow-driven GPU acceleration technique to efficiently execute the integrated hardware-software solutions on heterogeneous hardware platforms. This approach schedules multi-model AI workloads onto the available hardware resources in a way that maximizes overall performance and utilization.
Through extensive experiments, the paper demonstrates the effectiveness of the proposed integrated framework in improving the performance and efficiency of deep learning workloads across a variety of hardware configurations and model architectures.
Critical Analysis
The paper presents a comprehensive and technically sound approach to jointly optimizing hardware architecture and device placement for deep learning workloads. The key strength of the research is the recognition that these two aspects should not be addressed in isolation, but rather in an integrated manner to achieve the best overall performance and efficiency.
One potential limitation of the work is the computational complexity and scalability of the joint optimization process, especially for large-scale deep learning models and hardware configurations. The researchers acknowledge this challenge and suggest that further research is needed to develop more efficient search algorithms and performance modeling techniques.
Additionally, the paper does not extensively explore the impact of the integrated framework on real-world deployment scenarios, such as dynamic changes in workloads or hardware resources. Further investigation into the adaptability and robustness of the proposed solution in such dynamic environments would be valuable.
Another area for potential improvement is the consideration of additional hardware-specific constraints and objectives, such as power consumption, thermal dissipation, and cost. Integrating these factors into the optimization process could lead to even more practical and impactful solutions.
Overall, the paper presents a compelling and well-executed approach to a critical problem in the field of deep learning systems design. The insights and techniques developed in this research can serve as a foundation for further advancements in the field of hardware-software co-optimization.
Conclusion
This paper introduces an integrated framework for hardware architecture design and device placement optimization, which jointly addresses these two key aspects of deep learning system design. The proposed approach leverages techniques from hardware-aware neural architecture search and device placement optimization to converge on hardware-software solutions that offer superior performance and efficiency.
The researchers demonstrate the effectiveness of their framework through extensive experimentation, showcasing significant improvements over traditional methods that treat hardware and software optimization as separate concerns. While the work has some limitations in terms of computational complexity and adaptability to dynamic environments, the core ideas and techniques developed in this research represent an important step forward in the pursuit of more efficient and capable deep learning systems.
The insights and methodologies presented in this paper can serve as a foundation for further advancements in the field of hardware-software co-optimization, ultimately driving the development of more powerful and energy-efficient deep learning solutions that can have a transformative impact across a wide range of applications.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
0
Integrated Hardware Architecture and Device Placement Search
Irene Wang, Jakub Tarnawski, Amar Phanishayee, Divya Mahajan
Distributed execution of deep learning training involves a dynamic interplay between hardware accelerator architecture and device placement strategy. This is the first work to explore the co-optimization of determining the optimal architecture and device placement strategy through novel algorithms, improving the balance of computational resources, memory usage, and data distribution. Our architecture search leverages tensor and vector units, determining their quantity and dimensionality, and on-chip and off-chip memory configurations. It also determines the microbatch size and decides whether to recompute or stash activations, balancing the memory footprint of training and storage size. For each explored architecture configuration, we use an Integer Linear Program (ILP) to find the optimal schedule for executing operators on the accelerator. The ILP results then integrate with a dynamic programming solution to identify the most effective device placement strategy, combining data, pipeline, and tensor model parallelism across multiple accelerators. Our approach achieves higher throughput on large language models compared to the state-of-the-art TPUv4 and the Spotlight accelerator search framework. The entire source code of PHAZE is available at https://github.com/msr-fiddle/phaze.
Read more7/19/2024
🤿
0
Workload-Aware Hardware Accelerator Mining for Distributed Deep Learning Training
Muhammad Adnan, Amar Phanishayee, Janardhan Kulkarni, Prashant J. Nair, Divya Mahajan
In this paper, we present a novel technique to search for hardware architectures of accelerators optimized for end-to-end training of deep neural networks (DNNs). Our approach addresses both single-device and distributed pipeline and tensor model parallel scenarios, latter being addressed for the first time. The search optimized accelerators for training relevant metrics such as throughput/TDP under a fixed area and power constraints. However, with the proliferation of specialized architectures and complex distributed training mechanisms, the design space exploration of hardware accelerators is very large. Prior work in this space has tried to tackle this by reducing the search space to either a single accelerator execution that too only for inference, or tuning the architecture for specific layers (e.g., convolution). Instead, we take a unique heuristic-based critical path-based approach to determine the best use of available resources (power and area) either for a set of DNN workloads or each workload individually. First, we perform local search to determine the architecture for each pipeline and tensor model stage. Specifically, the system iteratively generates architectural configurations and tunes the design using a novel heuristic-based approach that prioritizes accelerator resources and scheduling to critical operators in a machine learning workload. Second, to address the complexities of distributed training, the local search selects multiple (k) designs per stage. A global search then identifies an accelerator from the top-k sets to optimize training throughput across the stages. We evaluate this work on 11 different DNN models. Compared to a recent inference-only work Spotlight, our method converges to a design in, on average, 31x less time and offers 12x higher throughput. Moreover, designs generated using our method achieve 12% throughput improvement over TPU architecture.
Read more4/24/2024
🤔
0
A structure-aware framework for learning device placements on computation graphs
Shukai Duan, Heng Ping, Nikos Kanakaris, Xiongye Xiao, Peiyu Zhang, Panagiotis Kyriakis, Nesreen K. Ahmed, Guixiang Ma, Mihai Capota, Shahin Nazarian, Theodore L. Willke, Paul Bogdan
Existing approaches for device placement ignore the topological features of computation graphs and rely mostly on heuristic methods for graph partitioning. At the same time, they either follow a grouper-placer or an encoder-placer architecture, which requires understanding the interaction structure between code operations. To bridge the gap between encoder-placer and grouper-placer techniques, we propose a novel framework for the task of device placement, relying on smaller computation graphs extracted from the OpenVINO toolkit using reinforcement learning. The framework consists of five steps, including graph coarsening, node representation learning and policy optimization. It facilitates end-to-end training and takes into consideration the directed and acyclic nature of the computation graphs. We also propose a model variant, inspired by graph parsing networks and complex network analysis, enabling graph representation learning and personalized graph partitioning jointly, using an unspecified number of groups. To train the entire framework, we utilize reinforcement learning techniques by employing the execution time of the suggested device placements to formulate the reward. We demonstrate the flexibility and effectiveness of our approach through multiple experiments with three benchmark models, namely Inception-V3, ResNet, and BERT. The robustness of the proposed framework is also highlighted through an ablation study. The suggested placements improve the inference speed for the benchmark models by up to $58.2%$ over CPU execution and by up to $60.24%$ compared to other commonly used baselines.
Read more5/24/2024
0
New!Automatic Generation of Fast and Accurate Performance Models for Deep Neural Network Accelerators
Konstantin Lubeck, Alexander Louis-Ferdinand Jung, Felix Wedlich, Mika Markus Muller, Federico Nicol'as Peccia, Felix Thommes, Jannik Steinmetz, Valentin Biermaier, Adrian Frischknecht, Paul Palomero Bernardo, Oliver Bringmann
Implementing Deep Neural Networks (DNNs) on resource-constrained edge devices is a challenging task that requires tailored hardware accelerator architectures and a clear understanding of their performance characteristics when executing the intended AI workload. To facilitate this, we present an automated generation approach for fast performance models to accurately estimate the latency of a DNN mapped onto systematically modeled and concisely described accelerator architectures. Using our accelerator architecture description method, we modeled representative DNN accelerators such as Gemmini, UltraTrail, Plasticine-derived, and a parameterizable systolic array. Together with DNN mappings for those modeled architectures, we perform a combined DNN/hardware dependency graph analysis, which enables us, in the best case, to evaluate only 154 loop kernel iterations to estimate the performance for 4.19 billion instructions achieving a significant speedup. We outperform regression and analytical models in terms of mean absolute percentage error (MAPE) compared to simulation results, while being several magnitudes faster than an RTL simulation.
Read more9/16/2024