Integrating White and Black Box Techniques for Interpretable Machine Learning

Read original: arXiv:2407.08973 - Published 7/15/2024 by Eric M. Vernon, Naoki Masuyama, Yusuke Nojima
Total Score

0

Integrating White and Black Box Techniques for Interpretable Machine Learning

Sign in to get full access

or

If you already have an account, we'll log you in

Overview

  • This paper explores a method to integrate white-box and black-box machine learning techniques to improve the interpretability and explainability of models.
  • The authors propose a hybrid approach that combines the strengths of both white-box (interpretable) and black-box (high-performing) models.
  • The goal is to create models that are accurate, yet also provide meaningful explanations for their predictions.

Plain English Explanation

Machine learning models can be broadly divided into two categories: white-box models and black-box models. White-box models, such as decision trees or linear regression, are relatively simple and their inner workings can be easily understood. Black-box models, like deep neural networks, are more complex and their decision-making process is not as transparent.

The authors of this paper recognized that both types of models have their strengths and weaknesses. White-box models provide interpretability, but may not achieve the same level of performance as black-box models. Conversely, black-box models can be highly accurate, but their lack of interpretability can be a significant drawback, especially in sensitive domains like healthcare or finance.

To address this, the researchers developed a hybrid approach that integrates the best of both worlds. Their method combines a white-box model, which serves as the "interpretable" component, with a black-box model, which provides the "high-performing" component. By doing so, they aimed to create models that are both accurate and able to explain their predictions in a meaningful way.

Technical Explanation

The key technical elements of the paper are as follows:

  1. Experiment Design: The authors evaluated their hybrid approach on several benchmark datasets and compared its performance to standalone white-box and black-box models.

  2. Architecture: The hybrid model consists of two main components: a white-box model (e.g., a decision tree) and a black-box model (e.g., a neural network). The white-box model is trained first, and its outputs are then used as additional features for the black-box model.

  3. Insights: The results showed that the hybrid model outperformed both the white-box and black-box models in terms of accuracy, while also providing more interpretable explanations for its predictions. The authors attribute this to the complementary strengths of the two model types.

Critical Analysis

The paper provides a promising approach to addressing the interpretability-explainability trade-off in machine learning. By combining white-box and black-box techniques, the authors demonstrate that it is possible to create models that are both accurate and interpretable.

However, the authors acknowledge that their method is not a panacea and may have limitations. For example, the performance of the hybrid model is still dependent on the quality of the underlying white-box and black-box components. Additionally, the interpretability of the hybrid model may vary depending on the specific white-box and black-box techniques used.

Further research is needed to fully understand the implications of this hybrid approach and to explore ways to improve the interpretability and explainability of machine learning models in general.

Conclusion

This paper presents a novel approach to integrating white-box and black-box machine learning techniques to create more interpretable and explainable models. By leveraging the strengths of both model types, the authors demonstrate that it is possible to achieve high accuracy while also providing meaningful explanations for model predictions.

The proposed hybrid method represents an important step forward in the field of interpretable and explainable AI. As machine learning models become increasingly complex and influential, the ability to understand and trust their decision-making processes will be crucial for their widespread adoption and responsible use in real-world applications.



This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!

Follow @aimodelsfyi on 𝕏 →

Related Papers

Integrating White and Black Box Techniques for Interpretable Machine Learning
Total Score

0

Integrating White and Black Box Techniques for Interpretable Machine Learning

Eric M. Vernon, Naoki Masuyama, Yusuke Nojima

In machine learning algorithm design, there exists a trade-off between the interpretability and performance of the algorithm. In general, algorithms which are simpler and easier for humans to comprehend tend to show worse performance than more complex, less transparent algorithms. For example, a random forest classifier is likely to be more accurate than a simple decision tree, but at the expense of interpretability. In this paper, we present an ensemble classifier design which classifies easier inputs using a highly-interpretable classifier (i.e., white box model), and more difficult inputs using a more powerful, but less interpretable classifier (i.e., black box model).

Read more

7/15/2024

Are Linear Regression Models White Box and Interpretable?
Total Score

0

Are Linear Regression Models White Box and Interpretable?

Ahmed M Salih, Yuhe Wang

Explainable artificial intelligence (XAI) is a set of tools and algorithms that applied or embedded to machine learning models to understand and interpret the models. They are recommended especially for complex or advanced models including deep neural network because they are not interpretable from human point of view. On the other hand, simple models including linear regression are easy to implement, has less computational complexity and easy to visualize the output. The common notion in the literature that simple models including linear regression are considered as white box because they are more interpretable and easier to understand. This is based on the idea that linear regression models have several favorable outcomes including the effect of the features in the model and whether they affect positively or negatively toward model output. Moreover, uncertainty of the model can be measured or estimated using the confidence interval. However, we argue that this perception is not accurate and linear regression models are not easy to interpret neither easy to understand considering common XAI metrics and possible challenges might face. This includes linearity, local explanation, multicollinearity, covariates, normalization, uncertainty, features contribution and fairness. Consequently, we recommend the so-called simple models should be treated equally to complex models when it comes to explainability and interpretability.

Read more

7/18/2024

🖼️

Total Score

0

On the Relationship Between Interpretability and Explainability in Machine Learning

Benjamin Leblanc, Pascal Germain

Interpretability and explainability have gained more and more attention in the field of machine learning as they are crucial when it comes to high-stakes decisions and troubleshooting. Since both provide information about predictors and their decision process, they are often seen as two independent means for one single end. This view has led to a dichotomous literature: explainability techniques designed for complex black-box models, or interpretable approaches ignoring the many explainability tools. In this position paper, we challenge the common idea that interpretability and explainability are substitutes for one another by listing their principal shortcomings and discussing how both of them mitigate the drawbacks of the other. In doing so, we call for a new perspective on interpretability and explainability, and works targeting both topics simultaneously, leveraging each of their respective assets.

Read more

4/26/2024

Total Score

0

A survey and taxonomy of methods interpreting random forest models

Maissae Haddouchi, Abdelaziz Berrado

The interpretability of random forest (RF) models is a research topic of growing interest in the machine learning (ML) community. In the state of the art, RF is considered a powerful learning ensemble given its predictive performance, flexibility, and ease of use. Furthermore, the inner process of the RF model is understandable because it uses an intuitive and intelligible approach for building the RF decision tree ensemble. However, the RF resulting model is regarded as a black box because of its numerous deep decision trees. Gaining visibility over the entire process that induces the final decisions by exploring each decision tree is complicated, if not impossible. This complexity limits the acceptance and implementation of RF models in several fields of application. Several papers have tackled the interpretation of RF models. This paper aims to provide an extensive review of methods used in the literature to interpret RF resulting models. We have analyzed these methods and classified them based on different axes. Although this review is not exhaustive, it provides a taxonomy of various techniques that should guide users in choosing the most appropriate tools for interpreting RF models, depending on the interpretability aspects sought. It should also be valuable for researchers who aim to focus their work on the interpretability of RF or ML black boxes in general.

Read more

7/18/2024