Interpretable Differential Diagnosis with Dual-Inference Large Language Models
0
💬
Sign in to get full access
Overview
- This paper investigates the use of large language models (LLMs) to generate interpretable differential diagnoses (DDx) for clinical applications.
- The authors develop a new DDx dataset with expert-derived interpretations and propose a novel framework called "Dual-Inf" that enables LLMs to conduct bidirectional inference for interpretation.
- Both human and automated evaluation demonstrate the effectiveness of Dual-Inf in predicting differentials and diagnosis explanations, with significant performance improvements over baseline methods.
Plain English Explanation
When a patient describes their symptoms to a doctor, the doctor needs to generate a list of possible diseases or conditions that could be causing those symptoms. This is called a differential diagnosis (DDx). Automating the generation of DDx is critical for clinical decision support, but it's also important to be able to explain the reasoning behind the potential diagnoses.
Large language models (LLMs) are powerful AI systems that can process and understand natural language. The authors of this paper wanted to see if they could use LLMs to not only generate DDx, but also provide interpretations or explanations for those potential diagnoses.
To do this, they first created a new dataset of clinical notes with expert-provided interpretations of the DDx. Then, they developed a novel framework called "Dual-Inf" that allows LLMs to perform bidirectional inference – generating both the DDx and the corresponding explanations.
The results show that Dual-Inf outperforms other methods, making fewer errors and demonstrating strong generalizability. The authors also found that Dual-Inf could be particularly helpful for diagnosing rare diseases and providing clear explanations.
Technical Explanation
The authors first developed a new dataset of 570 public clinical notes, with expert-provided interpretations for the differential diagnoses. This provides a valuable resource for training and evaluating models that can generate both DDx and corresponding explanations.
They then proposed the Dual-Inf framework, which uses LLMs to perform bidirectional inference. The model takes the patient's symptom description as input and generates a list of potential differentials, as well as an interpretation or explanation for each differential. This allows the model to not only predict the DDx, but also provide reasoning that is critical for clinical decision-making.
The authors evaluated Dual-Inf using both human and automated metrics, and found that it significantly outperformed baseline methods. Specifically, the performance improvement of Dual-Inf over the baselines exceeded 32% in terms of BERTScore, a metric that measures the semantic similarity between the model's interpretations and the expert-provided ones.
Further experiments showed that Dual-Inf made fewer errors in its interpretations, had strong generalizability, and was particularly effective at diagnosing rare diseases and providing clear explanations.
Critical Analysis
The authors acknowledge several limitations and areas for future research. For example, the dataset used for training and evaluation, while a valuable contribution, is still relatively small. Expanding the dataset with more clinical notes and expert-derived interpretations could further improve the model's performance and robustness.
Additionally, the authors note that their evaluation focused on predicting and interpreting DDx, but did not assess the model's ability to actually diagnose patients or recommend treatment. Integrating Dual-Inf into a complete clinical decision support system and evaluating its real-world impact would be an important next step.
Overall, the Dual-Inf framework represents a promising approach for leveraging LLMs for interpretable differential diagnosis. However, as with any AI-based clinical tool, it will be crucial to carefully validate the system's safety and reliability before deploying it in real-world healthcare settings.
Conclusion
This paper demonstrates the potential of using large language models for clinical reasoning and decision support. By developing a novel framework that can generate both differential diagnoses and corresponding interpretations, the authors have taken an important step towards more transparent and explainable AI systems in healthcare.
The insights from this research could have far-reaching implications, potentially aiding clinicians in making more informed decisions, improving patient outcomes, and advancing the field of AI-powered medical diagnosis and treatment recommendation. As the authors suggest, further development and clinical evaluation of systems like Dual-Inf will be crucial to realizing the full potential of this technology.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
💬
0
Interpretable Differential Diagnosis with Dual-Inference Large Language Models
Shuang Zhou, Sirui Ding, Jiashuo Wang, Mingquan Lin, Genevieve B. Melton, Rui Zhang
Methodological advancements to automate the generation of differential diagnosis (DDx) to predict a list of potential diseases as differentials given patients' symptom descriptions are critical to clinical reasoning and applications such as decision support. However, providing reasoning or interpretation for these differential diagnoses is more meaningful. Fortunately, large language models (LLMs) possess powerful language processing abilities and have been proven effective in various related tasks. Motivated by this potential, we investigate the use of LLMs for interpretable DDx. First, we develop a new DDx dataset with expert-derived interpretation on 570 public clinical notes. Second, we propose a novel framework, named Dual-Inf, that enables LLMs to conduct bidirectional inference for interpretation. Both human and automated evaluation demonstrate the effectiveness of Dual-Inf in predicting differentials and diagnosis explanations. Specifically, the performance improvement of Dual-Inf over the baseline methods exceeds 32% w.r.t. BERTScore in DDx interpretation. Furthermore, experiments verify that Dual-Inf (1) makes fewer errors in interpretation, (2) has great generalizability, (3) is promising for rare disease diagnosis and explanation.
Read more7/11/2024
0
Large Language Models for Disease Diagnosis: A Scoping Review
Shuang Zhou, Zidu Xu, Mian Zhang, Chunpu Xu, Yawen Guo, Zaifu Zhan, Sirui Ding, Jiashuo Wang, Kaishuai Xu, Yi Fang, Liqiao Xia, Jeremy Yeung, Daochen Zha, Mingquan Lin, Rui Zhang
Automatic disease diagnosis has become increasingly valuable in clinical practice. The advent of large language models (LLMs) has catalyzed a paradigm shift in artificial intelligence, with growing evidence supporting the efficacy of LLMs in diagnostic tasks. Despite the growing attention in this field, many critical research questions remain under-explored. For instance, what diseases and LLM techniques have been investigated for diagnostic tasks? How can suitable LLM techniques and evaluation methods be selected for clinical decision-making? To answer these questions, we performed a comprehensive analysis of LLM-based methods for disease diagnosis. This scoping review examined the types of diseases, associated organ systems, relevant clinical data, LLM techniques, and evaluation methods reported in existing studies. Furthermore, we offered guidelines for data preprocessing and the selection of appropriate LLM techniques and evaluation strategies for diagnostic tasks. We also assessed the limitations of current research and delineated the challenges and future directions in this research field. In summary, our review outlined a blueprint for LLM-based disease diagnosis, helping to streamline and guide future research endeavors.
Read more9/4/2024
0
DiReCT: Diagnostic Reasoning for Clinical Notes via Large Language Models
Bowen Wang, Jiuyang Chang, Yiming Qian, Guoxin Chen, Junhao Chen, Zhouqiang Jiang, Jiahao Zhang, Yuta Nakashima, Hajime Nagahara
Large language models (LLMs) have recently showcased remarkable capabilities, spanning a wide range of tasks and applications, including those in the medical domain. Models like GPT-4 excel in medical question answering but may face challenges in the lack of interpretability when handling complex tasks in real clinical settings. We thus introduce the diagnostic reasoning dataset for clinical notes (DiReCT), aiming at evaluating the reasoning ability and interpretability of LLMs compared to human doctors. It contains 511 clinical notes, each meticulously annotated by physicians, detailing the diagnostic reasoning process from observations in a clinical note to the final diagnosis. Additionally, a diagnostic knowledge graph is provided to offer essential knowledge for reasoning, which may not be covered in the training data of existing LLMs. Evaluations of leading LLMs on DiReCT bring out a significant gap between their reasoning ability and that of human doctors, highlighting the critical need for models that can reason effectively in real-world clinical scenarios.
Read more8/7/2024
0
CliBench: Multifaceted Evaluation of Large Language Models in Clinical Decisions on Diagnoses, Procedures, Lab Tests Orders and Prescriptions
Mingyu Derek Ma, Chenchen Ye, Yu Yan, Xiaoxuan Wang, Peipei Ping, Timothy S Chang, Wei Wang
The integration of Artificial Intelligence (AI), especially Large Language Models (LLMs), into the clinical diagnosis process offers significant potential to improve the efficiency and accessibility of medical care. While LLMs have shown some promise in the medical domain, their application in clinical diagnosis remains underexplored, especially in real-world clinical practice, where highly sophisticated, patient-specific decisions need to be made. Current evaluations of LLMs in this field are often narrow in scope, focusing on specific diseases or specialties and employing simplified diagnostic tasks. To bridge this gap, we introduce CliBench, a novel benchmark developed from the MIMIC IV dataset, offering a comprehensive and realistic assessment of LLMs' capabilities in clinical diagnosis. This benchmark not only covers diagnoses from a diverse range of medical cases across various specialties but also incorporates tasks of clinical significance: treatment procedure identification, lab test ordering and medication prescriptions. Supported by structured output ontologies, CliBench enables a precise and multi-granular evaluation, offering an in-depth understanding of LLM's capability on diverse clinical tasks of desired granularity. We conduct a zero-shot evaluation of leading LLMs to assess their proficiency in clinical decision-making. Our preliminary results shed light on the potential and limitations of current LLMs in clinical settings, providing valuable insights for future advancements in LLM-powered healthcare.
Read more6/17/2024