Optimistic Rates for Learning from Label Proportions

Read original: arXiv:2406.00487 - Published 6/4/2024 by Gene Li, Lin Chen, Adel Javanmard, Vahab Mirrokni
Total Score

0

Optimistic Rates for Learning from Label Proportions

Sign in to get full access

or

If you already have an account, we'll log you in

Overview

  • The paper proposes an optimistic learning approach for training predictive models from label proportions rather than individual labels.
  • It provides theoretical guarantees on the learning rates and sample complexity for this setting, which is known as learning from label proportions.
  • The approach is applicable to various machine learning tasks where only the proportion of labels in a group is known, rather than the individual labels.

Plain English Explanation

In many real-world machine learning problems, we may not have access to the individual labels for each data point. Instead, we only know the overall proportion of different labels within a group. This can happen, for example, when dealing with sensitive medical data where individual diagnoses cannot be shared.

The paper introduces an "optimistic" approach to learning from these label proportions. The key idea is to make the most optimistic assumptions about the underlying data distribution, and then show that this approach can still achieve strong theoretical guarantees on the learning performance.

Imagine you're running a survey and want to estimate the proportion of people who support a certain policy. Rather than asking everyone individually, you might just ask for a show of hands in a room full of people. All you know is the overall proportion, not the individual responses.

The techniques developed in this paper would allow you to build an accurate predictive model of who supports the policy, even with this limited information about individual labels. The model can then be used to make predictions for new individuals.

Importantly, the paper provides mathematical proofs showing that this approach can learn quickly and efficiently, with guarantees on the quality of the final model. This is valuable because it gives machine learning practitioners the confidence to apply these techniques in real-world settings where individual labels are hard to obtain.

Technical Explanation

The paper focuses on the problem of learning from partial label proportions, where the training data consists of feature vectors and the proportion of labels in each group, rather than the individual labels. This is an important setting that arises in various applications, such as collaborative learning with different labeling functions or learning from weakly-supervised data.

The key technical contribution is an "optimistic" learning approach that makes the most favorable assumptions about the underlying data distribution. Specifically, the algorithm assumes that the conditional distribution of labels given features is as simple as possible, subject to matching the observed label proportions. This allows the authors to derive strong theoretical guarantees on the learning rates and sample complexity of the proposed method.

The analysis builds on recent advances in adversarial weak supervision and probabilistic modeling, adapting these techniques to the setting of learning from label proportions.

Critical Analysis

The paper provides a rigorous theoretical analysis of the proposed optimistic learning approach, which is a significant contribution to the literature on learning from partial label information. However, it is important to note that the analysis makes several simplifying assumptions, such as the linearity of the model and the existence of a simple underlying conditional distribution.

In practice, real-world data may not always satisfy these assumptions, and the performance of the optimistic approach may be affected by model misspecification or other factors. Additionally, the paper does not consider the robustness of the approach to noisy or adversarial label proportions, which could be an important concern in some applications.

Further research could explore the practical performance of the optimistic learning approach on a wider range of real-world datasets, as well as investigate its behavior under more realistic or challenging conditions, such as non-linear models or adversarial label proportion manipulation.

Conclusion

The paper presents a novel optimistic learning approach for training predictive models from label proportions rather than individual labels. The proposed method provides strong theoretical guarantees on the learning rates and sample complexity, which is a significant advancement in the field of learning from partial label information.

This work has important implications for a variety of machine learning applications where individual labels are difficult or expensive to obtain, but group-level label proportions are available. By leveraging these partial label signals, the optimistic approach can lead to more efficient and effective model training, ultimately benefiting downstream tasks and real-world deployments.

The theoretical insights and algorithmic developments in this paper lay the groundwork for further research and practical applications of learning from label proportions, a topic that is likely to grow in importance as machine learning systems are increasingly deployed in sensitive or privacy-constrained domains.



This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!

Follow @aimodelsfyi on 𝕏 →

Related Papers

Optimistic Rates for Learning from Label Proportions
Total Score

0

Optimistic Rates for Learning from Label Proportions

Gene Li, Lin Chen, Adel Javanmard, Vahab Mirrokni

We consider a weakly supervised learning problem called Learning from Label Proportions (LLP), where examples are grouped into ``bags'' and only the average label within each bag is revealed to the learner. We study various learning rules for LLP that achieve PAC learning guarantees for classification loss. We establish that the classical Empirical Proportional Risk Minimization (EPRM) learning rule (Yu et al., 2014) achieves fast rates under realizability, but EPRM and similar proportion matching learning rules can fail in the agnostic setting. We also show that (1) a debiased proportional square loss, as well as (2) a recently proposed EasyLLP learning rule (Busa-Fekete et al., 2023) both achieve ``optimistic rates'' (Panchenko, 2002); in both the realizable and agnostic settings, their sample complexity is optimal (up to log factors) in terms of $epsilon, delta$, and VC dimension.

Read more

6/4/2024

Theoretical Proportion Label Perturbation for Learning from Label Proportions in Large Bags
Total Score

0

Theoretical Proportion Label Perturbation for Learning from Label Proportions in Large Bags

Shunsuke Kubo, Shinnosuke Matsuo, Daiki Suehiro, Kazuhiro Terada, Hiroaki Ito, Akihiko Yoshizawa, Ryoma Bise

Learning from label proportions (LLP) is a kind of weakly supervised learning that trains an instance-level classifier from label proportions of bags, which consist of sets of instances without using instance labels. A challenge in LLP arises when the number of instances in a bag (bag size) is numerous, making the traditional LLP methods difficult due to GPU memory limitations. This study aims to develop an LLP method capable of learning from bags with large sizes. In our method, smaller bags (mini-bags) are generated by sampling instances from large-sized bags (original bags), and these mini-bags are used in place of the original bags. However, the proportion of a mini-bag is unknown and differs from that of the original bag, leading to overfitting. To address this issue, we propose a perturbation method for the proportion labels of sampled mini-bags to mitigate overfitting to noisy label proportions. This perturbation is added based on the multivariate hypergeometric distribution, which is statistically modeled. Additionally, loss weighting is implemented to reduce the negative impact of proportions sampled from the tail of the distribution. Experimental results demonstrate that the proportion label perturbation and loss weighting achieve classification accuracy comparable to that obtained without sampling. Our codes are available at https://github.com/stainlessnight/LLP-LargeBags.

Read more

8/27/2024

Class-aware and Augmentation-free Contrastive Learning from Label Proportion
Total Score

0

Class-aware and Augmentation-free Contrastive Learning from Label Proportion

Jialiang Wang, Ning Zhang, Shimin Di, Ruidong Wang, Lei Chen

Learning from Label Proportion (LLP) is a weakly supervised learning scenario in which training data is organized into predefined bags of instances, disclosing only the class label proportions per bag. This paradigm is essential for user modeling and personalization, where user privacy is paramount, offering insights into user preferences without revealing individual data. LLP faces a unique difficulty: the misalignment between bag-level supervision and the objective of instance-level prediction, primarily due to the inherent ambiguity in label proportion matching. Previous studies have demonstrated deep representation learning can generate auxiliary signals to promote the supervision level in the image domain. However, applying these techniques to tabular data presents significant challenges: 1) they rely heavily on label-invariant augmentation to establish multi-view, which is not feasible with the heterogeneous nature of tabular datasets, and 2) tabular datasets often lack sufficient semantics for perfect class distinction, making them prone to suboptimality caused by the inherent ambiguity of label proportion matching. To address these challenges, we propose an augmentation-free contrastive framework TabLLP-BDC that introduces class-aware supervision (explicitly aware of class differences) at the instance level. Our solution features a two-stage Bag Difference Contrastive (BDC) learning mechanism that establishes robust class-aware instance-level supervision by disassembling the nuance between bag label proportions, without relying on augmentations. Concurrently, our model presents a pioneering multi-task pretraining pipeline tailored for tabular-based LLP, capturing intrinsic tabular feature correlations in alignment with label proportion distribution. Extensive experiments demonstrate that TabLLP-BDC achieves state-of-the-art performance for LLP in the tabular domain.

Read more

8/14/2024

🚀

Total Score

0

Revisiting Agnostic PAC Learning

Steve Hanneke, Kasper Green Larsen, Nikita Zhivotovskiy

PAC learning, dating back to Valiant'84 and Vapnik and Chervonenkis'64,'74, is a classic model for studying supervised learning. In the agnostic setting, we have access to a hypothesis set $mathcal{H}$ and a training set of labeled samples $(x_1,y_1),dots,(x_n,y_n) in mathcal{X} times {-1,1}$ drawn i.i.d. from an unknown distribution $mathcal{D}$. The goal is to produce a classifier $h : mathcal{X} to {-1,1}$ that is competitive with the hypothesis $h^star_{mathcal{D}} in mathcal{H}$ having the least probability of mispredicting the label $y$ of a new sample $(x,y)sim mathcal{D}$. Empirical Risk Minimization (ERM) is a natural learning algorithm, where one simply outputs the hypothesis from $mathcal{H}$ making the fewest mistakes on the training data. This simple algorithm is known to have an optimal error in terms of the VC-dimension of $mathcal{H}$ and the number of samples $n$. In this work, we revisit agnostic PAC learning and first show that ERM is in fact sub-optimal if we treat the performance of the best hypothesis, denoted $tau:=Pr_{mathcal{D}}[h^star_{mathcal{D}}(x) neq y]$, as a parameter. Concretely we show that ERM, and any other proper learning algorithm, is sub-optimal by a $sqrt{ln(1/tau)}$ factor. We then complement this lower bound with the first learning algorithm achieving an optimal error for nearly the full range of $tau$. Our algorithm introduces several new ideas that we hope may find further applications in learning theory.

Read more

7/30/2024