Latent Plan Transformer: Planning as Latent Variable Inference

Overview

• The paper explores how to use generative modeling for planning in tasks aiming for long-term returns, where planning becomes essential.
• The key technical challenge identified is the lack of step-wise rewards, which leads to temporal inconsistency in the data.
• The authors introduce the Latent Plan Transformer (LPT), a novel model that leverages a latent space to connect a Transformer-based trajectory generator and the final return.
• LPT can be learned with maximum likelihood estimation on trajectory-return pairs, and its latent variable inference enables "planning as inference" at test time.
• Experiments show LPT can discover improved decisions from suboptimal trajectories, performing competitively across several benchmarks.

Plain English Explanation

When working on tasks that aim for long-term rewards, planning becomes crucial. The paper explores using generative modeling techniques for planning, specifically focusing on datasets repurposed from offline reinforcement learning.

One key challenge the authors identify is the lack of step-by-step rewards in these datasets, which can lead to inconsistencies in the data over time. To address this, they introduce the Latent Plan Transformer (LPT), a novel model that uses a latent space to bridge the gap between a Transformer-based trajectory generator and the final return.

The LPT model can be trained using maximum likelihood estimation on pairs of trajectories and their associated returns. Importantly, the latent variable allows the model to naturally integrate sub-trajectories into a consistent abstraction, even with a finite context. At test time, the latent variable is inferred from the expected return, enabling "planning as inference" - the idea of using the model to discover improved decisions from suboptimal trajectories.

The experiments demonstrate that the LPT model can outperform other approaches across several benchmarks, including Gym-Mujoco, Franka Kitchen, Maze2D, and Connect Four. The model exhibits capabilities in nuanced credit assignment, trajectory stitching, and adaptation to environmental changes, validating the potential of latent variable inference as an alternative to step-wise reward prompting.

Technical Explanation

The paper proposes the Latent Plan Transformer (LPT), a novel generative model for planning in tasks with long-term returns. The key technical challenge addressed is the lack of step-wise rewards in the datasets repurposed from offline reinforcement learning, which can lead to temporal inconsistencies.

The LPT model leverages a latent space to connect a Transformer-based trajectory generator and the final return. It can be trained using maximum likelihood estimation on trajectory-return pairs, where the posterior sampling of the latent variable naturally integrates sub-trajectories into a consistent abstraction.

At test time, the latent variable is inferred from the expected return before policy execution, realizing the idea of "planning as inference." This allows the model to discover improved decisions from suboptimal trajectories.

The experiments demonstrate that LPT can outperform other approaches across several benchmarks, including Gym-Mujoco, Franka Kitchen, Maze2D, and Connect Four. The model exhibits capabilities in nuanced credit assignment, trajectory stitching, and adaptation to environmental contingencies, validating the potential of latent variable inference as an alternative to step-wise reward prompting.

Critical Analysis

The paper presents a promising approach to planning in tasks with long-term returns, but it also acknowledges some limitations and areas for further research.

One potential caveat is the reliance on datasets repurposed from offline reinforcement learning, which may not fully capture the complexities of real-world planning scenarios. Additional research could explore the performance of the LPT model on more diverse and challenging planning datasets.

Furthermore, the paper does not address the interpretability of the latent representations learned by the LPT model. Understanding the internal workings of the model and the specific factors it considers in its planning decisions could be an important area for future investigation.

While the experiments demonstrate the model's capabilities across several benchmarks, it would be valuable to see how the LPT model performs in more complex, real-world planning tasks, where environmental contingencies and dynamic constraints may pose additional challenges.

Overall, the Latent Plan Transformer presents an innovative approach to planning in the absence of step-wise rewards, and the results suggest it is a promising direction for further research and development.

Conclusion

The paper introduces the Latent Plan Transformer (LPT), a novel generative model that leverages a latent space to address the key challenge of temporal inconsistency in datasets repurposed from offline reinforcement learning. The LPT model can be trained using maximum likelihood estimation on trajectory-return pairs, and its latent variable inference enables "planning as inference" at test time, allowing the model to discover improved decisions from suboptimal trajectories.

The experimental results demonstrate the LPT model's competitive performance across several benchmarks, including Gym-Mujoco, Franka Kitchen, Maze2D, and Connect Four. The model's capabilities in nuanced credit assignment, trajectory stitching, and adaptation to environmental contingencies validate the potential of latent variable inference as an alternative to step-wise reward prompting in long-term planning tasks.

While the paper identifies some limitations and areas for further research, the Latent Plan Transformer represents an exciting development in the field of planning and decision-making, with potential applications in a wide range of domains.