Let's Think Outside the Box: Exploring Leap-of-Thought in Large Language Models with Creative Humor Generation
2312.02439
0
0
Abstract
Chain-of-Thought (CoT) guides large language models (LLMs) to reason step-by-step, and can motivate their logical reasoning ability. While effective for logical tasks, CoT is not conducive to creative problem-solving which often requires out-of-box thoughts and is crucial for innovation advancements. In this paper, we explore the Leap-of-Thought (LoT) abilities within LLMs -- a non-sequential, creative paradigm involving strong associations and knowledge leaps. To this end, we study LLMs on the popular Oogiri game which needs participants to have good creativity and strong associative thinking for responding unexpectedly and humorously to the given image, text, or both, and thus is suitable for LoT study. Then to investigate LLMs' LoT ability in the Oogiri game, we first build a multimodal and multilingual Oogiri-GO dataset which contains over 130,000 samples from the Oogiri game, and observe the insufficient LoT ability or failures of most existing LLMs on the Oogiri game. Accordingly, we introduce a creative Leap-of-Thought (CLoT) paradigm to improve LLM's LoT ability. CLoT first formulates the Oogiri-GO dataset into LoT-oriented instruction tuning data to train pretrained LLM for achieving certain LoT humor generation and discrimination abilities. Then CLoT designs an explorative self-refinement that encourages the LLM to generate more creative LoT data via exploring parallels between seemingly unrelated concepts and selects high-quality data to train itself for self-refinement. CLoT not only excels in humor generation in the Oogiri game but also boosts creative abilities in various tasks like cloud guessing game and divergent association task. These findings advance our understanding and offer a pathway to improve LLMs' creative capacities for innovative applications across domains. The dataset, code, and models will be released online. https://zhongshsh.github.io/CLoT/.
Create account to get full access
Overview
- This paper explores the use of large language models (LLMs) to generate creative humor, focusing on a technique called "leap-of-thought" which involves making unexpected connections between ideas.
- The researchers introduce the Oogiri-GO dataset, a collection of Japanese puns and jokes, and use it to train and evaluate LLMs on the task of creative humor generation.
- The paper investigates whether LLMs can learn to generate humorous content that goes beyond simple pattern matching, and explores the potential of LLMs to exhibit "leap-of-thought" reasoning.
Plain English Explanation
The paper looks at how powerful language models, known as large language models (LLMs), can be used to generate creative and humorous content. The key idea is to see if these models can make unexpected connections between different concepts, a technique the researchers call "leap-of-thought."
To explore this, the researchers created a dataset of Japanese puns and jokes called Oogiri-GO. They then trained LLMs on this dataset to see if the models could learn to generate their own original, humorous content, rather than just repeating patterns they had seen before.
The goal is to understand if LLMs can go beyond simple pattern matching and actually exhibit a kind of creative "leap-of-thought" when generating humor. This could have important implications for how we design and use these powerful language models in the future.
Technical Explanation
The paper focuses on the task of creative humor generation using large language models (LLMs). The researchers introduce the Oogiri-GO dataset, a collection of Japanese puns and jokes, and use it to train and evaluate LLMs on the task of generating humorous content.
The key technical aspect of the paper is the exploration of "leap-of-thought" in LLMs. This refers to the ability of the models to make unexpected connections between ideas and concepts, going beyond simple pattern matching, in order to generate novel and creative humor.
The paper compares the performance of different LLM architectures, including GPT-3, on the Oogiri-GO dataset. It examines metrics such as pun detection, logical reasoning, and self-evaluation capability to assess the models' ability to exhibit "leap-of-thought" reasoning when generating humorous content.
Additionally, the paper explores the potential use of smaller, more specialized language models to enhance the multi-step reasoning capabilities of LLMs in the context of creative humor generation.
Critical Analysis
The paper presents a novel and intriguing approach to exploring the capabilities of large language models in the domain of creative humor generation. The introduction of the Oogiri-GO dataset is a valuable contribution, providing a unique testbed for evaluating the "leap-of-thought" reasoning of LLMs.
However, the paper acknowledges several limitations and areas for further research. For example, the dataset is focused on Japanese puns and jokes, which may limit the generalizability of the findings to other cultural and linguistic contexts. Additionally, the paper does not delve deeply into the interpretability of the LLMs' humor generation process, leaving questions about the underlying reasoning mechanisms.
Further research could explore the integration of logical reasoning and self-evaluation capabilities to better understand and control the "leap-of-thought" process in LLMs. Expanding the dataset to include a broader range of humor styles and cultural contexts could also help validate the researchers' findings and explore the cross-cultural applicability of the approach.
Conclusion
This paper presents a novel and thought-provoking exploration of the use of large language models to generate creative humor. By introducing the Oogiri-GO dataset and investigating the "leap-of-thought" reasoning of LLMs, the researchers have opened up new avenues for understanding the capabilities and limitations of these powerful models in the domain of creative and humorous content generation.
The findings of this study have the potential to inform the development of more advanced language models with enhanced reasoning and creativity, which could have significant implications for various applications, from conversational AI to creative writing assistants. As the field of AI continues to evolve, research like this will be crucial in pushing the boundaries of what language models can achieve.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
💬
Synergy-of-Thoughts: Eliciting Efficient Reasoning in Hybrid Language Models
Yu Shang, Yu Li, Fengli Xu, Yong Li
0
0
Large language models (LLMs) have shown impressive emergent abilities in a wide range of tasks, but still face challenges in handling complex reasoning problems. Previous works like chain-of-thought (CoT) and tree-of-thoughts (ToT) have predominately focused on enhancing accuracy, but overlook the rapidly increasing token cost, which could be particularly problematic for open-ended real-world tasks with huge solution spaces. Motivated by the dual process theory of human cognition, we propose Synergy of Thoughts (SoT) to unleash the synergistic potential of hybrid LLMs for efficient reasoning. By default, SoT uses smaller-scale language models to generate multiple low-cost reasoning thoughts, which resembles the parallel intuitions produced by System 1. If these intuitions exhibit conflicts, SoT will invoke the reflective reasoning of scaled-up language models to emulate the intervention of System 2, which will override the intuitive thoughts and rectify the reasoning process. This framework is model-agnostic and training-free, which can be flexibly implemented with various off-the-shelf LLMs. Experiments on six representative reasoning tasks show that SoT substantially reduces the token cost by 38.3%-75.1%, and simultaneously achieves state-of-the-art reasoning accuracy and solution diversity. Notably, the average token cost reduction on open-ended tasks reaches up to 69.1%. Code repo with all prompts will be released upon publication.
5/24/2024
📊
Empowering Multi-step Reasoning across Languages via Tree-of-Thoughts
Leonardo Ranaldi, Giulia Pucci, Federico Ranaldi, Elena Sofia Ruzzetti, Fabio Massimo Zanzotto
0
0
Reasoning methods, best exemplified by the well-known Chain-of-Thought (CoT), empower the reasoning abilities of Large Language Models (LLMs) by eliciting them to solve complex tasks in a step-by-step manner. Although they are achieving significant success, the ability to deliver multi-step reasoning remains limited to English because of the imbalance in the distribution of pre-training data, which makes other languages a barrier. In this paper, we propose Cross-lingual Tree-of-Thoughts (Cross-ToT), a method for aligning Cross-lingual CoT reasoning across languages. The proposed method, through a self-consistent cross-lingual prompting mechanism inspired by the Tree-of-Thoughts approach, provides multi-step reasoning paths in different languages that, during the steps, lead to the final solution. Experimental evaluations show that our method significantly outperforms existing prompting methods by reducing the number of interactions and achieving state-of-the-art performance.
6/24/2024
uTeBC-NLP at SemEval-2024 Task 9: Can LLMs be Lateral Thinkers?
Pouya Sadeghi, Amirhossein Abaskohi, Yadollah Yaghoobzadeh
0
0
Inspired by human cognition, Jiang et al.(2023c) create a benchmark for assessing LLMs' lateral thinking-thinking outside the box. Building upon this benchmark, we investigate how different prompting methods enhance LLMs' performance on this task to reveal their inherent power for outside-the-box thinking ability. Through participating in SemEval-2024, task 9, Sentence Puzzle sub-task, we explore prompt engineering methods: chain of thoughts (CoT) and direct prompting, enhancing with informative descriptions, and employing contextualizing prompts using a retrieval augmented generation (RAG) pipeline. Our experiments involve three LLMs including GPT-3.5, GPT-4, and Zephyr-7B-beta. We generate a dataset of thinking paths between riddles and options using GPT-4, validated by humans for quality. Findings indicate that compressed informative prompts enhance performance. Dynamic in-context learning enhances model performance significantly. Furthermore, fine-tuning Zephyr on our dataset enhances performance across other commonsense datasets, underscoring the value of innovative thinking.
4/4/2024
🤔
How to think step-by-step: A mechanistic understanding of chain-of-thought reasoning
Subhabrata Dutta, Joykirat Singh, Soumen Chakrabarti, Tanmoy Chakraborty
0
0
Despite superior reasoning prowess demonstrated by Large Language Models (LLMs) with Chain-of-Thought (CoT) prompting, a lack of understanding prevails around the internal mechanisms of the models that facilitate CoT generation. This work investigates the neural sub-structures within LLMs that manifest CoT reasoning from a mechanistic point of view. From an analysis of Llama-2 7B applied to multistep reasoning over fictional ontologies, we demonstrate that LLMs deploy multiple parallel pathways of answer generation for step-by-step reasoning. These parallel pathways provide sequential answers from the input question context as well as the generated CoT. We observe a functional rift in the middle layers of the LLM. Token representations in the initial half remain strongly biased towards the pretraining prior, with the in-context prior taking over in the later half. This internal phase shift manifests in different functional components: attention heads that write the answer token appear in the later half, attention heads that move information along ontological relationships appear in the initial half, and so on. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first attempt towards mechanistic investigation of CoT reasoning in LLMs.
5/7/2024