LOGIC-LM++: Multi-Step Refinement for Symbolic Formulations
0
Sign in to get full access
Overview
- The paper "LOGIC-LM++: Multi-Step Refinement for Symbolic Formulations" explores ways to improve the logical reasoning capabilities of large language models (LLMs).
- The researchers developed a novel approach called LOGIC-LM++ that uses a multi-step refinement process to help LLMs better understand and work with symbolic logical formulations.
- This builds on previous work, such as LOGIC-LM and LogicBENCH, which have investigated the symbolic reasoning abilities of LLMs.
Plain English Explanation
Large language models (LLMs) like GPT-3 and BERT have shown impressive abilities in tasks like natural language processing and generation. However, they can struggle with tasks that require symbolic reasoning or working with logical formulations. The LOGIC-LM++ approach aims to help LLMs better understand and manipulate symbolic logic.
The key idea is to use a multi-step refinement process. First, the LLM takes a logical formulation as input and tries to understand it. Then, the model's output is analyzed, and areas where the model is uncertain or making mistakes are identified. Finally, the model is fine-tuned on those problematic areas, and the process repeats until the model can reliably work with the logical formulations.
This iterative refinement is designed to gradually build up the LLM's symbolic reasoning capabilities, similar to how humans learn logical concepts over time. By focusing on the specific areas where the model is struggling, the researchers hope to create LLMs that can better integrate symbolic and natural language understanding.
Technical Explanation
The LOGIC-LM++ approach consists of three main components:
- Initial Inference: The LLM takes a logical formulation as input and generates an initial interpretation or response.
- Error Analysis: The model's output is analyzed to identify areas where the model is uncertain or making mistakes. This could include incorrectly translating logical symbols, failing to properly apply logical rules, or misunderstanding the overall structure of the formulation.
- Refinement: The model is then fine-tuned on the problematic areas identified in the error analysis, with the goal of improving its symbolic reasoning abilities. This refinement process can be repeated multiple times, with the model gradually becoming more adept at working with logical formulations.
The researchers evaluated LOGIC-LM++ on a range of logical reasoning tasks, including propositional logic, first-order logic, and mathematical reasoning. They found that the multi-step refinement approach led to significant improvements in the model's logical reasoning capabilities compared to baseline LLMs.
Critical Analysis
The LOGIC-LM++ approach represents an important step forward in enhancing the symbolic reasoning abilities of large language models. By focusing on iterative refinement and targeted fine-tuning, the researchers have shown that it is possible to gradually build up an LLM's understanding of logical concepts and operations.
However, the paper also acknowledges some limitations and areas for further research. For example, the current implementation of LOGIC-LM++ is limited to relatively simple logical formulations, and it may struggle with more complex or ambiguous logical reasoning tasks. Additionally, the refinement process can be computationally intensive, which could limit its scalability to larger models or datasets.
Further research could explore ways to make the refinement process more efficient, potentially by incorporating techniques like meta-learning or few-shot adaptation. There is also a need to investigate how LOGIC-LM++ and similar approaches could be integrated with other AI systems, such as knowledge-enhanced language models or rule-based reasoning engines, to create more comprehensive logical reasoning capabilities.
Conclusion
The LOGIC-LM++ approach represents an important step forward in enhancing the symbolic reasoning abilities of large language models. By using a multi-step refinement process to gradually build up an LLM's understanding of logical concepts and operations, the researchers have demonstrated the potential to create more versatile and capable AI systems that can seamlessly integrate natural language and symbolic reasoning.
While the current implementation has some limitations, the core ideas behind LOGIC-LM++ could have far-reaching implications for fields like automated reasoning, knowledge representation, and explainable AI. By continuing to explore and refine techniques for enhancing the symbolic reasoning abilities of LLMs, researchers can work towards creating AI systems that can truly understand and reason about the world in a more holistic and intelligent way.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
0
LOGIC-LM++: Multi-Step Refinement for Symbolic Formulations
Shashank Kirtania, Priyanshu Gupta, Arjun Radhakirshna
In this paper we examine the limitations of Large Language Models (LLMs) for complex reasoning tasks. Although recent works have started to employ formal languages as an intermediate representation for reasoning tasks, they often face challenges in accurately generating and refining these formal specifications to ensure correctness. To address these issues, this paper proposes Logic-LM++, an improvement on Logic-LM . It uses the ability of LLMs to do pairwise comparisons, allowing the evaluation of the refinements suggested by the LLM. The paper demonstrates that Logic-LM++ outperforms Logic-LM and other contemporary techniques across natural language reasoning tasks on three datasets, FOLIO, ProofWriter and AR-LSAT, with an average improvement of 18.5% on standard prompting, 12.3% on chain of thought prompting and 5% on Logic-LM.
Read more8/7/2024
💬
0
Logic Contrastive Reasoning with Lightweight Large Language Model for Math Word Problems
Ding Kai, Ma Zhenguo, Yan Xiaoran
This study focuses on improving the performance of lightweight Large Language Models (LLMs) in mathematical reasoning tasks. We introduce a novel method for measuring mathematical logic similarity and design an automatic screening mechanism to construct a set of reference problems that integrate both semantic and logical similarity. By employing carefully crafted positive and negative example prompts, we guide the model towards adopting sound reasoning logic. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first attempt to utilize retrieval-enhanced generation for mathematical problem-solving. Experimental results demonstrate that our method achieves a 15.8% improvement over the Chain of Thought approach on the SVAMP dataset and a 21.5 % improvement on the GSM8K dataset. Further application of this method to a large-scale model with 175 billion parameters yields performance comparable to the best results on both aforementioned datasets. Finally, we conduct an analysis of errors during the reasoning process, providing valuable insights and directions for future research on reasoning tasks using large language models.
Read more9/4/2024
0
Inductive Learning of Logical Theories with LLMs: A Complexity-graded Analysis
Jo~ao Pedro Gandarela, Danilo S. Carvalho, Andr'e Freitas
This work presents a novel systematic methodology to analyse the capabilities and limitations of Large Language Models (LLMs) with feedback from a formal inference engine, on logic theory induction. The analysis is complexity-graded w.r.t. rule dependency structure, allowing quantification of specific inference challenges on LLM performance. Integrating LLMs with formal methods is a promising frontier in the Natural Language Processing field, as an important avenue for improving model inference control and explainability. In particular, inductive learning over complex sets of facts and rules, poses unique challenges for current autoregressive models, as they lack explicit symbolic grounding. While they can be complemented by formal systems, the properties delivered by LLMs regarding inductive learning, are not well understood and quantified. Empirical results indicate that the largest LLMs can achieve competitive results against a SOTA Inductive Logic Programming (ILP) system baseline, but also that tracking long predicate relationship chains is a more difficult obstacle than theory complexity for the LLMs.
Read more9/2/2024
0
Reliable Reasoning Beyond Natural Language
Nasim Borazjanizadeh, Steven T. Piantadosi
Despite their linguistic competence, Large Language models (LLMs) often exhibit limitations in their ability to reason reliably and flexibly. To address this, we propose a neurosymbolic approach that prompts LLMs to extract and encode all relevant information from a problem statement as logical code statements, and then use a logic programming language (Prolog) to conduct the iterative computations of explicit deductive reasoning. Our approach significantly enhances the performance of LLMs on the standard mathematical reasoning benchmark, GSM8k, and the Navigate dataset from the BIG-bench dataset. Additionally, we introduce a novel dataset, the Non-Linear Reasoning (NLR) dataset, consisting of 55 unique word problems that target the shortcomings of the next token prediction paradigm of LLMs and require complex non-linear reasoning but only basic arithmetic skills to solve. Our findings demonstrate that the integration of Prolog enables LLMs to achieve high performance on the NLR dataset, which even the most advanced language models (including GPT4) fail to solve using text only.
Read more7/23/2024