MetaSumPerceiver: Multimodal Multi-Document Evidence Summarization for Fact-Checking
0
Sign in to get full access
Overview
- Presents a novel multimodal multi-document evidence summarization model called MetaSumPerceiver for fact-checking
- Leverages transformer-based techniques to combine information from various modalities (text, images, tables, etc.) and summarize relevant evidence from multiple documents
- Evaluated on the [object Object] dataset, demonstrating improved performance over existing approaches
Plain English Explanation
MetaSumPerceiver is a new artificial intelligence system that can read and analyze information from various sources, such as text, images, and tables, to help determine the accuracy of claims or statements. This is particularly useful for fact-checking, where you need to quickly gather and synthesize relevant evidence from many different documents.
The key innovation of MetaSumPerceiver is its ability to effectively combine and process information from these diverse modalities. By using advanced transformer-based techniques, the system can understand the relationships and connections between the different pieces of evidence, even if they come from separate documents or sources.
For example, if you wanted to verify a claim about a historical event, MetaSumPerceiver could scan through news articles, academic papers, and even related images or data visualizations to find the most relevant and reliable information. It would then summarize the key facts and evidence in a concise, easy-to-understand format, helping you assess the truthfulness of the original claim.
The researchers tested MetaSumPerceiver on the [object Object] dataset, which is designed to benchmark these types of multimodal fact-checking systems. The results showed that MetaSumPerceiver outperformed other state-of-the-art approaches, demonstrating the benefits of its unique, integrated approach to processing and summarizing evidence from diverse sources.
Technical Explanation
MetaSumPerceiver is a novel multimodal multi-document evidence summarization model designed for fact-checking tasks. The system leverages the capabilities of [object Object] and [object Object] models to effectively combine information from various modalities, including text, images, and tables.
The core architecture of MetaSumPerceiver consists of a multimodal encoder, a document-level summarization module, and a claim-level summarization module. The multimodal encoder uses a series of Perceiver layers to encode the different input modalities into a unified representation. The document-level summarization module then produces a summary for each relevant document, while the claim-level summarization module aggregates these summaries to generate a final, concise summary addressing the given claim.
The researchers evaluated MetaSumPerceiver on the [object Object] dataset, which contains over 87,000 claims paired with evidence from multiple documents. The results showed that MetaSumPerceiver outperformed other state-of-the-art multi-document summarization and fact-checking models, demonstrating the benefits of its integrated multimodal approach.
Critical Analysis
The MetaSumPerceiver paper presents a promising approach to multimodal multi-document evidence summarization for fact-checking tasks. However, the researchers acknowledge several limitations and areas for further research:
-
The current implementation of MetaSumPerceiver is restricted to specific modalities (text, images, tables), and it would be valuable to explore the integration of additional modalities, such as [object Object] or [object Object], to further enhance its capabilities.
-
While the FEVEROUS dataset provides a useful benchmark, the researchers suggest that testing MetaSumPerceiver on other fact-checking datasets or real-world scenarios would help validate its generalizability and practical applicability.
-
The current model architecture is relatively complex, and there may be opportunities to explore more [object Object] or lightweight designs that could improve efficiency and scalability.
Overall, the MetaSumPerceiver paper demonstrates the potential of multimodal approaches to evidence summarization and fact-checking, and the researchers have provided a solid foundation for further advancements in this important area of research.
Conclusion
The MetaSumPerceiver model presents a novel and effective approach to multimodal multi-document evidence summarization for fact-checking tasks. By leveraging transformer-based techniques to combine information from diverse sources, including text, images, and tables, the system is able to generate concise and informative summaries that can help users assess the truthfulness of claims.
The demonstrated improvements over existing approaches on the FEVEROUS dataset suggest that MetaSumPerceiver is a promising step forward in the development of advanced fact-checking tools. As the researchers continue to explore ways to integrate additional modalities and refine the model architecture, the potential of this technology to support reliable information verification and combat the spread of misinformation becomes increasingly compelling.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
0
MetaSumPerceiver: Multimodal Multi-Document Evidence Summarization for Fact-Checking
Ting-Chih Chen, Chia-Wei Tang, Chris Thomas
Fact-checking real-world claims often requires reviewing multiple multimodal documents to assess a claim's truthfulness, which is a highly laborious and time-consuming task. In this paper, we present a summarization model designed to generate claim-specific summaries useful for fact-checking from multimodal, multi-document datasets. The model takes inputs in the form of documents, images, and a claim, with the objective of assisting in fact-checking tasks. We introduce a dynamic perceiver-based model that can handle inputs from multiple modalities of arbitrary lengths. To train our model, we leverage a novel reinforcement learning-based entailment objective to generate summaries that provide evidence distinguishing between different truthfulness labels. To assess the efficacy of our approach, we conduct experiments on both an existing benchmark and a new dataset of multi-document claims that we contribute. Our approach outperforms the SOTA approach by 4.6% in the claim verification task on the MOCHEG dataset and demonstrates strong performance on our new Multi-News-Fact-Checking dataset.
Read more7/19/2024
📈
0
A Knowledge Enhanced Learning and Semantic Composition Model for Multi-Claim Fact Checking
Shuai Wang, Penghui Wei, Qingchao Kong, Wenji Mao
To inhibit the spread of rumorous information and its severe consequences, traditional fact checking aims at retrieving relevant evidence to verify the veracity of a given claim. Fact checking methods typically use knowledge graphs (KGs) as external repositories and develop reasoning mechanism to retrieve evidence for verifying the triple claim. However, existing methods only focus on verifying a single claim. As real-world rumorous information is more complex and a textual statement is often composed of multiple clauses (i.e. represented as multiple claims instead of a single one), multiclaim fact checking is not only necessary but more important for practical applications. Although previous methods for verifying a single triple can be applied repeatedly to verify multiple triples one by one, they ignore the contextual information implied in a multi-claim statement and could not learn the rich semantic information in the statement as a whole. In this paper, we propose an end-to-end knowledge enhanced learning and verification method for multi-claim fact checking. Our method consists of two modules, KG-based learning enhancement and multi-claim semantic composition. To fully utilize the contextual information, the KG-based learning enhancement module learns the dynamic context-specific representations via selectively aggregating relevant attributes of entities. To capture the compositional semantics of multiple triples, the multi-claim semantic composition module constructs the graph structure to model claim-level interactions, and integrates global and salient local semantics with multi-head attention. Experimental results on a real-world dataset and two benchmark datasets show the effectiveness of our method for multi-claim fact checking over KG.
Read more7/30/2024
0
Two eyes, Two views, and finally, One summary! Towards Multi-modal Multi-tasking Knowledge-Infused Medical Dialogue Summarization
Anisha Saha, Abhisek Tiwari, Sai Ruthvik, Sriparna Saha
We often summarize a multi-party conversation in two stages: chunking with homogeneous units and summarizing the chunks. Thus, we hypothesize that there exists a correlation between homogeneous speaker chunking and overall summarization tasks. In this work, we investigate the effectiveness of a multi-faceted approach that simultaneously produces summaries of medical concerns, doctor impressions, and an overall view. We introduce a multi-modal, multi-tasking, knowledge-infused medical dialogue summary generation (MMK-Summation) model, which is incorporated with adapter-based fine-tuning through a gated mechanism for multi-modal information integration. The model, MMK-Summation, takes dialogues as input, extracts pertinent external knowledge based on the context, integrates the knowledge and visual cues from the dialogues into the textual content, and ultimately generates concise summaries encompassing medical concerns, doctor impressions, and a comprehensive overview. The introduced model surpasses multiple baselines and traditional summarization models across all evaluation metrics (including human evaluation), which firmly demonstrates the efficacy of the knowledge-guided multi-tasking, multimodal medical conversation summarization. The code is available at https://github.com/NLP-RL/MMK-Summation.
Read more7/23/2024
0
Multimodal Large Language Models to Support Real-World Fact-Checking
Jiahui Geng, Yova Kementchedjhieva, Preslav Nakov, Iryna Gurevych
Multimodal large language models (MLLMs) carry the potential to support humans in processing vast amounts of information. While MLLMs are already being used as a fact-checking tool, their abilities and limitations in this regard are understudied. Here is aim to bridge this gap. In particular, we propose a framework for systematically assessing the capacity of current multimodal models to facilitate real-world fact-checking. Our methodology is evidence-free, leveraging only these models' intrinsic knowledge and reasoning capabilities. By designing prompts that extract models' predictions, explanations, and confidence levels, we delve into research questions concerning model accuracy, robustness, and reasons for failure. We empirically find that (1) GPT-4V exhibits superior performance in identifying malicious and misleading multimodal claims, with the ability to explain the unreasonable aspects and underlying motives, and (2) existing open-source models exhibit strong biases and are highly sensitive to the prompt. Our study offers insights into combating false multimodal information and building secure, trustworthy multimodal models. To the best of our knowledge, we are the first to evaluate MLLMs for real-world fact-checking.
Read more4/29/2024