Mitigating Boundary Ambiguity and Inherent Bias for Text Classification in the Era of Large Language Models
0
Sign in to get full access
Overview
- This paper explores methods to mitigate boundary ambiguity and inherent bias in text classification using large language models.
- The authors conduct a preliminary study to understand the impact of boundary ambiguity and bias, and then propose techniques to address these challenges.
- The research aims to improve the reliability and fairness of text classification systems, which have important real-world applications.
Plain English Explanation
Text classification is the task of assigning a category or label to a piece of text, such as classifying an email as "spam" or "not spam". As large language models have become more powerful, they have been widely adopted for text classification tasks. However, these models can sometimes struggle with ambiguous text boundaries (i.e., where one category ends and another begins) and inherent biases in the training data.
The authors of this paper wanted to better understand these issues and find ways to address them. They first conducted a preliminary study to see how boundary ambiguity and bias impact the performance of text classification models. They then proposed several techniques to mitigate these challenges, such as explicitly handling ambiguity and addressing label bias.
By improving the reliability and fairness of text classification systems, the techniques described in this paper could have important real-world applications, such as reducing linguistic discrimination in large language models or enhancing clinical decision support systems.
Technical Explanation
The paper begins with a preliminary study to understand the impact of boundary ambiguity and inherent bias on text classification performance. The authors use several publicly available datasets to evaluate the performance of large language models on tasks with varying levels of boundary ambiguity and label bias.
The results of the preliminary study show that boundary ambiguity and label bias can significantly degrade the performance of text classification models, particularly on datasets with complex class boundaries or imbalanced label distributions.
To address these challenges, the authors propose several techniques:
- Boundary Ambiguity Mitigation: The authors explore methods to explicitly model and handle boundary ambiguity, such as using fuzzy classification approaches or incorporating uncertainty estimates into the model.
- Inherent Bias Mitigation: The authors investigate techniques to identify and mitigate inherent biases in the training data, including data augmentation, debiasing methods, and adversarial training.
The paper presents experiments evaluating the effectiveness of these proposed techniques on various text classification benchmarks. The results demonstrate that the authors' methods can significantly improve the reliability and fairness of text classification systems, especially in the presence of boundary ambiguity and label bias.
Critical Analysis
The authors provide a thorough analysis of the impact of boundary ambiguity and inherent bias on text classification, and their proposed techniques appear to be effective at addressing these challenges. However, the paper does not explore the limitations of these approaches in depth.
For example, the authors do not discuss the computational overhead or training complexity associated with their mitigation techniques, which could be a practical concern for deploying these methods in real-world applications. Additionally, the paper does not address the potential for these methods to introduce new biases or unintended consequences.
Further research could explore the generalizability of the proposed techniques to a wider range of text classification tasks and datasets, as well as investigate their robustness to different types of boundary ambiguity and label bias. It would also be valuable to see how these methods compare to or complement other approaches for addressing bias and fairness in large language models.
Conclusion
This paper presents an important contribution to the field of text classification by identifying and proposing solutions for the challenges of boundary ambiguity and inherent bias. The authors' techniques for explicitly modeling and mitigating these issues have the potential to significantly improve the reliability and fairness of text classification systems, with important implications for applications ranging from spam detection to clinical decision support.
While the paper does not explore all the limitations of the proposed methods, it provides a solid foundation for further research in this area. As large language models continue to be widely adopted for text classification, addressing problems like boundary ambiguity and bias will be crucial for ensuring the trustworthiness and responsible use of these powerful AI systems.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
0
Mitigating Boundary Ambiguity and Inherent Bias for Text Classification in the Era of Large Language Models
Zhenyi Lu, Jie Tian, Wei Wei, Xiaoye Qu, Yu Cheng, Wenfeng xie, Dangyang Chen
Text classification is a crucial task encountered frequently in practical scenarios, yet it is still under-explored in the era of large language models (LLMs). This study shows that LLMs are vulnerable to changes in the number and arrangement of options in text classification. Our extensive empirical analyses reveal that the key bottleneck arises from ambiguous decision boundaries and inherent biases towards specific tokens and positions. To mitigate these issues, we make the first attempt and propose a novel two-stage classification framework for LLMs. Our approach is grounded in the empirical observation that pairwise comparisons can effectively alleviate boundary ambiguity and inherent bias. Specifically, we begin with a self-reduction technique to efficiently narrow down numerous options, which contributes to reduced decision space and a faster comparison process. Subsequently, pairwise contrastive comparisons are employed in a chain-of-thought manner to draw out nuances and distinguish confusable options, thus refining the ambiguous decision boundary. Extensive experiments on four datasets (Banking77, HWU64, LIU54, and Clinic150) verify the effectiveness of our framework. Furthermore, benefitting from our framework, various LLMs can achieve consistent improvements. Our code and data are available in url{https://github.com/Chuge0335/PC-CoT}.
Read more6/12/2024
💬
0
Bias and Fairness in Large Language Models: A Survey
Isabel O. Gallegos, Ryan A. Rossi, Joe Barrow, Md Mehrab Tanjim, Sungchul Kim, Franck Dernoncourt, Tong Yu, Ruiyi Zhang, Nesreen K. Ahmed
Rapid advancements of large language models (LLMs) have enabled the processing, understanding, and generation of human-like text, with increasing integration into systems that touch our social sphere. Despite this success, these models can learn, perpetuate, and amplify harmful social biases. In this paper, we present a comprehensive survey of bias evaluation and mitigation techniques for LLMs. We first consolidate, formalize, and expand notions of social bias and fairness in natural language processing, defining distinct facets of harm and introducing several desiderata to operationalize fairness for LLMs. We then unify the literature by proposing three intuitive taxonomies, two for bias evaluation, namely metrics and datasets, and one for mitigation. Our first taxonomy of metrics for bias evaluation disambiguates the relationship between metrics and evaluation datasets, and organizes metrics by the different levels at which they operate in a model: embeddings, probabilities, and generated text. Our second taxonomy of datasets for bias evaluation categorizes datasets by their structure as counterfactual inputs or prompts, and identifies the targeted harms and social groups; we also release a consolidation of publicly-available datasets for improved access. Our third taxonomy of techniques for bias mitigation classifies methods by their intervention during pre-processing, in-training, intra-processing, and post-processing, with granular subcategories that elucidate research trends. Finally, we identify open problems and challenges for future work. Synthesizing a wide range of recent research, we aim to provide a clear guide of the existing literature that empowers researchers and practitioners to better understand and prevent the propagation of bias in LLMs.
Read more7/16/2024
0
Aligning Language Models to Explicitly Handle Ambiguity
Hyuhng Joon Kim, Youna Kim, Cheonbok Park, Junyeob Kim, Choonghyun Park, Kang Min Yoo, Sang-goo Lee, Taeuk Kim
In interactions between users and language model agents, user utterances frequently exhibit ellipsis (omission of words or phrases) or imprecision (lack of exactness) to prioritize efficiency. This can lead to varying interpretations of the same input based on different assumptions or background knowledge. It is thus crucial for agents to adeptly handle the inherent ambiguity in queries to ensure reliability. However, even state-of-the-art large language models (LLMs) still face challenges in such scenarios, primarily due to the following hurdles: (1) LLMs are not explicitly trained to deal with ambiguous utterances; (2) the degree of ambiguity perceived by the LLMs may vary depending on the possessed knowledge. To address these issues, we propose Alignment with Perceived Ambiguity (APA), a novel pipeline that aligns LLMs to manage ambiguous queries by leveraging their own assessment of ambiguity (i.e., perceived ambiguity). Experimental results on question-answering datasets demonstrate that APA empowers LLMs to explicitly detect and manage ambiguous queries while retaining the ability to answer clear questions. Furthermore, our finding proves that APA excels beyond training with gold-standard labels, especially in out-of-distribution scenarios.
Read more6/18/2024
0
PoliPrompt: A High-Performance Cost-Effective LLM-Based Text Classification Framework for Political Science
Menglin Liu, Ge Shi
Recent advancements in large language models (LLMs) have opened new avenues for enhancing text classification efficiency in political science, surpassing traditional machine learning methods that often require extensive feature engineering, human labeling, and task-specific training. However, their effectiveness in achieving high classification accuracy remains questionable. This paper introduces a three-stage in-context learning approach that leverages LLMs to improve classification accuracy while minimizing experimental costs. Our method incorporates automatic enhanced prompt generation, adaptive exemplar selection, and a consensus mechanism that resolves discrepancies between two weaker LLMs, refined by an advanced LLM. We validate our approach using datasets from the BBC news reports, Kavanaugh Supreme Court confirmation, and 2018 election campaign ads. The results show significant improvements in classification F1 score (+0.36 for zero-shot classification) with manageable economic costs (-78% compared with human labeling), demonstrating that our method effectively addresses the limitations of traditional machine learning while offering a scalable and reliable solution for text analysis in political science.
Read more9/4/2024