Neural Subnetwork Ensembles

Read original: arXiv:2311.14101 - Published 7/9/2024 by Tim Whitaker

🧠

Overview

Ensemble methods combine the predictions of multiple independently trained models to improve generalization
As deep neural networks have become more complex, traditional ensemble methods have become prohibitively expensive and time-consuming to implement
This paper introduces a low-cost framework for constructing "Subnetwork Ensembles" by sampling, perturbing, and optimizing subnetworks from a single trained parent model

Plain English Explanation

Neural networks are a type of machine learning model that can learn complex patterns in data. Ensemble methods combine the predictions of multiple independently trained neural networks to improve the overall accuracy and reliability of the system.

However, as neural networks have become larger and more sophisticated, the process of training multiple models from scratch for an ensemble has become extremely resource-intensive and time-consuming. This has made traditional ensemble methods impractical for many real-world applications.

To address this challenge, the researchers in this paper propose a new approach called "Subnetwork Ensembles". The key idea is to start with a single trained neural network and then generate a collection of "child" networks by selectively sampling, perturbing, and optimizing subnetworks from the original "parent" model. This allows them to create an ensemble without having to train multiple models independently from the beginning.

Through a series of experiments, the researchers demonstrate that this Subnetwork Ensemble approach can significantly improve training efficiency, model utilization, and overall generalization performance, all while minimizing the computational cost. In essence, they've found a way to "get more bang for your buck" by better leveraging the untapped potential within a single neural network.

Technical Explanation

The paper introduces a low-cost framework for constructing "Subnetwork Ensembles" by sampling, perturbing, and optimizing subnetworks from a single trained parent model. The researchers explore several distinct methodologies for generating these child networks and evaluate their efficacy through a variety of ablation studies and established benchmarks.

The key technical insights include:

Subnetwork Sampling: The researchers experiment with different strategies for selectively sampling subnetworks from the parent model, such as random, greedy, and probabilistic approaches. This allows them to create diverse child networks without having to train each one from scratch.
Subnetwork Perturbation: They also investigate ways to introduce controlled perturbations to the sampled subnetworks, such as altering the connection weights or the network structure. This adds further diversity to the ensemble and can help improve its generalization performance.
Subnetwork Optimization: Once the child networks are generated, the researchers optimize them through additional training, either from random initialization or starting from the parent model's weights. This fine-tuning step helps improve the individual performance of each subnetwork.

The researchers' findings reveal that this Subnetwork Ensemble approach can greatly improve training efficiency, parametric utilization, and generalization performance while minimizing computational cost. This builds on related work in areas such as Bayesian vs. PAC-Bayesian deep neural networks, efficient graph neural network ensembles, evolving subnetwork training for large language models, and scalable subsampling inference in deep neural networks.

Critical Analysis

The paper presents a compelling and practical approach to ensemble learning that addresses the scalability challenges of traditional methods. By leveraging the "unrealized potential" of a single deep neural network, the researchers have found a way to create an ensemble without the overhead of training multiple models from scratch.

One potential limitation of the Subnetwork Ensemble approach is that the performance of the child networks may still be somewhat correlated, as they are all derived from the same parent model. This could limit the diversity of the ensemble and its ability to capture different types of errors. The researchers acknowledge this and suggest further research into techniques for increasing the independence of the child networks, such as ensemble learning for heterogeneous large language models.

Additionally, the paper does not explore the interpretability or explainability of the Subnetwork Ensemble approach. As deep neural networks become more widely adopted, there is an increasing need to understand how they make decisions and to ensure they are behaving in a transparent and trustworthy manner. Future research could investigate ways to enhance the interpretability of the Subnetwork Ensemble framework.

Overall, this paper presents a novel and practical approach to ensemble learning that could have significant implications for deploying deep neural networks in real-world applications where cost and efficiency are critical factors.

Conclusion

This paper introduces a low-cost framework for constructing "Subnetwork Ensembles" by sampling, perturbing, and optimizing subnetworks from a single trained parent model. The researchers demonstrate that this approach can greatly improve training efficiency, parametric utilization, and generalization performance while minimizing computational cost.

By leveraging the unrealized potential of deep neural networks, Subnetwork Ensembles offer a compelling alternative to traditional ensemble methods, which have become prohibitively expensive and time-consuming as neural networks have grown in scale and complexity. This work has important implications for making deep learning more accessible and practical for a wide range of applications.

This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!

Follow @aimodelsfyi on 𝕏 →

Related Papers

🧠

Neural Subnetwork Ensembles

Tim Whitaker

Neural network ensembles have been effectively used to improve generalization by combining the predictions of multiple independently trained models. However, the growing scale and complexity of deep neural networks have led to these methods becoming prohibitively expensive and time consuming to implement. Low-cost ensemble methods have become increasingly important as they can alleviate the need to train multiple models from scratch while retaining the generalization benefits that traditional ensemble learning methods afford. This dissertation introduces and formalizes a low-cost framework for constructing Subnetwork Ensembles, where a collection of child networks are formed by sampling, perturbing, and optimizing subnetworks from a trained parent model. We explore several distinct methodologies for generating child networks and we evaluate their efficacy through a variety of ablation studies and established benchmarks. Our findings reveal that this approach can greatly improve training efficiency, parametric utilization, and generalization performance while minimizing computational cost. Subnetwork Ensembles offer a compelling framework for exploring how we can build better systems by leveraging the unrealized potential of deep neural networks.

7/9/2024

📶

Sequential Bayesian Neural Subnetwork Ensembles

Sanket Jantre, Shrijita Bhattacharya, Nathan M. Urban, Byung-Jun Yoon, Tapabrata Maiti, Prasanna Balaprakash, Sandeep Madireddy

Deep ensembles have emerged as a powerful technique for improving predictive performance and enhancing model robustness across various applications by leveraging model diversity. However, traditional deep ensemble methods are often computationally expensive and rely on deterministic models, which may limit their flexibility. Additionally, while sparse subnetworks of dense models have shown promise in matching the performance of their dense counterparts and even enhancing robustness, existing methods for inducing sparsity typically incur training costs comparable to those of training a single dense model, as they either gradually prune the network during training or apply thresholding post-training. In light of these challenges, we propose an approach for sequential ensembling of dynamic Bayesian neural subnetworks that consistently maintains reduced model complexity throughout the training process while generating diverse ensembles in a single forward pass. Our approach involves an initial exploration phase to identify high-performing regions within the parameter space, followed by multiple exploitation phases that take advantage of the compactness of the sparse model. These exploitation phases quickly converge to different minima in the energy landscape, corresponding to high-performing subnetworks that together form a diverse and robust ensemble. We empirically demonstrate that our proposed approach outperforms traditional dense and sparse deterministic and Bayesian ensemble models in terms of prediction accuracy, uncertainty estimation, out-of-distribution detection, and adversarial robustness.

8/21/2024

Bayesian vs. PAC-Bayesian Deep Neural Network Ensembles

Nick Hauptvogel, Christian Igel

Bayesian neural networks address epistemic uncertainty by learning a posterior distribution over model parameters. Sampling and weighting networks according to this posterior yields an ensemble model referred to as Bayes ensemble. Ensembles of neural networks (deep ensembles) can profit from the cancellation of errors effect: Errors by ensemble members may average out and the deep ensemble achieves better predictive performance than each individual network. We argue that neither the sampling nor the weighting in a Bayes ensemble are particularly well-suited for increasing generalization performance, as they do not support the cancellation of errors effect, which is evident in the limit from the Bernstein-von~Mises theorem for misspecified models. In contrast, a weighted average of models where the weights are optimized by minimizing a PAC-Bayesian generalization bound can improve generalization performance. This requires that the optimization takes correlations between models into account, which can be achieved by minimizing the tandem loss at the cost that hold-out data for estimating error correlations need to be available. The PAC-Bayesian weighting increases the robustness against correlated models and models with lower performance in an ensemble. This allows us to safely add several models from the same learning process to an ensemble, instead of using early-stopping for selecting a single weight configuration. Our study presents empirical results supporting these conceptual considerations on four different classification datasets. We show that state-of-the-art Bayes ensembles from the literature, despite being computationally demanding, do not improve over simple uniformly weighted deep ensembles and cannot match the performance of deep ensembles weighted by optimizing the tandem loss, which additionally come with non-vacuous generalization guarantees.

6/11/2024

E2GNN: Efficient Graph Neural Network Ensembles for Semi-Supervised Classification

Xin Zhang, Daochen Zha, Qiaoyu Tan

This work studies ensemble learning for graph neural networks (GNNs) under the popular semi-supervised setting. Ensemble learning has shown superiority in improving the accuracy and robustness of traditional machine learning by combining the outputs of multiple weak learners. However, adopting a similar idea to integrate different GNN models is challenging because of two reasons. First, GNN is notorious for its poor inference ability, so naively assembling multiple GNN models would deteriorate the inference efficiency. Second, when GNN models are trained with few labeled nodes, their performance are limited. In this case, the vanilla ensemble approach, e.g., majority vote, may be sub-optimal since most base models, i.e., GNNs, may make the wrong predictions. To this end, in this paper, we propose an efficient ensemble learner--E2GNN to assemble multiple GNNs in a learnable way by leveraging both labeled and unlabeled nodes. Specifically, we first pre-train different GNN models on a given data scenario according to the labeled nodes. Next, instead of directly combing their outputs for label inference, we train a simple multi-layer perceptron--MLP model to mimic their predictions on both labeled and unlabeled nodes. Then the unified MLP model is deployed to infer labels for unlabeled or new nodes. Since the predictions of unlabeled nodes from different GNN models may be incorrect, we develop a reinforced discriminator to effectively filter out those wrongly predicted nodes to boost the performance of MLP. By doing this, we suggest a principled approach to tackle the inference issues of GNN ensembles and maintain the merit of ensemble learning: improved performance. Comprehensive experiments over both transductive and inductive settings, across different GNN backbones and 8 benchmark datasets, demonstrate the superiority of E2GNN.

5/7/2024