A New Era in Software Security: Towards Self-Healing Software via Large Language Models and Formal Verification

Read original: arXiv:2305.14752 - Published 7/1/2024 by Norbert Tihanyi, Ridhi Jain, Yiannis Charalambous, Mohamed Amine Ferrag, Youcheng Sun, Lucas C. Cordeiro
Total Score

0

💬

Sign in to get full access

or

If you already have an account, we'll log you in

Overview

  • This paper presents an innovative approach that combines Large Language Models (LLMs) with Formal Verification strategies to automatically repair software vulnerabilities.
  • The method uses Bounded Model Checking (BMC) to identify vulnerabilities and extract counterexamples, which are then used to prompt an LLM to attempt a fix.
  • The resulting code is verified again using BMC to ensure the fix was successful.
  • The authors introduce the ESBMC-AI framework as a proof of concept, leveraging the ESBMC model checker and a pre-trained transformer model.
  • The approach is evaluated on 50,000 C programs from the FormAI dataset, demonstrating the ability to detect and repair issues like buffer overflow, arithmetic overflow, and pointer dereference failures with high accuracy.

Plain English Explanation

The paper presents a new way to automatically fix problems in computer programs, particularly critical software components. It combines two powerful techniques: Large Language Models (LLMs) and Formal Verification.

First, the researchers use a tool called Bounded Model Checking (BMC) to find vulnerabilities in the code. BMC is like a detective that examines the program and identifies potential issues, providing mathematical proof and details about where the problems occur.

Next, the researchers take the original code, the identified vulnerability, and the information from BMC, and feed it all into an LLM. The LLM is then instructed to try and fix the code. LLMs are like highly-trained assistants that can understand and generate human-like text, so they can attempt to repair the code based on the provided information.

The new code produced by the LLM is then checked again using BMC to ensure the fix was successful. This process of detection, repair, and verification is carried out in the ESBMC-AI framework, which the researchers developed as a proof of concept.

The researchers tested this approach on 50,000 C programs and found that it was able to accurately detect and fix common software vulnerabilities, such as buffer overflow, arithmetic overflow, and pointer dereference failures. This could be a significant step towards automating the process of finding and fixing errors in critical software, potentially integrating it into the continuous integration and deployment (CI/CD) process used in software development.

Technical Explanation

The paper presents a novel approach that combines Large Language Models (LLMs) with Formal Verification techniques, specifically Bounded Model Checking (BMC), to automatically detect and repair software vulnerabilities.

The researchers first employ BMC to identify vulnerabilities in the source code and extract counterexamples, which are mathematical proofs and stack traces that provide information about the location and type of the vulnerabilities. This vulnerability information is then combined with the original source code and provided as a prompt to a pre-trained transformer-based LLM.

The LLM is instructed to attempt to fix the code based on the provided information. The resulting code is then verified again using BMC to ensure the fix was successful. The authors introduce the ESBMC-AI framework as a proof of concept, leveraging the well-recognized Efficient SMT-based Context-Bounded Model Checker (ESBMC) and a pre-trained transformer model.

The researchers evaluated their approach on a dataset of 50,000 C programs randomly selected from the FormAI dataset, with their respective vulnerability classifications. The results demonstrate ESBMC-AI's capability to automate the detection and repair of common software issues, such as buffer overflow, arithmetic overflow, and pointer dereference failures, with high accuracy.

Critical Analysis

The paper presents a promising approach to automating the detection and repair of software vulnerabilities, which is a critical challenge in the field of software engineering. By combining LLMs with Formal Verification techniques, the researchers have developed a framework that can potentially streamline the process of finding and fixing errors in complex software systems.

However, the paper does not address some potential limitations of the approach. For instance, the researchers only evaluated the method on C programs, and it's unclear how well it would perform on other programming languages or more complex software architectures. Additionally, the reliance on pre-trained LLMs raises questions about the model's robustness and the potential for unintended biases or errors in the generated code fixes.

Further research is needed to explore the generalizability of the ESBMC-AI framework and to address any potential issues with the integration of LLMs and Formal Verification techniques. Additionally, the authors could have provided more details on the specific architectural choices and the training process for the LLM used in their experiments.

Overall, the paper presents an innovative and promising approach to automating the detection and repair of software vulnerabilities, which could have significant implications for the software development industry and the security of critical systems.

Conclusion

This paper introduces a novel method for automatically detecting and repairing software vulnerabilities by combining Large Language Models (LLMs) with Formal Verification techniques, specifically Bounded Model Checking (BMC). The researchers present the ESBMC-AI framework as a proof of concept, which leverages the ESBMC model checker and a pre-trained transformer model to address issues such as buffer overflow, arithmetic overflow, and pointer dereference failures in C programs.

The results demonstrate the potential of this approach to automate the vulnerability detection and repair process, which could have significant implications for the software development industry and the security of critical systems. While the paper raises some questions about the limitations and generalizability of the method, it represents an important step towards harnessing the power of Large Language Models (LLMs) for software vulnerability detection and repair.



This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!

Follow @aimodelsfyi on 𝕏 →

Related Papers

💬

Total Score

0

A New Era in Software Security: Towards Self-Healing Software via Large Language Models and Formal Verification

Norbert Tihanyi, Ridhi Jain, Yiannis Charalambous, Mohamed Amine Ferrag, Youcheng Sun, Lucas C. Cordeiro

This paper introduces an innovative approach that combines Large Language Models (LLMs) with Formal Verification strategies for automatic software vulnerability repair. Initially, we employ Bounded Model Checking (BMC) to identify vulnerabilities and extract counterexamples. These counterexamples are supported by mathematical proofs and the stack trace of the vulnerabilities. Using a specially designed prompt, we combine the original source code with the identified vulnerability, including its stack trace and counterexample that specifies the line number and error type. This combined information is then fed into an LLM, which is instructed to attempt to fix the code. The new code is subsequently verified again using BMC to ensure the fix succeeded. We present the ESBMC-AI framework as a proof of concept, leveraging the well-recognized and industry-adopted Efficient SMT-based Context-Bounded Model Checker (ESBMC) and a pre-trained transformer model to detect and fix errors in C programs, particularly in critical software components. We evaluated our approach on 50,000 C programs randomly selected from the FormAI dataset with their respective vulnerability classifications. Our results demonstrate ESBMC-AI's capability to automate the detection and repair of issues such as buffer overflow, arithmetic overflow, and pointer dereference failures with high accuracy. ESBMC-AI is a pioneering initiative, integrating LLMs with BMC techniques, offering potential integration into the continuous integration and deployment (CI/CD) process within the software development lifecycle.

Read more

7/1/2024

Automated Repair of AI Code with Large Language Models and Formal Verification
Total Score

0

Automated Repair of AI Code with Large Language Models and Formal Verification

Yiannis Charalambous, Edoardo Manino, Lucas C. Cordeiro

The next generation of AI systems requires strong safety guarantees. This report looks at the software implementation of neural networks and related memory safety properties, including NULL pointer deference, out-of-bound access, double-free, and memory leaks. Our goal is to detect these vulnerabilities, and automatically repair them with the help of large language models. To this end, we first expand the size of NeuroCodeBench, an existing dataset of neural network code, to about 81k programs via an automated process of program mutation. Then, we verify the memory safety of the mutated neural network implementations with ESBMC, a state-of-the-art software verifier. Whenever ESBMC spots a vulnerability, we invoke a large language model to repair the source code. For the latest task, we compare the performance of various state-of-the-art prompt engineering techniques, and an iterative approach that repeatedly calls the large language model.

Read more

5/16/2024

💬

Total Score

0

Harnessing Large Language Models for Software Vulnerability Detection: A Comprehensive Benchmarking Study

Karl Tamberg, Hayretdin Bahsi

Despite various approaches being employed to detect vulnerabilities, the number of reported vulnerabilities shows an upward trend over the years. This suggests the problems are not caught before the code is released, which could be caused by many factors, like lack of awareness, limited efficacy of the existing vulnerability detection tools or the tools not being user-friendly. To help combat some issues with traditional vulnerability detection tools, we propose using large language models (LLMs) to assist in finding vulnerabilities in source code. LLMs have shown a remarkable ability to understand and generate code, underlining their potential in code-related tasks. The aim is to test multiple state-of-the-art LLMs and identify the best prompting strategies, allowing extraction of the best value from the LLMs. We provide an overview of the strengths and weaknesses of the LLM-based approach and compare the results to those of traditional static analysis tools. We find that LLMs can pinpoint many more issues than traditional static analysis tools, outperforming traditional tools in terms of recall and F1 scores. The results should benefit software developers and security analysts responsible for ensuring that the code is free of vulnerabilities.

Read more

5/27/2024

🌿

Total Score

0

Enhancing Source Code Security with LLMs: Demystifying The Challenges and Generating Reliable Repairs

Nafis Tanveer Islam, Joseph Khoury, Andrew Seong, Elias Bou-Harb, Peyman Najafirad

With the recent unprecedented advancements in Artificial Intelligence (AI) computing, progress in Large Language Models (LLMs) is accelerating rapidly, presenting challenges in establishing clear guidelines, particularly in the field of security. That being said, we thoroughly identify and describe three main technical challenges in the security and software engineering literature that spans the entire LLM workflow, namely; textbf{textit{(i)}} Data Collection and Labeling; textbf{textit{(ii)}} System Design and Learning; and textbf{textit{(iii)}} Performance Evaluation. Building upon these challenges, this paper introduces texttt{SecRepair}, an instruction-based LLM system designed to reliably textit{identify}, textit{describe}, and automatically textit{repair} vulnerable source code. Our system is accompanied by a list of actionable guides on textbf{textit{(i)}} Data Preparation and Augmentation Techniques; textbf{textit{(ii)}} Selecting and Adapting state-of-the-art LLM Models; textbf{textit{(iii)}} Evaluation Procedures. texttt{SecRepair} uses a reinforcement learning-based fine-tuning with a semantic reward that caters to the functionality and security aspects of the generated code. Our empirical analysis shows that texttt{SecRepair} achieves a textit{12}% improvement in security code repair compared to other LLMs when trained using reinforcement learning. Furthermore, we demonstrate the capabilities of texttt{SecRepair} in generating reliable, functional, and compilable security code repairs against real-world test cases using automated evaluation metrics.

Read more

9/4/2024