Open Ad Hoc Teamwork with Cooperative Game Theory
0
Sign in to get full access
Overview
- This paper explores the use of cooperative game theory to address the challenge of open ad hoc teamwork, where agents must cooperate effectively without prior coordination.
- The authors introduce a novel Coalitional Affinity Game (CAG) framework that models the relationships and preferences of agents in the team.
- The paper presents algorithms for team formation and task allocation that leverage the CAG model to enable efficient and stable cooperation.
- The proposed approaches are evaluated through simulations and real-world robotic experiments, demonstrating their effectiveness in open ad hoc teamwork scenarios.
Plain English Explanation
The paper focuses on a problem called "open ad hoc teamwork," where a group of agents (like robots or software programs) need to work together on a task, but they haven't coordinated with each other beforehand. This can be a tricky situation because the agents may have different goals, skills, and preferences, and they need to figure out how to cooperate effectively.
To address this challenge, the researchers use ideas from a field called "cooperative game theory." Essentially, they create a model that represents the relationships and preferences of the agents in the team. This model, called the Coalitional Affinity Game (CAG), helps the agents understand how they can work together in the most efficient and stable way.
The paper then presents algorithms, or step-by-step procedures, that the agents can use to form teams and allocate tasks based on the CAG model. These algorithms aim to help the agents cooperate smoothly, even in situations where they haven't worked together before.
The researchers test their approaches through computer simulations and real-world experiments with robots. The results show that the CAG-based methods are effective at enabling efficient and stable cooperation in open ad hoc teamwork scenarios.
Technical Explanation
The paper introduces the Coalitional Affinity Game (CAG) framework to model the relationships and preferences of agents in open ad hoc teamwork. The CAG captures the affinity, or attraction, between agents and the tasks they can perform, as well as the synergies that arise when agents form coalitions.
The authors present two key algorithms that leverage the CAG model:
-
Team Formation Algorithm: This algorithm determines the optimal team composition by finding the coalition of agents that maximizes the overall team affinity, taking into account the individual preferences and synergies of the agents.
-
Task Allocation Algorithm: This algorithm assigns tasks to the members of the formed team in a way that maximizes the team's overall performance, considering the agents' capabilities and the task requirements.
The proposed approaches are evaluated through both simulations and real-world robotic experiments. The results demonstrate the effectiveness of the CAG-based methods in enabling efficient and stable cooperation in open ad hoc teamwork scenarios, outperforming alternative coordination strategies.
Critical Analysis
The paper provides a comprehensive and rigorous framework for addressing the challenge of open ad hoc teamwork. The Coalitional Affinity Game (CAG) model offers a principled way to capture the complexities of agent relationships and preferences, which is a crucial aspect of successful team formation and task allocation.
One potential limitation of the research is the assumption of complete information about the agents' capabilities and preferences. In real-world scenarios, this information may not be readily available, and the agents may need to learn and update their knowledge over time. The authors acknowledge this limitation and suggest exploring learning-based approaches to address it.
Additionally, the paper focuses on static task allocation, where the team composition and task assignments remain fixed throughout the process. In dynamic environments, where tasks and agent availability may change over time, the proposed algorithms may need to be extended to handle such flexibility.
Overall, the paper presents a significant contribution to the field of open ad hoc teamwork, offering a novel game-theoretic framework and practical algorithms that can enable efficient and stable cooperation among agents. The insights and methods discussed in the paper can inspire further research and development in this important area of multi-agent systems.
Conclusion
This paper introduces a Coalitional Affinity Game (CAG) framework to address the challenge of open ad hoc teamwork, where agents must cooperate effectively without prior coordination. The CAG model captures the relationships and preferences of agents, and the authors present algorithms for team formation and task allocation that leverage this model.
The proposed approaches are evaluated through simulations and real-world robotic experiments, demonstrating their effectiveness in enabling efficient and stable cooperation in open ad hoc teamwork scenarios. The paper's contributions offer a promising direction for further research and development in the field of multi-agent systems, particularly in the context of dynamic and uncertain environments.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
0
Open Ad Hoc Teamwork with Cooperative Game Theory
Jianhong Wang, Yang Li, Yuan Zhang, Wei Pan, Samuel Kaski
Ad hoc teamwork poses a challenging problem, requiring the design of an agent to collaborate with teammates without prior coordination or joint training. Open ad hoc teamwork (OAHT) further complicates this challenge by considering environments with a changing number of teammates, referred to as open teams. One promising solution in practice to this problem is leveraging the generalizability of graph neural networks to handle an unrestricted number of agents with various agent-types, named graph-based policy learning (GPL). However, its joint Q-value representation over a coordination graph lacks convincing explanations. In this paper, we establish a new theory to understand the representation of the joint Q-value for OAHT and its learning paradigm, through the lens of cooperative game theory. Building on our theory, we propose a novel algorithm named CIAO, based on GPL's framework, with additional provable implementation tricks that can facilitate learning. The demos of experimental results are available on https://sites.google.com/view/ciao2024, and the code of experiments is published on https://github.com/hsvgbkhgbv/CIAO.
Read more7/9/2024
0
N-Agent Ad Hoc Teamwork
Caroline Wang, Arrasy Rahman, Ishan Durugkar, Elad Liebman, Peter Stone
Current approaches to learning cooperative behaviors in multi-agent settings assume relatively restrictive settings. In standard fully cooperative multi-agent reinforcement learning, the learning algorithm controls textit{all} agents in the scenario, while in ad hoc teamwork, the learning algorithm usually assumes control over only a $textit{single}$ agent in the scenario. However, many cooperative settings in the real world are much less restrictive. For example, in an autonomous driving scenario, a company might train its cars with the same learning algorithm, yet once on the road, these cars must cooperate with cars from another company. Towards generalizing the class of scenarios that cooperative learning methods can address, we introduce $N$-agent ad hoc teamwork, in which a set of autonomous agents must interact and cooperate with dynamically varying numbers and types of teammates at evaluation time. This paper formalizes the problem, and proposes the $textit{Policy Optimization with Agent Modelling}$ (POAM) algorithm. POAM is a policy gradient, multi-agent reinforcement learning approach to the NAHT problem, that enables adaptation to diverse teammate behaviors by learning representations of teammate behaviors. Empirical evaluation on StarCraft II tasks shows that POAM improves cooperative task returns compared to baseline approaches, and enables out-of-distribution generalization to unseen teammates.
Read more4/17/2024
0
Multi-Robot Coordination Induced in Hazardous Environments through an Adversarial Graph-Traversal Game
James Berneburg, Xuan Wang, Xuesu Xiao, Daigo Shishika
This paper presents a game theoretic formulation of a graph traversal problem, with applications to robots moving through hazardous environments in the presence of an adversary, as in military and security applications. The blue team of robots moves in an environment modeled by a time-varying graph, attempting to reach some goal with minimum cost, while the red team controls how the graph changes to maximize the cost. The problem is formulated as a stochastic game, so that Nash equilibrium strategies can be computed numerically. Bounds are provided for the game value, with a guarantee that it solves the original problem. Numerical simulations demonstrate the results and the effectiveness of this method, particularly showing the benefit of mixing actions for both players, as well as beneficial coordinated behavior, where blue robots split up and/or synchronize to traverse risky edges.
Read more9/14/2024
0
Grounded Predictions of Teamwork as a One-Shot Game: A Multiagent Multi-Armed Bandits Approach
Alejandra L'opez de Aberasturi G'omez, Carles Sierra, Jordi Sabater-Mir
Humans possess innate collaborative capacities. However, effective teamwork often remains challenging. This study delves into the feasibility of collaboration within teams of rational, self-interested agents who engage in teamwork without the obligation to contribute. Drawing from psychological and game theoretical frameworks, we formalise teamwork as a one-shot aggregative game, integrating insights from Steiner's theory of group productivity. We characterise this novel game's Nash equilibria and propose a multiagent multi-armed bandit system that learns to converge to approximations of such equilibria. Our research contributes value to the areas of game theory and multiagent systems, paving the way for a better understanding of voluntary collaborative dynamics. We examine how team heterogeneity, task typology, and assessment difficulty influence agents' strategies and resulting teamwork outcomes. Finally, we empirically study the behaviour of work teams under incentive systems that defy analytical treatment. Our agents demonstrate human-like behaviour patterns, corroborating findings from social psychology research.
Read more9/27/2024