Operationalizing a Threat Model for Red-Teaming Large Language Models (LLMs)

Read original: arXiv:2407.14937 - Published 7/23/2024 by Apurv Verma, Satyapriya Krishna, Sebastian Gehrmann, Madhavan Seshadri, Anu Pradhan, Tom Ault, Leslie Barrett, David Rabinowitz, John Doucette, NhatHai Phan
Total Score

45

📈

Sign in to get full access

or

If you already have an account, we'll log you in

Overview

  • Securing and making large language models (LLMs) resilient requires anticipating and countering unforeseen threats.
  • Red-teaming has emerged as a critical technique for identifying vulnerabilities in real-world LLM implementations.
  • This paper presents a detailed threat model and a systematization of knowledge (SoK) of red-teaming attacks on LLMs.
  • The paper develops a taxonomy of attacks based on the stages of the LLM development and deployment process.
  • It also compiles methods for defense and practical red-teaming strategies for practitioners.

Plain English Explanation

Large language models (LLMs) are powerful AI systems that can generate human-like text. While these models have many useful applications, they can also be vulnerable to various attacks that could compromise their security and reliability. To address this, the researchers in this paper explore the concept of "red-teaming" - a process of systematically testing the security of an LLM system by simulating real-world attacks.

The paper starts by outlining a detailed threat model, which helps identify the different ways an LLM system could be attacked. The researchers then develop a taxonomy of these attacks, categorizing them based on the different stages of the LLM development and deployment process. For example, an attacker might try to manipulate the training data used to create the LLM, or they might find ways to exploit vulnerabilities in the model's deployment infrastructure.

By understanding these attack vectors, the researchers aim to help developers and practitioners build more secure and resilient LLM-based systems. The paper also provides practical strategies for conducting effective red-teaming exercises, which can uncover vulnerabilities before they are exploited by malicious actors.

Technical Explanation

The paper presents a comprehensive systematization of knowledge (SoK) on red-teaming attacks against large language models (LLMs). The researchers develop a detailed threat model by analyzing the various stages of the LLM development and deployment process, including data collection, model training, and inference.

Based on this threat model, the authors create a taxonomy of attacks that can be carried out against LLMs. These attacks range from data poisoning and model inversion to adversarial examples and backdoor insertion. The paper also explores techniques for defending against these attacks, such as robust training, input validation, and anomaly detection.

In addition, the researchers provide practical guidance for conducting red-teaming exercises on LLM-based systems. This includes strategies for simulating real-world attack scenarios, assessing the effectiveness of defensive measures, and reporting vulnerabilities to developers.

Critical Analysis

The paper provides a comprehensive and well-structured analysis of the security challenges facing large language models (LLMs). The threat model and taxonomy of attacks are particularly valuable, as they help practitioners and researchers understand the diverse ways in which LLMs can be compromised.

However, the paper does not delve into the potential consequences of successful attacks on LLM-based systems. It would be useful to explore the real-world impact of these vulnerabilities, such as the spread of misinformation, the breach of sensitive data, or the disruption of critical services.

Additionally, the paper focuses primarily on the technical aspects of red-teaming and defense strategies. While this is important, it would be beneficial to also consider the broader societal and ethical implications of securing LLMs, such as the potential for misuse, the impact on marginalized communities, and the trade-offs between security and privacy.

Conclusion

This paper presents a systematic and thorough analysis of the security challenges associated with large language models (LLMs). By developing a detailed threat model and taxonomy of attacks, the researchers provide a framework for identifying and addressing vulnerabilities in LLM-based systems.

The practical guidance on red-teaming and defensive strategies is particularly valuable for practitioners looking to enhance the security and resilience of their LLM-based applications. By anticipating and proactively countering potential threats, developers can help ensure that these powerful AI systems are used responsibly and securely.

As LLMs continue to become more prevalent in various domains, the insights and strategies outlined in this paper will be crucial for maintaining the trustworthiness and reliability of these technologies in the face of evolving security challenges.



This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!

Follow @aimodelsfyi on 𝕏 →

Related Papers

📈

Total Score

45

Operationalizing a Threat Model for Red-Teaming Large Language Models (LLMs)

Apurv Verma, Satyapriya Krishna, Sebastian Gehrmann, Madhavan Seshadri, Anu Pradhan, Tom Ault, Leslie Barrett, David Rabinowitz, John Doucette, NhatHai Phan

Creating secure and resilient applications with large language models (LLM) requires anticipating, adjusting to, and countering unforeseen threats. Red-teaming has emerged as a critical technique for identifying vulnerabilities in real-world LLM implementations. This paper presents a detailed threat model and provides a systematization of knowledge (SoK) of red-teaming attacks on LLMs. We develop a taxonomy of attacks based on the stages of the LLM development and deployment process and extract various insights from previous research. In addition, we compile methods for defense and practical red-teaming strategies for practitioners. By delineating prominent attack motifs and shedding light on various entry points, this paper provides a framework for improving the security and robustness of LLM-based systems.

Read more

7/23/2024

Exploring Straightforward Conversational Red-Teaming
Total Score

0

Exploring Straightforward Conversational Red-Teaming

George Kour, Naama Zwerdling, Marcel Zalmanovici, Ateret Anaby-Tavor, Ora Nova Fandina, Eitan Farchi

Large language models (LLMs) are increasingly used in business dialogue systems but they pose security and ethical risks. Multi-turn conversations, where context influences the model's behavior, can be exploited to produce undesired responses. In this paper, we examine the effectiveness of utilizing off-the-shelf LLMs in straightforward red-teaming approaches, where an attacker LLM aims to elicit undesired output from a target LLM, comparing both single-turn and conversational red-teaming tactics. Our experiments offer insights into various usage strategies that significantly affect their performance as red teamers. They suggest that off-the-shelf models can act as effective red teamers and even adjust their attack strategy based on past attempts, although their effectiveness decreases with greater alignment.

Read more

9/10/2024

Red Teaming Game: A Game-Theoretic Framework for Red Teaming Language Models
Total Score

0

Red Teaming Game: A Game-Theoretic Framework for Red Teaming Language Models

Chengdong Ma, Ziran Yang, Hai Ci, Jun Gao, Minquan Gao, Xuehai Pan, Yaodong Yang

The primary challenge in deploying Large Language Model (LLM) is ensuring its harmlessness. Red team can identify vulnerabilities by attacking LLM to attain safety. However, current efforts heavily rely on single-round prompt designs and unilateral red team optimizations against fixed blue teams. These static approaches lead to significant reductions in generation diversity, known as the mode collapse, which makes it difficult to discover the potential risks in the increasingly complex human-LLM interactions. Here we introduce dynamic Red Team Game (RTG) to comprehensively analyze the multi-round offensive and defensive interactions between red team and blue team. Furthermore, we develop a Gamified Red Team Solver (GRTS) with diversity measures to mitigate mode collapse and theoretically guarantee the convergence of approximate Nash equilibrium which results in better strategies for both teams. Empirical results demonstrate that GRTS explore diverse and implicit attacks to adaptively exploit various LLMs, surpassing the constraints of specific modes. Insightfully, the geometrical structure we unveil of the red team task aligns with the spinning top hypothesis, confirming the necessity of constructing a diverse LLM population as a promising proxy for heterogeneous human expert red-teamers. This paves the way for scalable toxicity detection and safe alignment for LLMs.

Read more

7/30/2024

ALERT: A Comprehensive Benchmark for Assessing Large Language Models' Safety through Red Teaming
Total Score

0

ALERT: A Comprehensive Benchmark for Assessing Large Language Models' Safety through Red Teaming

Simone Tedeschi, Felix Friedrich, Patrick Schramowski, Kristian Kersting, Roberto Navigli, Huu Nguyen, Bo Li

When building Large Language Models (LLMs), it is paramount to bear safety in mind and protect them with guardrails. Indeed, LLMs should never generate content promoting or normalizing harmful, illegal, or unethical behavior that may contribute to harm to individuals or society. This principle applies to both normal and adversarial use. In response, we introduce ALERT, a large-scale benchmark to assess safety based on a novel fine-grained risk taxonomy. It is designed to evaluate the safety of LLMs through red teaming methodologies and consists of more than 45k instructions categorized using our novel taxonomy. By subjecting LLMs to adversarial testing scenarios, ALERT aims to identify vulnerabilities, inform improvements, and enhance the overall safety of the language models. Furthermore, the fine-grained taxonomy enables researchers to perform an in-depth evaluation that also helps one to assess the alignment with various policies. In our experiments, we extensively evaluate 10 popular open- and closed-source LLMs and demonstrate that many of them still struggle to attain reasonable levels of safety.

Read more

6/26/2024