OptoGPT: A Foundation Model for Inverse Design in Optical Multilayer Thin Film Structures

Read original: arXiv:2304.10294 - Published 4/5/2024 by Taigao Ma, Haozhu Wang, L. Jay Guo
Total Score

0

📈

Sign in to get full access

or

If you already have an account, we'll log you in

Overview

  • Optical multilayer thin film structures are widely used in photonic applications
  • Existing inverse design methods have various drawbacks, such as:
    • Lack of adaptability to different design targets
    • Difficulty in accommodating different types of structures (e.g., different materials per layer)
    • Inability to handle versatile design situations under different angles and polarizations
    • Lack of consideration for practical fabrication and manufacturing
  • The paper introduces OptoGPT, a decoder-only transformer, to address these issues simultaneously

Plain English Explanation

Optical devices like lenses, mirrors, and filters often use thin layers of different materials stacked on top of each other. This is called an optical multilayer thin film structure. These structures are used in many photonic (light-based) technologies, such as cameras, displays, and solar cells.

However, the current methods for designing these structures have some problems. They can't easily adapt to different design goals, like changing the target wavelength or material. They also struggle to handle more complex structures, like having different materials in each layer. And they don't consider the practical challenges of actually manufacturing these devices.

To solve these issues, the researchers have developed a new tool called OptoGPT. It's a type of machine learning model called a "transformer" that can quickly design optical multilayer structures for different applications. The transformer is "decoder-only," meaning it's optimized for generating new designs rather than just classifying existing ones.

The key benefit of OptoGPT is its flexibility. It can adapt to various design targets and different types of multilayer structures. It can also handle complex situations, like designing for different light angles and polarizations. And importantly, it considers the practical constraints of manufacturing these optical devices.

Technical Explanation

OptoGPT is a decoder-only transformer model that the researchers developed to address the limitations of existing inverse design methods for optical multilayer thin film structures.

The architecture of OptoGPT is designed to efficiently generate new optical multilayer designs. Unlike typical transformer models, OptoGPT is a "decoder-only" model, meaning it does not have an encoder component. This makes it well-suited for generative tasks, as it can focus on producing new designs rather than just classifying existing ones.

The key innovations of OptoGPT include:

  1. Adaptability to Different Design Targets: OptoGPT can quickly adapt to generate designs for different target specifications, such as different wavelengths or reflectance/transmittance requirements.
  2. Handling Diverse Structures: OptoGPT can handle the design of multilayer structures with different materials in each layer, unlike previous methods that were limited to homogeneous structures.
  3. Versatile Design Situations: OptoGPT can accommodate versatile design situations, such as designing for different light incidence angles and polarizations.
  4. Practical Fabrication Considerations: OptoGPT takes into account practical constraints and considerations for the fabrication and manufacturing of the designed optical multilayer structures.

The researchers evaluated OptoGPT on a variety of optical multilayer design tasks and demonstrated its superior performance compared to existing inverse design methods. OptoGPT was able to generate high-quality designs that meet the target specifications while also considering practical fabrication constraints.

Critical Analysis

The paper presents a promising approach to address the limitations of existing inverse design methods for optical multilayer thin film structures. However, there are a few potential areas for further research and improvement:

  1. Interpretability and Explainability: As a transformer-based model, the inner workings of OptoGPT may be difficult to interpret. Improving the model's interpretability could help users understand how it arrives at its design decisions.

  2. Robustness and Uncertainty Quantification: The paper does not extensively discuss the robustness of the OptoGPT designs to manufacturing variations or uncertainties. Incorporating techniques for uncertainty quantification could help ensure the reliability of the generated designs.

  3. Scalability and Computational Efficiency: While the paper demonstrates the effectiveness of OptoGPT, the computational and memory requirements of the model are not thoroughly explored. Investigating ways to optimize the deployment of the model could be valuable for real-world applications.

  4. Extending to Other Photonic Structures: The current focus is on optical multilayer thin film structures. Exploring the applicability of the OptoGPT approach to the design of other photonic structures, such as waveguides or metasurfaces, could further expand the impact of this research.

Overall, the OptoGPT approach presented in the paper is a promising step towards more versatile and practical inverse design methods for optical multilayer thin film structures. Addressing the identified areas for further research could lead to even more robust and widely applicable solutions.

Conclusion

The paper introduces OptoGPT, a decoder-only transformer model, as a solution to the limitations of existing inverse design methods for optical multilayer thin film structures. OptoGPT offers several key advantages, including the ability to quickly adapt to different design targets, handle diverse structures with various materials, accommodate versatile design situations, and consider practical fabrication constraints.

The technical evaluation of OptoGPT demonstrates its superior performance compared to existing methods, highlighting its potential to significantly impact the design and development of a wide range of photonic applications. While the paper identifies a few areas for further research, the overall approach represents an important step forward in the field of optical multilayer design, with the possibility of broader applications in photonics and beyond.



This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!

Follow @aimodelsfyi on 𝕏 →

Related Papers

📈

Total Score

0

OptoGPT: A Foundation Model for Inverse Design in Optical Multilayer Thin Film Structures

Taigao Ma, Haozhu Wang, L. Jay Guo

Optical multilayer thin film structures have been widely used in numerous photonic applications. However, existing inverse design methods have many drawbacks because they either fail to quickly adapt to different design targets, or are difficult to suit for different types of structures, e.g., designing for different materials at each layer. These methods also cannot accommodate versatile design situations under different angles and polarizations. In addition, how to benefit practical fabrications and manufacturing has not been extensively considered yet. In this work, we introduce OptoGPT (Opto Generative Pretrained Transformer), a decoder-only transformer, to solve all these drawbacks and issues simultaneously.

Read more

4/5/2024

🏷️

Total Score

0

Towards smallers, faster decoder-only transformers: Architectural variants and their implications

Sathya Krishnan Suresh, Shunmugapriya P

Research on Large Language Models (LLMs) has recently seen exponential growth, largely focused on transformer-based architectures, as introduced by [1] and further advanced by the decoder-only variations in [2]. Contemporary studies typically aim to improve model capabilities by increasing both the architecture's complexity and the volume of training data. However, research exploring how to reduce model sizes while maintaining performance is limited. This study introduces three modifications to the decoder-only transformer architecture: ParallelGPT (p-gpt), LinearlyCompressedGPT (lc-gpt), and ConvCompressedGPT (cc-gpt). These variants achieve comparable performance to conventional architectures in code generation tasks while benefiting from reduced model sizes and faster training times. We open-source the model weights and codebase to support future research and development in this domain.

Read more

4/24/2024

Transfer learning-assisted inverse modeling in nanophotonics based on mixture density networks
Total Score

0

Transfer learning-assisted inverse modeling in nanophotonics based on mixture density networks

Liang Cheng, Prashant Singh, Francesco Ferranti

The simulation of nanophotonic structures relies on electromagnetic solvers, which play a crucial role in understanding their behavior. However, these solvers often come with a significant computational cost, making their application in design tasks, such as optimization, impractical. To address this challenge, machine learning techniques have been explored for accurate and efficient modeling and design of photonic devices. Deep neural networks, in particular, have gained considerable attention in this field. They can be used to create both forward and inverse models. An inverse modeling approach avoids the need for coupling a forward model with an optimizer and directly performs the prediction of the optimal design parameters values. In this paper, we propose an inverse modeling method for nanophotonic structures, based on a mixture density network model enhanced by transfer learning. Mixture density networks can predict multiple possible solutions at a time including their respective importance as Gaussian distributions. However, multiple challenges exist for mixture density network models. An important challenge is that an upper bound on the number of possible simultaneous solutions needs to be specified in advance. Also, another challenge is that the model parameters must be jointly optimized, which can result computationally expensive. Moreover, optimizing all parameters simultaneously can be numerically unstable and can lead to degenerate predictions. The proposed approach allows overcoming these limitations using transfer learning-based techniques, while preserving a high accuracy in the prediction capability of the design solutions given an optical response as an input. A dimensionality reduction step is also explored. Numerical results validate the proposed method.

Read more

5/22/2024

Generative Inverse Design of Crystal Structures via Diffusion Models with Transformers
Total Score

0

Generative Inverse Design of Crystal Structures via Diffusion Models with Transformers

Izumi Takahara, Kiyou Shibata, Teruyasu Mizoguchi

Recent advances in deep learning have enabled the generation of realistic data by training generative models on large datasets of text, images, and audio. While these models have demonstrated exceptional performance in generating novel and plausible data, it remains an open question whether they can effectively accelerate scientific discovery through the data generation and drive significant advancements across various scientific fields. In particular, the discovery of new inorganic materials with promising properties poses a critical challenge, both scientifically and for industrial applications. However, unlike textual or image data, materials, or more specifically crystal structures, consist of multiple types of variables - including lattice vectors, atom positions, and atomic species. This complexity in data give rise to a variety of approaches for representing and generating such data. Consequently, the design choices of generative models for crystal structures remain an open question. In this study, we explore a new type of diffusion model for the generative inverse design of crystal structures, with a backbone based on a Transformer architecture. We demonstrate our models are superior to previous methods in their versatility for generating crystal structures with desired properties. Furthermore, our empirical results suggest that the optimal conditioning methods vary depending on the dataset.

Read more

6/17/2024