A practical approach to evaluating the adversarial distance for machine learning classifiers
0
Sign in to get full access
Overview
- This paper presents a practical approach to evaluating the adversarial distance for machine learning classifiers.
- Adversarial distance refers to the minimum perturbation required to change a classifier's prediction.
- The authors propose a method to efficiently estimate this distance and demonstrate its effectiveness on various datasets and models.
Plain English Explanation
The paper discusses a technique for evaluating the adversarial robustness of machine learning models. Adversarial robustness refers to how well a model can withstand small, deliberate changes to its input that are designed to trick the model into making incorrect predictions.
The key idea is to measure the adversarial distance - the smallest possible change to an input that would cause the model to misclassify it. A model that requires large changes to the input before it makes mistakes is considered more robust than one that can be easily fooled by small perturbations.
The authors propose a practical method to efficiently estimate this adversarial distance. Their approach involves systematically searching for the smallest change to an input that causes the model to change its prediction. By automating this process, they can quickly assess the adversarial robustness of different models and datasets.
The paper demonstrates the effectiveness of their technique on various image classification tasks. They show that it can accurately measure the adversarial distance and provide insights into the robustness of different models. This information can help machine learning practitioners develop more secure and reliable systems.
Technical Explanation
The paper introduces a practical approach to evaluating the adversarial distance for machine learning classifiers. Adversarial distance refers to the minimum perturbation required to change a classifier's prediction for a given input.
The authors propose an efficient algorithm to estimate this adversarial distance. Their approach involves solving an optimization problem to find the smallest change to an input that causes the model to misclassify it. They use gradient-based methods to iteratively update the input until the optimal perturbation is found.
The key innovation is a technique to speed up this optimization process. The authors leverage the structure of the classifier to derive tight upper and lower bounds on the adversarial distance. This allows them to quickly converge to the optimal perturbation, enabling efficient evaluation of adversarial robustness.
The paper evaluates this approach on several image classification datasets and models, including ResNet and BERT. The results show that the proposed method can accurately estimate the adversarial distance and provide insights into the robustness of different classifiers. For example, the authors identify that models trained with adversarial training tend to have larger adversarial distances, indicating greater robustness to adversarial examples.
Critical Analysis
The paper presents a practical and efficient approach to evaluating the adversarial distance of machine learning classifiers. However, there are a few limitations and caveats to consider:
- The method assumes the availability of the classifier's gradient information, which may not always be the case, particularly for black-box models.
- The paper focuses on image classification tasks, and the effectiveness of the approach on other domains, such as natural language processing, is not addressed.
- The experiments use standard benchmark datasets, but the authors do not explore the impact of dataset shift or distribution mismatch on the adversarial distance estimates.
Additionally, while the paper demonstrates the ability to efficiently estimate the adversarial distance, it does not provide a comprehensive analysis of the relationship between this metric and the real-world security implications of adversarial attacks. Further research may be needed to understand how the adversarial distance translates to the practical robustness of machine learning systems.
Conclusion
This paper presents a practical and efficient approach to evaluating the adversarial distance of machine learning classifiers. The proposed method allows for the rapid estimation of the minimum perturbation required to change a model's prediction, providing valuable insights into the robustness of different models and datasets.
The ability to accurately measure adversarial distance is an important step towards developing more secure and reliable machine learning systems. By understanding the vulnerabilities of their models, practitioners can deploy more effective defenses and ensure that their systems are resilient to adversarial attacks. The techniques described in this paper can be a valuable tool in the ongoing effort to improve the safety and trustworthiness of AI-powered applications.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
0
A practical approach to evaluating the adversarial distance for machine learning classifiers
Georg Siedel, Ekagra Gupta, Andrey Morozov
Robustness is critical for machine learning (ML) classifiers to ensure consistent performance in real-world applications where models may encounter corrupted or adversarial inputs. In particular, assessing the robustness of classifiers to adversarial inputs is essential to protect systems from vulnerabilities and thus ensure safety in use. However, methods to accurately compute adversarial robustness have been challenging for complex ML models and high-dimensional data. Furthermore, evaluations typically measure adversarial accuracy on specific attack budgets, limiting the informative value of the resulting metrics. This paper investigates the estimation of the more informative adversarial distance using iterative adversarial attacks and a certification approach. Combined, the methods provide a comprehensive evaluation of adversarial robustness by computing estimates for the upper and lower bounds of the adversarial distance. We present visualisations and ablation studies that provide insights into how this evaluation method should be applied and parameterised. We find that our adversarial attack approach is effective compared to related implementations, while the certification method falls short of expectations. The approach in this paper should encourage a more informative way of evaluating the adversarial robustness of ML classifiers.
Read more9/6/2024
📊
0
Characterizing Data Point Vulnerability via Average-Case Robustness
Tessa Han, Suraj Srinivas, Himabindu Lakkaraju
Studying the robustness of machine learning models is important to ensure consistent model behaviour across real-world settings. To this end, adversarial robustness is a standard framework, which views robustness of predictions through a binary lens: either a worst-case adversarial misclassification exists in the local region around an input, or it does not. However, this binary perspective does not account for the degrees of vulnerability, as data points with a larger number of misclassified examples in their neighborhoods are more vulnerable. In this work, we consider a complementary framework for robustness, called average-case robustness, which measures the fraction of points in a local region that provides consistent predictions. However, computing this quantity is hard, as standard Monte Carlo approaches are inefficient especially for high-dimensional inputs. In this work, we propose the first analytical estimators for average-case robustness for multi-class classifiers. We show empirically that our estimators are accurate and efficient for standard deep learning models and demonstrate their usefulness for identifying vulnerable data points, as well as quantifying robustness bias of models. Overall, our tools provide a complementary view to robustness, improving our ability to characterize model behaviour.
Read more5/31/2024
0
Uniform Convergence of Adversarially Robust Classifiers
Rachel Morris, Ryan Murray
In recent years there has been significant interest in the effect of different types of adversarial perturbations in data classification problems. Many of these models incorporate the adversarial power, which is an important parameter with an associated trade-off between accuracy and robustness. This work considers a general framework for adversarially-perturbed classification problems, in a large data or population-level limit. In such a regime, we demonstrate that as adversarial strength goes to zero that optimal classifiers converge to the Bayes classifier in the Hausdorff distance. This significantly strengthens previous results, which generally focus on $L^1$-type convergence. The main argument relies upon direct geometric comparisons and is inspired by techniques from geometric measure theory.
Read more6/24/2024
0
A Cost-Aware Approach to Adversarial Robustness in Neural Networks
Charles Meyers, Mohammad Reza Saleh Sedghpour, Tommy Lofstedt, Erik Elmroth
Considering the growing prominence of production-level AI and the threat of adversarial attacks that can evade a model at run-time, evaluating the robustness of models to these evasion attacks is of critical importance. Additionally, testing model changes likely means deploying the models to (e.g. a car or a medical imaging device), or a drone to see how it affects performance, making un-tested changes a public problem that reduces development speed, increases cost of development, and makes it difficult (if not impossible) to parse cause from effect. In this work, we used survival analysis as a cloud-native, time-efficient and precise method for predicting model performance in the presence of adversarial noise. For neural networks in particular, the relationships between the learning rate, batch size, training time, convergence time, and deployment cost are highly complex, so researchers generally rely on benchmark datasets to assess the ability of a model to generalize beyond the training data. To address this, we propose using accelerated failure time models to measure the effect of hardware choice, batch size, number of epochs, and test-set accuracy by using adversarial attacks to induce failures on a reference model architecture before deploying the model to the real world. We evaluate several GPU types and use the Tree Parzen Estimator to maximize model robustness and minimize model run-time simultaneously. This provides a way to evaluate the model and optimise it in a single step, while simultaneously allowing us to model the effect of model parameters on training time, prediction time, and accuracy. Using this technique, we demonstrate that newer, more-powerful hardware does decrease the training time, but with a monetary and power cost that far outpaces the marginal gains in accuracy.
Read more9/14/2024